Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:37:42.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From being to becoming: reflections on the enduring popularity of Kazantzakis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Dimitris Tziovas
Dimitris Tziovas*
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this article, Kazantzakis’ popularity over the years is briefly reviewed and it is argued that the two dominant approaches to his work, which could be described as ethnographic and philosophical-theological, respectively, correspond to the antithesis between being and becoming. The question addressed here is whether we can read his fiction in a new way, and pass from the ontology of being to the contingency of becoming, following the example of the process theologians who brought him closer to postmodernism.

Type
Articles
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , 2009 , pp. 83 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dimiroulis, D., ‘O Καζαντζάκης ενόψει του 21ου αιώνα’, in Νίκος Καζαντζάκης: To έργο кои η πρόσληψή του (Herakleio 2006) 300 Google Scholar; Dimiroulis, D., ‘Όλθί μοιάζουν μεγεθυσμενα’, To Δέντρο 155-6 (May 2007) 44-8Google Scholar.

2 Bien, P., Nikos Kazantzakis: Novelist (Bristol 1989) 3 Google Scholar.

3 Kazantzakis, N., ‘Θεόδωρος Δοστογιέφσκι’, Né a Εστία 60 (706) (1 December 1956) 1646 Google Scholar.

4 S. Alexiou, ‘Νίκος Καζαντζάκης: Από τη ζωή, τη σκέψη και το έργο του’, in ίη Νίκος Καζαντζάκης: To εργο Ш1 η πρόσληφή τοο, 15.

5 For a critique of this approach, see Politi, J., ‘H ιδεολογία της αυθεντικότητας κοα о Ζορμπάς του N. Καζαντζάκη’, in her book H ανεξακρίβωτη σκηνή (Athens 2001) 15–47 Google Scholar.

6 Kazantzakis, N., Zorba the Greek, trans. Wildman, C. (London 1995) 54 Google Scholar.

7 Kazantzakis, Zorba the Greek, 156–7.

8 D. Papanikolaou, ‘Ol μεταμορφώσεις του Ζορμπά’, in Νίκος Καζαντζάκης: Τοέργο кш η πρόσληψή του, 91–108.

9 Middleton, D. J. N. and Bien, P. (eds), God’s Straggler: Religion in the Writings of Nikos Kazantzakis (Macon 1996) 6 Google Scholar. Middleton views ‘Kazantzakis’ narrative fiction as a mythopoesis of process thought’, in his Novel Theology: Nikos Kazantzakis’s Encounter with Whiteheadian Process Theism (Macon 2000) xix.

10 R. Beaton, ‘Out of Crete — Nikos Kazantzakis, creator of Zorba and The Last Temptation, fifty years on’, Times Literary Supplement, 22 June 2007, 13.

11 Yalourakis, M., ‘Συνάντηση με τον Νικ. Καζαντζάκη’, Σρραϊκά. Γρά.μματοι, 5-6 (1956) 161 Google Scholar.

12 Middleton, D. J. N., ‘Kazantzakis among the postmoderns: some reflections’, BMGS 29 (2005) 71–88 Google Scholar. This paper is reprinted as Chapter 6 (‘Kazantzakis and Postmodern Theology’) in his book Broken Hallelujah: Nikos Kazantzakis and Christian Theology (Lanham 2007).

13 Middleton, ‘Kazantzakis among the postmoderns’, 72.

14 Middleton, ‘Kazantzakis among the postmoderns’, 84.

15 Middleton, ‘Kazantzakis among the postmoderns’, 83.

16 Middleton, e.g., refers to ‘Zorba as a symbol of process, not a static repose’ in Novel Theology, 182–3.

17 Philippidis, S. N., ‘Σημειωτικες κοα αφηγηματικες αντιθέσεις στα μυθιστορήματα του Καζαντζάκη’, in his book Τόποι: Μελετήμαζτα για τον αφηγηματικό λόγο επτά νεοελλήνων πεζογράφων (Athens 1997) 31–60 Google Scholar.

18 Bien, Nikos Kazantzakis, 28.

19 Only recently Charitini Christodoulou highlighted the openness of The Last Temptation in her unpublished doctoral thesis, Dialogic Openness in Nikos Kazantzakis’ О Τελευταίος Πεφασμός, University of Birmingham 2007.

