No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On Cicero, ‘Ad Familiares’
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2018
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1750270500012070/resource/name/firstPage-S1750270500012070a.jpg)
- Type
- Meeting Report
- Information
- Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (Second Series) , Volume 5: New Series , 1959 , pp. 6 - 15
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press 1959
References
page 6 note 1 Lehmann's supplement.
page 9 note 1 The notion that ‘this would appear to have been a show lotus which tourists came to see’ (Tyrrell–Purser) is moonshine.
page 9 note 2 Or ‘how far people would be satisfied that your action was necessary’.
page 11 note 1 Or Billienus. The spelling is doubtful.
page 11 note 2 For verna thus, cf. XI, 19, 2.
page 11 note 3 De Causa Serviliana, p. 16.
page 12 note 1 There is no reason to call the L. Bellienus of Sail. Iug. 104, 1 Google Scholar L. Annius Bellienus, as Broughton tentatively does ( Magistrates, 1, p. 556 Google Scholar).
page 13 note 1 I waste no time on Klebs' clearly erroneous opinion that this Demetrius was so called: RE, Bellienus, 7.
page 15 note 1 In Att. VII, 1, 3 Google Scholar they have been making Pompeio change places with Caesare for four centuries, to the detriment of the sense.
page 15 note 2 An inscription containing it is generally held to be a forgery: see RE, s.v. Aemilius, no. 30.