Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T02:30:04.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Onomastics, gender, office and images on Byzantine lead seals: a means of investigating personal piety*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

John Cotsonis
John Cotsonis*
Affiliation:
The Archbishop lakovos Library, Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based upon a database of 7,390 lead seals that bear religious figural imagery in conjunction with the names and official titles of their owners, this paper investigates the contribution of lead seals to our understanding of the choice of various religious images as an expression of personal piety. The study examines the roles of homonymity, gender, family names and official titles in individuals’ selections of sacred images for their seals. Tables and figures display the numerical and statistical results that are compared to trends found in other media.

Type
Articles
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , 2008 , pp. 1 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I wish to thank Annemarie Weyl Carr for her insightful comments regarding an earlier version of the material related to gender. Special appreciation is also extended to John Nesbitt for his helpful discussions throughout the preparation of this paper as well as to the two anonymous readers. Funds for the accompanying photographs were kindly provided by Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology.

References

Cheynet, J.-C. and Vannier, J.-F., Études prosopographiques (Paris 1986).Google Scholar
Cheynet, J.-C, Morrisson, C. and Seibt, W., Sceaux byzantins de la collection Henri Seyrig (Paris 1991).Google Scholar
Davidson, G., Corinth XII: The Minor Objects (Princeton 1952), nos. 2751–2808.Google Scholar
De Gray Birch, W., Catalogue of Seals in the Department of Manuscripts in the British Museum (London 1898).Google Scholar
Dunn, A., A Handlist of the Byzantine Lead Seals and Tokens in the Barber Institute of Fine Arts, University of Birmingham (Birmingham 1983).Google Scholar
Koltsida-Makre, I., Βυζα,ντινα μολοβδόβουλλα, Συλλογής Όρφανι’δη-Νικολαιδη, Νομισματικον Μουσείοο Άθηνών (Athens 1996).Google Scholar
Konstantopoulos, K., Βυζαντιακα μολυβδόβουλλα. τοΰ έν Άθήναις Έθνικου Νομισματικου Μουσείου (Athens 1917).Google Scholar
Konstantopoulos, K., Βυζαντιακα μολυβδόβουλλα, Συλλογή Αναστασίου Κ.Π. Σταμούλη (Athens 1930).Google Scholar
Laurent, V., Documents de sigillographie byzantine: Le collection C. Orghidan (Paris 1952).Google Scholar
Laurent, V., Les sceaux byzantins du Médaillier Vatican (Vatican City 1962).Google Scholar
Laurent, V., Les corpus des sceaux de l’empire byzantine, V/l—3: L’église (Paris 1963-1972); II: L’administration centrale (Paris 1982).Google Scholar
Lihačev, N., Istoričeskoe značené italo-grečeskoj ikonopisi izobrazenija Bogomateri (St Petersburg 1911).Google Scholar
Lihačev, N., Molivdovuly grečeskogo vostoka, ed. Šandrovskaja, V. (Moscow 1991).Google Scholar
Nesbitt, J. and Oikonomides, N., Catalogue of the Byzantine Seals at Dumbarton Oaks and in the Fogg Museum of Art, I-IV (Washington, DC 1991, 1994, 1996, 2001).Google Scholar
Oikonomides, N., A Collection of Dated Byzantine Lead Seals (Washington, DC 1986).Google Scholar
Pančenko, B., ‘Kollekcii Russago Archeologičeskago Instituía v Konstantinople. Katalog Molivdovulov’, IRAIK 8 (1903) nos. 1–124; in 9 (1904) nos. 125-300; and in 13 (1908) nos. 301-500.Google Scholar
Šandrovskaja, V., ‘Sfragistika’, Iskusstvo Vizantii v Sobranijach SSSR. Katalog Vystavki,I-III (Moscow 1977) nos. 205–258; nos. 678-865; and nos. 1020-1044.Google Scholar
Schlumberger, G., Sigillographie de l’empire byzantin (Paris 1884).Google Scholar
Schlumberger, G., ‘Sceaux byzantins inédits’, Mélanges d’archéologie byzantine (Paris 1895), 199–274; REG 13 (1900) 467-492; in Revue numismatique 9 (1905) 321-354 and 20 (1916) 32-46.Google Scholar
Seibt, W., Die Skleroi: Eine prosopographisch-sigillographische Studie(Vienna 1976).Google Scholar
Seibt, W., Die byzantinischen Bleisiegel in Österreich, 1: Kaiserhof (Vienna 1978).Google Scholar
Seibt, W. and Zarnitz, M. L., Das byzantinische Bleisiegel als Kunstwerk (Vienna 1997).Google Scholar
Sode, C., Byzantinische Bleisiegel in Berlin, II, Poikila Byzantina, 14 (Bonn 1997).Google Scholar
Speck, P., Byzantinische Bleisiegel in Berlin (West), Poikila Byzantina, 5 (Bonn 1986).Google Scholar
Stavrakos, C., Die byzantinischen Bleisiegel mit Familiennamen aus der Sammlung des Numismatischen Museums Athen (Wiesbaden 2000).Google Scholar
Szemioth, A. and Wasilewski, T., ‘Sceaux byzantins du Musée National de Varsovie’, Studia Zródioznawcze. Commentationes 11 (1966) 1–38 and 14 (1969) 63-89.Google Scholar
Wassiliou, A.-K. and Seibt, W., Die byzantinischen Bleisiegel in Osterreich, 2: Zentral- und Provinzialverwaltung (Vienna 2004).Google Scholar
Zacos, G., Byzantine Lead Seals, II, ed. Nesbitt, J. (Berne 1984).Google Scholar
Zacos, G. and Veglery, A., Byzantine Lead Seals, 1/1-3 (Basel 1972).Google Scholar