Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:38:35.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crossing traditional boundaries: grub to glamour in Byzantine silk weaving

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Anna Muthesius
Anna Muthesius*
Affiliation:
Lucy Cavendish College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Byzantine silk research evokes images of glamour but it is prudent to consider grass roots as well as exotic aspects of this enticing subject: without the grub there would be no glamour. In its fullest sense a study of Byzantine silk weaving entails research on many and varied levels, across a broad range of disciplines. An immense variety of topics require consideration: the production of the silk yarn; the various workshop practices involved in weaving the yarn into silk cloth; the relationship between technique and design; the marketing and the numerous uses of the silks both at home and abroad, and the implications of the distribution of Byzantine silks purely through diplomatic channels.

Type
Critical Studies:
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 15 , 1991 , pp. 326 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Titles cited in the article are given below and a selected list of related literature is appended.

Akhmim-Panapolis, , 1891. Forrer, R., Römische und byzantinische Seiden Textilien aus den Gräbern von Akhmim-Panapolis (Strassburg).Google Scholar
Andreades, , 1934. Andreades, A., ‘Byzance paradis du monopole et du privilège’, B 9, 177ff.Google Scholar
Ashtor, , 1969. Ashtor, E., Histoire des prix et des salaires dans l’orient médiéval (Paris).Google Scholar
Athens, , 1964. Byzantine art an European art. Ninth Council of Europe Exhibition, April 1 to June 15 1964 (Athens).Google Scholar
Becker, , 1987. Becker, J., Pattern and Loom (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Beckwith, , 1955. Beckwith, J., Keuhnel, E., Volbach, F., ‘Probleme der mittelalterlichen Textilforschung’, Kunstchronik, 8 Jahrgang, 11, 305–30.Google Scholar
Beckwith, , 1971. Beckwith, J., ‘Byzantine Tissues’, XIV Congrès International des études Byzantines (Bucarest).Google Scholar
Berlin, , 1900–13. Lessing, J., Die Gewebesammlung des königlichen Kunstgewerbe-Museums zu Berlin (Berlin).Google Scholar
Birka, , 1938. Geijer, A., Birka III. Die Textilfunde aus den Gräbern (Uppsala).Google Scholar
Blanchet, , 1847. Blanchet, P., Tissus antiques et du Moyen Age (Paris).Google Scholar
Blümner, , 1874. Blümner, H., Technologie und Terminologie der Gewerbe und Kunste bei Griechern und Römern (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Bock, , 1856–71. Bock, F., Geschichte der liturgishen Gewänder des Mittelalters (Bonn).Google Scholar
Braun, , 1907, 1964. Braun, J., Die liturgische Gewandung im Occident und Orient nach Ursprung, Entwicklung, Verwendung und Symbolik (Freiburg im Breisgau, reprinted Darmstadt 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgeman, , 1987. Bridgeman, J., ‘Purple dye in Late Antiquity and Byzantium’, The Royal Purple and the Biblical Blue (Spanier, E. ed.) (Jerusalem) 159–63.Google Scholar
Brixen, , 1861. Tinkhauser, G., ‘Die alte und neue Domkirche zu Brixen in Tirol’, Mitteilungen der K.K. central Kommission zur Erforschung und Erhaltung der Baudenkmale, 6 Jahrgang, 120–34.Google Scholar
Broudy, , 1979. Broudy, E., The Book of Looms (London).Google Scholar
