Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:51:51.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Passage to India? Anuradhapura and the Early Use of the Brahmi Script

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

R.A.E. Coningham ,
F.R. Allchin ,
C.M. Batt  and
D. Lucy
R.A.E. Coningham
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences University of BradfordBradford BD7 1DP
F.R. Allchin
Affiliation:
Ancient India and Iran Trust Brookstands House Brooklands Avenue Cambridge CB2 2BG
C.M. Batt
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences University of BradfordBradford BD7 1DP
D. Lucy
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences University of BradfordBradford BD7 1DP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The island of Sri Lanka, situated off the tip of southern India, is often perceived as the recipient of material culture diffused from more northerly regions. This article counters this model by suggesting that Sri Lanka may have played a pivotal role in the development of Brahmi, South Asia's earliest readable script. Sherds inscribed with this script, recently found at Anuradhapura, with dates of the beginning of the fourth century BC, now represent its earliest dated examples anywhere in the subcontinent. By analyzing the sherds' archaeological and scriptural context it presents a tentative mechanism for Brahmi's development and spread through South Asia and concludes by discussing the dynamic relationships between scripts, langtiage, material culture and ethnic division within Sri Lanka.

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , April 1996 , pp. 73 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allchin, F.R., 1989. City and state formation in Early Historic South Asia. South Asian Studies 5, 1–16.Google Scholar
Allchin, F.R., 1990. Patterns of city formation in Early Historic South Asia. South Asian Studies 6, 163–74.Google Scholar
Allchin, F.R. & Norman, K.R., 1985. Guide to the Asokan inscriptions. South Asian Studies 1, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auboyer, J., 1965. Daily Life in Ancient India: From Approximately 200 BC to AD 700. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Barth, F., 1972. Ethnic processes on the Pathan–Baluch boundary, in Directions in Sociolinguistics: the Ethnography of Communications, eds. Gumperz, J.J. & Hymes, D.. New York (NY): Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 454–64.Google Scholar
Bechert, H., 1978. The beginnings of Buddhist histiography: the Mahavamsa and political thinking, in Religion and the Lcgitimisation of Power in Sri Lanka, ed. Smith, B.L.. Chambersburg: Anima & Conococheazgue, 1–12.Google Scholar
Bechert, H., 1982. The date of the Buddha reconsidered. Indologica Taurinensia 10, 29–36.Google Scholar
Begley, V., 1981. Excavations of Iron Age burials at Pomparippu, 1970. Ancient Ceylon 4, 49–96.Google Scholar
Bowman, S., 1994. Using radiocarbon: an update. Antiquity 68, 838–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk, Ramsey C., 1994. OxCal Radiocarbon Calibration and Stratigraphic Analysis Program. Oxford: Research Laboratory for Archaeology.Google Scholar
Buck, C.E., Kenworthy, J.B., Litton, CD. & Smith, A.F.M., 1991. Combining archaeology and radiocarbon information: a Bayesian approach to calibration. Antiquity 65, 808–21.Google Scholar
Buhler, J.G., 1886. The Laws of Manu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buhler, J.G., 1896. Indische Palaeographie. Strassburg: Karl J. Trubner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, J.G., 1904. Indian Palaeography. Bombay: Bombay Education Society's Press.Google Scholar
Chhabra, B.C., 1985. Peshawar potsherds with Kharoshthi writings. Epigraphia Indica XXVIII, 125–9.Google Scholar
Coleman, R., 1988. Review of Archaeology and Language. Current Anthropology 29 (3), 449–53.Google Scholar
Coningham, R.A.E., 1993. Anuradhapura citadel archaeological project: preliminary results of the excavation of the southern rampart. South Asian Studies 8, 111–22.Google Scholar
Coningham, R.A.E., 1994. ‘Urban texts’: an Interpretation of the Architectural, Textual and Artefactual Records of a Sri Lankan Early Historic City. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Coningham, R.A.E., 1995a. Monks, caves and kings: an archaeological reassessment of the nature of early Buddhism in Sri Lanka (Ceylon). World Archaeology 27.2, 222–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coningham, R.A.E., 1995b. Dark age or continuum? An archaeological analysis of the second emergence of urbanism in South Asia, in The Archaeology of Early Historic South Asia: the Emergence of Cities and States, ed. Allchin, F.R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 54–72.Google Scholar
Coningham, R.A.E. & Allchin, F.R., 1995. The rise of cities in Sri Lanka, in Vie Archaeology of Early Historic South Asia: the Emergence of Cities and States, ed. Allchin, F.R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 214–57.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., 1877. Inscriptions of Asoka. (Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum 1.) Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Dani, A.H., 1963. Indian Palaeography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dani, A.H., 1966. Shaikhan Dheri excavations. Ancient Pakistan 2, 17–214.Google Scholar
