Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T18:40:50.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tityos and the Lover

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2018

E. J. Kenney
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge

Extract

      Nec Tityon uolucres ineunt Acherunte iacentem
      nec quod sub magno scrutentur pectore quicquam
      perpetuam aetatem possunt reperire profecto.
      quamlibet immani proiectu corporis exstet,
      qui non sola nouem dispessis iugera membris
      obtineat, sed qui terrai totius orbem,
      non tamen aeternum poterit perferre dolorem
      nec praebere cibum proprio de corpore semper.
      sed Tityos nobis hic est, in amore iacentem
      quem uolucres lacerant atque exest anxius angor
      aut alia quauis scindunt cuppedine curae.
      Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, III, 984–94

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 44 note 1 Noted by Fletcher, G. B. A., Latomus, XXVII (1968), 887 Google Scholar.

page 45 note 1 As remarked by West, D., The imagery and poetry of Lucretius (1969), p. 102 Google Scholar.

page 46 note 1 A. S. Pease on Cic., N.D. iii, 60 Google Scholar.

page 46 note 2 See Webster, T. B. L., Hellenistic poetry and art (1964), passimGoogle Scholar.

page 46 note 3 Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L., The Greek Anthology: Hellenistic Epigrams II (1965), 559–61Google Scholar.

page 46 note 4 Lesky, A., Gesch. d. gr. Lit. (19571958), p. 677;Google Scholar Reitzenstein, , R.-E. VI, 72–4, s.v. ‘Epigramm’;Google Scholar cf. Luck, , GGA CCXIX (1967), 50–1Google Scholar.

page 47 note 1 I am indebted to the members of Professor H. Dörrie's seminar at Münster for helpful criticisms, and in particular to Dr M. Baltes for his salutary scepticism over the interpretation of lacerant.