Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:01:29.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rhetoric of Poverty: The Lives and Opinions of Theodore Prodromos*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Roderick Beaton
Roderick Beaton*
Affiliation:
King’s College London (University of London)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There has been an upsurge of interest recently in the Greek literary revival of the twelfth century that followed upon the Byzantine defeat at Manzikert in 1071, creating by an accident of history a largely Greek-speaking state out of a former ‘universal’ empire. The leading part played in this revival by the court poet Theodore Prodromos who lived from c. 1100 until perhaps the 1170s, and by works attributed to him, has long been recognised, although the dichotomy imposed by nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholars between literature in the learned language and literature in the vernacular has obscured the fact that, whether or not the entire ‘Prodromic’ corpus is the work of a single individual, large parts of it are thematically and stylistically unified. Margaret Alexiou’s article in the last volume of BMGS, an in-depth analysis of the fourth of the vernacular Poems of Poor Prodromos, goes a long way towards opening up this area to new methods of inquiry (Alexiou, M. 1986). Much however still remains to be done in establishing the nature and context of these innovative works of the twelfth century. The present paper looks at the literary context for the earliest extant use of the Greek vernacular in twelfth-century ‘begging poetry’, and is intended as ‘prolegomena’ to a forthcoming literary analysis of the four Poems of Poor Prodromos, or Ptochoprodromika.

Type
Research Article
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 11 , 1987 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexiou, M. (1986). ‘The poverty of écriture and the craft of writing: towards a reappraisal of the Prodromic poems’, BMGS 10, 1–40.Google Scholar
Alexiou, S. (1983). 1, 41–57.Google Scholar
Alexiou, S. (1985). (Athens).Google Scholar
Alexiou, S. (forthcoming). in Eideneier, H. (ed.) Neograeca Medii Aevi: Text und Ausgabe (Cologne).Google Scholar
Antoniadi, S. (1956). Mélanges Merlier 1, 13–23 (Athens).Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1982. ‘A talent to abuse: some aspects of Byzantine satire’, Byzantische Forschungen 8, 19–28.Google Scholar
Beaton, R.M. (1986). Review of Alexiou 1985. JHS 106, 271–3.Google Scholar
Beaton, R.M. (1986a). ‘ De vulgari eloquentia in twelfth-century Byzantium’, in Howard-Johnston, J. (ed.) Byzantium and the West c. 850-c. 1200 (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Beaton, R.M. (1986b). ‘Byzantine historiography and modern oral poetry: the case of Rapsomatis’, BMGS 10, 41–50.Google Scholar
Beaton, R.M. (forthcoming) in Eideneier, H. (ed.) Neograeca Medii Aevi: Text und Ausgabe (Cologne).Google Scholar
Beck, H.-G. (1971). Geschichte der byzantinischen Volksliteratur (Munich).Google Scholar
Bernardinello, S. (1972). Theodori Prodromi de Manganis. Università di Padova: Studi Bizantini e Neoellenici, 4 (Padua).Google Scholar
Browning, R. (1980). The Byzantine empire (London).Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1980). ‘The Archpoet’s confession: sources, interpretation and historical context’, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 15, 87–103.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1983). ‘The Archpoet’s “Jonah-Confession” (Poem II): literary, exegetical and historical aspects’, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 18, 168–93.Google Scholar
Curtius, E.R. (1953). European literature and the Latin middle ages (London).Google Scholar
Duby, G. (1982). ‘The culture of the knightly class: audience and patronage’, in Benson, R.L., Constable, G. and Lanham, CD. (eds.), Renaissance and renewal in the twelfth century (Oxford) 248–62.Google Scholar
