Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:28:10.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Living Instruments and the Death Penalty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2005

Get access

Extract

A Written constitution is a “living instrument” (see, e.g., Commonwealth v. South Australia (1926) 38 C.L.R. 408, Dennis v. United States 341 U.S. 494 (1954) and Tyrer v. United Kingdom (1978) 2 E.H.R.R. 1). The judgments in Bovce v. The Queen, Matthew v. Trinidad and Tobago and Watson v. The Queen [2004] UKPC 32, 33, 34, [2004] 3 W.L.R. 786, 812, 841 accept this proposition but disclose profound disagreement as to its implications in practice.

In Reyes v. The Queen [2002] UKPC 11, [2002] 2 A.C. 235 (noted [2002] C.L.J. 505), the Privy Council held that the mandatory death sentence for murder in Belize was inhuman and degrading and thus contrary to the Constitution. In Boyce, Matthew and Watson the question was whether the same was true in Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago and Jamaica.

Type
Case and Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)