Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:29:34.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to be a good symposiast and other lessons from Xenophon's Symposium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Fiona Hobden
Fiona Hobden
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Xenophon's Symposium lies at a confluence between two trends in modern scholarship. On the one hand, its author and his writings have recently attracted a resurgence in interest and credibility. No longer is Xenophon regarded as merely a ‘literary dilettante’, a dull, unimaginative and ultimately incompetent philosopher, or a conservative gentleman of the British old school. He is rather a political radical, an innovator in literary form, and the defender of a ‘trendy and shocking philosopher’. In this vein, his Symposium has been rescued from condemnation as a poor imitation of Plato's dialogue of the same name. No modern reader of Xenophon's work would go so far as Eunapius in declaring its writer to be ‘the only man out of all the philosophers to adorn philosophy in word and deed’. Yet, as Huss's comprehensive commentary has shown, the Symposium is much more than the product of an amateur philosopher and writer. It is a work of considerable complexity which draws on a variety of literary influences beyond Plato's Symposium, mixing seriousness with jest in order to explore, among other issues, beauty and desire.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 50 , 2004 , pp. 121 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Andrisano, A. (2003) ‘Les performances du Symposion de Xénophon’, Pallas 63, 287–302.Google Scholar
Bartlett, R. C. (1996) ‘On the Symposium’, in id. (ed.) The shorter Socratic writings. Apology of Socrates to the jury, Oeconomicus and Symposium, Ithaca, 173–96.Google Scholar
Bourriot, F. (1995) Kalos kagathos – kalokagathia. D'un terme de propagande de sophistes à une notion sociale et philosophique, Zurich and New York.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1990) ‘Miles ludens? The problem of martial exhortation in early Greek elegy’, in Murray (1990a) 221–9.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. (1997) ‘Jokes, jokers and jokebooks in ancient Greek culture’, in Bremmer, J., Roodenburg, H. (eds.) A cultural history of humour. From antiquity to the present day, Cambridge, 11–29.Google Scholar
Chroust, A.-H. (1957) Socrates, Man and myth. The two Socratic apologies of Xenophon, London.Google Scholar
Crowther, L. (1985) ‘Male “beauty” contests in Greece: the euandria and the euexia’, AC 54, 285–91.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (2000) ‘Gnesippus paigniagraphos: the comic poets and the erotic mime’, in Harvey, D., Wilkins, J. (ed.) The rivals of Aristophanes. Studies in Athenian Old Comedy, London, 41–64.Google Scholar
Davies, J. K. (1971) Athenian propertied families, 600–300 BC, Oxford.Google Scholar
Donlan, W. (1985) ‘Pistos,philos, hetairos’, in Figueira, T., Nagy, G. (eds.) Theognis of Megara. Poetry and the polis, Baltimore, 223–44.Google Scholar
Due, B. (1989) The Cyropaedia. Xenophon's aims and methods, Aarhus.Google Scholar
Fehr, B. (1990) ‘Entertainers at the symposion: The akletoi in the archaic period’, in Murray (1990a) 185–95.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. (1988) ‘Hesiod's mimetic muses and the strategies of deconstruction’, in Benjamin, A. (ed.) Poststructuralist classics, London, 45–78.Google Scholar
Fisher, N. R. E. (1992) Hybris. A study in the values of honour and shame in ancient Greece, Warminster.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2002) The origins of criticism. Literary culture and poetic theory in classical Greece, Princeton and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. (2003) ‘From letters to literacy: reading the song culture of classical Greece’, in Yunis, H. (ed.) Written texts and the rise of literate culture in ancient Greece, London, 15–37.Google Scholar
Frontisi-Ducroux, F., Lissarrague, F. (1990) ‘From ambiguity to ambivalence: a Dionysiae excursion through the “Anakreontic vases”’, in Halperin, D., Winkler, J., Zeitlin, F. (eds.) Before sexuality. The construction of erotic experience in the ancient world, Princeton, 211–56.Google Scholar
Garelli-François, M.-H. (2002) ‘Le spectacle final du Banquet de Xénophon: le genre et le sens’, Pallas 59, 177–86.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (1981) ‘The interpretation of Greek lyric poets in our time’, in Kresic, S. (ed.) Contemporary literary hermeneutic and interpretation of classical texts, Ottawa, 109–20.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (1988) Poetry and its public in ancient Greece. From Homer to the fifth century, Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Gera, D. (1993) Xenophon's Cyropaedia. Style, genre and literary technique, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. (2002) ‘Entertainment at Xenophon's Symposium’, Athenaeum 90, 207–13.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2002a) Who needs Greek? Contests in the cultural history of Hellenism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2002b) The invention of prose, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gray, V. (1989) The character of Xenophon's Hellenica, London.Google Scholar
Gray, V. (1992) ‘Xenophon's Symposion: the display of wisdom’, Hermes 120, 58–75.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1969) A hi story of Greek philosophy, vol. 3, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Halliwell, F. S. (1991) ‘The uses of laughter in Greek culture’, CQ 41, 279–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesk, J. (2003) Sophocles: Ajax, London.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. (in preparation) ‘Policing speech: flyting and abuse in Athenian drama and society’.Google Scholar
Hindley, C. (1994) ‘Erōs and military command in Xenophon’, CQ 44, 347–66.Google Scholar
