Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:41:26.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dialectics of expansion and retraction: recent scholarship on the Palaiologan aristocracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Dionysios Stathakopoulos
Dionysios Stathakopoulos*
Affiliation:
Department of Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, Kings College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the first half of the fifteenth century a man donated an icon to the monastery of Mega Spelaion at Kalavryta; his name was less an instrument of identification than a manifesto of social association: John Tornikes Doukas Angelos Palaiologos Raoul Laskaris Philanthropenos Asanes. To judge from the chain of such resounding names of the leading late Byzantine families he clearly belonged to the dominant class of his time, and since nothing else is known of him, for lack of more precise social coordinates, we surely must count him among the aristocracy. Can we take an educated guess at what constituted a person of such social standing? He must have owned land; he probably held some office, while the accumulation of all his names points to marriage alliances between families of similar social standing. None of these assumptions suggests anything new about the aristocracy of the Palaiologan period, and yet, the overview that will follow aims to disclose exactly that: the points in which this era brought forth new developments that challenge the (thankfully dwindling) misconception of Byzantium as a state in which hardly anything changed. In 1973 Angeliki Laiou published her important article on the Palaiologan aristocracy. In twenty dense pages she made a number of remarks and reached several important conclusions that have influenced the direction of scholarship on the topic. As such it is worth summarizing these conclusions briefly.

Type
Critical Study
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , 2009 , pp. 92 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Prosopographisches Lexikon der Palaiologenzett (hereafter PLP), Trapp, E. et al. (eds), 14 vols (Vienna 1976-2001) 1502 Google Scholar.

2 Laiou, A.E., ‘The Byzantine aristocracy in the Palaiologan period: a case of arrested development’, Viator 4 (1973) 131-51, here 132CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Laiou, ‘Arrested development’, 139.

4 Laiou, ‘Arrested development’, 143.

5 Laiou, ‘Arrested development’, 141.

6 Laiou, ‘Arrested development’, 147–9, quote on 149.

7 The person who has single-handedly brought the late Byzantine merchants into focus, and to whose early work Oikonomides made reference, is Klaus-Peter Matschke. His own substantial contribution will be discussed below.

8 Oikonomidès, N., Hommes d’affaires grecs et latins à Constantinople (XIIIe-XVe siècles) (Montreal/Paris 1979) 115-20Google Scholar.

9 Codex lustinianus = Corpus luris Civilis, II, ed. Krüger, P. (Berlin 1959) XII 1.6Google Scholar; Basilica, ed. Heimbach, G. E. (Leipzig 1833-1897) VI 1.23 Google Scholar; Constantine Harmenopoulos, Hexabiblos, ed. Heimbach, G. E. (Leipzig 1851, repr. Aalen 1969) III 5.2. Google Scholar

10 Oikonomidès, Hommes d’affaires, 122–3.

11 PLP 91696.

12 PLP 1526.

13 Laiou-Thomadakis, A. E., ‘The Byzantine economy in the Mediterranean trade system: thirteenth-fifteenth centuries’, DOP 34 (1982) 199–201 Google Scholar.

14 PLP 91697.

15 For George Goudelis’ xenon, see Chortasmenos, John, Briefe, Gedichte, Kleine Schriften, ed. Hunger, H. (Vienna 1969) Ep. 8, 157-9Google Scholar. On the son’s dealings, see Laiou-Thomadakis, ‘Byzantine economy’, 221.

16 Garnsey, P., Famine and Food Supply in the Graeco-Roman World: Responses to Risk and Crisis (Cambridge 1988) 82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Laiou-Thomadakis, ‘Byzantine economy’, 204, 212.

18 Laiou-Thomadakis, A. E., ‘The Greek merchant of the Palaeologan period: a collective portrait’, Praktika tes Akademias Athenon 57 (1982) 105, 108, 110-11Google Scholar.

19 Laiou-Thomadakis, ‘The Greek merchant’, 105.

20 Laiou-Thomadakis, ‘The Greek merchant’, 109, 113.

21 Nicol, D., ‘The prosopography of the Byzantine aristocracy’, in Angold, M. (ed.), The Byzantine Aristocracy IX to XIII Centuries (Oxford 1984) 79–91 Google Scholar.

