The idea of images as agents
Investigators working in a number of different fields have argued that seeing images has a direct effect on people's minds and on their actions (e.g. Freedberg Reference Freedberg1989; Gell Reference Gell, Coote and Shelton1992; Reference Gell1998; Giles Reference Giles, Garrow, Gosden and Hill2008, 6, 70, 205; 2012; Gosden Reference Gosden2005; Gregory Reference Gregory1998; Malafouris Reference Malafouris2013; Mitchell Reference Mitchell2005; Morphy Reference Morphy2009; Olivier Reference Olivier, Nimura, Chittock, Hommel and Gosden2020a,Reference Olivier, Martin and Morrisonb; Osborne Reference Osborne2018; Osborne & Tanner Reference Osborne and Tanner2007; Stafford Reference Stafford2007; Wexler Reference Wexler2006). Just as national flags can drive people to patriotic fervour, and emblems of schools and of athletic teams can induce those who identify with them to aggressive action, people can respond emotionally to images to such an extent that they are driven to act upon their responses.
Historical and ethnographic cases provide good examples. In a case documented by both archaeological and textual evidence, Robin Osborne argues (2018) that changes in subject matter and style during the fifth century bce in the character of images painted on Attic pottery acted on the beliefs, feelings and thoughts of people in ancient Greece. In his recent study of the arts of Oceania, Nicholas Thomas (Reference Thomas2018, 99) notes how images of eyes are thought to provide protection to warriors. Küchler and Carroll (Reference Küchler and Carroll2020, 134–6) write of how people ascribe agency to images and objects for fostering action. In a striking modern American ethnographic example, in her book Read My Pins (Reference Albright2009), former United States Secretary of State Madeleine Albright explains in detail why she selected specific images to elicit the responses she sought from the diplomats with whom she was meeting.
The theme of agency as it can be understood specifically in relation to archaeology has been developed by Dobres and Robb (Reference Dobres and Robb2000), by Jones and Boivin (Reference Jones, Boivin, Hicks and Beaudry2010), by Robb (Reference Robb2010), by Dobres (Reference Dobres and Smith2014) and by Vedeler (Reference Vedeler, Glørstad, Kirstoffersen, Røstad and Vedeler2018) (see also Barrett Reference Barrett2022, 112). As these authors indicate, the word ‘agency’ can be understood in a number of different ways. This paper suggests one application of the concept within the field of prehistoric archaeology. With regard specifically to imagery in Iron Age Europe, Garrow and Gosden (Reference Garrow and Gosden2012, 305, 311) note that decorated metalwork played active roles in society. This paper explores one specific context within the archaeology of the European Iron Age.
Early Celtic art
I use the term ‘Celtic art’ because it is common in popular discourse about the distinctive imagery and design fashioned during the Early La Tène Period (450–350 bce). ‘Celtic’ is a problematic name (Pope Reference Pope2022; Wells Reference Wells1995; Reference Wells2001), but it is convenient as a designation for the people of the central regions of Iron Age Europe. ‘Art’ is also a problematic term, because it comes loaded with assumptions. This paper is not intended to explore these terms crticially, but to use them as shorthand for discussing the imagery and design elements of the Early La Tène period in the central and western regions of Europe (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Map showing locations of sites mentioned in the text. The large circle labelled Hohenasperg indicates also the nearby locations of the sites of Hirschlanden, Hochdorf and Nebringen. The circle labelled Mont Lassois indicates also the location of Vix.
A major constituent of this art is imagery—images of human-like faces and occasionally whole bodies; images of animals, both real and imaginary (Frey Reference Frey2013, 33, 47-48); and images of ‘hybrids’—creatures fashioned from the parts of different animals (Guggisberg Reference Guggisberg2000; Olivier Reference Olivier, Nimura, Chittock, Hommel and Gosden2020a), sometimes combining human and animal forms (Aldhouse-Green Reference Aldhouse-Green2021). It is accompanied by certain design elements such as spirals, S-curves and formlines. This highly distinctive art was developed relatively suddenly during the fifth century bce, and it occurs on objects in specific kinds of contexts that will be explored below. This art is very different from art and designs that preceded it, and it appeared at a time when major cultural changes were under way.
There has been a surge recently in interest in the art and imagery in later prehistoric Europe (e.g. Bagley Reference Bagley2013; Reference Bagley2014; Bagley & Schumann Reference Bagley, Schumann, Karl and Leskovar2013; Farley & Hunter Reference Farley and Hunter2015; Gosden et al. Reference Gosden, Crawford and Ulmschneider2014; Guggisberg Reference Guggisberg2000; Reference Guggisberg, Counts and Arnold2010; Reference Guggisberg, Haselgrove, Rebay-Salisbury and Wells2018; Hess Reference Hess2015a,Reference Hess, Karl and Leskovarb; Joy Reference Joy2010; Reference Joy2019; Reference Joy, Nimura, Chittock, Hommel and Gosden2020; Kruta Reference Kruta and Bradford2015; Nebelsick Reference Nebelsick, Nessel and Nebelsick2022; Nortmann Reference Nortmann2016; Olivier Reference Olivier, Nimura, Chittock, Hommel and Gosden2020a,Reference Olivier, Martin and Morrisonb; Robb Reference Robb2015; Reference Robb2020; Romankiewicz Reference Romankiewicz2020; Wells Reference Wells2012; Reference Wells2017; Reference Wells, Nimura, Chittock, Hommel and Gosden2020a; Wendling Reference Wendling, Kastler, Lang and Wendling2018). The different studies pursue diverse approaches to images and representation. In this paper I develop just one approach to imagery and design in Early Celtic art, the fundamental characteristics of which were outlined by Paul Jacobsthal in 1944 and expanded and refined by J.V.S. Megaw in a series of publications since 1970. The idea that I shall argue is that the imagery of the art of the late fifth and early fourth centuries bce in the central regions of temperate Europe served to stimulate people, specifically elites of the societies, to engage in aggressive commercial and military expansion into the larger world of Eurasia. From the fifth century bce on, societies of temperate Europe played a much more active role in world affairs than they had before. The power of the style that emerged in the fifth century bce is evident in its maintenance and development throughout the four centuries before the Roman conquests, to be revived in the early medieval period (Goldberg Reference Goldberg, Farley and Hunter2015), persisting through the late medieval centuries (Pulliam Reference Pulliam, Farley and Hunter2015), and thriving into modern times in the popular arts of Ireland, Scotland, and other places (Fowle Reference Fowle, Farley and Hunter2015).
Examples
The new style appears primarily on a limited number of types of objects—most frequently on personal ornaments (jewellery) made of gold, ornate bronze feasting vessels (mostly jugs for pouring liquid) and weapons (especially bronze sword scabbards). In its earliest manifestations, between about 450 and 350 bce, the new style was largely restricted to elite contexts, specifically to objects placed in richly outfitted burials believed to be those of elite members of Iron Age society. A number of exceptionally ornate bronze fibulae also bear Early La Tène ornament (e.g. Baitinger & Pinsker Reference Baitinger, Pinsker, Baitinger and Pinsker2002a, 284–90; Binding Reference Binding1993).
As examples of the new style, I present here six objects, all characteristic of this style. They are all complex objects, and my discussion focuses on the aspects important for my argument.
ERSTFELD NECKRING 3 (Fig. 2). Largest external width 17.5 cm (Guggisberg Reference Guggisberg2000; Reference Guggisberg and Müller2009a, 199 fig. 265; 2010; Megaw & Megaw Reference Megaw and Megaw1989, 93). This ring, like the other three gold neckrings from Erstfeld, bears complex decoration over about two-thirds of the object. Eight figures are distinguishable on the ring. On either side of the opening is a highly stylized human-like figure with bulbous eyes and large nose, with detailed hatching on what seems to be a garment on the torso. The two figures are facing away from the opening. Each one grasps a bird-like creature of almost the same size as the human-like creatures. These have the long pointed beaks of birds of prey. They are ornamented with hatching patterns. The opening of the ring is bordered by great bulbous forms, and underneath them are downward-facing creatures which look more human than anything else, but are highly stylized with bulbous eyes and only parts of bodies. They have hands that reach backwards to grasp parts that connect to the first stylized human-like creatures. At the other end of the decoration on the ring from the opening are heads of what appear to be deer, with eyes, ears and snouts represented. Further along the ring on each side are sections of ornament with fine hatching and with palmettes.
