Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T12:35:37.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1. Canonist Evidence in the Case of St William of York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2011

Adrian Morey
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Cambridge Historical Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , 1952 , pp. 352 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Case of St William of York, by Prof. M. D. Knowles, ante vol. v, no. 2, p. 176.

2 The decretal Cum essent in presentia nostra occurs in the following collections: Collectio Cheltenhamensis, B. M. Egerton MS. 2819 f. 88v with an incomplete text; Coll. Wigorniensis, B.M. Royal MS. 10 A II f. 47, analysed by Lohmann, H. in Zeitschrift d. Savigny Stiftung, Kanon. Abteilung 22, LIII (1933), p. 127Google Scholar; Coll. Claustroneoburgensis, no. 206 printed with a faulty text by F. Schönsteiner in Jahrbuch des Stiftes Klosterneuburg, II (1909), p. 94. The address occurs in the Coll. Wigorniensis. The fragment Porro testes to the end has been printed by Friedberg from the Coll. Brugensis in Die Canonessammlungen von Gratian bis Bernhard von Pavia, p. 158, and is included in the Coll. Sangermanensis and the Coll. Abrincensis, both calendered by Singer, H. in his Neue Beiträge zu den Dekretalensammlungen in Sitzungsberichte der Wiener Akademie, phil. hist. Klasse, CLXXI (1913), p. 265Google Scholar. The last two collections give an inscription to the bishop of Chichester and the abbot of Ford. For the literature of the decretal collections see Prof.Holtzmann, W., ‘Über eine Ausgabe der päpstlichen Dekretalen des 12 Jahrhunderts’ in Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, phil. hist. Kl. (1945), P. 15Google Scholar and Kuttner, S., ‘Notes on a projected Corpus of 12th century Decretals’ in Traditio, VI (1948), p. 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar. I have to thank Prof. Holtzmann for kindly reading this note and expressing his agreement with the dating of the decretal.

3 Cf. Early Yorkshire Charters, vi, p. 158, ed. C. T. Clay, and also his ‘Notes on the Early Archdeacons in the Church of York’, in Yorkshire Arch. Journal, xxxiv, p. 9.

4 John of Salisbury, ep. 108, ed. Giles, I, p. 158.

5 Art. cit. p. 276.

6 William of Newburgh, Historia Regum, ed. Howlett, Rolls Series, vol. I.