Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:29:10.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dangerous supplements: Etymology and Genealogy in Euripides' Heracles*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Christina S. Kraus
Affiliation:
Oriel College, Oxford

Extract

The complex patterns of repetition and reversal in the Heracles have been carefully and convincingly explored. Whether dividing the play into two, three, or even four major scenes, scholars have shown that it is not simply imagery or language, but whole actions or plot-elements which recur from scene to scene, and indeed from generation to generation. A consensus has developed that the play's violent disruptions and juxta-positions of opposites work together with near-obsessive repetitions of language, plot, and myth to stage Euripides’ vision of epic valour savagely mutated into a new, moral heroism contained by a new, democratic philia.

It is appropriate that repetition, and repetition-as-reversal, should figure so largely in this drama, whose action depends on a doubly-fathered hero and whose centrepiece is the triply repeated description of an action which is itself a play within a play. In a prominent ode the chorus long for a second youth as a sign of goodness (655-72), a desire apparently realised by Heracles' reappearance from the dead. Nor is he the only one to be reborn: in the last act, Theseus' appearance, also – ultimately – from Hades (1170), redoubles Heracles' first entrance: another hero with two fathers, another monster-killer, another rescuer from the dead.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Barlow, S. A. (1982) ‘Structure and dramatic realism in Euripides’ “Heracles’”, G&R 29: 115125. Reprinted in Greek tragedy, edd. McAuslan, I. and Walcott, P.. 1993.Google Scholar
Barlow, S. A. (1996) Euripides: Herakles, . ed. with translation, introduction, and commentary.Google Scholar
Baudy, G. J. (1993) ‘Die Herrschaft des Wolfes. Das Thema des “verkehrten Welt” in Euripides' Herakles’, Hermes 121: 159–80.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. F. (1991) Dionysus und die griechische Tragödie: politische und ‘metatheatralische’ Aspekte im Text.Google Scholar
Bond, G. W. (1981) Euripides Heracles, , ed. with introduction and commentary.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. (1971) Catastrophe survived.Google Scholar
Culler, J., ed. (1988) On puns.Google Scholar
Dunn, F. M. (1996) Tragedy's end: closure and innovation in Euripidean drama.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Empson, W. (1953) Seven types of ambiguity, ed. 3.Google Scholar
Foley, H. (1985) Ritual irony: poetry and sacrifice in Euripides.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (1972) The Herakles theme.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1981) Narrative discourse. Trans. Lewin, J..Google Scholar
Gibert, J. C. (1997) ‘Euripides' Heracles 1351 and the hero's encounter with death’, CP 92: 247–58.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1986) Reading Greek tragedy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991) The poet's voice.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. (1977) ‘Euripides' Herakles’, YCS 25: 259–75.Google Scholar
Gygli-Wyss, B. (1966) Das nominate Polyptoton im älteren Griechisch.Google Scholar
Halleran, M. R. (1985) Stagecraft in Euripides.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. (1985) ‘Slings and arrows: the debate with Lycus in the Heracles’, TAPA 115: 1925.Google Scholar
Hangard, J. (1976) ‘Remarques sur quelques motif's répétés dans l'Héraclès d'Euripide’, in Miscellanea tragica in honorem J. C. Kamerbeek, edd. Bremer, J. M., Radt, S. L., Ruijgh, C. J..Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1996) ‘Dancing in Athens, dancing on Delos: some patterns of choral projection in Euripides’, Philologus 140: 4862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, W. E. (1984) ‘Deciphering time in the Herakles of Euripides’, QUCCA 47: 89109.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1980) trans, and ed., Derrida, J., Dissemination.Google Scholar
Kroeker, E. (1938) Der Herakles des Euripides. Analyse des Dramas. Diss, Giessen.Google Scholar
Lee, K. H. (1982) ‘The Iris–Lyssa scene in Euripides' Heracles’, Antichthon 16: 4453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, E. A. (1991) ‘Double meaning and mythic novelty in Euripides' plays’, TAPA 121: 123132.Google Scholar
Michelini, A. (1987) Euripides and the tragic tradition.Google Scholar
Mikalson, J. D. (1986) ‘Zeus the father and Heracles the son in tragedy’, TAPA 116: 8998.Google Scholar
Miller, J. H. (1982) Fiction and repetition.Google Scholar
Nussbaumer, P.J. Ev. (1938) Die Figuren des Gleichklangs bei Euripides.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J. J. (1996) True names.Google Scholar
Padel, R. (1990) ‘Making space speak’, in Nothing to do with Dionysus?, edd. Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I.. (1995) Whom gods destroy.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1980) The violence of pity in Euripides' Medea.Google Scholar
Ruck, C. (1976) ‘Duality and the madness of Herakles’, Arethusa 9: 5376.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. and Stählin, O. (19401961) Geschichte der griechischen Literatur. 5 vols.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. (1982) Dionysiac poetics and Euripides' Bacchae.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidensticker, B. (1982) Palintonos harmonia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, J. T. (1916) ‘The formal beauty of the Hercules furens, CQ 10: 72–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, M. S. (1985) ‘Heracles and Greek tragedy’, G&R 32: 122. Reprinted in Greek tragedy, edd. McAuslan, I. and Walcott, P.. 1993.Google Scholar
Stanford, W. B. (1939) Ambiguity in Greek literature.Google Scholar
Sulzberger, M. (1926) ‘ΟΝΟΜΑ ΕΠΩΝΥΜΟΝ: Les noms propres chez Homère et dans la mythologie grecque’, REG 39: 381447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taplin, O. (1977) The stagecraft of Aeschylus.Google Scholar
Walker, H. J. (1995) Theseus and Athens.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilamowitz, U. von (1895) Euripides Heracles, ed. 2.Google Scholar
Willink, C. (1988) ‘Sleep after labour in Euripides' Heracles’, CQ 38: 8697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, C. (1992) ‘Euripides' Iphigenia among the Taurians: aetiology, ritual, and myth’, CA 11: 308–34.Google Scholar