Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:05:58.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laonikos Chalkokondyles and the rise of the Ottoman Turks*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Jonathan Harris
Jonathan Harris*
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While most Christian writers who described the fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks in 1453 regarded the disaster as divine retribution for the sins of its inhabitants, carried out through the agency of the barbaric and infidel Turks, the historical work of Laonikos Chalkokondyles takes a very different approach to the problem. It argues that nations rose or fell partly through luck, but also according the virtue they possessed, so that the Turks, rather than being mere agents, could in fact take the credit for their success. In this approach, Chalkokondyles reflects not classical Greek literature, but a western tradition to be found in Livy and Cicero, a strand of thought that he may have adopted as a result of contacts with Renaissance Italy.

Type
Articles
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 27 , 2003 , pp. 153 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Michael Jeffreys, Joseph Munitiz, Rhoads Murphey, Diotima Papadi and the anonymous readers for Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies for their comments, help and suggestions on this article.

References

1. Leonard of Chios, ‘Historia Constantinopolitane urbis a Mahumete II Capta’, in Patrologia Graeca 159. 923-43, at 943Google Scholar; Oeuvres complètes de Gennade Scholarios, ed. Petit, L., Siderides, X.A. and Jugie, M., IV (Paris 1931) 211-31Google Scholar; Nestor-Iskander, , The Tale of Constantinople, trans. Hanak, Walter K. and Philippides, Marios (New Rochelle, New York 1998) 30-1, 68-9Google Scholar; The Nikonian Chronicle, trans. Zenkovsky, S.A. and Zenkovsky, B.J., V (Princeton, New Jersey 1989) 62-7Google Scholar. On reactions to the fall, East and West, see Runciman, Steven, The Fall of Constantinople (Cambridge 1965) 160, 167-8Google Scholar; Setton, K.M., The Papacy and the Levant (1204-1571), II (Philadelphia 1978) 138-9Google Scholar; Housley, Norman, The Later Crusades from Lyons to Alcazar 1274-1580 (Oxford 1992) 99–100 Google Scholar; Harris, Jonathan, Greek Emigrés in the West, 1400-1520 (Camberley 1995) 40, 80Google Scholar; Obolensky, Dimitri, The Byzantine Commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500-1453 (London 1971) 346-50Google Scholar.

2. Gascoigne, Thomas, Loci et Libro Veritatum, ed. Thorold-Rogers, J.E. (Oxford 1881) 16 Google Scholar. On the identification of Turks with Trojans, see Spencer, Terence, ‘Turks and Trojans in the Renaissance’, Modern Language Review 47 (1952) 330-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Vaughan, D.M., Europe and the Turk, 1350-1700 (Liverpool 1954) 66 Google Scholar.

3. Critobuli lmbriotae Historiae, ed. Reinsch, D.R. (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae 22. Berlin and New York 1983) 14, 77Google Scholar; History of Mehmet the Conqueror, trans. Rigg, C.T. (Princeton 1954) 12, 77Google Scholar. On Kritoboulos, see: Emrich, G., ‘Michael Kritobulos, der byzantinische Geschichtsschreiber Mehmeds II’, Materialia Turcica 1 (1975) 35–43 Google Scholar; Grecu., V., ‘Kritobulos aus Imbros’, BS 18 (1957) 1–17 Google Scholar. On classical and Byzantine use of tyche, see Sacks, Kenneth, Polybius on the Writing of History (Berkeley and Los Angeles 1981) 136-8Google Scholar; Hornblower, Simon, Thucydides (London 1987) 30 Google Scholar; Cameron, Averil, Procopius and the Sixth Century (London 1985) 36, 117-19Google Scholar.

4. Doukas, , Historia Byzantina, ed. Bekker, I. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae. Bonn 1834) 215-16Google Scholar and Istoria Turco-Bizantina, ed. Grecu, V. (Bucharest 1958) 267-9Google Scholar. English translation: Decline and Fall of Byzantium to the Ottoman Turks, trans. Magoulias, H.J. (Detroit 1975) 181-2Google Scholar.