Figure 2. Erstfeld neckring. Largest external width 17.5 cm. Schweizerisches Nationalmuseum, A-52046.
A noteworthy aspect is the representation of violence in the apparent conflict between the anthropoid figures and the large birds with their long pointed bills shown stabbing at the faces of the human-like figures. Guggisberg (Reference Guggisberg, Counts and Arnold2010, 226–7, 231) notes that the anthropomorphic figures are shown wearing helmets and armour, themes referring to warfare.
REINHEIM NECKRING (Fig. 3). External width 14.2 cm (Echt Reference Echt1999; Keller Reference Keller1965; Reinhard Reference Reinhard2004). The two ends of the ring have bulbous knobs similar to those on the Erstfeld ring. Below the knobs are human-like faces, which Echt (Reference Echt1999) identifies as those of women (Frey Reference Frey and Hourihane2004, 37), and just above them are heads of birds of prey, characterized by downward-pointing sharp beaks. Especially viewed from the side, the bird heads can be seen as parts of helmets on the women's heads (best seen in Echt Reference Echt1999, pl. 1). Under the bulbs are faces, gazing downward, that look partly human, partly animal. Megaw & Megaw (Reference Megaw and Megaw1989, 91) identify the faces as those of owls; Guggisberg (Reference Guggisberg and Müller2009b, 194) suggests lions. All of these creatures are predatory animals, referring to violence. The ornament is enriched with hatching. Echt suggests the Greek goddess Athena as a possible model for the helmeted females.
Figure 3. Reinheim neckring. External width 14.2 cm. (Erich Lessing/Art Resource, NY.)
GLAUBERG I FIBULA (Fig. 4). Length 6.4 cm (Baitinger & Pinsker Reference Baitinger, Pinsker, Baitinger and Pinsker2002b, 250 fig. 243). The main part of the bronze fibula from grave 1 at the Glauberg consists of an unreal creature with the body and head of what could be a horse or a dog, with a long tail, a small wing, and a very human-looking head, with a beard, projecting from the lower part of its back. The horse or dog has its head turned backward (a feature common to creatures represented in Early La Tène art), viewing what seems to be a captive human, suggesting violence between the different beings represented here. Extensive use of hatching draws and holds the attention of the viewer. At the head end of the fibula is an openwork plaque with what appear to be two highly stylized horses, their heads facing outward. On the two ends of the iron axle are spherical coral beads.
Figure 4. Glauberg fibula. Length 6.4 cm. (Photograph: Pavel Odvody/Keltenwelt am Glauberg.)
WEISKIRCHEN I BELT PLAQUE (Fig. 5). Width 7.5 cm (Müller Reference Müller and Müller2009a, 189 fig. 250). Attached to the belt hook is a cast bronze plaque bearing clear images of five creatures and, according to one reading of the object, a ‘hidden’ sixth image (Müller Reference Müller and Müller2009a, 189 fig. 250). The central and dominant image is that of a typical Early La Tène face, often called a mask, of roughly human character. The mask has bulbous eyes, a reduced chin, and on top of the head two S-scrolls. On either side of the mask are pairs of creatures, usually identified as sphinxes, apparently mammals with wings, all with their heads turned backward looking over their backs. The image suggests a captive anthropomorphic figure (as on the Glauberg fibula), guarded on both sides by these sphinxes. Just below the mask are coral insets of irregular shapes, in which Müller (Reference Müller and Müller2009a, 188 fig. 249) sees a ‘hidden’ figure of a human. Below all of these figures are two rows of inset coral pieces. Hatching on all of the creatures serves to attract and hold the viewer's attention.
Figure 5. Weiskirchen 1 belt plaque. Width 7.5 cm. Inv.1939,45b © GDKE/Rheinisches Landesmuseum Trier. (Photograph: Th. Zühmer.)
DÜRRNBERG JUG (Fig. 6). Height 45.8 cm (Frey Reference Frey, Baitinger and Pinsker2002a, 184 fig. 155; 2002b, 195 fig. 174; Hundt Reference Hundt, Moosleitner, Pauli and Penninger1974, pls D-I; Moosleitner Reference Moosleitner, Moosleitner, Pauli and Penninger1974, 77–8). The bronze jug from grave 112 at the Dürrnberg in Austria is of a shape derived from the Etruscan ‘beaked flagons’ (Vorlauf Reference Vorlauf1997) with a fairly narrow body, a handle on one side and spout on the other, and figurative ornament at the base of the handle, on the top of the handle and on the rim. At the base of the handle is a human-like face quite like the mask on the Weiskirchen belt hook plaque. On the top of the handle is a four-legged creature resembling a lion or other large feline, with a human head in its jaws, referencing the theme of violence. On the rim on either side of the top of the handle are very unusual four-legged creatures that resemble anteaters more than anything else, with long snouts and long tails, unlike any actual animals. All of the creatures are decorated with hatching.
Figure 6. Dürrnberg jug. Height 45.8 cm. (© Salzburg Museum, Austria.)
HOCHSCHEID SCABBARD (Fig. 7). Width 4.9 cm (Haffner Reference Haffner1992; Megaw & Megaw Reference Megaw and Megaw1989, 59 fig. 57; Wells Reference Wells2012, 124–5 fig. 29). Incised designs and images cover the surface of this scabbard. Near the base of the scabbard is a pair of open S-curves, and going up the scabbard are five more pairs of open S-curves, with pointed horn-shaped incised forms between each pair. At the top, above these six pairs, are four-legged mammals whose shape echoes the open S-curves. It is not clear what animal they represent, if indeed they were meant to represent any real animal. They could be dogs or wolves, both predatory animals. The important point of this object is the development of the S-form, from an abstract shape at the bottom of the scabbard to a represented creature at the top. A similar transformation from shapes to creatures occurs on the scabbard from Glauberg grave 2, where we see canines emerge from the abstract pattern (Frey Reference Frey, Fernández-Götz and Krausse2016, 377). On the scabbard from Glauberg grave 1, S-curves transition to become birds of prey (Bartel et al. Reference Bartel, Bodis, Bosinski, Baitinger and Pinsker2002, 154–5 fig. 118).
Figure 7. Hochscheid scabbard. Width 4.9 cm. (Hochscheid Schwert © GDKE/Rheinisches Landesmuseum Trier Rek. Lambert Dahm.)
The six objects featured above, as well as many others from the Early La Tène context, embody several different but closely related themes, all of which revolve around the subject of violence. There are scenes of unmistakable violence against humans—the human head in the monster's mouth of the Dürrnberg flagon, the head in the monster's mouth of the Glauberg 1 belt hook (Baitinger & Pinsker Reference Baitinger, Pinsker, Baitinger and Pinsker2002b, 253 fig. 247), the two creatures converging on the human head on the belt hook in Glauberg grave 2 (Baitinger & Pinsker Reference Baitinger, Pinsker, Baitinger and Pinsker2002b, 260 fig. 256). Others represent humans as captive—the human head on the back of the creature of the Glauberg fibula, the human-like face trapped between the sphinxes on the Weiskirchen belt plaque, the human-like head on the foot end of the Parsberg fibula (Megaw & Megaw Reference Megaw and Megaw1989, 66 fig. 67). Others, such as the Erstfeld neckring, show human-like creatures fighting with animals, here raptors as on the Reinheim neckring.
An interpretation of the ideology reflected in these representations is that elites needed to be aggressive in order to fulfill their aims in gaining power and expanding their influence beyond the central regions of Europe. Perhaps their thinking was something along the lines of ‘we inhabit a dangerous, threatening world where conflict is all around us; by presenting these themes in art, using animals as metaphors for human enemies, we prepare ourselves for actions that we must take to aid us in acquiring the power and wealth that we seek through conquest and expansion’. Such ideology would accord well with Livy's account of the expansion of the Gauls (see below).
The question of numbers—how many were there?