Burnham, , 1980; Burnham, D., Warp and Weft, a textile terminology (Ontario).Google Scholar
C.I.E.T.A., 1964. Centre International d’étude des textiles anciens, Vocabulary of Technical Terms (Lyons).Google Scholar
C.I.E.T.A. analysis. Vial, G., ‘Le tissu aux eléphants d’Aix-la-Chapelle’, C.I.E.T.A. Bulletin 14 (1961) 29–34; ‘Chasuble de Brauweiler’, C.I.E.T.A. Bulletin 18 (1963) 28–38; Micheaux, R. de, ‘Le tissu dit de Mozac’, C.I.E.T.A. Bulletin 17 (1963) 12–20, analysis Guicherd, F..Google Scholar
Canard, , 1951. ‘Le cérémonial byzantin’, B 21, 355–420.Google Scholar
Charbonnel, , 1964. Charbonnel, N., ‘La condition des ouvriers dans les ateliers impériaux aux 4 et 5 siècles’, Travaux et Recherches de la Faculté de droit et des sciences économiques de Paris, séries historiques 1, 61–93.Google Scholar
Chartraire, Prou, 1899. Chartraire, E., Prou, M., ‘Note sur un tissu byzantin du trésor de la cathédrale de Sens’, in Mémoires de la Société nationale des Antiquaires de France 18.Google Scholar
Chrisophilopulos, , 1935. Christophilopulos, A.P., To eparchikon biblion Leontos tou sophou kai ai syntechniai en Byzantio (Athens).Google Scholar
Cole, , 1899. Cole, A.S., Ornament in European Silks (London).Google Scholar
Computer Analysis, , 1989. Wouters, J., ‘De analyse van de kleurstoffen’, Tongeren Basiliek van O.-L.-Vrouw Geboorte. Textiel (Leuven 1988), 100–106.Google Scholar
Cox, , 1900. Cox, R., L’art de décorer les tissus (Lyons).Google Scholar
Crowfoot, , 1936, 1937. Crowfoot, G., ‘Of the warp-weighted loom’, Annual of the British School of Athens 37, 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, , 1911. Dalton, O.M., Byantine Art and Archeology (Oxford).Google Scholar
De Fleury, , 1883–89. Fleury, C. Rohault De, La Messe. Etudes archéologiques sur ses monuments. Cont. G. Rohault de Fleury I-VIII (Paris).Google Scholar
De Jonghe, and Tavernier, , 1977, 1978, 1980. Jonghe, D. de, Tavernier, M., ‘Die spätantiken Köper 4-Damasten aus dem Sarg des Bischofs Paulimus in der Krypt der St. Paulinus-Kirche zu Trier’, Trierer Zeitschrift 40/41, 145–75: ‘De schachtentrekstoel van Fez’, Bulletin van de Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis Brussel, 48 (Brussels) 145–62; ‘Met selectieroeden geweven Koptische weefsels’, ibid. 50 (Brussels) 75–106.Google Scholar
De Linas, , 1860–63. Linas, C. de, Anciens vêtements sacerdotaux et anciens tissus conservés en France (Paris, 3rd edition).Google Scholar
De Waal, , 1888. Waal, E de, ‘Figürliche Darstellungen auf Teppichen und Vorhängen in römischen Kirchen bis zur Mitte des neunten Jahrhunderts nach dem Liber Pontificalis’, Römische Quartalschrift, 313ff.Google Scholar
Diehl, , 1925. Diehl, C., Manuel d’art byzantin (Paris).Google Scholar
Dreger, , 1904. Dreger, M., Kunstlerische Entwicklung der Weberei und Stickerei (Wien).Google Scholar
Dupont-Aubervill, , 1877. Dupont-Aubervill, J., L’Ornament des tissus (Paris).Google Scholar
Europos, Dura, 1945. Pfister, R., Bellinger, L., ‘The Textiles’, in: The Excavations at Dura Europos, final report IV ed. Rostovtzoff, M.I., part II (New Haven).Google Scholar
Ebersolt, , 1923. Ebersolt, J., Les Arts somptuaires de Byzance (Paris).Google Scholar
Endrei, , 1989. Endrei, W., ‘A dozen mediaeval looms’, Alden Biesen Rhine-Meuse Textile Conference (Alden Biesen).Google Scholar
