Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:12:47.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Greek epic: a Near Eastern genre?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Johannes Haubold
Johannes Haubold
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article addresses a problem that is rapidly advancing to the status of a new Homeric question: the relationship between Greek epic and the narrative traditions of neighbouring Near Eastern cultures. The present situation recalls the debates that raged over the issue of oral poetry not so long ago. The formula used to be the central object of contention, now it is the ‘Near Eastern parallel’. Today there are so many parallels on record that it is hard to keep track. Yet, as with the formula, the number of known parallels seems to bear little relation to their usefulness. Now as then, problems of the most basic kind abound. What, for a start, is a Near Eastern parallel? And why should we care if someone pointed one out to us? Questions such as these are only just beginning to be asked in earnest.

As with the oral-traditional hypothesis, the Near Eastern hypothesis concerns the whole of Greek literature. But the problem has crystallised around epic, and so it is epic that concerns me here. In the first part of my paper, I sketch out briefly what I see as some of the parameters of the present impasse. In the second half, I suggest a framework for future study that enables us to see what we have come to call ‘Greek epic’ as one regional offshoot of the broader Near Eastern genre of cosmic history. In order to illustrate my claim, I look at one of the more notorious parallels between Greek and Near Eastern literatures: the problem of mortality as developed in the Iliad and the Poem of Gilgamesh. I argue that the full implications of the issue are better understood within the overall framework proposed in this article.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (Second Series) , Volume 48 , 2002 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arthur, M. (1982) ‘Cultural strategies in Hesiod's Theogony: law, family, society’, Arethusa 15, 63–82.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1973) Indo-European language and society, trans. Palmer, E., London.Google Scholar
Bernal, M. (1987) Black Athena: the afroasiatic roots of classical civilization, vol. 1: The fabrication of Greece, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Bottéro, J. (2001) Religion in ancient Mesopotamia, trans. Fagan, T. Lavender, Chicago.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1984) Die orientalisierende Epoche in der griechischen Religion und Literatur, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1991) ‘Homerstudien und Orient’, in Latacz, J. (ed.) Zweihundert Jahre Homerforschung. Rückblick und Ausblick, Stuttgart, 155–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkert, W. (1992) The orientalizing revolution: Near Eastern influence on Greek culture in the early archaic age, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Cagni, L. (1969) L'epopea di Erra, Rome.Google Scholar
Cagni, L. (1977) The poem of Erra, Malibu.Google Scholar
Cassin, E. (1991) ‘Mesopotamian cosmogony’, in Bonnefoy, Y. (ed.) Mythologies, trans. Honigsblum, G. et al. , Chicago, 155–62.Google Scholar
Clifford, R. (1994) Creation accounts in the ancient Near East and in the Bible, Washington.Google Scholar
Dalley, S. (2000) Myths from Mesopotamia (2nd edn.), Oxford.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. (2001) Review of West (1997) in JHS 121,167–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumézil, G. (1968) Mythe et épopée vol. I: l'idéologic des trois functions dans les épopées des peuples indoeuropéens, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumézil, G. (1971) Mythe et épopée vol. 2: un héros, un sorcier, un roi, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumézil, G. (1973) Mythe et épopée vol. 3: histories romaines, Paris.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. (1991) The Iliad: a commentary, vol. 5, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnegan, R. (1977) Oral poetry: its nature, significance, and social context, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1992) Homer: the poetry of the past, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1997) ‘Epic as genre’, in Morris and Powell, 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A. (1999) The epic of Gilgamesh: a new translation, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
George, A., Al-Rawi, F. (1996) ‘Tablets from the Sippar library VI: Atia-hasis’, Iraq 58, 147–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitin, S., Mazar, A., Stern, E. (eds.) (1998) Mediterranean peoples in transition: thirteenth to early tenth centuries BCE, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991) The poet's voice: essays on poetics and Greek literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1998) Review of West (1997) in G&R 44, 235.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. (1987) Anthropology through the looking-glass: critical ethnography in the margins of Europe, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. (1997) ‘Homer's dialect’, in Morris and Powell, 193–217.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, J. (2000) A grammar of Akkadian, Winona Lake.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. and Millard, A. (eds.) (1969) Atra-hasis: the Babylonian story of the flood, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. and Parker, S. (eds.) (1966) Enuma eliš: the Babylonian epic of creation, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lamberterie, C. de (1997) ‘Milman Parry et Antoine Meillet’, in Létoublon, F. (ed.) Hommage à Milman Parry, Amsterdam, 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latacz, J. (ed.) (2000) Homers Ilias: Gesamtkommentar, vol. 1, Munich.Google Scholar
Létoublon, F. (ed.) (1997) Hommage à Milman Parry: le style formulaire de l'épopée homérique et la théorie de l'oralité poétique, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, A. (1960) The singer of tales, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1989) The language of heroes: speech and performance in the Iliad, Princeton.Google Scholar
Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds.) (1997) A new companion to Homer, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S. (1992) Daidalos and the origins of Greek art, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S. (1997) ‘Homer and the Near East’, in Morris and Powell, 599–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muellner, L. (1996) The anger of Achilles: mênis in Greek epic, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1974) Comparative studies in Greek and Indie meter, Harvard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979) The best of the Achaeans: concepts of the hero in archaic Greek poetry, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1990) Greek mythology and poetics, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Ong, W. (1977) Interfaces of the word: studies in the evolution of consciousness and culture, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (1993) Review of Burkert (1992) and Morris (1992) in Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 6, 231–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, R. (2001) ‘The use of abuse: Semonides 7’, PCPS 47, 47–64.Google Scholar
Parpola, S. (ed.) (1997) The Standard Babylonian epic of Gilgamesh, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Parry, M. (1928a) L'épithète traditionnelle dans Homère. Essai sur un probleme de style homérique, Paris.Google Scholar
Parry, M. (1928b) Les formules et la métrique d'Homère, Paris.Google Scholar
Penglase, C. (1994) Greek myths and Mesopotamia: parallels and influence in the Homeric hymns and Hesiod, London.Google Scholar
Petriconi, H. (1964) ‘Das Gilgamesch-Epos als Vorbild der Ilias’, in Linguistic and literary studies in honour of Helmut A. Hatzfeld, Washington, 329–42.Google Scholar
Pulleyn, S. (2000) Homer: Iliad 1, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, L. (1991) The power of Thetis: allusion and interpretation in the Iliad, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Strauss Clay, J. (1989) The politics of Olympus: form and meaning in the major Homeric hymns, Princeton.Google Scholar
Walcot, P. (1966) Hesiod and the Near East, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1995) How to kill a dragon: aspects of Indo-European poetics, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. (1966) Hesiod: Theogony. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. (1985) The Hesiodic Catalogue of women: its nature, structure, and origins, Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. (1988) Hesiod: Theogony and Works and days, Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. (1997) The east face of Helicon: west Asiatic elements in Greek poetry and myth, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermann, C. (1974) Genesis, vol. 1, Neukirchen-Vluyn.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1996) ‘Signifying difference: the case of Hesiod's Pandora’, in Playing the other: gender and society in classical Greek literature, Chicago, 53–86.Google Scholar