How numerous were objects such as these six examples? I have selected these because they exemplify the special features of Early La Tène art—anthropomorphic, animal and hybrid images represented in ways designed to attract visual attention to exceptionally finely crafted personal ornaments, weapons, and vessels. All six were made between about 425 and 380 bce. They are among some 50 known objects (this is a very rough estimate) that are similarly richly decorated and that have been recovered between central France and Slovakia (for overviews of such objects and discussions of chronology, see especially Beilharz et al. Reference Beilharz, Hoppe, Krausse, Müller and von Nicolai2012; Farley & Hunter Reference Farley and Hunter2015; Jacobsthal Reference Jacobsthal1944; Kruta Reference Kruta and Bradford2015; Megaw & Megaw Reference Megaw and Megaw1989; Müller Reference Müller2009b).
The known objects bearing such imagery are only a small fraction of those that once existed. Estimating how many there may have been during the fifth and fourth centuries bce is a useful (but very imprecise) exercise. The majority of richly outfitted burials of this period were looted, many of them in antiquity (Frey Reference Frey, Baitinger and Pinsker2002a, 172). It is likely that many looted objects were melted down, bought by private collectors and otherwise escaped public notice.
Heiko Steuer (Reference Steuer1982, 72) has approached the question of survival and modern discovery of ancient objects in Europe through extensive investigation of both archaeological evidence and written sources for the early medieval period. He provides a useful way of thinking about the question. He estimates that around 1 per cent of the objects that were in use during early medieval times are known today (in museums, published, or otherwise documented). If we use his estimate (of course more objects have been found since Steuer was writing in 1982, but we probably have wider access to early medieval material culture than to that of the fifth and fourth centuries bce), then using my estimate of 50 objects existing today, we can reckon with some 5000 such objects in use during the period 425–380 bce. If we instead use a hypothetical figure of 5 per cent rather than Steuer's 1 per cent, that would posit some 1000 such objects crafted and used. Megaw and Megaw (Reference Megaw and Megaw1989, 87) estimate that more than 500 ornate Early La Tène fibulae have been documented. If we apply Steuer's estimate of 1 per cent, then we can reckon with some 50,000 such fibulae once in use; if we apply the figure of 5 per cent, then some 10,000 in use (see Binding Reference Binding1993 for numerous examples of such fibulae).
Main elements of the style
For the purposes of this paper, I identify three main themes—faces, violence, and transformation—in Early La Tène art, all of which are apparent in the six examples above. All of these examples, and Early La Tène art in general, are based largely on faces (Hess Reference Hess, Karl and Leskovar2015b). Some look anthropomorphic, but none are what we would consider portraits—that is, attempts to portray actual individual persons. They convey instead the idea of human-like, but not actually human. Other faces are those of non-human creatures, many of them hybrids composed of parts of different real creatures.
In many cases, the human-like figures seem to be captive victims of violence. On Erstfeld ring 3, especially the faces underneath on either side of the opening seem to be constrained. On the Glauberg fibula, the human head is unconnected to a body and seems attached helplessly to the back of the horse or dog, and that creature may be gazing back triumphantly at the human head. The horse/dog creature seems very much in control, the human head a powerless captive. On the Weiskirchen belt hook, the central mask is surrounded by the four sphinxes, as if held captive by them. On the top of the handle of the Dürrnberg jug, a human head is held inside the jaws of a predatory creature (a similar scene is on the belt hook from Glauberg grave 1: Baitinger & Pinsker Reference Baitinger, Pinsker, Baitinger and Pinsker2002b, 253 fig. 247).
A third theme is transformation. Any hybrid suggests transformation from one creature to another. The transformation theme is especially clearly represented on the Hochscheid scabbard. From the base of the scabbard upward toward the top, S-curves become ever more like an animal, until at the very top, the S-curves have turned into two four-legged predatory canines.
In all of these examples, specific techniques of representation were used by the craft workers who made them. One is hatching—covering a surface with incised dots or lines. Hatching catches and holds viewers’ attention more than smooth surfaces do (Brett Reference Brett2005; Gibson Reference Gibson1986; Gregory Reference Gregory1998)—it is a technique used to increase the visual attractiveness of an object. Other devices also serve to hold the attention of the viewer. These include spirals, S-shapes, tendrils and palmettes (Fürst et al. Reference Fürst, Schönfelder and Armbruster2021, 75–6 n. 39; Jacobsthal Reference Jacobsthal1944).
All of the representations of humans, animals and hybrids on these examples, and on others, are miniatures—small objects bearing very finely executed details that require close examination to see fully (Bagley & Schumann Reference Bagley, Schumann, Karl and Leskovar2013, 132). Finely crafted miniatures are enchanting and, like hatching, they attract and hold attention (Bailey Reference Bailey2005; Frey Reference Frey, Fernández-Götz and Krausse2016, 377; Kiernan Reference Kiernan2015). As miniatures, they convey meaning in an intensified fashion (Knappett Reference Knappett, Johanssen, Jessen and Jessen2012), and they cause the viewer to ponder and to imagine their relation to the larger real creatures (Martin & Langin-Hooper Reference Martin and Langin-Hooper2018).
The social context of the art and the effectiveness of display
The five objects from graves are all from burials with richer than average assemblages of grave goods and, where the evidence is available, with structures, such as burial chambers and mounds, associated with elites. Other similarly decorated objects have also been recovered from graves that contain the kinds of special items associated with the small group of most privileged individuals in the communities (for overviews of the kinds of objects that characterize the elites of this period, see Müller Reference Müller2009b, 80–104, 184–209).
We get the best sense of how these special objects of the elite were displayed socially from the well-excavated intact burials, such as those of the Glauberg and Reinheim. At the Glauberg, at least one lifesize stone statue marked the location of the grave (it is unclear where other statues represented by fragments were situated), preserving the memory of the individual and of the ritual that was conducted when the individual was buried. The care with which the grave goods were arranged on and around the body gives us a sense of the display enacted for participants.
The ornate gold neckrings in the graves at the Glauberg, Lavau (Dubuis et al. Reference Dubuis, Millet, Riquier, Brun, Chaume and Sacchetti2021; Millet et al. Reference Millet, Dubuis and Bernardet2020) and Reinheim make clear that these rings were indeed worn around the neck, a highly visible place, at least in burial—we do not know how often or on what occasions they were worn during lifetimes. The ornate neckrings cannot have been part of everyday personal ornaments—they would have been uncomfortable to wear for extended periods of time. And they do not show traces of much use. More likely, they were part of personal ornament for special occasions, perhaps comparable to crowns in recent centuries.
Fibulae would also have been worn on clothing, as they are often found on the chest where they would have fastened garments and communicated information about the status of the wearer. Four fibulae had been positioned on the woman's body at Reinheim. But fibulae as complex and heavy as that from Glauberg grave 1 were probably worn only on special occasions, like the gold neckrings.
Ornate scabbards, such as that from Hochscheid (and those from Weiskirchen 1 and Glauberg 1) would have been visible worn on the side of buried warriors, and during warriors’ lifetimes when they removed the swords and displayed the scabbards; similarly for the ornate vessels such as the jugs from the Dürrnberg, from Glauberg grave 1 and from Reinheim—as we know from the grave deposits, these were also the prerogative of elites and were probably displayed and used on occasions of special social and political purpose—feasts (Wells Reference Wellsforthcoming). Again, the minute detail of the images on the bronze vessels would have made them objects of mystery to non-elites, who could perhaps see them from a distance, but probably not up close. We do not have a grave plan for the Dürrnberg jug. But we know that other ornate jugs of this period, such as those in Glauberg 1 and Reinheim, were placed in the grave chambers near the buried individuals. Representations on vessels of the Situla Art provide a good idea of what such feasts were like, and how status was expressed at them (Frey Reference Frey and Bonfante2011; Lucke & Frey Reference Lucke and Frey1962).