5. Doukas (ed. Bekker), 20, 232, 284; (ed. Grecu), 41, 289, 355-7; (trans. Magoulias) 64, 191, 222-3.

6. Doukas (ed. Bekker) 33-4; (ed. Grecu) 59; (trans. Magoulias) 73; Critobuli Imbriotae Historiae, 14, 16; Kritoboulos, History of Mehmet the Conqueror, 12, 13; Fleet, Kate, ‘Italian perceptions of the Turks in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries’, Journal of Mediterranean Studies 5 (1995) 159-72, at 164-6Google Scholar; Schwoebel, Robert, The Shadow of the Crescent: The Renaissance Image of the Turk (1453-1517) (Nieuwkoop 1967) 18–19 Google Scholar; Vryonis, Speros, ‘Byzantine attitudes to Islam during the late Middle Ages’, GRBS 12 (1971) 263-86, at 273-6Google Scholar, reprinted in Vryonis, Speros, Studies on Byzantium, Seljuks and Ottomans (Malibu 1981) no. VIIIGoogle Scholar; Bryer, A.A.M., ‘Greek historians on the Turks: the case of the first Byzantine-Ottoman Marriage’, in The Writing of History in the Middle Ages: Essays Presented to Richard William Southern, ed. Davis, R.H.C. et al. (Oxford 1981) 471-93, at 492-3Google Scholar; Runciman, Steven, ‘Byzantine historians and the Ottoman Turks’, in Historians of the Middle East, ed. Lewis, Bernard and Holt, P.M. (London 1962) 271-89, at 275Google Scholar.

7. There are two editions of the historical work of Laonikos Chalkokondyles: Historiarum Libri Decem, ed. Bekker, I. (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae. Bonn 1843)Google Scholar and Historiae Demonstrationes, 2 vols., ed. Darkó, E. (Budapest 1922-7)Google Scholar, hereinafter B and D respectively. An English translation of Books I-III can be found in Laonikos Chalkokondyles. A Translation and Commentary of the Demonstrations of Histories, trans. Nikoloudis, Nikolaos (Athens 1996)Google Scholar – hereinafter N – and of Book VIII in Melville-Jones, J.R., The Siege of Constantinople: Seven Contemporary Accounts (Amsterdam 1972) 42–55 Google Scholar - hereinafter M.

8. B 3-4; D I. 1-2; N 89.

9. B 8; D I. 6; N 44, 95. There exists a brief, incomplete and apparently largely fictional biography of him, written by Antonios Kalosynas, a Cretan Doctor, during the sixteenth century: ‘Vies des Chalkokondyles d’Athènes’, in Hopf, C., Chroniques Gréco-romanes (Paris 1873) 243-5Google Scholar. On the Acciaiuoli in Athens, see Setton, K.M., ‘The Catalans and Florentines in Greece, 1380-1462’, in A History of the Crusades, ed. Setton, K.M. III (Madison, Wisconsin 1975) 225-77Google Scholar; Lock, Peter, The Franks in the Aegean, 1204-1500 (London 1995) 130-1Google Scholar.

10. See, for example: B 6, 64; D I. 4, 58; N 93, 185. On the tendency of later writers in Greek to use the word ‘Hellene’, see: Vryonis, Speros, ‘Byzantine cultural self-consciousness in the fifteenth century’, in The Twilight of Byzantium. Aspects of Cultural and Religious History in the Late Byzantine Empire, ed. Čurčić, Slobodan and Mouriki, Doula (Princeton 1991) 5–14 Google Scholar; Runciman, Steven, The Last Byzantine Renaissance (Cambridge 1970) 15–23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. B 20, 28, 81-2; D I. 17, 25, 76; N 109, 119, 207.