20 Philippidis, S. N., ‘O Λόγος του Πατρός και о Λόγος του Υιού: Αυθεντική ζωή κοα αυθεντικός λόγος στο μυθιστόρημα Βίος ¡ecu ηολιτεία. του Αλεξη Ζορμπά του Νίκου Καζαντζάκη’, in his book Αμφισημίες: Μελετήματα. για τον αφηγηματικό λόγο έξι νεοελλήνων συγγρχφεων (Athens 2005) 159-60Google Scholar.

21 Bien, P., ‘Nikos Kazantzakis’s Novels on Film’, Journal of Modern Greek Studies 18 (2000) 161-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Beaton, R., ‘Writing, identity and truth in Kazantzakis’s novel The Last Temptation ’, Κάμπος: Cambridge Papers in Modern Greek 5 (1997) 1–21 Google Scholar; Farinou-Malamatari, G., ‘Kazantzakis and biography’, Κάμπος: Cambridge Papers in Modern Greek 6 (1998) 19–34 Google Scholar.

23 Vrasidas Karalis, in his editorial note to a special issue on Kazantzakis, talks about outmoded literary devices’, as if Modernism had never existed, which ‘make his work something of an unexpected challenge to the reading habits and aesthetic addictions of the postmodernized cultural subject’ (Modern Greek Studies (Australia & New Zealand) 8–9 (2000-2001) 7; see also S. N. Philippidis, ‘O Λόγος του Πατρός, 156, 171).

24 Kastrinaki, A., ‘О Νίκος Καζαντζάκης και о αισθητισμός: έλξη και άπωση’ in JVúcoç Καζαντζάκης: Σαράντα χρόνια. από το θάνατο tou, Πεπραγμενα Επιστημονικού Διημέρου (Chania 1998) 127-53Google Scholar.

25 Levitt, M. P., The Cretan Glance: The World and Art of Nikos Kazantzakis (Columbus 1980) 79 Google Scholar.

26 Kimon Friar has argued that: ‘A revealing parallel may be drawn between Kazantzakis and D. H. Lawrence. Both were Dionysian, demon-driven men, placed instinct and the promptings of the blood above the ordered deductions of the mind, celebrated the primitive and atavistic origins of the human spirit, were insatiable travelers who in landscape and inscape discerned the contours of God’s or Nature’s purpose, turned to the physical universe for their imagery and away from urban mechanics and subtleties, extolled strife and crucifixion as the unavoidable and necessitous law of life and even of love, were impatient with refinements of craft and entrusted themselves to the demonic outpourings of creative inspiration, placed the prophet above the man of letters, were obsessed with messianic drives and dreams’ ( Friar, K., Modern Greek Poetry (New York 1973) 32)Google Scholar.

27 Beaton, R., ‘The temptation that never was: Kazantzakis and Borges’, in Middleton, D. J. N. (ed.), Scandalizing Jesus (New York 2005) 85–95 Google Scholar.

28 S. N. Philippidis, ‘Λαϊκότροπα στοιχεία στα μυθιστορήματα του Καζαντζάκη’, in Τόποι, 229. Middleton also argues: ‘Now, most literary critics acknowledge Kazantzakis’s modernism. I am one of them. But as I established in chapter six, his work also points forward to the ideas and themes we associate with postmodernism’ (Broken Hallelujah, 126).

29 See Tziovas, D., ‘The poetics of manhood: Genre and self-identity in Freedom and Death ’, in his book The Other Self: Selfhood and Society in Modern Greek Fiction (Lanham 2003) 153-74Google Scholar.

30 Kazantzakis, N., Report to Greco, trans. Bien, Peter (London 1973) 144-5Google Scholar.

31 Kazantzakis, Report to Greco, 322.

32 Kazantzakis, Report to Greco, 450.

33 Kazantzakis, Report to Greco, 471; see also C. Dounia, “‘Με αλήθεια кои φαντασία”: О Καζαντζάκης αυτοβιογραφουμενος’, in Νίκος Καζοίντζάκης: To εργο кса η πρόσληφή τοο, 255–70.

34 Kazantzakis, N., The Last Temptation, trans. Bien, Peter (London 1975) 488 Google Scholar.

35 Kazantzakis, N., Θέατρο, Τραγωδίες, III (Athens 1956) 222-3Google Scholar.