22 A search for the thesis using COPAC in July 2008 showed that no library in the United Kingdom holds a copy.

23 Kyritses, D., The Byzantine Aristocracy in the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries (unpublished doctoral thesis, Harvard University 1997) 2 Google Scholar.

24 Kyritses, Aristocracy, 395–46.

25 Kyritses, Aristocracy, 72.

26 Kyritses, Aristocracy, 138–9.

27 Kyritses, Aristocracy, 209–11.

28 Kyritses, Aristocracy, 246.

29 Kyritses, Aristocracy, 280–1.

30 Kyritses, Aristocracy, 387–90, quote on 390.

31 Kyritses, Aristocracy, 392–4, quote on 394.

32 Matschke, K.-P. and Tinnefeid, F., Die Gesellschaft im späten Byzanz: Gruppen, Strukturen und Lebensformen (Cologne/Weimar/Vienna 2001)Google Scholar. For a complete list of Matschke’s publications, see the bibliography in Kolditz, S. and Müller, R. C. (eds), Geschehenes und Geschriebenes: Studien zu Ehren von Gunther S. Henrich und Klaus-Peter Matschke (Leipzig 2005) 535-44Google Scholar.

33 Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 28.

34 Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 29–31.

35 Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 54.

36 Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 91.

37 Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 158–220.

38 Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 159.

39 Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 171–5.

40 Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 177–87.

41 Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 201.

42 Matscbke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 217.

43 Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 389–90.

44 Ganchou, Th., ‘Le rachat des Notaras après la chute de Constantinople, ou les relations “étrangères” de l’élite byzantine au XVe siècle’, in Balard, M. and Ducellier, A. (eds), Migrations et diasporas Méditerranéennes (Xe-XVIe siècles) (Paris 2002) 215–335 Google Scholar.

45 In addition to the article in discussion, cf.Matschke, K.P., ‘The Notaras family and its Italian connections’, DOP 49 (1995) 59–72 Google Scholar.

46 PLP 20733.

47 PLP 20730.

48 Ganchou, ‘Rachat’, 158–64.

49 Ganchou has already published a considerable corpus of information on many aspects of the life and fortunes of members of the Late Byzantine dominant class, and has announced the publication of monographs on the Goudelis and the Notaras families.

50 Kiousopoulou, T., Βα,σιλεύςή οικονόμος: πολιτική εξουσία. και ιδεολογία. πριν την Άλωση (Athens 2007)Google Scholar.

51 Kiousopoulou, #Αχσί/Ιεύς, 20.

52 Kiousopoulou, Βασιλεύς, 57.

53 Kiousopoulou, Βασιλεύς, 74–5.

54 Kiousopoulou, Βασιλεύς, 75.

55 Kiousopoulou, Βασιλεύς, 75, 88.

56 Kiousopoulou, Βασιλεύς, 97.

57 Kiousopoulou, Βασιλεύς, 108–11.

58 Kiousopoulou, Βασιλεύς, 115.

59 Kiousopoulou, Βασιλεύς, 155–6.

60 Kiousopoulou, Βασιλεύς, 265–70.

61 For a first collection of such works, see Nicol, ‘Prosopography’, 89–90 and the bibliography in Matschke and Tinnefeid, Gesellschaft, 397–418.

62 Angold, M., ‘Archons and dynasts: local aristocracies and the cities of the later Byzantine empire’, in Angold, M. (ed.), The Byzantine Aristocracy IX to XIII Centuries (Oxford 1984) 236-53Google Scholar.

63 Angold, ‘Archons’, 240.

64 Necipoğlu, N., ‘The aristocracy in late Byzantine Thessalonike: A case study of the city’s archontes (late 14th and early 15th centuries)’, DOP 57 (2003) 133-51Google Scholar.

65 Necipoğlu, ‘Aristocracy’, 135–38.

66 Necipoğlu, ‘Aristocracy’, 140–4, 148.

67 Necipoğlu, ‘Aristocracy’, 151.

68 Pavlikianov, C., The Medieval Aristocracy on Mount Athos (Sofia 2001)Google Scholar.

69 Pavlikianov, Medieval Aristocracy, 1–4.

70 Pavlikianov, Medieval Aristocracy, 193.

71 Pavlikianov, Medieval Aristocracy, 196.

72 Pavlikianov, Medieval Aristocracy, 197.

73 Pavlikianov, Medieval Aristocracy, 198.