Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:03:45.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Significance of Unction in Byzantine Iconography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Christopher Walter
Christopher Walter*
Affiliation:
Institu français d’études byzantines, Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How agreeable it would be if the art historian could, with the aid of iconographical documents, resolve problems which baffle those who depend primarily upon literary sources for their studies. Unfortunately, such a triumph is rarely afforded to the art historian. Byzantine artists in particular have not left us a detailed record of contemporary events; their productions tell us more about the ideas current in their lifetime than about what actually happened. This is certainly the case for the rite of unction. We have no pictures of a Byzantine emperor being anointed and no evidence that such pictures ever existed. Consequently the art historian cannot directly help towards a firm answer to the question raised by Donald Nicol in his article: after what date should references in chronicle sources to a Byzantine emperor being consecrated by unction be interpreted in a literal rather than in a figurative or metaphorical sense?

Type
Research Article
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 2 , 1976 , pp. 53 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nicol, D. M., ‘Kaisersalbung. The Unction of Emperors in Late Byzantine Coronation Ritual’, above pp. 37–52 Google Scholar.

2. Dodd, Erica Cruikshank, Byzantine Silver Stamps (Dumbarton Oaks Studies, VII: 1961), no. 62, p. 186 Google Scholar (with bibliography).

3. Kraeling, C. H., The Excavations at Dura-Europos: The Synagogue (New Haven, 1956), pp. 164–8 Google Scholar, pl. 66; Grabar, A., ‘Le thème religieux des fresques de la synagogue de Doura’, L’art de la fin de l’Antiquité et du Moyen Age (Paris, 1968), II, pp. 706–8 Google Scholar; III, pl. 166b; Gutmann, J., ‘Programmatic Paintings in the Dura Synagogue’, The Dura-Europos Synagogue : A Re-evaluation (1932–1972) (Fifth World Congress of Jewish Studies, IV [Jerusalem, 1973]), pp. 137–54 Google Scholar; idem, ‘Dura Europos (Die Synagoge)’, Reallexikon für byzantinischen Kunst, I (Stuttgart, 1966), 1230–40.

4. Buchthal, H., The Miniatures of the Paris Psalter (London, 1938), p. 20 Google Scholar.

5. Dictionnaire des antiquités grecques et romaines, ed. C. Daremberg and Saglio, E., IV, 1485: ‘Statua’; V, 594: ‘Unguentum’; Paulys Real-Encyclopädie, II, 1 (Stuttgart, 1920), 1857–8 Google Scholar: ‘Salben’.

6. Lesêtre, H., ‘Onction’, Dictionnaire de la Bible, IV, 1807 Google Scholar, fig. 482 (representation of an Egyptian king anointed by two gods); Bloch, M., Les rois thaumaturges (Strasbourg, 1924), p. 67 Google Scholar.

7. Grabar, A., L’empereur dans l’art byzantin (Strasbourg, 1936; reprinted, Variorum, London, 1971), pp. 96–7 Google Scholar.

8. See meanwhile Weitzmann’s penetrating study of the theme of two of mese plates: ‘Prolegomena to a Study of the Cyprus Plates’, Metropolitan Museum Journal, III (1970), 97-111.

9. Tertullian, De resurredione carnis, 8: MPL, II, 806.

10. Tertullian, Traité du baptême, 7-8: ed. Refoulé, R. F. (Sources chrétiennes, 35 [Paris, 1952]), pp. 120–3 Google Scholar; see also Leclercq, H., ‘Onction’, Dictionnaire d’archéologie chrétienne et de liturgie, XII, 2116–19 Google Scholar.

11. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catéchèses mystagogiques, 3: ed. Piédagnel, A. (Sources chrétiennes, 126 [Paris, 1966]), pp. 120–33 Google Scholar.

12. Sarcophagus in the Museo Nazionale, Rome. See Grabar, A., Christian Iconography, A Study of its Origins (London, 1969), pp. 103–4, 265–6 Google Scholar.

13. Among many examples, that in the catacombs of St. Callixtus, Rome: Grabar, Christian Iconography, fig. 18.

14. Coppens, J., L’imposition des mains et les rites connexes (Wetteren-Paris, 1925), pp. 401–2 Google Scholar.

15. Westwood, J. O., The Bible of the Monastery of Saint Paul near Rome (London, 1876)Google Scholar; Leclercq, H., ‘Charles le Chauve (Manuscrits de)’, Dictionnaire d’archéologie chrétienne et de liturgie, III, 856–65 Google Scholar. My remarks are based on the set of photographs kindly put at my disposal by Suzy Dufrenne.

