Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:19:41.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Administrative Law—Natural Justice—Right to a Hearing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

R. B. Cooke
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Case and Comment
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , April 1954 , pp. 14 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ibid., at p. 1151. It is hard to imagine that any such decision would be taken without some record of its being made; and indeed paragraph 30 (2) of the London Cab Order, 1934, requires the Commissioner to cause notice of revocation to be given to the licensee.

2 [1931] 2 K.B. 215; 144 L.T. 464.

3 Ibid., p. 374.

4 [1951] A.C. 66, 78–9.

5 [1918] A.C. 557, 560. For a recent decision on the right to reply to statements made by an opponent see Connolly v. Palmerston North City Council [1953] N.Z.L.R. 115, where Fair J. adopts the analysis of quasi-judicial powers contained in Mr. H. W. B. Wade's article in 10 C.L.J. 216.

6 Panamena Europea Navigation v. Frederick Leyland & Co. [1947] A.C. 428; Franklin v. Minister of Town and Country Planning [1948] A.C. 87.

7 (1878) 3 App.Cas. 614.

8 [1918] A.C. 557.

9 [1922] 1 A.C. 202.

10 [1950] N.Z.L.R. 433.

11 (1885) 10 App.Cas. 229.

12 [1952] 2 Q.B. 413.

13 (1863) 14 C.B. (n.s.) 180.

14 (1912) 14 C.L.R. 1.

15 [1940] Ch. 70.

16 It is also possible to limit the operation of that decision by making a distinction, pointed out in the Dairy Board case at pp. 416–7, between withdrawal of a privilege conferred by a licence and restriction by zoning or other order of a liberty existing at common law.

17 [1951] A.C. 66, 78.

18 Partnership. 15th ed. (1952) 79.

19 (1851) 13 Beav. 117.

20 (1886) 18 Q.B.D. 7.

21 [1931] 2 K.B. 215, 233. See also Barnard v. National Dock Labour Board [1953] 2 Q.B. 18, 39–40, 45; R. v. Statutory Visitors to St. Lawrence's Hospital, Caterham [1953] 1 W.L.R. 1158, 1162.

22 E.g., Bonaker v. Evans (1850) 16 Q.B. 162; Wood v. Woad (1874) L.R. 9 Ex. 190.

23 R. v. Gaskin (1799) 8 T.R. 209, 210.

24 R. v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1953] 1 W.L.R. 1150, 1155.