12. On this point see also Nikoloudis, Nikolaos, “Ερμηνευτικά προβληματα ένός ίστορικου γεγονότος; κατάληψη τής Καλλίπολης καί ό AaóviKoc Χαλκοκονδΰης, Та Ίστορικά 16 (1992) 41-8, at 46Google Scholar. On the importance of the emperor and the city of Constantinople in earlier, Byzantine historiography see: Tinnefeld, Franz, Kategorien der Kaiserkritik in der byzantinische Historiographie von Prokop bis Niketas Choniates (Munich 1971) 180-93Google Scholar; Scott, Roger, ‘The classical tradition in Byzantine historiography’, in Byzantium and the Classical Tradition, ed. Mullett, M. and Scott, R. (Birmingham 1981) 61–74, at 63, 71Google Scholar; Harris, Jonathan, ‘Distortion, Divine Providence and Genre in Nicetas Choniates’s Account of the Collapse of Byzantium 1180-1204’, Journal of Medieval History 26 (2000) 19–31, at 24-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13. B 320-2; D II. 93-4; N 41-57; Miller, William, ‘The last Athenian historian’, JHS 42 (1922) 36–49, at 36-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Darko, E., ‘Zum Leben Laonikos Chalkondyles’, BZ 24 (1923-4) 29–39 Google Scholar; Setton, Papacy and the Levant, II. 51.

14. Plethon, George Gemistos, Traité des lois, ed. Alexandre, C., trans. Pellissier, A. (Paris 1858) 1–261 Google Scholar; Woodhouse, C.M., George Gemistos Plethon: The Last of the Hellenes (Oxford 1986), 318-56Google Scholar; Masai, F., Pléthon et le platonisme de Mistra (Paris 1956) 208-23Google Scholar; Monfasani, John, ‘Platonic Paganism in the fifteenth century’, Reconsidering the Renaissance, ed. di Cesare, Mario A. (Binghampton, New York 1992) 45–61 at 49-57Google Scholar, reprinted in Monfasani, John, Byzantine Scholars in Renaissance Italy: Cardinal Bessarion and Other Émigrés (Aldershot 1995) no. XGoogle Scholar.

15. B 293; D II. 68; Nikoloudis, Nikolaos, ‘Laonikos Chalkokondyles on the Council of Florence’, Ekklesiastikos Pharos 3 (1992) 132-4, at 134Google Scholar.

16. Plethon, Traité des lois, 64-78; Woodhouse, George Gemistos Plethon, 332-4; Keller, A., ‘Two Byzantine scholars and their reception in Italy’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 20 (1957) 363-70, at 363-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. B 3-4; D I. 1-2; N 77, 89. Cf Herodotus, I.1.

18. B 61; D I. 55; N 181.

19. N 63; Turner, C.J.G., ‘Pages from late Byzantine philosophy of history’, BZ 57 (1964) 346-73, at 359-61Google Scholar.

20. B 437-41; D II. 197-201; Vryonis, Speros, ‘Laonikos Chalkokondyles and the Ottoman budget’, International Journal of Middle East Studies 1 (1976) 423-32CrossRefGoogle Scholar, reprinted in Vryonis, Studies on Byzantium, Seljuks and Ottomans, no. XII.

21. B 119-26; D I. 111-18; N 275-83.

22. B 15-16; D I. 13; N 103.

23. B 32; D I. 28-9; N 125.

24. B 48, 55-6; D I. 44, 51; N 145, 153-5.

25. B 162; D I. 152; N 329.

26. B 393-4, 403-5; D II. 158, 166-8; M 49, 54-5.

27. Cf. Herodotus, VII. 35-9. For Turkish hostility to Mehmed, see Babinger, Franz, Mehmed the Conqueror and his Time, trans. Manheim, Ralph (Princeton 1978) 409-32Google Scholar; Imber, Colin, The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1481 (Istanbul 1990) 252 Google Scholar.