16. Wald, E. De, The Stuttgart Psalter (Princeton, 1930)Google Scholar; Der Stuttgarter Bilderpsalter, Bilb. fol. 23 Württembergische Landesbibliothek, Stuttgart, I. Facsimile-Band (Stuttgart, 1965); II: Untersuchungen (Stuttgart, 1968), pp. 75, 119-20, 169. It should be remarked in passing that the drawing of the unction of David in Leningrad Q. v. xiv no. 1, f. 1, contrary to the opinion of Kurz, O., ‘Ein insulares Musterbuchblatt und die byzantinische Psalterillustration’, BNJ, XIV (1938), 84–93 Google Scholar, is unlikely to be a copy after a Byzantine original of this period for two reasons: David and Samuel are given the same stature, and oil is poured from the wide end of the horn. The drawing is consequently closer to known Western representations.

17. Wald, E. De, Illustrations of the Utrecht Psalter (Princeton, 1932), pp. 13–14 Google Scholar, pl. xx; p. 40, pl. lxxxviii; p. 58, pl. cxvi; p. 72, pl. cxliv. Dufrenne, Suzy, Les illustrations du Psautier d’Utrecht (in course of publication; thesis in typescript, Paris, 1972), I, p. 129 Google Scholar; II, pp. 445-7.

18. Leclercq, H., ‘Onction dans l’ordination’, Dictionnaire d’archéologie chrétienne et de liturgie, XII, 2143–6 Google Scholar.

19. Buchthal, op. cit., pp. 18-21, fig. 3; Nersessian, Sirarpie Der, L’illustration des Psautiers grecs du Moyen Age, II: Londres Add. 19.352 (Paris, 1970), p. 100 Google Scholar, n. 4 (giving a considerable list of variants).

20. Dufrenne, Suzy, L’illustration des Psautiers grecs du Moyen Age, I (Paris, 1966), p. 32 Google Scholar, pl. 19.

21. Nersessian, Sirarpie Der, ‘The Illustrations of the Homilies of Saint Gregory of Nazianzus, Paris. Gr. 510. A study of the Connection between Text and Images’, DOP, XVI (1962), 203–4, pl. 4 Google Scholar.

22. Miniature della Bibbia Cod. vat. regin. greco i e del Salterio Cod. vat. palat. greco 381 (Milan, 1905), p. 9, pl. 12; Mango, C., ‘The date of Cod. Vat. Regin. Gr. 1 and the “Macedonian Renaissance”‘, Inst. Romanum Norvegiae, Acta ad archaeol. et artium pertinentia, IV (Rome, 1969), 121–6 Google Scholar.

23. Walter, Ch., ‘Raising on a shield in Byzantine iconography’, REB, XXXIII (1975), 146–7 Google Scholar.

24. E. Schwartz, Acta conciliorum, II, i, 2, p. 15513; II, ii, 2, p. 99; Walter, Ch., L’iconographie des conciles dans la tradition byzantine (Paris, 1970), p. 139 Google Scholar.

25. Mansi, J. D., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, XIII, 408 Google Scholar (= MPG, XCV III, 1436).

26. Lazarev, V., Storia della pittura bizantina (Turin, 1967), p. 141, pl. 128 Google Scholar.

27. H. Lesêtre, op. cit., 1805-81, says that ‘une onction royale était exceptionnelle, soit pour établir une nouvelle dynastie … soit pour quelqu’un dont le pouvoir était contestable’. Cothenet, E., ‘Onction’, Dictionnaire de la Bible (Supplément), VI (Paris, 1960), 717 Google Scholar, says that ‘on peut conclure avec certitude que… l’onction constituait l’un des actes essentiels de i’intronisation du nouveau roi’.

28. Wald, E. De, The Illustrations in the Manuscripts of the Septuagint, III : Psalms and Odes, 2: Vaticanus graecus 752 (Princeton, 1942), p. 16 Google Scholar; Walter, op. cit. (n. 23). 153-4.

29. Theodoret of Cyr, Interpretatio in Psalmis: MPG, LXXX, 1048D-1049C.

30. Lassus, J., L’illustration du Livre des Rois (Paris, 1973), p. 51 Google Scholar, fig. 40.

31. Ibid., p. 44, fig. 24.

32. Ibid., p. 44, fig. 25.

33. Ibid., p. 79, fig. 97. In this miniature the oil gushes from the top of the horn held by Zadok. This detail comes from an apocryphal account of David’s first unction, according to which, when Samuel approached David, the oil at once gushed from his horn. For an example in the iconography of David’s first unction, see the Barberini Psalter, Vatican, barb, graec. 372, f. 152v: Stichel, R., ‘Ausserkanonische Elemente in byzantinischen Illustrationen des Alten Testaments’, Römische Quartalschrift, LXIX (1974), 169–70 Google Scholar, fig. 7b.

34. Der Nersessian, op. cit. (n. 19), figs. 33, 159, 174, 196, 297, 298.

35. Ibid., figs. 33, 159.

36. Georges et Dèmètrios Tornikès, Lettres et discours, ed. Darrouzès, J. (Paris, 1970), pp. 82 Google Scholar l. 24-83 l. 2.