Hindley, C. (1999) ‘Xenophon on male love’, CQ 49, 74–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindley, C. (2004) ‘Sophron eros: Xenophon's ethical erotics’, in Tuplin, C.J. (ed.), Xenophon and his world, Stuttgart, 125–46.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1991) The mask of comedy. Aristophanes and the intertextual parabasis, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Huss, B. (1999a) Xenophons Symposion. Ein Kommentar, Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Huss, B. (1999b) ‘The dancing Socrates and the laughing Xenophon, or the other Symposium’, AJP 120, 381–409.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1974) review of L. Strauss, Xenophon's Socrates (London 1972), Philosophical Review 409–13.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1995) Greek comedy and ideology. New York.Google Scholar
Levine, D. (1985) ‘Symposium and the polis’, in Figueira, T., Nagy, G. (eds.) Theognis of Megara. Poetry and the polis, Baltimore, 176–96.Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. (1990) Aesthetics of the Greek banquet, Princeton.Google Scholar
Llewelyn, J. (1988) ‘On the saying that philosophy begins in thaumazein’, in Benjamin, A. (ed.) Post-structuralist classics, London, 173–91.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. (1995) Aristophanes and Athens. An introduction to the plays, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanezi, S. (2000) ‘Laughter as dessert’, in Braund, D., Wilkins, J. (ed.) Athenaeus and his world, Exeter, 400–12.Google Scholar
Miller, M. (1991) ‘Foreigners at the Greek symposion?’, in Slater, (ed.), 59–81.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. (2000) Silence in the land of logos, Princeton.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1982) ‘Symposion and Männerbund’, in Oliva, P., Frolikova, A. (eds.) Concilium Eirene 16.1, Prague, 94–112.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1983a) ‘The symposion in history’, in Gabba, E. (ed.) Tria corda. Scritti in onore di ArnaldoMomigliano, Como, 257–72.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1983b) ‘The symposion as social organisation’, in Hägg, R. (ed.) The Greek renaissance of the eighth century B.C.: tradition and innovation, Stockholm, 195–9.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (ed.) (1990a) Sympotica: a study of the symposium, Oxford.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1990b) ‘Sympotic history’, in Murray (1990a) 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, O. (1995) ‘Forms of sociality’, in Vernant, J.-P. (ed.) The Greeks, Chicago, 218–53.Google Scholar
Murray, O., Tecuşan, M. (eds.) (1995) In vino veritas, London.Google Scholar
Nadon, C. (2001) Xenophon's prince. Republic and empire in the Cyropaedia, Berkeley and London.Google Scholar
Olson, S. (1996) ‘Politics and poetry in Aristophanes' Wasps’, TAPA 126, 129–50.Google Scholar
Romeri, L. (2002) Philosophes entre mots et mets, Grenoble.Google Scholar
Rösler, W. (1980) Dichter und Gruppe. Eine Untersuchung zu den Bedingungen und zur historischen Funktion früher griechische Lyrik am Beispiel Alkaios, Munich.Google Scholar
Rösler, W. (1990) ‘Mnemosyne in the symposion’, in Murray (1990a) 230–7.Google Scholar
Rossi, L. (1983) ‘Il simposio greco arcaico e classico come spettacolo a se stesso’, in Spettacoli conviviali dall'antichità classica alle corli italiane del'400: Atti del VII convegno di studio, Viterbo, 41–50.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Pantel, P. (1990) ‘Sacrificial meal and symposion: two models of civic institutions in the archaic city?’, in Murray (1990a) 14–33.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Pantel, P. (1992) La cité au banquet. Histoire des repas publics dans les cités grecques, Rome.Google Scholar
Sirinelli, J. (2000) Plutarque de Chéronée, Paris.Google Scholar
Slater, W. (ed.) (1991) Dining in a classical context, Michigan.Google Scholar
Sonin, J. (1999) ‘The verbalisation of non-verbal communication in classical Greek texts’, PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. (1997) Performance and gender in ancient Greece, Princeton.Google Scholar
Sutton, R. (2001) ‘The good, the base and the ugly: the drunken orgy in Attic vase painting and the Athenian self’, in Cohen, B. (ed.) Not the classical ideal. Athens and the construction of the other in Greek art, Leiden, 180–202.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. (1989) Xenophon's imperial fiction. On the education of Cyrus, Princeton.Google Scholar
Tecuşan, M. (1990) ‘Logos sympotikos: Patterns of the irrational in philosophical drinking: Plato outside the Symposium’, in Murray (1990a) 238–60.Google Scholar
Too, Y. (1998) ‘Xenophon's Cyropaedia: disfiguring the pedagogical state’, in Too, Y., Livingstone, N. (eds.) Pedagogy and power. Rhetorics of classical learning, Cambridge, 282–302.Google Scholar
Too, Y. (2002) ‘The economies of pedagogy: Xenophon's wifely didactics’, PCPS 47, 65–80.Google Scholar
Tredennick, H., Waterfield, R. (eds.) (1990) Conversations of Socrates, London.Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. (1993) The failings of empire. A reading of Xenophon's Hellenica 2.3.11–7.5.27, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (2000) The boastful chef. The discourse of food in ancient Greek comedy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (1999) ‘The aulos in Athens’, in Goldhill, S., Osborne, R. (eds.) Performance culture in Athenian democracy, Cambridge, 58–95.Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (2004) ‘Dirty dancing: Xenophon's Symposium’, in Murray, P., Wilson, P. (eds.) Music and the Muses. The culture of mousike in the classical Athenian city, Oxford, 337–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yunis, H. (ed.) (2003) Written texts and the rise of literate culture in ancient Greece, London.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1995) The mask of Socrates. Images of the intellectual in antiquity, Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford.Google Scholar