Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2016
The first time André Gide heard the name of Cavafy was during his visit to Greece, in April 1939. He was talking to Dimaras, Theotokas and Seferis when the conversation turned to the poet of Alexandria. Gide asked what kind of poetry Cavafy wrote. ‘Lyrique’, Dimaras replied. ‘Didactique’, corrected Seferis. Later on Dimaras read ‘The City’ to the group. After the end of the reading Gide turned to Seferis and said: ‘Je comprends maintenant ce que vous vouliez dire par le mot didactique…’.
1. George Seferis, (Athens, 1977), p. 116.
2. Tellos Agras, XIV (1933), 759-63.
3. D. Nikolareizis, (Athens, 1962), pp. 173-8.
4. Yannis Dallas, (Athens, 1974), pp. 129-30.
5. George Seferis, 3rd ed., I (Athens, 1974), p. 403.
6. Ibid.
7. Ibid., p. 330.
8. Ibid.
9. Ibid., p. 62.
10. Ibid., p. 209.
11. Ibid., pp. 403-4.
12. Ibid., p. 347.
13. Ibid., p. 38.
14. Ibid., p. 376.
15. Eliot, T. S., Selected Essays (London, 1972), p. 145.Google Scholar
16. I, p. 197.
17. Ibid., pp. 348-9.
18. Ibid., p. 344.
19. Ibid., p. 377.
20. Ibid., p. 431.
21. Ibid., p. 442.
22. Ibid., p. 38.
23. Ibid., II, pp. 261-2.
24. Ibid., I, p. 347.
25. Ibid., p. 342.
26. Selected Essays, p. 286. The italics are mine.
27. Ibid., p. 287.
28. The Sacred Wood (London, 1972), p. 129.
29. Cleanth Brooks believes that all poetry is ironic for the simple reason that every element in a poem undergoes a modification of meaning as a result of the pressure of its context. See his ‘Irony as a Principle of Structure’, in Zabel, Morton, ed., Literary Opinion in America (New York, 1951), pp. 729-41.Google Scholar
30. Selected Essays, p. 288.
31. ‘We took it, the holy relic, and carried it elsewhere. / We took it, we carried it in love and in honour.’ C. P. Cavafy, Collected Poems, tr. E. Keeley and P. Sherrard (London, 1975), p. 152.
32. I, p. 454.
33. ‘For most pious Jovian let us give our prayers’. Collected Poems, p. 101.
34. I, p. 454.
35. Cavafy’s feelings about Christianity seem to have been so complicated that any unambiguous answer to the question of whether or not he was a Christian would be simplistic. For a survey of the problem, see G. P. Savvidis, K. Π. (Athens, 1963), and in Savvidis, (Athens, 1973), pp. 115-20.
36. I, p. 456.
37. Ibid., p. 360.
38. Ibid., p. 359.