37. Michel Italikos, Lettres et discours, ed. Gautier, P. (Paris, 1972), pp. 79, 292 Google Scholar.

38. Walter, op. cit. (n. 23), 133, 173.

39. Bloch, Les rois thaumaturges, p. 69.

40. Basse, B., La constitution de l’ancienne France (Paris, 1973), p. 90 Google Scholar.

41. Bloch, op. cit., p. 73 n. 1.

42. Porphyrogenitus, Constantine, De cerimoniis, II, 23: pp. 620–2 Google Scholar (CSHB); Bréhier, L., ‘“Hiereus” et “Basileus”’, Mélanges L. Petit (Bucharest, 1948), pp. 42–3 Google Scholar.

43. Bloch, op. cit., p. 71.

44. Chrysostom, John, Homily on Isaiah, 6: MPG, LVI, 125 Google Scholar.

45. Theophanes, Chronograpkia, ed. C. de Boor (Leipzig, 1883-5), I, pp. 472 l. 30-473 l. 4. The account of the Liber Pontificalis, ed. L. Duchesne, II, p. 7, which makes no allusion to an unction, must be preferred. As Bloch, op. cit., p. 464, plausibly suggests, Theophanes was misled by the fact that Charles, the son of Charlemagne, was anointed by the pope the same day. Cf. liber Ponttficalis, p. 7. For the most recent discussion of Charlemagne’s imperial coronation, see Klassen, P., ‘Karl der Grosse, der Papsttum und Byzanz’, Karl der Grosse, I, ed. Beumann, H. (Düsseldorf, 1965), pp. 584–5, 595–6 Google Scholar, and Tsirpanlis, C. N., ‘Byzantine Reactions to the Coronation of Charlemagne’, Byzantina, VI (1974), 345–60 Google Scholar.

46. Manasses, Constantine, Compendium Chronicum (CSHB), p. 193 Google Scholar, vv. 4516-18. Unfortunately the illuminated Bulgarian version of the chronicle, Vatican, slav. 2, contains no miniature of Charlemagne’s supposed unction.

47. Canones: MPG, CXXXVII, 1156. Cf. Nicol, op. cit., p. 51.

48. Demetrios Chomatianos, Ad Constantinum Cabasilam, Responsum, 4: ed. Pitra, J. B., Analecta Sacra et Classica, VI (Paris and Rome, 1891), col. 631 (= MPG, CXIX, 949)Google Scholar. See also Darrouzès, J., ‘Les réponses canoniques de Jean de Kitros’, REB, XXXI (1973), 323–4 Google Scholar.

49. Bréhier, op. cit., p. 45.

50. Laurent, V., ‘Le rituel de l’investiture du patriarche byzantin’, Bulletin de la section historique de l’Académie roumaine, XXVIII (1947), 231 Google Scholar; idem, ‘Le trisépiscopat du patriarche Matthieu Ier’, REB, XXX (1972), 16. The subject merits re-examination.

51. Ostrogorsky, G., History of the Byzantine State (Oxford, 1968), p. 341 Google Scholar.

52. Darrouzès, J., Recherches sur les Offikia de l’église byzantine (Paris, 1970), pp. 51–8 Google Scholar; Gautier, P., ‘L’édit d’Alexis Comnène sur la réforme du clergé’, REB, XXXI (1973), 165–201 Google Scholar.

53. Walter, , L’iconographie des conciles, pp. 143–4 Google Scholar.

54. The Church of Haghia Sophia at Trebizond, ed. Rice, D. Talbot (Edinburgh, 1968), pp. 2, 116 Google Scholar, fig. 79.

55. Djurić, V., ‘Tri dogadjaja u srpskoj državi XIV veka i njihov odjek u slikarstvu’, Zbomik za likovne umetnosti, IV (1968), 87–97 Google Scholar, fig. 17.

56. G. Millet and Frolow, A., La peinture du Moyen Age en Yougoslavie, III (Paris, 1962), fig. 21, i Google Scholar.

57. Okunev, N., ‘Monast’ir’ Morača v Cernogorii’, BS, VIII (1939–46), 119–80 Google Scholar; Skovan-Vikčević, Anika, ‘Freske XIII veka u manastiru Morači’, Zbomik radova Viz. Inst., V (1958), 161 Google Scholar; Djurić, V., ‘Jedna slikarska radionica u Srbiji XIII veka’, Starinar, XII (1961), 68 Google Scholar; Babić, Gordana, Les chapelles annexes des églises byzantines (Paris, 1969), p. 134 Google Scholar, figs. 96, 97.

58. I discussed this theme in my paper, ‘The iconographical sources for the coronation of Milutin and Simonida at Gracanica’, delivered at the Symposium on L’art byzantin au commencement du XIVe siècle at Belgrade, October 1973 (in course of publication).