The cultural context: Iron Age Europe of the fifth and fourth centuries bce
The development of the new style during the fifth and fourth centuries bce took place principally in the central regions of temperate Europe, from France in the west to Slovakia in the east. During the preceding century, the cultural landscape had been dominated by a number of centres, of which the Heuneburg in southwest Germany (Krausse et al. Reference Krausse, Fernández-Götz, Larsen and Kretschmer2016) and Mont Lassois in eastern France (Chaume et al. Reference Chaume, Mordant and Allag2011) are the most thoroughly researched. Recent investigations at the Heuneburg have revealed that associated with the hilltop settlement were extensive suburbs, and a population as high as 5000 has been suggested for the site. All of the centres, of which some 20 have been studied, show substantial populations; manufacturing in pottery, iron, bronze, gold and other substances; and extensive trade with other regions, notably with Greek and Etruscan societies in the Mediterranean basin. The majority of the population of temperate Europe lived in much smaller communities—villages and farmsteads.
The many cemeteries that have been excavated and studied throughout temperate Europe show a great disparity between the most common graves, with few grave goods, and richly outfitted burials such as those of Hochdorf in southwest Germany (Biel Reference Biel1985) and Vix in eastern France (Brun et al. Reference Brun, Chaume and Sacchetti2021).
Around the middle of the fifth century bce, most of the major centres of the Early Iron Age (known as the Hallstatt Period) declined in activity and importance at the same time that the new art style appeared. In the succeeding Early La Tène period, there do not seem to be centres on the same scale as those of the preceding period (though a few sites such the Glauberg north of Frankfurt—Baitinger & Pinsker Reference Baitinger and Pinsker2002c—may turn out, with future research, to have been similar). Burial evidence is fundamentally like that of the preceding period, but with some changes that will be discussed below. Most burial was by inhumation and with a wide range of burial inventories, from no or very few grave goods to relatively richly outfitted graves, but none as rich in grave goods as the richest of the preceding century (Frey Reference Frey, Baitinger and Pinsker2002a, 175).
We have no direct evidence of workshops at which the objects of Early La Tène art were produced (but see the evidence from the earlier workshop remains at the Hochdorf tumulus: Biel Reference Biel1985, 35–6, 162 fig. 89, pl. 2C). The technical processes involved in the manufacture of the objects are quite well understood (Armbruster Reference Armbruster, Beilharz, Hoppe, Krausse, Müller and von Nicolai2012; Armbruster et al. Reference Armbruster, Nordez, Blet-Lemarquand, Török and Giumlia-Mair2021). Production was most likely carried out on a small scale, with a small number of easily portable tools, including hammers, anvils, chisels and punches, that craftworkers could easily carry with them. We do not know whether most craftworkers operated in fixed workshops or moved from place to place to produce objects for their customers (Megaw & Megaw Reference Megaw and Megaw1990, 90). Guggisberg (Reference Guggisberg2000) and Bagley (Reference Bagley2014, 265–6) raise the question whether more than one craftworker was involved in the manufacture of any specific object. Investigators speculate that the elite consumers provided the raw materials—the gold, bronze and coral—to the craftsworkers (Fischer Reference Fischer1992, 123–4) and directed them in producing what was desired (Bagley & Schumann Reference Bagley, Schumann, Karl and Leskovar2013, 125; Frey Reference Frey, Baitinger and Pinsker2002b, 186). Craftworkers who produced the luxury goods for the elites may have been organized in small groups (Nortmann Reference Nortmann2016, 224) and may have participated in regional networks (Stöllner Reference Stöllner, Jerem, Schönfelder and Wieland2010, 285 n. 17; for an example of networks of Late Bronze Age metal workers identified archaeologically, see Golubiewski-Davis Reference Golubiewski-Davis2018).
Although communities in temperate Europe were in contact and interaction with the literate societies of Greece and Italy, the communities north of the Alps did not adopt the practice of writing until the end of the prehistoric Iron Age, at the time of the Roman conquests some four centuries after the period of concern here. They were ‘oral societies’ in the sense of Walter Ong (Reference Ong1982; Reference Ong and Baumann1986), relying on communication through oral expression and signalling with the use of material objects—an important topic, the details of which are beyond the scope of this paper.
Historical sources, especially the Roman writer Livy, describe invasions by Gauls (Celts) from north of the Alps into Italy, Greece and Anatolia during the fourth century bce. Numerous Greek and Roman writers mention Celtic mercenaries fighting with armies in the lands of the eastern Mediterranean region during the third and second centuries bce. At the same time, there is a marked increase in weapons, especially swords, being placed in burials in temperate Europe. These momentous changes evident in both the Mediterranean texts and the European archaeology were both reflected in and driven by the new art emerging in the late fifth and early fourth centuries bce, as will be seen.
Interpretations of Early Celtic art
Investigators agree that Early La Tène art was a thoroughly new phenomenon in the fifth and fourth centuries bce, very different from what went before and reflecting a new way of thinking (Echt Reference Echt, Fernández-Götz and Krausse2016; Frey Reference Frey2013; Pauli Reference Pauli1975, 209). It constituted a change in what Anders Andrén (Reference Andrén, Schjødt, Lindow and Andrén2020, 166–8) refers to as ‘pictorial conventions’. Different researchers emphasize different aspects of the new style. During the preceding period, the Late Hallstatt, there were relatively few representations of humans and animals, and when they were fashioned, they tended to be naturalistic in appearance. What looks like a horse was meant to be a horse (though what a horse signified to the people of this time was another matter). In the new style, representations of humans and animals were highly stylized, and it is often impossible to determine what animal is signified (Ginoux Reference Ginoux and Pare2012). Many of the animal forms represent hybrids made of parts of different real creatures (Olivier Reference Olivier, Gosden, Crawford and Ulmschneider2014, 52–4), and many are mythological, such as the sphinxes on the Weiskirchen belt plate. Miranda Aldhouse-Green (Reference Aldhouse-Green2021) argues that identity of humans and animals in Early La Tène art was often fluid, as for example on the neckring from Erstfeld.
Rudolf Echt (Reference Echt, Fernández-Götz and Krausse2016) argues that the new style was part of a major change in what he calls self-awareness and self-representation, with individuals increasingly perceiving themselves as separate individuals rather than primarily as parts of larger social groups (see also Frey Reference Frey2013). Frey suggests that Late Hallstatt elites travelled more than their predecessors had done. The abundant imports from Greece, Italy and elsewhere in the greater Mediterranean region indicate the great extent and intensity of these interactions (Mac Sweeney & Wells Reference Mac Sweeney, Wells, Haselgrove, Rebay-Salisbury and Wells2023), and there is every reason to think that European elite individuals were travelling widely during the sixth and fifth centuries bce. Travel would have exposed them to new ideas and worldviews (Wells Reference Wells2012; Reference Wells, Nimura, Chittock, Hommel and Gosden2020a).
Many investigators suggest that Early La Tène art was essentially ‘religious’ in nature (Bagley Reference Bagley2013, 73; Echt Reference Echt, Fernández-Götz and Krausse2016, 354; Frey Reference Frey and Birkhan2007; Guggisberg Reference Guggisberg2000, 239; Hess Reference Hess2015a,Reference Hess, Karl and Leskovarb; Nortmann Reference Nortmann2016, 213; Stöllner Reference Stöllner, Baitinger and Schönfelder2019; Wendling Reference Wendling, Kastler, Lang and Wendling2018), though what exactly ‘religion’ might mean in this context is not elaborated. What we consider religion was probably not a separate category in the minds of Iron Age Europeans, but a product of changes in thinking in the course of the Enlightenment (Brück Reference Brück1999). Some suggest links between imagery of Early La Tène and specific Greek deities known from textual sources (Guggisberg Reference Guggisberg2000; Reference Guggisberg, Counts and Arnold2010; Hatt Reference Hatt and Pauli1980). But caution is in order when attempting to make connections between beliefs and representations of different societies and different periods, as Nortmann (Reference Nortmann2016, 221–2) emphasizes. It is also questionable whether we can apply a modern category—religion—to the ways of life of people who lived 2500 years ago, in societies that left no written information about how they understood their experience.
As seen in the examples above, many of the images in Early La Tène art display violence. The creatures with human heads in their mouths on the belt hook from Glauberg grave 1 and on the Dürrnberg jug have been mentioned above. The birds on the Erstfeld and Reinheim neckrings are birds of prey, characteristic for bird imagery after 400 bce, in contrast to the waterbirds of earlier periods. Jacobson-Tepfer (Reference Jacobson-Tepfer2015) and Kisel (Reference Kisel, Pankova and Simpson2020) both argue that representations such as these often portray metaphorically actual situations within the social and political contexts of the times that they were crafted. In other words, representations of violence are likely to reflect violent conditions at the time that the objects were made. Frey (Reference Frey2013, 41) suggests that strife between humans is metaphorically represented by the conflict between dogs and other predatory animals on the Glauberg 2 scabbard.
