Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:26:35.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonetic attributions of undeciphered characters: the case of sign *56 in Linear B*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Evangelos Kyriakidis
Evangelos Kyriakidis
Affiliation:
University of Kent at Canterbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

After the decipherment of Linear B and the attribution of phonetic values to most signs, several others still remain undeciphered. Any attempt to reconstruct their phonetic value is beset with difficulties. In this paper we will attempt to set out some basic principles for making reconstructions of undeciphered characters in well-studied scripts. We shall then look specifically at the range of evidence available and the various theories built around the decipherment of Linear B sign *56 trying to construct a strong argument in favour of one possible phonetic attribution. In doing so we shall comment on the strengths and weaknesses of the various arguments, thus illuminating the usefulness of such principles in making a secure attribution.

Principles for secure reconstructions

Most phonetic attributions at this advanced level of script decipherment, where most if not all the basic phonemes or groups of phonemes can be represented through the characters already deciphered, are supported by words that are spelt in two alternative ways, with the undeciphered character and with the deciphered one respectively, enabling the equation of the phonemic value of the two characters. The general principle that governs this decipherment method is that both ‘alternative spellings’ should clearly refer to the same thing. Another principle in this should be that the more complicated the situation, the safer the interpretation as there will be less potential for coincidence.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 53 , 2007 , pp. 202 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, W. (1968) Vox Graeca, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aravantinos, V., Godart, L. and Sacconi, A. (1995a) ‘Sui nuovi testi del Palazzo di Cadmo a Tebe, note preliminari’, RendLinc 6, 809–45.Google Scholar
Aravantinos, V., Godart, L. and Sacconi, A. (1995b) ‘Sui nuovi testi del Palazzo di Cadmo a Tebe’, RendLinc 9, vol. 6, 23–5.Google Scholar
Aravantinos, V., Godart, L. and Sacconi, A. (2001), Thébes: fouilles de la Cadmée, vol. 1, Les tablettes en Linéaire B de la Odos Pelopidou, édition et commentaire, Rome.Google Scholar
Billigmeier, J. (1969) ‘An inquiry into the non-Greek names on the Linear B tablets from Knossos and their relationship to languages of Asia Minor’, Minos 10, 177–83.Google Scholar
Chadwick, J., Godart, L., Killen, J., Olivier, J.-P., Sacconi, A. and Sakellarakis, I. (1986) Corpus of Mycenaean inscriptions from Knossos, vol. 1 (1–1063), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Consani, C. (1981) ‘Per la definizione del valore fonetico del syllabograma *56 nel syllabario Lineare B’, Rendiconti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei 36. 1–2, 9–18.Google Scholar
Duhoux, Y. (2006) ‘Adieu au MA-KA cnossien: une nouvelle lecture en KN F 51 et ses consequences pour les tablettes Lineaire B de Thèbes’, Kadmos 45, 1–19.Google Scholar
Godart, L., and Sacconi, A. (1996) ‘Les dieux thébains dans les archives mycéniennes’, Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, Comptes rendus des séances de l'année 1996 janvr. mars. Paris, 99–111.Google Scholar
Georgiev, V. (1956) ‘La valeur phonétique de quelques signes du syllabaire créto-mycénien B’, in Lejeune, M. (ed.), Etudes myceniennes: Actes du colloque international de Gif-sur-Yvette (avril 1956), Paris, 51–81.Google Scholar
Firth, R. (1996–1997) ‘The find-places of the tablets from the Palace of Knossos’, Minos 31–32, 1–122.Google Scholar
Furumark, A. (1953) ‘Ägäische Texte in griechischer Sprache’, Eranos 51, 102–20.Google Scholar
Killen, J. (1979) ‘The Knossos Ld (1) tablets’, in Risch, E. and Mühlestein, H. (eds.) Colloquium Mycenaeum, Actes du sixième colloque international sur les textes mycéniens et égéens tenu à Chaumont sur Neuchâtel du 7 au 13 septembre 1975, Neuchatel, 151–81.Google Scholar
Killen, J. (2006) ‘Thoughts on the functions of the new Thebes tablets’, in Deger-Jalkotzy, S. and Panagl, O. (eds.), Die neuen Linear B-Texte aus Theben: Ihr Aufschlusswert für die mykenische Sprache und Kultur. Akten des internationalen Orschungskolloquiums an der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften am 5. und 6. Dezember 2002, Vienna, 79–100.Google Scholar
Lejeune, M. (1966) ‘Doublets et complexes’, in Proceedings of the Cambridge colloquium on Mycenaean studies, Cambridge, 135–49.Google Scholar
Lejeune, M. and Godart, L. (1995) ‘Le syllabogramme *56 dans le Linéaire B Thebain’, RivFil 123, 272–7.Google Scholar
Masson, E. (1967) Recherches sur les plus anciens emprunts sémitiques en grec, Paris.Google Scholar
Melena, J. (1987) ‘On untransliterated syllabograms *56 and *22’, in Ilievski, P. and Crepajac, L. (eds.), Tractata Mycenaea. Proceedings of the eighth international colloquium on Mycenaean studies, Ohrid (15–20 September 1985), Skopje, 203–32 and 237–40.Google Scholar
Melena, J. (May 2000) ‘On the structure of the Mycenaean Linear B syllabary I. The untransliterated syllabograms (preliminary report)’, 27–31.Google Scholar
Olivier, J.-P. (1969) The Mycenae tablets IV. A revised transliteration, Leiden.Google Scholar
Palmer, L. R. (1954) review of Ventris and Chadwick (1953), Gnomon 26, p. 000.Google Scholar
Shelmerdine, C. (1985) The perfume industry of Mycenaean Pylos, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Vandenabeele, F., and Olivier, J.-P. (1979) Les idéogrammes archéologiques du Linéaire B, Paris.Google Scholar
Ventris, M., and Chadwick, J. (1953) ‘Evidence for Greek dialect in the Mycenaean archives’, JHS 73, 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventris, M., and Chadwick, J. (1973) Documents in Mycenaean Greek (2nd edn.), Cambridge.Google Scholar