No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On Time and Other Things: Some Cartesian Dichotomies in Antarctica
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 October 2021
Abstract
Antarctica differs from all other regions in the world, not only from its unique geography, but also in the way humans understand it and have incorporated it into global relations. Considering Antarctica's distinctive landscapes and human relations, this paper discusses aspects of how time is humanly perceived in Antarctica. Basing on elements from different human occupations, nineteenth-century sailor-hunters and current incursions, this discussion approximates different historical groups in their experiences of Antarctica, connecting their personal lives, past and present. Meanwhile, also put into issue are the dualities that separate nature and culture, physical and relative time, and past and present, as well as the related notions of time in itself, perceived time speed and internal time consciousness.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
References
Augé, M., 1997. Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Basberg, B.L. & Headland, R.K., 2008. The 19th century Antarctic sealing industry: sources, data and economic significance. NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper 21/2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1553751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berguño, J., 1993a. Las Shetland del Sur: el ciclo lobero – Primera parte [South Shetlands: the sealer's economic cycle – First part]. Boletín Antártico Chileno 12(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
Berguño, J., 1993b. Las Shetland del Sur: el ciclo lobero – Segunda parte [South Shetlands: the sealer's economic cycle – Second part]. Boletín Antártico Chileno 12(2), 2–9.Google Scholar
Delano, A., 1817. A Narrative of Voyages and Travels in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Boston (MA): E.G. House.Google Scholar
Descola, P., 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, P.D., 1993. O ato fotográfico [The photographic act]. Campinas: Papirus editora.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, M., 2014. Archaeology of the Anthropocene. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1(1), 73–132.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E.E., 1940. The Nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fabian, J., [1983] 2014. Time and the Other: How anthropology makes its object. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanning, E., 1924. Voyages and Discoveries in the South Seas 1792–1832. Salem (MA): Marine Research Society.Google Scholar
Gell, A., 2014. Antropologia do tempo: construções culturais de mapas e imagens temporais [The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images]. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.Google Scholar
González-Ruibal, A., 2018. Beyond the Anthropocene: defining the age of destruction. Norwegian Archaeological Review 51(1–2), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodridge, C.M., 1837. Narrative of a Voyage to the South Seas and the Shipwreck of the Princess of Wales Cutter: With an Account of a Two Years’ Residence on an Uninhabited Island. Exeter: W.C. Featherstone.Google Scholar
Gross, D., 1984. Time allocation: a tool for the study of cultural behavior. Annual Review of Anthropology 13, 519–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. & Anagnostopoulos, A., 2009. What is archaeological ethnography? Public Archaeology 8(2–3), 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrowfield, D., 1978. Historical archaeology in Antarctica. New Zealand Antarctic Record 1(3), 45–50.Google Scholar
Headland, R., 1989. Chronological List of Antarctic Expeditions and Related Historical Events. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hissa, S.B.V., 2012. Tempo e Arqueologia: experiências materiais e imateriais de Antártica [Time and archaeology: material and immaterial experiences of Antarctica]. Masters thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Hissa, S.B.V., 2016. Dando tempo ao tempo, na arqueologia [Giving time to time, in archaeology]. Revista de Arqueologia 29(1), 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hissa, S.B.V., 2017. Navegar é preciso, viver também é preciso: ideias iniciais sobre a organização e a percepção de tempo de marinheiros brasileiros em navio polar [Navigating is necessary, living is also necessary: initial ideas about Brazilian sailors on polar ships and how they manage and perceive time]. Revista de Antropologia da Universidade de São Paulo 60(3), 284–307.Google Scholar
Husserl, E., 1929. Investigaciones lógicas [Logic investigations]. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.Google Scholar
Husserl, E., 1991. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-consciousness. London: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E., 1992. Conferências de Paris [Conferences in Paris]. Lisbon: LusoSofia Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E., 2008. A idéia da fenomenologia [The idea of phenomenology]. Lisbon: Edições 70.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 1993. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology 25(2), 152–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T., 2010. Bringing Things Back to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials. NCRM Working Paper 15. Realities/Morgan Centre, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2011. Being Alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ion, A., 2018. A taphonomy of a dark Anthropocene. A response to Þóra Pétursdóttir's OOO-inspired ‘Archaeology and Anthropocene’. Archaeological Dialogues 25(2) 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaguaribe, H., 2003. Tempo e história [Time and history], in Tempo dos tempos [Time of times], ed. Doctors, M.. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor, 156–65.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, B. & Troman, G., 2004. Time for ethnography. British Educational Research Journal 30(4), 535–48.Google Scholar
Landis, M.J., 2001. Antarctica: Exploring the extreme. Chicago (IL): Chicago Review Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, G., 2006. Historical archaeology and time, in The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology, eds Hicks, D. & Beaudry, M.C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 34–47.Google Scholar
Lyman, R.L. & O'Brien, M.J., 2006. Measuring Time with Artifacts: A history of methods in American archaeology. Lincoln (NE): University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Magnani, J.G.C., 2003. A antropologia urbana e os desafios da metropole [Urban anthropology and challenges faced by the metropolis]. Tempo social USP 15(1), 81–98.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W., 2002. The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. The South Atlantic Quarterly 101(1), 57–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G., Samford, P., Shlasko, E. & Madsen, A., 2000. Telling time for archaeologists. Northeast Historical Archaeology 29, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrell, B., Jun., 1832. A Narrative of Four Voyages, to the South Sea, North and South Pacific Ocean, Chinese Sea, Ethiopic and Southern Atlantic Ocean, Indian and Antarctic Ocean. New York (NY): J. & J. Harper.Google Scholar