28. B 359-61; D II. 127-30; Turner, 360.

29. B 403; D II. 166-7; M 54. For a similar story, see Ibn-Munqidh, Usamah, An Arab-Syrian Gentleman and Warrior in the Period of the Crusades, trans. Hitti, Philip K. (New York 1893) 193-4Google Scholar.

30. B 5; D I. 2-3; N 91.

31. B 44, 55; D I. 40, 50-1; N 139, 153.

32. B 151; D I. 141; N 315.

33. B 158; D I. 148; N 325.

34. Procopius, , History of the Wars, trans. Dewing, H.B. (Loeb Classical Library, IV. Cambridge, Mass, and London 1924) 236 Google Scholar.

35. Attaleiates, Michael, Historia, ed. de Presle, W. Brunet and Bekker, I. (Bonn 1853) 165 Google Scholar.

36. An exception appears to be the work of Nikephoros Gregoras: N 68-9.

37. Livy, History of Rome, 30.12.12: ‘Omnia quidem ut posses in nobis di dederunt virtusque et felicitas sua’. Cf. 5.34.2, 8.29.5, 34.37.4; liro Kajanto, God and Fate in Livy (Turku 1959) 79-91.

38. E.g. Tusculan Disputations, 2.13-14.

39. Petrarch, , De Remediis Utriusque Fortunae (Lyons 1577) 4 Google Scholar. English Translation: Remedies for Fortune Fair and Foul, trans. Rawski, Conrad H., I (Bloomington, Indiana 1991) 1 Google Scholar.

40. Pontano, Giovanni, ‘De Fortuna’, in Opera Omnia Soluta Oratione Composita, I (Venice 1518) 264r-309vGoogle Scholar; Allen, Don Cameron, ‘Renaissance remedies for fortune: Marlow and the Fortunati ’, Studies in Philology 38 (1941) 188-91Google Scholar; Kidwell, Carol, Pontano. Poet and Prime Minister (London 1991) 292-3Google Scholar.

41. Machiavelli, Niccolò, The Prince, trans. Bull, George (Harmondsworth 1999, 2nd ed.) 49–50 Google Scholar; Flanagan, Thomas, ‘The concept of Fortune in Machiavelli’, in The Political Calculus. Essays on Machiavelli’s Philosophy, ed. Parel, Anthony (Toronto 1972) 127-56, at 129-35Google Scholar; Skinner, Quentin, Machiavelli (Oxford 1981) 23–31, 39-41Google Scholar.

42. Plethon, Traité des lois, 64-79; Keller, ‘Two Byzantine scholars’, 363-6; Skinner, Quentin, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, I (Cambridge 1978) 94–101 Google Scholar.

43. Woodhouse, George Gemistos Plethon, 128-88; Harris, Greek Émigrés, 68, 129.

44. da Bisticci, Vespasiano, The Vespasiano Memoirs. Lives of Illustrious Men of the Fifteenth Century, trans. George, William and Waters, Emily (London 1926) 273-4, 278-9Google Scholar; Harris, Greek Emigres, 69-70; W. Bodnar, Edward, Cyriacus of Ancona and Athens (Brussels 1960) 58 Google Scholar.

45. N 46-8; Miller, ‘Last Athenian Historian’, 38. On his cousin, Demetrius, see: Geanakoplos, D.J., ‘The discourse of Demetrius Chalcondyles on the inauguration of Greek studies at the University of Padua’, Studies in the Renaissance 21 (1974) 118-44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46. N 51-6; Darkó, E., ‘Neue Beitrage zur Biographie des Laonikos Chalkokondyles’, BZ 27 (1927) 276-85Google Scholar.

47. Piccolomini, , ‘De Turcarum Origine’, in Pius II, Opera Omnia (Basle 1551) 383-6, at 383Google Scholar; Schwoebel, Shadow of the Crescent, 70-4.

48. Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini (Pius II), ‘Somnium de Fortuna’, in Opera Omnia, 611-16.

49. Piccolomini, ‘De Turcarum Origine’, 383

50. B 4; D I. 2; N 89.