This change in worldview is reflected also in changes in burial practices for elites, as noted by Verger (Reference Verger1995; see also Echt Reference Echt, Fernández-Götz and Krausse2016, 266; Wells Reference Wells2012, 131-48). In the late phase of the Early Iron Age tradition (600-450 bce), funerary ritual emphasized the social and political role of the buried individual in the community. An outstanding example is the Magdalenenberg tumulus, in which 126 modestly outfitted burials were arranged concentrically around the richly equipped chamber burial in the centre (Spindler Reference Spindler1976, fig. 16). In the mounds around the Hohenasperg, such as that at Hochdorf (Biel Reference Biel1985, 31 fig. 20), we see a similar situation, with plainer burials arranged around the richly outfittted central chamber tomb.
In the Early La Tène Period, there was no longer the principal emphasis on the elite individual's place in the community. Instead, the elite person was represented as a military hero, as in grave 1 at the Glauberg (Herrmann Reference Herrmann, Baitinger and Pinsker2002, 100 fig. 63), or as a woman in possession of special objects indicative both of wealth and of power to affect the course of events, especially regarding the health and well-being of the community to which she belonged, as in the cases of the graves at Reinheim and Gündlingen (Dehn Reference Dehn1994; Wells Reference Wells2001, 58–60). Elites became ‘entangled’ in this emerging environment of new ideas, designs and objects introduced through the growing interactions, direct and indirect, with communities not just in the Mediterranean Basin, but also further afield, in the Near East, central Asia and beyond (Wells Reference Wells, Nimura, Chittock, Hommel and Gosden2020a).
Interactions between Iron Age communities in temperate Europe and the societies of the Mediterranean Basin that resulted in much sharing and borrowing of motifs and design elements have long been explored, especially by Jacobsthal (Reference Jacobsthal1944) and his successors. With recent field research and publications in the Near East, the steppes of eastern Europe and central Asia, and as far eastward as China, it is becoming apparent that Early La Tène art and design shared important features with the arts and crafts of many different peoples of Eurasia. For examples, see Bunker Reference Bunker, So and Bunker1995; Chugunov Reference Chugunov, Simpson and Pankova2017a,Reference Chugunov, Simpson and Pankovab; Di Cosmo Reference Di Cosmo1994; Falkenhausen Reference Falkenhausen2006; Pare Reference Pare and Pare2012; Reeder Reference Reeder1999; Thote Reference Thote, Fernández-Götz and Krausse2016; Wu Reference Wu2017. For discussion of specific details that link these connections to the development of the Early La Tène style, see Fischer Reference Fischer1993; Wells Reference Wells2012, 200–209; 2020a, 38–41). On other cultural practices that show important connections between the peoples of Early La Tène temperate Europe and other regions of Eurasia, see Cugunov et al. (Reference Cugunov, Parzinger and Nagler2010); Gheyle et al. (Reference Gheyle, Wulf, Dvornikov, Ebel, Goossens, Bourgeois, Henry and Kelp2016); Korolkova (Reference Korolkova, Simpson and Pankova2017); Thote (Reference Thote, Whitfield and Wang2000; Reference Thote, Fernández-Götz and Krausse2016); Wright et al. (Reference Wright, Honeychurch and Amartuvshin2009).
A new approach to Early Celtic art: art as agent
The changes in the style and subject matter of crafted objects illustrate these social and ideological changes but, more important for the purpose of this paper, the new motifs and designs of crafted objects contributed to the enactment of those changes. As pointed out above, art, representation and design are not just passive reflections of changes, but they are active drivers of change. John Barrett's ideas (2022, 111) about the embodiment of relationships between humans and their material culture is relevant here. The important point is that some elites developed intense (‘embodied’) relations with the objects that expressed the new motifs relating to aggression and violence. Some of these were objects of personal expression tied to individuals (neckrings, bracelets, fibulae, swords and their scabbards), others were objects of social expression (bronze vessels designed for use in feasts). In Early La Tène Europe, at a time when communities became much more intensively exposed to new ideas of design and subject matter through the growing interactions with other parts of Eurasia (Jacobsthal Reference Jacobsthal1944, 32–6, 156–60; Wells Reference Wells, Nimura, Chittock, Hommel and Gosden2020a), some emerging elites and the craftworkers who made things for them adopted the new stylistic ideas and created the phenomenon we know as ‘Early La Tène art’ (or ‘Early Celtic art’).
This new style and subject matter, expressed on personal ornaments, fine bronze feasting vessels and weapons, offered elites a new medium through which to express identity and a new way of thinking about who they were; how they related to their communities, their society, and the wider world; and a new ideology of aggression and military activity. With the other ongoing changes (see above), the opportunity to forge a new kind of identity based on a whole new understanding of the world and seeing new opportunities to expand their status, power and wealth led to the spread of the new style and the joining of new elites across much of Europe to the new designs and themes. The design features that were developed in western and central Europe during the fifth century bce spread during the following centuries all over Europe (Farley & Hunter Reference Farley and Hunter2015; Jacobsthal Reference Jacobsthal1944).
The representations on personal ornaments, scabbards and bronze vessels signalled to viewers the new aggressive ideology that emerged in the Early La Tène period. The monstrous creature with the human(-like) head stuck on its back on the Glauberg fibula, the human(-like) head under the threatening pointed beak of the raptor on the Reinheim neckring, the creature with the human head in its jaws at the top of the handle of the Dürrnberg flagon, all remind the viewer of the dangers in the world and of the need to overcome threatened danger through force. On personal ornaments, these visual signals attest to the adherence of the individual wearer to the new aggressive ideology; on objects used in social contexts, such as the flagons, they attest to the commitment of the community to this ideology. The persons wearing the Glauberg fibula, the Reinheim neckring, the belthook from grave 2 at the Glauberg, and other personal ornaments bearing images of actual or potential violence, were communicating and thus promoting this new set of attitudes. Wearing these objects made the wearers feel that they were active members of the elite groups that were undertaking aggressive actions in lands to the south and the southeast. The aggressive scenes on the scabbards such as those in Glauberg graves 1 and 2 served both to promote the ideology and to imbue the swords with added force and effectiveness in pursuing the aggressive policy. (All of these signs and signals were largely restricted to the elite individuals in Early La Tène society.)
To summarize my argument: the new style was actively created and developed by members of society who were able to command the work of craft specialists to produce objects with which they could express their new understandings of their relation to the world in which they lived and the new ideology that involved agression and military violence. The opportunity was presented by the exposure to new design elements and motifs through expanding interactions with other parts of Eurasia, and by the decline in the fortunes of the old traditional elites at the centres such as the Heuneburg. The new representations on neckrings such as those from Erstfeld and Reinheim, on weapons such as the scabbards from Weiskirchen and Hochscheid, and on vessels such as those from Glauberg 1 and Basse-Yutz, were thus used to communicate both to privileged individuals who had direct access to these objects and to others who saw and marvelled at them that a new way of understanding the social and natural world was emerging, and with it a new dynamic of aggression and expansion.
