Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:45:55.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The La Marche Antler Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Alexander Marshack  and
Francesco d'Errico
Alexander Marshack
Affiliation:
Peabody Museum of Archaeology and EthnologyHarvard University11 Divinity Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Francesco d'Errico
Affiliation:
UMR 9933 of the CNRSInstitut du QuaternaireAvenue des Facultès 33405 Talence, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the last issue of the Cambridge Archaeological Journal (Vol. 5:2, October 1995) Francesco d'Errico presented a new analysis of the La Marche antler, one of the most intriguing examples of Palaeolithic ‘notation’. That article has stimulated the following response from Alexander Marshack, who for many years has been a leading researcher in this field. On p. 111 below, Francesco d'Errico replies to Marshack's critique.

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , April 1996 , pp. 99 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramova, Z.A., 1967. Paleolithic art in the U.S.S.R. Arctic Anthropology 4(2), 1–179.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F., 1989a. A reply to Alexander Marshack. Current Anthropology 30(4), 495–500.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F., 1989b. L'Art Gravé Azilien. Analyse microscopique, reconstitution gestuelle, signification. Ph.D thesis, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle à l'lnstitut de Paléontologie Humaine.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F., 1992a. A reply to Alexander Marshack. Rock Art Research 9(1), 59–64.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F. 1992b. Technology, motion, and the meaning of Epipaleolithic art. Current Anthropology 33(1), 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Errico, F., 1993a. Identification des traces de manipulation, suspension, polissage sur l'art mobilier en os, bois de cervidés, ivoire, in Traces et fonction: les gestes retrouvés. (ERAUL 50.) Liège: ERAUL, 177–88.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F., 1993b. La vie sociale de l'art mobilier paléolithique. Manipulation, transport, suspension des objets en os, bois de cervidés, ivoire. Oxford journal of Archaeology 12(2), 145–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Errico, F., 1994. L'Art Gravé Azilien: de la Technique à la Signification. (XXXIe supplément à Gallia Préhistoire.) Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F., 1995. A new model and its implications for the origins of writing: the La Marche antler revisited. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 5(2), 163–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Errico, F., 1996. Comment to: James Elkins, On the impossibility of close reading. The case of Alexander Marshack. Current Anthropology 37(2), 207–8.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F. & Cacho, C., 1994. Notation versus decoration in the Upper Palaeolithic. A case-study from Tossal de la Roca (Alicante, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science 21(2), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glory, A., 1979. Drawings, in Lascaux Inconnu, eds. Leroi-Gourhan, A. & Allain, J.. (XIIe supplément à Gallia Préhistoire.) Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Gvozdover, M., 1995. Art of the Mammoth Hunters: the Finds from Avdeevo. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P., 1981. Nuova serie di graffiti e segni vari paleolitici del Riparo Tagliente a Stallavena nei Monte Lessini (Verona. Italia). Bollettino del Museo Civico St. Natur. VII.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P., 1988. Art paléolithique mobilier et pariétal en Italie. L'Anthropologie 92(1), 139–202.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P., 1989. Sacralità Arte e Grafia Paleolitiche: Splendori e Problemi. Trieste: Museo Civico di Storia Natural di Trieste.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1972a. The Roots of Civilization. New York (NY): McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1972b. Upper Paleolithic notation and symbol. Science 178, 817–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshack, A., 1975. Exploring the mind of Ice Age man. National Geographic 147(1), 62–89.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1979. Upper Paleolithic symbol systems of the Russian Plain: cognitive and comparative analysis of complex ritual marking. Current Anthropology 20(2), 271–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A., 1991a. The Roots of Civilization. 2nd edition, revised and enlarged. Mt Kisco (NY): Moyer Bell Ltd.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1991b. The Taï plaque and calendrical notation in the Upper Palaeolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1(1), 25–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A., 1995a. Methodology and the search for notation among engraved pebbles of the European late Palaeolithic. Review of F. d'Errico, 1994, ‘L'Art gravé azilien: de la technique à la signification’. Antiquity 69, 1049–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A., 1995b. Images of the Ice Age. Archaeology 40(4), 28–39.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1996a. A commentary on Leroy McDermott's Self-representation in Upper Paleolithic female figurines. Current Anthropology 37(2), 259–62.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1996b. Oküzini: Variabilité de catégorie dans l'imagerie symbolique, in ‘Fouilles à Öküzini un site Paléolithique Final au Sud de la Turquie’, eds. Yalçinkaya, I. et al. L'Anthropologie 100(4), 586–94.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1996c. Paleolithic image-making and symboling in Europe and the Middle East: a comparative study, in Beyond Art: Pleistocene Image and Symbol, eds. Conkey, M.W., Soffer, O. & Stratmann, D.. Berkeley & San Francisco (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1996d. A commentary and response to James Elkins' On the impossibility of close reading. Current Anthropology 37(2), 211–14.Google Scholar
Palès, L., 1989. Les Gravures de La Marche. IV – Cervidés, Mammouths et divers. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Palès, L. & de St Péreuse, M.T., 1981. Les Gravures del La Marche: Equidés et Bovidés. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Semenov, S.A., 1964. Prehistoric Technology. London: Adams & Mackay.Google Scholar