No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 December 2020
This response takes as its starting point the twofold agenda Winfried Siemerling pursues in The Black Atlantic Reconsidered: his systematic outline of a history of Black writing in Canada from the eighteenth century to the present and his goal to fill a geographical gap in Paul Gilroy’s influential concept of the Black Atlantic, thereby also offering a reconsideration of this concept. I suggest that, although Siemerling is clearly successful with regard to the first aspect, he is only partially so with regard to the second, with the logic of a nation-based literary history to some extent countering the agenda of the constitutive transnationality of the Black Atlantic. This tension between the two agendas, I suggest, results in crucial questions concerning the complex relationship among the national, the transnational, and the diasporic in the specific logic of literary histories.
1 Gilroy, Paul, The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 4.Google Scholar
2 Siemerling, Winfried, The Black Atlantic Reconsidered: Black Canadian Writing, Cultural History, and the Presence of the Past (Montreal: McGill/Queen’s University Press, 2015), 98.Google Scholar
3 Clarke, George Elliott, “The Black Atlantic Reconsidered: Black Canadian Literature, Cultural History, and the Presence of the Past by Winfried Siemerling (review),” University of Toronto Quarterly 86.3 (2017): 184–85, esp. 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Siemerling, The Black Atlantic Reconsidered, 30.
5 Blodgett, E. D., Five-Part Invention. A History of Literary History in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003), 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Clarke, “The Black Atlantic Reconsidered,” 185.
7 Clarke, George Elliott, “Must All Blackness Be American? Locating Canada in Borden’s ‘Tightrope Time,’ or Nationalizing Gilroy’s Black Atlantic,” Odysseys Home. Mapping African-Canadian Literature (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002), 71–85, esp. 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Siemerling, Winfried, The New North American Studies: Culture, Writing, and the Politics of Re/Cognition (New York: Routledge, 2005), 133; emphasis mine.Google Scholar
9 Siemerling, The New North American Studies, 136.
10 Siemerling, The New North American Studies, 140.
11 Siemerling, The New North American Studies, 2.
12 Walcott, Rinaldo, Black Like Who? Writing Black Canada (Toronto: Insomniac Press, 2003). Kindle. Loc. 465.Google Scholar
13 Siemerling, The Black Atlantic Reconsidered, 30.
14 Siemerling, The Black Atlantic Reconsidered, 360–61.