Eurasia-wide changes, fifth–fourth centuries bce
The fifth century bce was a time of profound cultural change throughout Eurasia, what Jan Assmann (Reference Assmann, Fernández-Götz and Krausse2016, 183) refers to as ‘a global intellectual revolution.’ The middle of the final millennium bce was the time that the historian-philosopher Karl Jaspers ([Reference Jaspers1949] 1953) named the Axial Age for developments in religion and philosophy in different parts of Eurasia—in Greece, Israel, Persia, India and China (Baumard et al. Reference Baumard, Hyafil and Boyer2015; Bellah & Joas Reference Bellah and Joas2012; Gregersen Reference Gregersen2017; on how archaeology fits into this wider perspective, see Riva & Mira Reference Riva and Mira2022; Stoddart Reference Stoddart2022). In commerce, during the middle of the millennium, historians including Christopher Ehret (Reference Ehret2002, 162–4) argue that in the greater Mediterranean world, a shift took place from trade being under the control of kings and other potentates to commerce becoming controlled by individual merchants working for their own gain (see also Fletcher Reference Fletcher2012; Hodos Reference Hodos2009; Reference Hodos2020, 96). Around this time coinage came into use, first in the Mediterranean world, in China and in India. Jan Lucassen (Reference Lucassen2021, 116–48) argues that the growing use of coins contributed to the expansion of market economies throughout much of Eurasia. At the same time, communities across Eurasia began sharing similar kinds of art and design (Wells Reference Wells2012, 204–5; 2020a). Laurent Olivier notes (Reference Olivier, Nimura, Chittock, Hommel and Gosden2020a, 106–8; Reference Olivier, Martin and Morrison2020b, 24) that similar kinds of symbolism developed in both temperate Europe and China (see also Andreeva Reference Andreeva2023; Juliano Reference Juliano, Linduff and Rubinson2018; O'Sullivan & Hommel Reference O'Sullivan, Hommel, Nimura, Chittock, Hommel and Gosden2020; Pare Reference Pare and Pare2012).
Greek and Roman writers on Celtic expansion
In treatments of the ‘expansion’ of the Celts during the fifth and fourth centuries bce, several historical processes noted and described by Greek and Roman writers are ordinarily treated as separate occurrences. One is the ‘invasion’ of or ‘migration’ to, depending on interpretations, by Celts (or ‘Gauls’) across the Alps into Italy and on to Rome, recounted by Livy. Another is the movement of Celts into Greece and attacking of Delphi, and moving on into Anatolia. Another is the recruitment of Celtic warriors by representatives of potentates in the lands of the eastern Mediterranean to serve as mercenaries in armies fighting in Greece, southern Italy, Sicily, Anatolia, Syria and Egypt. I suggest that we can understand these processes as related instances of expansion, and increasing militarism, on the part of the people called Celts and Gauls, and that the images in La Tène art can be understood both as a reflection (for us investigators) and as agents (for the elites of the time and their followers) in relation to these processes.
Images, aggression, and the archaeology of expansion
The new images of Early Celtic Art, with their emphasis on scenes of violence and representations of animals and hybrids associated with aggression (birds of prey, bulls, rams, canines) expressed and drove a new, increasingly aggressive and expansionist ideology on the part of the elites of temperate Europe. This new ideology was a factor in increasing militarism and the symbolism associated with it, in invasions of lands to the south and southeast, and in migration to those regions.
Imagery provided a series of models for elites, who commissioned the objects of Early La Tène art, for the new ways of thinking (Echt Reference Echt, Fernández-Götz and Krausse2016; Frey Reference Frey and Hourihane2004; Reference Frey2013) that included a new drive for expansion, conquests and acquisition of new settlement lands. The movements of the Celtic groups were portrayed as violent and aggressive by the Classical writers, and in many cases they surely were. But they also involved settlements of new lands in Italy, eastern Europe and Anatolia (Darbyshire et al. Reference Darbyshire, Mitchell and Vardar2000), and probably other places that were unobserved by the Classical writers and that have as yet escaped the notice of archaeologists— perhaps lands further to the east, where material evidence of them has not yet been identified.
The main point of this paper is to argue that the imagery of the Early La Tène period not only reflects major changes in mentality and society, specifically among the elites of Iron Age Europe, but actually caused changes in thinking and in behaviour. This is a complex issue with many ramifications. In this short paper, I briefly explore three. All three were parts of the same processes, but they are ordinarily represented as distinct events because of the way they were portrayed by Greek and Roman writers. The new images of Early Celtic Art, with their emphasis on scenes of violence and its results, as well as representations of animals and hybrids associated with aggression, expressed and drove this new, increasingly aggressive and expansionist ideology on the part of the elites of temperate Europe.
Migrations into Italy
One expression of the new aggressive attitudes fostered at least in part by the new imagery of the Early La Tène Period was expeditions mounted to other parts of Europe and to the greater Mediterranean world during the fourth and third centuries bce. The Roman historian Livy (59 bce–ce 17), writing in the final decades of the final century bce, described in some detail invasions (or migrations, depending upon the interpretations of modern scholars) by groups whom he called Gauls from north of the Alps across the mountains into the Po Plain of northern Italy. Some groups continued southward down the peninsula to Rome and beyond. Though Livy was writing centuries after the events he described, he included considerable detail, naming specific passes through the mountains and even providing the names of some of the Gallic leaders (for recent discussion, see Colonna Reference Colonna and Piana Agnostinetti2017; Roncaglia Reference Roncaglia2018, 16–17). While there is debate about details of the character and the chronology of these incursions described by Livy (see e.g. Lejars Reference Lejars2020; Pare Reference Pare1991, 196), they are consistent with the description by the Greek writer Polybius (Hist. 2, 17) written in the second century bce of Celtic inhabitants of Italy (Vitali Reference Vitali, Marzatico and Gleirscherpp2004a).
The archaeological evidence in Italy shows strong connections to communities north of the Alps, consistent with what we would expect from Livy's account, however we might interpret it in detail. The archaeological evidence indicates that these movements, whether military invasions, peaceful migrations, or most likely a variety of mechanisms, happened at just the time that the new style of representation appeared in temperate Europe. Burial practices in some of the cemeteries in northern Italy indicate strongly the presence of settlers from the north (Vitali Reference Vitali, Agusta-Boularot and Lafon2004b; Reference Vitali and Schönfelder2010). Swords and other weapons similarly indicate links (Frey Reference Frey and Green1995; Lejars & Bernardet Reference Lejars and Bernardet2015), as do fibulae of types made north of the Alps (De Marinis Reference De Marinis, Beilharz, Hoppe, Krausse, Müller and von Nicolai2012). The flourishing of La Tène style design on many objects further attests to those connections (Vitali Reference Vitali and Schönfelder2010), perhaps produced by craftworkers who were among the migrants from the north (Vitali & Kaenel Reference Vitali and Kaenel2000).
The prevalence of weapons of northern style, especially swords, among the indicators of arrival in Italy underscores the link between the new style of representation and increased aggression on the part of the elites of temperate Europe and their followers. Fitzpatrick (Reference Fitzpatrick, Haselgrove, Rebay-Salisbury and Wells2023, 1151) notes that in some of the cemeteries in northern Italy of the period 350–330 bce, some 40 per cent of the graves contain weapons. Livy's account of the attack on Rome in 387 bce further underscores the aggressive actions undertaken at the time of the appearance of the new style.
The Celtic invasions and/or migrations to Italy at the start of the fourth century bce had a great impact on the societies in Italy and beyond. A distinctive ‘Italo-Celtic’ culture emerged in Italy (Polybius; Lejars Reference Lejars and Szabo2006; Prosdocimi Reference Prosdocimi and Vitali1987), and the Celtic presence was of great importance down to the Roman imperial period. Historians have suggested that it was the sacking of Rome in 387 bce that played an important part in Rome's determination to establish a secure frontier to prevent further invasions, one of the reasons for the conquests and expansion of the Roman Empire.
Movements into Eastern Europe, Greece, Anatolia
Beginning in the early fourth century bce, at the same time that Celtic groups were invading Italy, Greek and Roman written sources, including works by Herodotus, Xenophon and other writers, also attest to them in eastern and southeastern Europe (Guštin & Jevtić Reference Guštin and Jevtić2011; Rustoiu & Berecki Reference Rustoiu, Berecki and Berecki2014), invading Greece (Rapin Reference Rapin and Charpy1995), and in some cases moving on to Anatolia (modern Turkey) (for modern discussion, see Bouzek Reference Bouzek, Gosden, Crawford and Ulmscheider2014; Mitchell Reference Mitchell1993; Müller-Karpe Reference Müller-Karpe and Szabo2006; Schönfelder Reference Schönfelder2007; Szabó Reference Szabó, Moscati, Frey, Kruta, Raftery and Szabó1991; Reference Szabó and Charpy1995; Reference Szabó and Szabo2006) and possibly further east into central Asia (Sims-Williams Reference Sims-Williams2006, 299).