Eideneier, H. (1982-3). ‘Leser- oder Hörerkreis? Zur byzantinischen Dichtung in der Volkssprache’, 34, 119–50.Google Scholar
Eideneier, H. (forthcoming). ‘Der Ptochoprodromos in schriftlicher und mündlicher Überlieferung’, in idem (ed.) Neograeca Medii Aevi: Text und Ausgabe (Cologne).Google Scholar
Eideneier, H. and N., (1979). ‘Zum Fünfzehnsilber der Ptochoprodromika’, in 1–7 (Thessaloniki).Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (1984). “Who was the uncle of Theodore Prodromus?’, BS 45/1, 40–5.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. (forthcoming). ‘Echoes of Byzantine élite culture in twelfth-century Russia?’ in Google Scholar
Hercher, R. (1859). Erotici scriptores graeci, Vol. 2 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Hesseling, D.C. and Pernot, H. (1910). Poèmes prodromiques en grec vulgaire (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Hörandner, W. (1967). ‘Theodoros Prodromos und die Gedichtsammlung des Cod. Marc. XI 22’, JÖBG 16, 91–9.Google Scholar
Hörandner, W. (1974). Theodoros Prodromos: Historische Gedichte. Wiener Byzantinische Studien 11 (Vienna).Google Scholar
Hörandner, W. (1975). ‘Marginalien zum “Manganeios Prodromos”’, JÖB 24, 95–106.Google Scholar
Hörandner, W. (1982). ‘Zur Frage der Metrik früher volkssprachlicher Texte. Kann Theodoros Prodromos der Verfasser volkssprachlicher Gedichte sein?’, JÖB 32/3, 375–81.Google Scholar
Hunger, H. (1955), (1956). ‘Johannes Tzetzes, Allegorien zur Odysee’, BZ 48, 249-310; BZ 49, 4–48.Google Scholar
Hunger, H. (1968). Der byzantinische Katz-Mäuse-Kreig (Graz, Vienna, Cologne).Google Scholar
Jeffreys, M. (1974). ‘The nature and origins of the political verse’, DOP 28, 141–95.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, M. (1977). Review of Hörandner 1974. BZ 70, 105–7.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, A. and Constable, G. 1982. People and Power in Byzantium (Washington, D.C).Google Scholar
Kazhdan, A. and Epstein, A.W. 1985. Change in Byzantine culture in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, A. and Franklin, S. (1984). Studies on Byzantine literature of the eleventh and twelfth centuries (Cambridge and Paris).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koder, J. (1972). ‘Der Fünfzehnsilber am kaiserlichen Hof um das Jahr 900’, BS 33, 214–9.Google Scholar
Kustas, G. (1973). Studies in Byzantine rhetoric. 17 (Thessaloniki).Google Scholar
Kyriakis, M. (1974). ‘Poor poets and starving literati in twelfth-century Byzantium’, B 44, 290–309.Google Scholar
La Porte du Theil, J.G. (1810). ‘Notice d’un manuscrit de la Bibliothèque du Vatican, coté CCCV parmi les manuscrits grecs, III’, in Notices et extraits des manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Impériale, Vol. 8 (Paris).Google Scholar
Legrand, E. (1891). ‘Poésies inédites de Théodore Prodrome’, REG 4, 70–3.Google Scholar
Leone, P.A.M. (1972). Ioannes Tzetzes: Epistulae (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Magdalino, P. (1984). ‘Byzantine snobbery’, in Angold, M. (ed.) The Byzantine aristocracy: IX to XIII centuries (B.A.R. International Series, S221, Oxford) 58–78.Google Scholar
Majuri, A. (1919). ‘Una nuova poesia di Teodoro Prodromo’, BZ 23, 397–407.Google Scholar
Moravčsik, J. (1928-9). ‘Barbarische Sprachreste in der Théogonie des Johannes Tzetzes’, BNJ 7, 352–6.Google Scholar
Mullett, M. (1984). ‘Aristocracy and patronage in the literary circles of Comnenian Constantinople’, in Angold, M. (ed.) The Byzantine aristocracy: IX to XIII centuries (B.A.R. International Series, S221, Oxford) 173–201.Google Scholar
Robinson, C. (1979). Lucian and his influence in Europe (London).Google Scholar
Romano, R. 1974. Pseudo-Luciano: Timarione. Byzantina et Neo-hellenica Neapolitana 2 (Naples).Google Scholar
Spadaro, G. (1982). ‘Due redazioni inedite di Spaneas’, JÖB 32/3, 277–88.Google Scholar
Tsolakis, E. 1959. 3 (Thessaloniki).Google Scholar
Wendel, C. (1940). ‘Das unbekannte Schiussstück der Theogonie des Tzetzes’, BZ 40, 23–6.Google Scholar