Falke, , 1913. Falke, Otto von, Kunstgeschkhte der Seidenweberei (Berlin, Repr. 1921, 1936).Google Scholar
Faymonville, , 1900. Faymonville, K., Die Purpurfarberei (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Fischbach, , 1902. Fischbach, F., Die wichtigsten Webeomamente bis zum 9. Jahrhundert (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Flanagan, , 1957. Flanagan, J., ‘Figured Fabrics’, A History of Technology 3 (Singer, C., Holmyard, E.J., Hall, A.R. ed.) (Oxford).Google Scholar
Flemming, , 1927. Flemming, E., Encyclopaedia of Textiles (Berlin 1927).Google Scholar
Fleury-Lehmberg, , 1989. Fleury-Lehmberg, M., Textile Conservation (Abegg Foundation, Berne).Google Scholar
Frauberger, , 1898. Frauberger, H., ‘Der Byzantinische Purpurstoff im Gewerbemuseum zu Düsseldorf’, Jahrbücher des Vereins von Altertumsfreunden im Rheinland 92, 224–32.Google Scholar
Geijer, , 1979. Geijer, A., A History of Textile Art (London).Google Scholar
Goitein, , 1967, 1971, 1983. Goitein, S.D., A Mediterranean Society I, II, IV. (New York).Google Scholar
Grabar, , 1951. Grabar, A., ‘Les succès des arts orientaux à la cour byzantine sous les macédoniens’, Münchner Jahrbuch der Bildenden Kunst, dritte folge, 2, 31ff.Google Scholar
Guillou, , 1974. Guillou, A., Le Brébion de la metropole byzantine de Reggio in: Corpus des actes Grec d’ltalie 4 (Vatican City).Google Scholar
Halabiye Zenobia, , 1951. Plister, R., Textiles de Halabiyeh (Paris).Google Scholar
Haldon, , 1989. Haldon, J., ‘The feudalism debate once more: the case of Byzantium’, Journal of Peasant Studies 17, no.1, 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldon, , 1990. Haldon, J., Constantine Porphyrogenitus, Three treatises on Imperial military Expeditions. Introduction, edition, translation and commentary (C.F.H.B. 28, Vienna).Google Scholar
Hannover, Kestner, 1964, Grönwoldt, R., Webereien und Stickereien des Mittelalters. Textilien I. Bildkataloge des Kestner Museums, Hannover VII (Hannover).Google Scholar
Harvey, , 1990. Harvey, A., Economic expansion in the Byzantine Empire 900–1200. (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heichelheim, , 1949. Heichelheim, F.M., ‘Byzantinische Seiden’, C.I.B.A. Rundschau 84 (1949) 2742–2768.Google Scholar
Hendy, , 1985. Studies in the Byzantine monetary economy c.300–1450 (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendy, , 1989. Hendy, M.F., The Economy, Fiscal Administration and Coinage of Byzantium (London) 1–48, 57–80.Google Scholar
Henning, , 1933. Hennig, R., ‘Die Einführung der Raupenzucht im Byzantinerreich’, 33 (1933) 295–312.Google Scholar
Hirth, , 1855. China and the Roman Orient (Shanghai, Hong Kong 1855, New York 1966).Google Scholar
Hofenk-De-Graf, , 1970–1990. Hofenk-de-Graf, J., ‘Analyse des matières colorantes dans les textiles anciens’, C.I.E.T.A. Bulletin 35 (1972) 12–21. Also unpublished research at the Central laboratory Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hooper, , 1911. Hooper, L., ‘The technique of Greek and Roman weaving’, Burlington Magazine 18, 276–84.Google Scholar
Johnstone, , 1967. Johnstone, P., The Byzantine Tradition in Church Embroidery. (London).Google Scholar
Justi, , 1898. Justi, F., (Rider silks) Zeitschrift für Christliche Kunst 12, 361ff.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, , 1950. Kazhdan, A.P., Review of Lopez, ‘Silk Industry in the Byzantine Empire’, Vizantiskii Vremennik 3, 290–93.Google Scholar