Deraniyagala, S.U., 1972. The citadel of Anuradhapura 1969: excavations in the Gedige area. Ancient Ceylon 2, 50–169.Google Scholar
Deraniyagala, S.U., 1990. Radiocarbon dating of early Brahmi script in Sri Lanka: 600–500 BC. Ancient Ceylon 11, 149–68.Google Scholar
Deraniyagala, S.U., 1992. The Prehistory of Sri Lanka: an Ecological Perspective. Colombo: Department of Archaeological Survey.Google Scholar
Dhavalikar, M.K. & Possehl, G.L., 1974. Subsistence pattern of an early farming community of Western India. Puratatlua 7, 39–56.Google Scholar
Diringer, D. (with R. Regensburg), 1968. The Alphabet. 3rd edition. (First published in 1948.) London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Godakumbura, C.E., 1946. The Dravidian element in Sinhalese. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies XI(4), 837–41.Google Scholar
Gunasekera, U.A., Prematilleke, P.L. & Silva, R., 1971. A corpus of pottery forms found in Ceylon. Ancient Ceylon 1, 166–92.Google Scholar
Halevy, M.J., 1885. Essai sur l'origine des ecritures Indiennes. Journal Asiatique Serie VIII, Tome VI, 243–301.Google Scholar
von Hinuber, O., 1990. Der beginn der schrifl and fruhe schriftlichkeit in Indien. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
Hunt, E.H., 1924. Hyderabad cairn burials and their significance. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute LIV, 140–56.Google Scholar
Karunaratne, S., 1984. Lithic and Other Inscriptions of Ceylon. Colombo: Archaeological Department.Google Scholar
Kirk, R.L., 1976. The legend of Prince Vijaya — a study of Sinhalese origins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 45, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, J., 1981. An Historical Relation of Ceylon. Colombo: Gunasena & Co..Google Scholar
Lal, B.B., 1960. From the megalithic to the Harappan: tracing back the graffiti on the pottery. Ancient India 16, 4–24.Google Scholar
Lukacs, J.R. & Kennedy, K.A.R., 1981. Biological anthropology of human remains from Pomparippu. Ancient Ceylon 4, 97–142.Google Scholar
Mahavamsa, , 1950. Translated by Geiger, W.. The Mahavamsa. Colombo: Ceylon Government Information Department.Google Scholar
Paranavitana, S., 1956. Sigiri Graffiti, 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paranavitana, S., 1970. Inscriptions of Ceylon, 1. Colombo: Archaeological Survey of Ceylon.Google Scholar
Parpola, A., 1995. Deciphering the Indus Script. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ragupathy, P., 1987. Early Settlement in Jaffna: an Archaeo-logical Survey. Madras: Ragupathy.Google Scholar
Raman, V., 1988. Excavations at Uraiyur (Tiruchirappalli) 1965–69. Madras: University of Madras.Google Scholar
Ratnayake, H., 1984. Jetavanaramaya Project, Anuradhapura. Colombo: Central Cultural Fund.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A.C., 1987. Archaeology and Language. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Robinson, F. (ed.), 1989. Vie Cambridge Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roychoudhury, A.K., 1984. Genetic relationships between Indian populations and their neighbours, in The People of South Asia: the Biological Anthropology of India, Pakistan and Nepal, ed. Lukacs, J.R.. New York (NY): Plenum Press, 283–293.Google Scholar
Seneviratne, S., 1984. The archaeology of the megalithic black and red ware complex in Sri Lanka. Ancient Ceylon 5, 237–307.Google Scholar
Seneviratne, S., 1992. Pre-state chieftains and servants of the state: a case study of Parumaka. The Sri Lanka Journal of the Humanities XV(1 & 2), 99–131.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1988. Review of Archaeology and Language. Current Anthropology 29(3), 458–63.Google Scholar
Sircar, D.C., 1965. Indian Epigraphy. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Stein, M.A., 1903. Sand-buried Ruins of Khotan. London: Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P.J., 1986. A computer program for radiocarbon age calculation. Radiocarbon 28, 1022–30.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, R., 1964. Salihundam: a Buddhist Site in Andhra Pradesh. Hyderabad: Government of Andhra Pradesh.Google Scholar
Thapar, R., 1961. Asoka and the Decline of the Mauryas. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M., 1946. Arikamedu: an Indo-Roman trading-station on the east coast of India. Ancient India 2, 17–124.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M., 1948. Brahmagiri and Chandravalli 1947: megalithic and other cultures in Mysore state. Ancient India 4, 180–310.Google Scholar
Winternitz, M., 1927. A History of Indian Literature, vol. 1. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.Google Scholar
Yazdani, G., 1917. Megalithic remains of the Deccan — a new feature of them. Journal of the Hyderabad Archaeological Society 7, 56–79.Google Scholar