Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:30:42.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Third Meeting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2015

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Lent Term, 1890
Information
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (First Series) , Volume 25 , January 1890 , pp. 3 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press 1890

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 [Printed in full in the Transaction of the Cambridge Philological Society, Vol. III. (Part III.), pp. 154 sqq.]

2 This is the express explanation of the scholiast, twice repeated. Bonitz, who attempts to reverse the relations by dividing the line at the caesura, is compelled (a) to restrict the remark to lines with feminine ćaesura; (b) to make Aristotle commit a ὕστερον πρότερον, as he thus states yhe second half and the larger number first.

3 ὲπιδέξιος and ἐνδέξιος being partically identical, are taken together for convenience.