Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:21:03.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ancient ‘etymology’ and Tibullus: on the classification of ‘etymologies’ and on ‘etymological markers’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Francis Cairns
Affiliation:
University of Leeds

Extract

Ancient ‘etymology’ is now such a well-established modern scholarly interest that a paper about it need no longer be prefaced by an account of its commonest forms or by a justification of its importance, especially in poetry – and that despite the pseudo-etymological nature of many ancient etymologies. For such matters it is sufficient to refer to what have already become the standard works on ancient etymologies and etymologising. If further explanation of the high intellectual status accorded by antiquity to etymologising seems necessary, it can be provided economically by reference to those ancient philosophical theories of language, e.g. that of the Stoics, which held that words are related to the reality (φύσις) of the things which they name, and to the close links which surviving ancient etymological treatises assert between etymology (i.e. derivations) and ‘semantics’ (i.e. meaning). The etymologies most familiar to older classical scholarship are those revolving around proper names; but even before the recent upsurge of interest in ancient etymology there was some awareness of the additional potential for common nouns, verbs and adjectives to be etymologised.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bartelink, G. J. M., 1965, Etymologisering bij Vergilius (Mededelingen d. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Afd. Letterkunde n.r. 28.3), AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F., 1979, Tibullus: A Hellenistic Poet at Rome, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Günther, H.-C., 1994, ‘Tibullus Ludens’, Eikasmos 5. 25169Google Scholar
Kienast, D., 1982. Augustus. Prinzeps und Monarch. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Maltby, R., 1993a, ‘Varro's attitude to Latin derivations from Greek’, PLLS 7.4760Google Scholar
Maltby, R. 1993b. ‘The limits of etymologising’, Aevum Antiquum 6. 25775Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P., 1980 (ed.), Tibullus: Elegies I, PietermaritzburgGoogle Scholar
Murgatroyd, P., 1994 (ed.). Tibullus: Elegies II. OxfordGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, J. J., 1996. True Names: Virgil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay, Michigan [not available to me when this paper was finished]Google Scholar