Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T09:27:50.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Limits of Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2009

Philip Duke
Philip Duke
Affiliation:
Center of Southwest Studies, Fort Lewis College, Durango, CO 81301-3999, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , April 1999 , pp. 152 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonnichsen, R., 1977. Models for Deriving Cultural Information from Stone Tools. (Mercury Series, Archaeological Survey of Canada, paper 60.) Ottawa: National Museum of Man.Google Scholar
Cordell, L.S. & Plog, F., 1979. Escaping the confines of normative thought. American Antiquity 44, 405–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, E.S. & Jarman, M.R., 1975. Palaeoeconomy, in Palaeoeconomy, ed. Higgs, E.S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, page nos??.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. & Orton, C., 1976. Spatial Analysis in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, S., 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trigger, B., 1984. Archaeology at the crossroads: what's new? Annual Review of Anthropology 13, 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar