Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T07:26:39.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fragments from Ottoman Zagori: continuity and change in a montane landscape through a local perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2023

Faidon Moudopoulos-Athanasiou*
Affiliation:
Catalan Institute of Classical Archaeology, Tarragona
Elias Kolovos*
Affiliation:
University of Crete, Rethymno

Abstract

This article discusses elite continuity and settlement pattern change in Zagori (NW Greece) from the late fourteenth to the nineteenth century. The peaceful assimilation of the regional and local elites into the Ottoman Empire (1430) led to adaptations in the montane landscape. Imperial and local archival research, ethnography, and landscape archaeology reveal that the Ottoman administration divided large decentralized settlements into smaller villages to accommodate local elites and new timariots. This topography of division (fifteenth to sixteenth centuries) gave way to a topography of adaptation (seventeenth to nineteenth centuries) when local elites influenced settlement patterns in forming the administrative unit the Zagorisian League.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 It is interesting to note the comments from the livestreamed event on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX5N7UQdeZ0 (Accessed: 03.04.2022).

2 With the nineteenth-century reforms, the sancak of Yanya became the vilayet of Yanya: see Kokolakis, M., Το ύστερο γιαννιώτικο πασαλίκι: χώρος, διοίκηση και πληθυσμός στην τουρκοκρατούμενη Ήπειρο (Athens 2003)Google Scholar.

3 The present-day administrative border of the municipality of Zagori does not represent the reality of the Ottoman period. Although the Slavic place name Zagori predates the Ottoman conquest, already in the first available Ottoman registers of the sixteenth century the nahiye-i Zagorye appears alongside the nahiye-i Papinkoz. Administratively, the two regions merged only later and the creation of a single Zagorisian identity is the product of nineteenth-century local scholars: see Dalkavoukis, V., Γράφοντας ανάμεσα. Εθνογραφικές δοκιμές με αφορμή το Zαγόρι (Athens 2015) 64-88Google Scholar. The region should not be conflated with the Zagoria, located in SW Albania. This article takes the districts of Zagori and Papingo together, as a single upland unity sharing geomorphological and cultural characteristics.

4 Agreement on 24 January 1774. Cited in K. Varzokas, ‘Οι Zαγορίσιοι και ο Αλή Πασάς’, Πρακτικά πρώτου συμποσίου λόγου «Ο λόγος για το Zαγόρι (Ioannina 1988) 88–105. For the institution of the Varoş, see S. Ivanova, ‘Varos: the elites of the reaya in the towns of Rumeli, seventeenth-eighteenth Centuries’ in Anastasopoulos, A. (ed), Provincial Elites in the Ottoman Empire (Rethymno 2005)Google Scholar.

5 ‘Νούτσος απ’ το Καπέσοβο, Πασχάλης απ’ την Πόλη, έφεραν τον Αλή πασά μέσα εις το βαρόσι’. For the verse and a recent relevant discussion, see E. Kolovos and F. Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, ‘τ οι Zαγορίσιοι είναι κακοί και γράφουνε στην Πόλη: δυο αδημοσίευτα έγγραφα από την δεκαετία του 1820 και η σημασία τους για το Zαγόρι’, in Ph. Doris and P. Papastratis (eds), Youkali, ένα liber amicorum για τον Σταύρο Μουδόπουλο (Athens 2023) 255–76.

6 Ladias, V., ‘Αξίζει να τιμηθεί και ο Αλή Πασάς μαζί με Έλληνες αγωνιστές του ’21;’, Ἐν Τσεπελόβῳ 38 (2022) 36–7Google Scholar.

7 Skiotis, D., ‘From bandit to pasha: first steps in the rise to power of Ali of Tepelen, 1750–1784’, International Journal of Middle East Studies 2 (1971) 219–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 V. Panagiotopoulos, D. Dimitropoulos and P. Michailaris. Αρχείο Αλή Πασά: συλλογής Ι. Χώτζη Γενναδείου Βιβλιοθήκης της Αμερικάνικης Σχολής Αθηνών (Athens 2007).

9 B. McGowan, ‘The Age of the Ayans, 1699–1812’, in H. İnalcık and D. Quataert (eds), An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, (Cambridge 1994) II (16001914) 637–743; also Yaycioglu., A. Partners of the Empire: the crisis of the Ottoman order in the age of revolutions (Palo Alto 2020)Google Scholar.

10 Nicol, D.M., The Despotate of Epiros (Cambridge 1984) 176Google Scholar.

11 Hendrickx, T. Sansaridou, The Chronicle of the Tocco. Greeks, Italians, Albanians and Turks in the Despotate of Epirus (14th–15th Centuries) (Thessaloniki 2008)Google Scholar.

12 P. Aravantinos, Χρονογραφία της Ηπείρου, Τόμος Α (Athens 1856); I. Lambridis, Zαγοριακά Α (Athens 1870).

13 Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, F., The Early Modern Zagori of Northwest Greece: an interdisciplinary archaeological inquiry into a montane cultural landscape (Leiden 2022)Google Scholar.

14 Ph. Kotzageorgis, Πρώιμη Οθωμανική Πόλη (Athens 2019).

15 Osswald, B., ‘L'expansion territoriale ottomane en Épire et dans les Îles Ioniennes (XIVe–XVe siècles)’, Ηπειρωτικά Χρονικά 40 (2006) 341–64Google Scholar (353–4).

16 Delilbasi, M., ‘A contribution to the history of EpirusGamer 1 (2012) 37–60Google Scholar (39).

17 İnalcık, H., ‘Ottoman Methods of Conquest’, Studia Islamica 2 (1954) 103–29Google Scholar; Lowry, H., The Nature of the Early Ottoman State (Albany NY 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Aravantinos, Χρονογραφία της Ηπείρου, 33–4.

19 For detail, see Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 57–60.

20 Ottoman registers bear complete lists of tie Zagori Voynuks for the years 1564-5 and 1583–4. See Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 57–60.

21 G. Ágoston, ‘Warfare’, in G. Ágoston and B. Masters (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire (New York 2010) 592; E. Radushev and G. Baş, Early Ottoman Military and Administrative Order in the Balkans: a muster roll of the Voynuk Corps (Defter-İ Esâmî-İvoynugân) in the Western Balkans from 1487 (Sofia 2020).

22 Voevoda in the pre-Ottoman Balkans ‘denoted a highranking commander and, on the eve of the Ottoman conquest, the governor of a military district’. F Adanir, ‘Woywoda’, in P. Bearman et al. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, online Brill (Consulted online on 21 December 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_7923).

23 M. Acheimastou-Potamianou, Οι τοιχογραφίες του έτους 1414 στη μονή της Αγίας Παρασκευής του Βίκου στο Zαγόρι της Ηπείρου (Athens 2017).

24 Radushev and Baş, Early Ottoman Military and Administrative Order in the Balkans, 16.

25 G. Papageorgiou, Οικονομικοί και κοινωνικοί μηχανισμοί στον ορεινό χώρο (Ioannina 1995) 64.

26 Lambridis, I., Zαγοριακά Β (Athens 1889) 16, 22Google Scholar.

27 Besides Michael Voevoda Therianos, another member of the pre-Ottoman administration at Zagori is known. He was Ioannis Tsafas (Zaffa) Oursinos (Orsini), registered in a chrysobull of Symeon Palaiologos (1361) as owning the most fertile regions of Zagori, under the title of Grand Constable (Cited in Lambridis, Zαγοριακά Α, 31). Recent scholars suggest that the chrysobull may have beena forgery by Zaffa Orsini himself: see M. Katsaropoulou, ‘Ένα πρόβλημα της Ελληνικής Μεσαιωνικής ιστορίας: η Σερβική επέκταση στη Δυτική Κεντρική Ελλάδα στα μέσα του ΙΔ’ Αιώνα’, (PhD thesis, Thessaloniki 1989) 126–37. However, the authenticity of the document is irrelevant, as either Zaffa Orsini or another minor noble would have controlled the area between Apano and Kato Soudena (Πεδινάτα) and Veitsa.

28 This kanunname is unfortunately lost, and the first Ottoman register available to researchers dates to 1530, a century after the initial conquest.

29 Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 74–88.

30 Nicol, The Despotate of Epiros, 151.

31 Lambridis, Zαγοριακά Α, 23.

32 For the frescoes of the early Ottoman period in Zagori, see I. Houliaras, Η εντοίχια θρησκευτική ζωγραφική του 16ου και 17ου αιώνα στο δυτικό Zαγόρι (Ioannina 2009).

33 For further details on this ‘topography of division’ see Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 88-94.

34 Stara, K. and Tsiakiris, R., ‘Oriental planes and other monumental trees in central squares and churchyards in NW Greece: sacred, emblematic and threatened’, Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae 1 (2019) 14–18Google Scholar.

35 Lambridis, Zαγοριακά Α, 36.

36 Inalcik, H., ‘Military and fiscal transformation in the Ottoman Empire, 1600–1700’, Archivum Ottomanicum 6 (1980) 283–337Google Scholar.

37 Papageorgiou, Οικονομικοί και οινωνικοί μηχανισμοί στον ορεινό χώρο, 190ff; Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 64–5.

38 ‘Χωριδίου κειμένου παρά τη μονή του Ασπραγγέλου’, Lambridis, Zαγοριακά Α, 51.

39 Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 90, 99, 101.

40 Lambridis, Zαγοριακά Α, 51–2.

41 Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 90–101.

42 Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 100-1.

43 K. Oikonomou, Τοπωνυμικό Zαγορίου (Ioannina 1991) 249.

44 Aravantinos, Χρονογραφία της Ηπείρου, 261.

45 It is important to remember that the Orthodox notables of Ioannina were removed from the castle only after the unsuccessful rebellion of Dionysios Skylosphos (1611). See E. Gara, ‘Prophecy, rebellion, suppression: revisiting the revolt of Dionysios the Philosopher in 1611’, in G. Slonero et al. (eds), Paradigmes rebelles: Pratiques et cultures de la désobéissance à l’époque moderne (Brussels 2018) 335–62.

46 Oikonomou, Τοπωνυμικό Zαγορίου; for a list see Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 63.

47 See F. Dasoulas, Ο Αγροτικός Κόσμος των Βλάχων της ΠίνδουΧώρα Μετζόβου’ (18ος-19ος αι.) (Thessaloniki 2019).

48 The emergence of monasteries and their increase in property and wealth during the seventeenth century is emphasized in recent literature, especially for mountainous areas. See R. Avramov et al. (eds), Monastic Economy Across Time: wealth management, patterns, and trends (Sofia 2021) and Ph. Kotzageorgis, ‘Τα μοναστήρια ως τοπικές Οθωμανικές ελίτ’, in E. Kolovos (ed.), Μοναστήρια, οικονομία και ολιτική από τους μεσαιωνικούς στους νεώτερους χρόνους (Herakleion 2011) 163-90. On Pindus in particular, see Th. Tsampouras, Τα καλλιτεχνικά εργαστήρια από την περιοχή του Γράμμου κατά το 16ο και 17ο αιώνα (No. GRI-2013-11028) (Thessaloniki 2013) and Greene, M., ‘History in high places: Tatarna Monastery and the Pindus mountains’. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 64.1-2 (2020) 1–24Google Scholar.

49 K. Raios, Ιερά Μονή Βουτσάς: παράδοση, ιστορία, ναοδομία, ιστόρηση, βιβλιοθήκη, κειμήλια (Ioannina 2018).

50 Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 96–8.

51 Kotzageorgis, ‘Τα Μοναστήρια ως Τοπικές Οθωμανικές Ελίτ’, 163–90.

52 F. Petsas and G. Saralis, Αρίστη και Δυτικό Zαγόρι (Athens 1982).

53 Moudopoulos-Athanasiou,The Early Modern Zagori, 98.

54 Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 68. For the çiftlik status of the two villages see K. Vakatsas, ‘Η Γενική Διοίκηση Ηπείρου, η αγροτική ιδιοκτησία 1913–18’ (PhD thesis, Ioannina 2001) 57.

55 Moudopoulos-Athanasiou, The Early Modern Zagori, 111–20.

56 Aravantinos, Χρονογραφία της Ηπείρου, 261.

57 M. Kiel, ‘The Ottoman Imperial Registers: Central Greece and Northern Bulgaria in the 15th–19th century; the demographic development of two areas compared’, in J. Bintliff and K. Sbonias (eds.), Reconstructing Past Population Trends in Mediterranean Europe (3000 BC–AD 1800) (Oxford 2016) 195–218.

58 King, C., Lament from Epirus. An Odyssey into Europe's oldest surviving folk music (New York 2018) 58Google Scholar.