Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:22:54.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Horatian Notes: Despised Readings in the Manuscripts of the Odes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2019

C. O. Brink*
Affiliation:
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 3 note 1 I count 21 instances of elision before et at line-endings in Ödes I-HI. The only unelided instance of et in that position (apart from the dubious case discussed above) is mitigated in the same way as fors et would be : C. m. 11. 5 ends nunc et, two monosyllables. But two monosyllables form as many as one half of all cases of monosyllables at the end of the hexameter, cf. J. Hellegouarc'h, Le monosyllabe Jans l'hexametre latin (1964), 55-61, diagram p. 52.

Page 6 note 1 There is in turn a similarity between C. IV. 9. 1 and II. 4. 1 ne sit ancillae übi amor pudori, which I leave aside since the latter passage contains a 3rd, not a 2nd, person verb. But n. 4. 1 may be compared with one of the instances from the A.P. (406), mentioned earlier in passing. At C. n. 1. 37, ne introduces an almost regulär subordinate clause in the 2nd person, preceding the imperative quaere (40).