Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T21:15:44.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Literacy as Symbolic Strategy in Greece: Methodological Considerations of Topic and Place

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Michael Herzfeld
Michael Herzfeld*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Against reification: what is a context?

This paper provides me with an opportunity to suggest why the study of orality and literacy/literality in modern Greece has some theoretical as well as purely descriptive or local significance. For social anthropology, comparison between societies and cultures is a central task. While the study of modern Greek culture displays a remarkably persistent level of methodological introversion, its singular characteristics are very germane to the comparativist perspective. In part, this is due to the peculiar political circumstances that make the ancient forebears of the Greeks so much a part of current debates about the status of the modern culture.

Type
Articles:
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 14 , 1990 , pp. 151 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 1990

References

Alexiou, M.B. 1974. The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition, ((Cambridge).Google Scholar
Apostolakis, Y. 1929. (Athens).Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1981. ‘The past as a scarce resource’, Man (N.S.) 16: 201–219.Google Scholar
Austin, J.L. 1975 [1962] How To Do Things With Words, ed. Urmson, J.O. and Sbisà, Marina ((Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
Bailey, F.G. 1971. Gifts and Poison: The Politics of Reputation ((Oxford).Google Scholar
Bailey, F.G. 1983. The Tactical Uses of Passion: An Essay on Power, Reason, and Reality ((Ithaca).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M.M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination (Austin). Trans, by Emerson, C. and Holquist, M..Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice ((Cambridge). Trans, by Nice, R..Google Scholar
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. 1960. ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’, in Sebeok, T.A. (ed.), Style in Language ((Cambridge, Mass.) 253–276.Google Scholar
Caraveli, A. 1982. ‘The song beyond the song: Aesthetics and social interaction in Greek folksong’, Journal of American Folklore 95: 129–158.Google Scholar
Chock, P.P. 1987. ‘The irony of stereotypes: Toward an anthropology of ethnicity’, Cultural Anthropology 2: 347–368.Google Scholar
Cowan, J.K. 1988. Embodiments: The Social Construction of Gender in Dance Events in a Northern Greek Town. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, (Bloomington; forthcoming, Princeton.Google Scholar
Danforth, L.M. 1976. ‘Humour and status reversal in Greek shadow theatre’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 2: 99–111.Google Scholar
Fernandez, J.W. 1986. Persuasions and Performances: The Play of Tropes in Culture ((Bloomington).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1978. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison ((New York). Trans. by Sheridan, A..Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1988. Plough, Sword and Book: The Structure of Human History ((London).Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Introduction to the Theory of Structuration ((Cambridge).Google Scholar
Goody, J. 1986. The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society ((Cambridge).Google Scholar
Havelock, E.A. 1963. Preface to Plato ((Cambridge, Mass.)Google Scholar
Havelock, E.A. 1986. The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present ((New Haven and London).Google Scholar
Heath, S.B. 1983. Ways With Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms ((Cambridge).Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. 1973. ‘“The Siege of Rhodes” and the ethnography of Greek oral tradition’, 25: 413–440.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. 1985a. The Poetics of Manhood: Contest and Identity in a Cretan Mountain Village ((Princeton, N.J.).Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. 1985b. ‘Gender pragmatics: Agency, speech, and bride-theft in a Cretan mountain village’, Anthropology 9: 25–44.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. 1985c. ‘Interpretations from within: Metatext for a Cretan quarrel’, in Alexiou, M.B. and Lambropoulos, V. (eds.), The Text and its Margins: Post-Structuralist Approaches to Twentieth-Century Greek Literature ((New York) 197–218.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S.C. 1978. Anthropology and the Greeks ((London).Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1960. ‘Linguistics and poetics’, in Sebeok, T.A. (ed.), Style in Language ((Cambridge, Mass.) 350–377.Google Scholar
Just, R. 1987. Review of Herzfeld 1985a. Canberra Anthropology 10: 126–128.Google Scholar
Kapferer, B. (ed.) 1976. Transaction and Meaning: Directions in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behavior ((Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Karp, I. 1986. ‘Agency and social theory: A review of Anthony Giddens’, American Ethnologist 13: 131–137.Google Scholar
Karp, I. and Maynard, K. 1983. ‘Reading The Nuer’, Current Anthropology 24: 481–503.Google Scholar
Kazazis, K. 1966. ‘Sunday Greek’, in Papers for the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago) 130–140.Google Scholar
Lambrinos, G. 1947. To (Athens).Google Scholar
Mackridge, P. 1985. The Modern Greek Language: a Descriptive Analysis of Standard Modern Greek ((Oxford).Google Scholar
Mouzelis, N. 1978. Modern Greece: Facets of Underdevelopment ((London).Google Scholar
Murray, D. 1988. ‘The context of oral and written language: A framework for mode and medium switching’, Language in Society 17: 351–373.Google Scholar
Ong, W.J. 1977. Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture ((Ithaca, N.Y.)Google Scholar
Ong, W.J. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word ((London and New York).Google Scholar
Politis, N.G. 1909. 1: 3–18.Google Scholar
Royce, A.P. 1982. Ethnic Identity: Strategies of Diversity (Bloomington).Google Scholar
Sifakis, G. 1988. (Iraklio).Google Scholar
Sperber, D. 1975. Rethinking Symbolism ((Cambridge).Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1978. ‘A cross-cultural study of oral narrative style’, Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ((Berkeley) 640–650.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1980. ‘Implications of the oral/literate continuum for cross-cultural communication’, in Alatis, J.E. (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1980: Current Issues in Bilingualism ((Washington, D.C.) 326–347.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1982. ‘The oral/literate continuum in discourse’, in Tannen, D. (ed)., Spoken and Written Language (Norwood, N.J.) 1–16.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends (Norwood, N.J.).Google Scholar
Trawick, M. 1988. ‘Spirits and voices in Tamil songs’, American Ethnologist 15: 193–215.Google Scholar
Tziovas, D. 1989. ‘Residual orality and belated textuality in Greek literature and culture’, Journal of Modern Greek Studies 7: 321–335.Google Scholar