These migrations had a large military component (see below). Celtic-style weapons appear in large numbers in graves of the fourth century bce in Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania and neighbouring countries (Rustoiu Reference Rustoiu, Guštin and Jevtić2011; Szabó Reference Szabó2014). Rustoiu (Reference Rustoiu2006) cites the much discussed grave at Ciumesi in Romania that contained the famous helmet with a bird of prey on top, along with a Celtic-style sword and La Tène ornaments. Rustoiu suggests that the person buried here was a chieftain of a Celtic contingent, and that his greaves were made specifically for him in Greece (since they had to be crafted for a specific individual's legs). This link with Greece leads to discussion of the role of Celtic mercenaries in Greece and other lands of the eastern Mediterranean. Rustoiu (Reference Rustoiu2006, 56) proposes that recruiters were sent to temperate Europe by the monarchs of the Mediterranean world to enlist young men to join the armies of those lands, promising riches in exchange for their military service. The results may account for the influx of wealth into Europe during these centuries.
We shall be able to learn a great deal more about these movements into Italy, eastern Europe and Anatolia when more results from isotope and aDNA analyses become available. So far, a number of such studies offer tantalizing but limited results (e.g. Cicolani & Zamboni Reference Cicolani, Zamboni, Fernández-Götz, Nimura, Stockhammer and Cartwright2022; Fitzpatrick Reference Fitzpatrick, Haselgrove, Rebay-Salisbury and Wells2023; Gori & Abar Reference Gori, Abar, Fernández-Götz, Nimura, Stockhammer and Cartwright2022; Günther & Jakobsson Reference Günther and Jakobsson2016; Hauschild et al. Reference Hauschild, Pare, Alt, Knipper, Scheeres and Schönfelder2013; Scheeres et al. Reference Scheeres, Knipper and Hauschild2013). As larger samples are analysed from more relevant locations, results will aid in developing a more detailed picture of these movements during the fifth, fourthand third centuries bce.
Mercenary service
Mercenary service by soldiers identified in the written sources as Celts is another example of the expression of increased aggression on the part of elites in fourth-century bce Europe (Baray Reference Baray2017a,Reference Barayb; Griffith Reference Griffith1935; Strobel Reference Strobel1996). Although many ancient writers refer to Celts or Gauls in the service of armies fighting in Italy, Sicily, North Africa, Greece, Asia Minor, Egypt and other places (Adam & Fichtl Reference Adam, Fichtl, Couvenhes, Crouzet and Péré-Noguès2011), we do not have much detailed information about exactly where they came from or about their terms of service. But according to the written sources, these Celts or Gauls played important parts in military conflicts in the greater Mediterranean region.
When we read of Celtic mercenaries serving in armies in the lands of the eastern Mediterranean (Griffith Reference Griffith1935; Szabó Reference Szabó and Charpy1995), we need to understand the word ‘mercenary’ broadly. What Greek and Roman writers recorded as mercenaries may have been people with a variety of actions and intentions. Though the writers may have used words that translate best as mercenaries, it is quite possible that groups of settlers and others were considered under this term. And individuals may have played different roles at different times. Since our information about what different groups of people were doing in this period is generally rather vague, we should keep our minds open to the various possibilities of migration and settlement falling under some writer's perception as mercenary.
Celtic military forces played significant roles in the outcomes of many important battles of the fourth and third centuries bce (for a recent summary, see Rustoiu Reference Rustoiu2006) and thus contributed to the political and economic circumstances of these regions. It could be argued that the cultural, social and political development of this part of the world was in large measure determined by the military activities of Celtic mercenaries. We have no precise figures for the numbers of troops involved, but from numbers suggested by ancient authors for various war parties it is likely that contingents of Celtic mercenaries typically numbered in the several thousands.
Personal ornaments, especially fibulae, of European types that have been recovered from sites in Anatolia, Syria, Lebanon and Israel (Parachaud Reference Parachaud2018; Reference Parachaud, Pierrevelcin, Kysela and Fichtl2020; Reference Parachaud2022; Voigt Reference Voigt2003), can be understood as evidence of objects left behind by Celtic mercenaries and/or as indications of traditions maintained by mercenaries and their descendants of their (real or perceived) homelands. The cultural influence of these mercenaries and their descendants on the indigenous societies of the Near East is a topic that would produce great rewards for our understanding of cultural changes during the centuries immediately preceding the expansion of the Roman Empire, but the topic is beyond the scope of this paper.
All of the available evidence, textual, archaeological and linguistic, indicates that people called Celts or Gauls by Mediterranean writers had settled in Anatolia by the early decades of the third century bce (Darbyshire et al. Reference Darbyshire, Mitchell and Vardar2000; Voigt Reference Voigt2003). As Darbyshire and his colleagues make clear, we know very little about the specific motivations for the migration of Celts to Anatolia, but they argue that whatever other motivations may have been involved, the search for land for settlement was a main reason. While the early phases of the movements may have involved military action and looting, eventually Celtic groups settled and remained in place in Anatolia. Darbyshire et al. emphasize that the archaeological database for the region is not abundant, and there are many uncertainties about the exact nature of Celtic settlement. The written sources make clear that the Celts—now ‘Galatians’—became from the third century on a major political, military and cultural force in the region. Both military and decorative material culture have been identified in the regions described by the writers as settlement areas of the Celts and further afield in the Near East, for example in what are today Israel and Egypt.
For individuals to leave their homes to serve in these armies, there must have been strong incentives—substantial rewards—awaiting them. A portion of the material wealth of European societies during the fourth and third centuries may be attributable to the wealth brought home from their campaigns, whether in the form of booty captured during their military service or in salaries paid to them. The first coins to arrive in temperate Europe were Greek coins that probably represented the pay that mercenaries received (Mannsperger Reference Mannsperger, Bittel, Kimmig and Schiek1981). By the end of the fourth century bce, minting of coinage was begun in temperate Europe, modelled on the coins of Philip II of Macedon (Haselgrove Reference Haselgrove, Haselgrove, Rebay-Salisbury and Wells2023). Other prizes that were likely brought back from their mercenary service include Greek helmets found in the south of France, recovered at Baux-de-Provence, Modez and in the Montpellier region, one from the river Guadalete in Spain (Garcia Reference Garcia, Bouffier and Hermany2013), and a Celtic shield represented in Sicily (Rapin Reference Rapin2001).
Otto-Herman Frey (Reference Frey, Pohl, Recker and Theune2001) and Martin Schönfelder (Reference Schönfelder2007, 310) suggest that the armour shown on the statue from the Glauberg tumulus, as well as the armour represented on the seated figure on the bronze jug from grave 1 at the site, is Greek or Etruscan in style. Had the man buried in the grave served as a mercenary, and had his uniform acquired in that service remained part of his identity after he had returned home?
Militarism at home in temperate Europe
The new aggressive and expansionist ideology expressed in military activity of the Celts during the fifth, fourth and third centuries bce in lands to the south and east of their homelands was also expressed in their homelands in temperate Europe (Wells Reference Wells, Haselgrove and Moore2007; Reference Wells, Fagan, Fibiger, Hudson and Trundle2020b). Weapons were placed in many more graves than had been the case earlier, they were deposited frequently on large and complex ritual sites, and they are shown in informative pictorial representations.
Weapons in graves
There is general agreement that there was a great increase in military activity and military ideology at this time, with many more weapons placed in graves (Stöllner Reference Stöllner, Jerem, Schönfelder and Wieland2010, 278–9; Reference Stöllner, Gosden, Crawford and Ulmschneider2014, 121) and more attention paid to the decoration of weapons, especially swords, as at Hochscheid (Fig. 7, above), the Glauberg (Frey Reference Frey, Baitinger and Pinsker2002b) and Weiskirchen (Müller Reference Müller and Müller2009a, 188 fig. 248 & 189 fig. 250). Pictorial representations of marching soldiers on the scabbard from Hallstatt grave 994 (Barth Reference Barth2009; Egg et al. Reference Egg, Hauschild and Schönfelder2006) and on situlae (Lucke & Frey Reference Lucke and Frey1962) further attest to this increasing militarism. Otto-Herman Frey (Reference Frey, Baitinger and Pinsker2002c) highlights these changes in his comparison of the statues from Hirschlanden and the Glauberg (see below).