Murdoch, W.B., 1984. From Edinburgh to the Antarctic: An Artist's notes and sketches during the Dundee Antarctic Expedition of 1892–93. Edinburgh: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Norum, R. & Mostafanezhad, M., 2016. A chronopolitics of tourism. Geoforum 77, 157–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, L., 2004. The past of the present. Archaeological memory and time. Archaeological Dialogues 10(2), 204–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, B., 2003. Material culture after text: re-membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36(2), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peixoto, F.A., 2015. A viagem como vocação: itnerários, parcerias e formas de conhecimento [Traveling as vocation: itineraries, partnerships and ways of knowledge]. São Paulo: EDUSP.Google Scholar
Pétursdóttir, Þ. & Olsen, B., 2018. Theory adrift: the matter of archaeological theorizing. Journal of Social Archaeology 18(1), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piettre, B., 1997. Filosofia e ciência do tempo [Philosophy and science of time]. Bauru: EDUSC.Google Scholar
Reis, J., 2005. História e teoria: historicismo, modernidade, temporalidade e verdade [History and theory: historicism, modernity, temporality and truth]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.Google Scholar
Salerno, M.A., 2006. Arqueología de la indumentária: Prácticas e Identidad en los confines Del Mundo Moderno (Antártida, Siglo XIX) [Archaeology of clothing: practices and identity in the ends of the world]. Buenos Aires: Del Tridente.Google Scholar
Salerno, M.A., Cruz, M.J. & Zarankin, A., 2019. Inside and outside capitalism: the life of sealers on the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica, in The Historical Archaeology of Shadow and Intimate Economies, eds Nyman, J., Fogle, K. & Beaudry, M.. Gainesville (FL): University Press of Florida, 158–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöpke, R., 2009. Matéria em movimento: a ilusão do tempo e o eterno retorno [Matter in movement: the illusion of time and the eternal return]. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.Google Scholar
Senatore, M.X., 2020. Things in Antarctica: an archaeological perspective. Polar Journal 10(2), 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senatore, M.X. & Zarankin, A., 2011. Widening the scope of the Antarctic heritage: archaeology and the ugly, the dirty and the evil in Antarctic history, in Polar Settlements: Location, techniques and conservation, eds Barr, S. & Chaplin, P.. Lorenskog: IPHC-ICOMOS, 51–9.Google Scholar
Senatore, M.X. & Zarankin, A., 2014. Against the domain of master narratives: archaeology and history in Antarctica, in Against the Typological Tyranny in Archaeology: A view from South America, eds. Gnecco, C. & Langebaek, C.. New York (NY): Springer, 121–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.I. & Simpson, H.W., 1987. Early nineteenth century sealers’ refuges on Livingston Island, South Shetland Islands. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin 74, 49–72.Google Scholar
Solli, B., Burström, M., Domanska, E., et al. , 2011. Some reflections on heritage and archaeology in the Anthropocene. Norwegian Archaeological Review 44(1), 40–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stackpole, E., 1955. The Voyages of the Huron and the Huntress: The American sealers and the discovery of the continent of Antarctica. Mystic (CT): Marine Historical Association.Google Scholar
Stehberg, R., 2003. Arqueología Histórica Antártica: Aborígenes Sudamericanos en los Mares Subantárticos en el Siglo XIX [Antarctic historical archaeology: South American aborigines in sub-Antarctic seas in the 19th century]. Santiago: Centro de Investigaciones Diego Barros Arana.Google Scholar
Stehberg, R. & Cabeza, Á., 1987. Comienzos de la Arqueología Histórica Antártica en el Sitio Cuatro Pircas [Beginnings of Antarctic historical archaeology in the Cuatro Pircas archaeological site]. Revista Chilena de Antropologia 6, 83–111.Google Scholar
Tamm, M. & Olivier, L. (eds), 2019. Rethinking Historical Time: New approaches to presentism. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E., 1967. Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past and Present 38(1), 56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C., 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, paths and monuments. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., Hamilton, S. & Bender, B., 2000. Art and the representation of the past. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6(1), 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valtonen, A. 2004 Rethinking Free Time: A study on boundaries, disorder and symbolic goods. Helsinki: HeSE.Google Scholar
Verrill, A.H., 1916. The Real Story of the Whaler: Whaling, past and present. New York (NY): D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
Wallis, G., 1970. Chronopolitics: the impact of time perspectives on the dynamics of change. Social Forces 49(1), 102–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witmore, C., 2014. Chronopolitics and archaeology, in The Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, ed. Smith, C.. New York (NY): Springer, 1471–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarankin, A., Hissa, S., Salerno, M., Froner, Y., Radicchi, G., Resende de Assis, L. & Batista, A., 2011. Paisagens em Branco: Arqueologia e Antropología Antárticas [Landscapes in white: Antarctic archaeology and anthropology]. Vestigios. Revista Latinoamericana de Arqueología Histórica 5(2), 11–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarankin, A. & Salerno, M.A., 2014. The wild continent: some discussions on the Anthropocene in Antarctica. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1(1), 114–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarankin, A. & Salerno, M.A., 2017. Antarctic archaeology: discussing the history of the southernmost end of the world, in The Oxford Handbook of Historical Archaeology, eds Symonds, J., & Herva, V-P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199562350.013.55Google Scholar
Zarankin, A. & Senatore, M.X., 2005. Archaeology in Antarctica: 19th century capitalism expansion strategies. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 9(1), 43–56.Google Scholar
Zarankin, A. & Senatore, M.X., 2007. Historias de un Pasado en Blanco: Arqueología Histórica Antártica [Histories of a past in white: Antarctic historical archaeology]. Belo Horizonte: Argumentum.Google Scholar