Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:09:53.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sir Edward Coke1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

William Holdsworth
Get access

Extract

Coke and Bacon, the two greatest lawyers of the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, were members of Trinity College. Bacon was the greatest jurist of his day. Coke was the greatest of our common lawyers. I account it a great honour that Trinity College should in 1926, the tercentenary of Bacon's death, have asked me to say something of Bacon as a lawyer, and that in this year, 1934, the tercentenary of Coke's death, it has asked me to give this lecture.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Law Journal , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , November 1935 , pp. 332 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 3 Co. Rep. Preface.

3 (1610) 8 Co. Rep. 113b.

4 At f. 116b.

5 (1603) 2 S. T. at p. 26.

6 As Attorney-General he had prepared documents to authorize its application: Spedding, Bacon's Letters and Life, T, 93 n., vii, 78, 79; cp. Third Instit. 35; Holdsworth, , H. E. L. v, 185.Google Scholar

7 Ibid. 427, nn. 4 and 6.

8 Ibid. 450, n. 9.

9 Ibid. 428, n. 1.

10 S. P. Dom. 1629–31, 490, clxxxiii, 18.

11 1 S. T. 588.

12 Divine Right of Kings, 136.Google Scholar

13 8 Co. Rep. Pref. xxxiv, cited Holdsworth, H. E. L. v, 456, n. 2.

14 Co. Litt. 43a; Second Instit. 15.

15 10 Co. Rep. Pref.; Co. Litt. 168a; Fourth Instit. 63.

16 Co. Litt. 102a, 262a, 352b, 368a; 10 Co. Rep. Pref. xvii.

17 Co. Litt. 165; Fourth Instit. 289.

18 Co. Litt. 141.

19 Second Instit. 123.

20 Fourth Instit. 129, 244.

21 Ibid. 129; Foster's Case (1615) 11 Co. Rep. 60a.Google Scholar

22 Second Instit. 53, and many other passages.

23 3 Co. Rep. Pref. viii–x.

24 9 Co. Rep. Pref. i–v.

25 Co. Litt. Pref.

26 Co. Litt. Epilogue.

27 Fourth Instit. 240.

28 Coke, Compleate Copy-Holder, § 9.

29 E.g. Arthur Blackamore's Case (1611)Google Scholar 8 Co. Rep. 156a; Beecher's Case (1609) 8 Co. Rep. 58a.Google Scholar

30 E.g.. 4 Co. Rep. 21a–32a (copyhold cases); ibid. 39b–48a (appeals and indictments).

31 E.g. Shelley's Case (1579–1581) 1 Co. Rep. 88b.Google Scholar

32 Spedding, , Letters and Life of Bacon, v, 86.Google Scholar

33 For this document, which has been attributed without much positive evidence to Lord Ellesmere, see Holdsworth, , H. E. L. v, 478, n. 1.Google Scholar

34 Holdsworth, H. E. L., v, 465, nn. 1–4.Google Scholar

35 Lives of the Norths, i, 17.Google Scholar

36 3 Co. Rep. Pref. xiii.

37 Above, p. 333.

38 Second Instit. 626; Third Instit. 208; Holdsworth, H. E. L. iv, 253, 257–8.Google Scholar

39 Spedding, , Letters and Life of Bacon, vi, 65.Google Scholar

40 L. Q. R. v. 36.

41 Y. B. 5 Hy. VII, Pasch, pl. 5, p. 3.

42 Hist. Crim. Law, ii, 206, n. 1.Google Scholar

43 Jurisprudence, ii, 1130.Google Scholar

44 Spedding, , Letters and Life of Bacon, vi, 65.Google Scholar

48 Reminiscences, i, 118.Google Scholar

46 Shermoulin v. Sands (1697) 1 Ld. Raym. at p. 272.Google Scholar

47 Holdsworth, , H. E. L. v, 170–76, 185–7.Google Scholar

48 History of Continental Criminal Procedure (Continental Legal History Series) 322–3.Google Scholar

49 Above, p. 335.

50 Holdsworth, , H. E. L. ii, 430–34, iv, 174, 188–9.Google Scholar

51 Essays in Legal History (1913) 214.