Martin Schönfelder (Reference Schönfelder2007) suggests that these changes reflect the formation of a ‘warrior elite’ that achieved its status at least in part through mercenary service abroad (Ginoux & Ramsl Reference Ginoux, Ramsl, Gosden, Crawford and Ulmschneider2014). Glauberg grave 1 is an example of the archaeological evidence for a new warrior elite. The man was accompanied by a sword (with decorated scabbard—see above), a shield, three lances, a quiver and a bow and arrows. The statue that accompanied the grave is that of a well-armed warrior, with body armour, sword and shield.
After the initial phase of the La Tène Period, swords and other weapons were still deposited regularly in substantial proportions of graves. Cemeteries such as Nebringen in Germany (Krämer Reference Krämer1964), Münsingen-Rain in Switzerland (Hodson Reference Hodson1968), Radovesice in Czechia (Waldhauser Reference Waldhauser1987), Ludas in Hungary (Szabó Reference Szabó2014, 87 fig. 5, 90 fig. 7), Vače in Slovenia (Dular Reference Dular2016) and Ciumesti in Romania (Rustoiu Reference Rustoiu2006) are examples of burial places where the practice of including weapons in graves was common during the fourth and third centuries bce.
Weapons more decorated and individualized
Swords and their scabbards, in particular, were often highly decorated in this period. The decoration could have served a variety of purposes. Perhaps some of the signs were meant to protect the user and to intimidate the enemy (Giles Reference Giles, Garrow, Gosden and Hill2008; Reference Giles2012). As Gell (Reference Gell1998) might suggest, many of the decorations could have been enchanting and designed to capture the attention of the enemies to their disadvantage. The decorations may also have served to identify the owner of the sword and scabbard. Even among large assemblages of scabbards, such as that at the site of La Tène, each decoration is different (De Navarro Reference De Navarro1972). The special symbolism on the Hochscheid scabbard has been discussed above.
Ritual deposits of weapons
Before the fourth century bce, sites understood as places of ritual deposition were relatively small and rarely included any appreciable quantity of weapons (Bradley Reference Bradley1990). From the fourth century bce, much more expansive open spaces were structured for use as sites of ritual activity. The classic example is the site of Gournay-sur-Aronde in northern France, a square ditched enclosure, a building in the centre, and weapons—swords, sword belts, spears, shields—of some 500 warriors, most of them recovered in the ditches (Brunaux Reference Brunaux and Nash1988; Reference Brunaux1996; Reference Brunaux and Goudineau2006). Similar deposits, but with fewer weapons, are at Ribemont (Brunaux Reference Brunaux1999), not far from Gournay. In Austria, the site of Roseldorf (Holzer Reference Holzer, Fernández-Götz, Wendling and Winger2014; Kohler-Schneider et al. Reference Kohler-Schneider, Caneppele and Heiss2015) shows similar depositions of weapons at this time.
At the site of La Tène in Lake Neuchâtel in Switzerland, 166 swords have been recovered, a great many of them with ornate scabbards (De Navarro Reference De Navarro1972), along with other weapons, coins and other objects that were deposited in the shallows of the lake. Excavations at the site yielded remains of a large wooden structure built into the edge of the lake, apparently to be used for the deposition of objects. At Hjortspring on the island of Als in Denmark at about this same time, swords, spears, over 50 wooden shields, and other weapons, including coats of mail, were deposited in a pond, together with a wooden boat (Kaul Reference Kaul, Jørgensen, Storgaard, Thomsen, Ingvardson and Andersen2003; Randsborg Reference Randsborg1996).
The importance of these new sites intended for ritual performance involving weapons is that they demonstrate that display of weapons in open public places was an important activity at the same time as the Celtic incursions into Italy, eastern Europe, Anatolia and elsewhere.
Images of weapons
Along with the placing of swords and other weapons in graves and depositing them in open-air land sites such as Gournay and in water, as at La Tène, during this period, representations of soldiers with their weapons also become important. The scabbard of the sword in Hallstatt grave 994 shows armed troops, some riding horseback, others marching in infantry formation, all wearing similar uniforms and bearing weapons (Barth Reference Barth2009; Egg et al. Reference Egg, Hauschild and Schönfelder2006). Similar troop formations are shown on a number of the bronze situlae found in the eastern Alpine regions, including northeast Italy, Slovenia and Austria (e.g. Lucke & Frey Reference Lucke and Frey1962, pls 63, 64, 65).
Frey (Reference Frey, Baitinger and Pinsker2002c, 216–18) calls attention to the stunning differences between two near-lifesize stone statues, that from the Early Iron Age burial mound of Hirschlanden and that from the Early La Tène mound at the Glauberg. Both were sculpted from local stone, one in southwest Germany, the other in the central part of Germany north of Frankfurt, and both represent armed elites. The Hirschlanden figure, which is nearly naked, wears the characteristic dagger at his waist, a thick neckring around his neck and a conical hat or helmet on his head. The Glauberg figure wears body armour and a sword at his right side, holds a shield and wears a thin neckring matched by the gold neckring in grave 1 at the site. Instead of a hat or helmet, the top of his head is decorated with the palmette crown characteristic of Early La Tène art. Hirschlanden gives us a picture of the hero of the earlier period, Glauberg of the later. The armour on the Glauberg statue is matched by the armour shown on the figure sitting on the rim of the bronze jug in grave 1 at the site (Frey Reference Frey, Pohl, Recker and Theune2001).
Aftermath
After the archaeologically clear dominance of the warrior elites of the fourth and third centuries bce in temperate Europe, the following period sees a reduction in the display of weaponry, both in graves and on ritual sites. The large settlements known as oppida appear, named after Julius Caesar's use of the term to refer to the great fortified sites against which he fought in Gaul (Fichtl Reference Fichtl, Haselgrove, Rebay-Salisbury and Wells2023). During the second century bce, cemeteries in the central regions of temperate Europe are many fewer than they had been previously. Weapons are much fewer in number, though some swords have been recovered from water deposits. The overall character of life at the oppida suggests an increased focus on manufacturing and trade and less on warfare (Gebhard Reference Gebhard, Haselgrove, Rebay-Salisbury and Wells2023; Gosden Reference Gosden, Haselgrove, Rebay-Salisbury and Wells2023). In Gaul, this new pattern is interrupted by the invasion of Caesar's legions in 58 bce (Roymans & Fernández-Götz Reference Roymans and Fernández-Götz2019), and profound changes happened in other parts of temperate Europe at the same time (Wells Reference Wells1999, 122–47, 224–58).
Conclusion
This paper argues for an approach to Early La Tène art and design in terms of the role that the imagery played in fostering a new aggressive and expansionary ideology among the elites of the fifth and fourth centuries bce in temperate Europe. These centuries were times of great dynamism throughout much of Eurasia. Karl Jaspers and his followers have argued for an understanding of these times as what he called the Axial Age, based on textual evidence pertaining to philosophy and religion. In this paper, I argue that we can identify closely related changes in the material culture of temperate Europe and the lands into which Europeans expanded, militarily, socially and culturally. Early Celtic art was not the only factor that drove these momentous changes, but it played an important part in bringing the societies of Iron Age Europe into contact and interaction with the complex literate civilizations that lay to the south and east. In this way, the societies based in temperate Europe became dynamic players in the phenomena known as the Axial Age, when many profound changes took place throughout much of Eurasia and arguably fashioned many of the cultural features of what we call modernity.
Acknowledgements
I did most of the research for this paper during a sabbatical semester in the fall of 2021, for which I thank the College of Liberal Arts of the University of Minnesota. For helpful advice and for useful publications, I thank Lothar von Falkenhausen, Heather Flowers, Melanie Giles, Chris Gosden, Colin Haselgrove, Manual Fernández-Götz, Aurel Rustoiu and Simon Stoddart. For help with the map I thank Matt Edling. I thank the three anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions that led to the to improvement of the draft that they read. For the artefact illustrations, I thank the Schweizerisches Landesmuseum, Art Resource of New York, Keltenwelt am Glauberg, the Rheinisches Landesmuseum Trier and the Salzburg Museum.
