Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:28:43.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lectures on Horace's Epistles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Don Fowler†
Don Fowler†
Affiliation:
Jesus College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lecture one: Reading Horace, or L'homme et l'oeuvre

All criticism is also biography: and telling a story about a text is also telling a story about oneself. This is particularly true of Horace. When one writes about Horace, one is constructing a Horace, making the man: and constructing a Horace is inevitably also constructing oneself. Consider for example, Colin Macleod, whose last graduate class before his suicide was on Horace's Epistles, and who wrote extensively on Horace. Macleod's Horace was complex, often contradictory, morally serious – which fits Macleod of course.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 54 , 2008 , pp. 80 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) ‘The problem of speech genres’, in (id.) Speech genres and other late essays, trans. McGee, V. W., Austin, 60–102.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1991) ‘Discordant Muses’, PCPS 37, 1–21.Google Scholar
Barton, C. (1993) The sorrows of the ancient Romans: the gladiator and the monster, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1971) Problems in general linguistics, trans. Meek, M. E., Coral Gables.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1982) Horace on poetry, vol. 3: Epistles book 2: the letters to Florus and Augustus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Culler, J. (1975) Structuralist poetics, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. (1981) ‘Plato's pharmacy’, in (id.) Dissemination, trans. Johnson, B., London, 63–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1993) ‘Images of Horace in twentieth-century scholarship’, in Martindale, C. (ed.) Horace made new: Horatian influences on British writing from the Renaissance to the twentieth century, Cambridge, 268–76.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1995) ‘Horace and the aesthetics of polities’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) Homage to Horace. A bimillenary celebration, Oxford, 248–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (2000a) Roman constructions. Readings in postmodern Latin, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (2000b) ‘Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism in the age of electronic media’, in Most, G. (ed.) Commentaries – Kommentare, Göttingen, 426–42.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1957) Horace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (1993) The walking Muse. Horace on the theory of satire, Princeton.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. (1991) Shifting paradigms, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1982) ‘Frontiers of narrative’, in (id.) Figures of literary discourse, trans. Sheridan, A., Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1991) ‘The Janus episode in Ovid's Fasti’, MD 26, 47–64.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1960) ‘Die Horazische Ode’, in (id.) Vom Geistdes Römertums, Darmstadt, 172–89.Google Scholar
Highet, G. (1974) ‘Masks and faces in satire’, Hermes 102, 321–37.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1987) Language in literature, Cambridge, Mass, and London.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic philosophers, vol.1: translations of the principal sources with philosophical commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (1997) Horace's narrative odes, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, J. (1987–) Ovid: Amores, Liverpool and Leeds.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (1994) Horace: Epistles book 1, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moles, J. (1995) revue of Mayer (1994), Bryn Mawr Classical Review (1995.02.37).Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. (1992) ‘The orator and the reader: manipulation and response in Cicero's Fifth Verrine’, in Woodman, T., Powell, J. (eds.) Author and audience in Latin literature, Cambridge, 1–17.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970) A commentary on Horace: Odes book 1, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ricks, C. (1984) ‘Clichés’, in (id.) The force of poetry, Oxford, 356–68.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1965) ‘Art as technique’, in Lemon, L. T., Reis, M. J. (eds.) Russian formalist criticism. Lincoln, Nebraska, 3–24.Google Scholar
Winkler, M. M. (1983) The persona in three satires of Juvenal, Hildesheim.Google Scholar