King, , 1966. King, D., ‘Patterned silks in the Carolingian Empire’, C.I.E.T.A. Bulletin 23, 47–52.Google Scholar
Kislinger, , 1990. Kislinger, E., ‘Jüdische Gewerbetreibende in Byzanz’, in: Die Juden in ihrer mittelalterlichen Umwelt (Wien).Google Scholar
Klesse, , 1967. Klesse, B., Seidenstoffe in der italienische Malerei des vierzehnten Jahrhunderts (Berne).Google Scholar
Koder, , 1990. Koder, J., Delikt und Strafe im Eparchenbuch: Aspekte des mittelalterlichen Korporationswesens in Konstantinopel (Wien).Google Scholar
Koder, , 1991. Koder, J., Das Eparchenbuch Leons des Weisen (CFHB 33, Vienna).Google Scholar
Kondakov, , 1924. Kondakov, A., ‘Les constumes orientaux ’ la cour byzantin’, 7–49.Google Scholar
Lethaby, , 1913–14. Lethaby, J., ‘Byzantine silks in London museums’, Burlington Magazine 24, 145ff.Google Scholar
London, , 1922. Kendrick, A.F., Textiles from Burying Grounds in Egypt I-III (London 1920–22).Google Scholar
London, , 1924. Kendrick, A.F., Muhammadan Textiles of the Medieval Period (London).Google Scholar
London, , 1925. Kendrick, A.F., Catalogue of Early Medieval Woven Fabrics (London).Google Scholar
Lopez, , 1945. Lopez, R.S., ‘Silk Industry in the Byzantine Empire’, Speculum 20, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon Textile Museum, 1987. Martiniani-Reber, M, Soieries sassanides, coptes et byzantines 5–11 siècles (Lyon, musée historique des tissus) (Paris 1986).Google Scholar
Maastricht, , 1873. Bock, F., Willemsen, M., Antiquités sacrées conservées dans les Anciennes Collégiales de S. Servais et de Notre Dame à Maastricht (Maastricht) (German ed. Köln, and Neuss, ).Google Scholar
Marquardt, and Mommsen, , 1886. Marquardt, J., Mommsen, T., Handbuch der Cömischen Altertümer 7.2 ed. (Leipzig). See Marquardt, J., Das Privatleben der Römer.Google Scholar
Michel, , 1852, 1854. Michel, F., Recherches sur le commerce, la fabrication et l’usage des étoffes de soie d’or et d’argent et autres tissus en Orient et en Occident, principalement en France I-II (Paris).Google Scholar
Migeon, , 1909. Migeon, G., Les arts du tissu (Paris).Google Scholar
Millet, , 1939. Millet, G., Broderies religieuses de style byzantin (Paris 1939, 1942).Google Scholar
Muthesius, , 1982. Finds: Muthesius, A., Anglo-Scandinavian Finds from Lloyds Bank, Pavement, and Other sites (York Archaeological Trust), 132–36.Google Scholar
Muthesius, , 1982. Eastern Silks in Western Shrines and Treasuries before 1200 A.D. (Ph.D. Thesis, Courtauld Institute of Art, University of London).Google Scholar
Muthesius, , 1989. Muthesius, A., ‘From Seed to Samite, aspects of Byzantine Silk Weaving. Ancient and medieval textile studies in honour of Donald King’, Textile History 20, part 2, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthesius, , 1990. Trade: Muthesius, A., The impact of the Mediterranean silk trade on the West before 1200 A.D. Textiles in Trade Conference. Textile Society of America (Washington).Google Scholar
Muthesius, , 1990. Muthesius, A., Silk and the mediaeval Papacy: influences on the Latin Church outside Rome (Lecture, Cambridge University).Google Scholar
Muthesius, , 1991. Muthesius, A., ‘The history of the Byzantine silk industry. Lopez and beyond’, Medieval History (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Muthesius, , forthcoming. Muthesius, A., History of the Byzantine Silk industry (Koder, J., Kislinger, E., eds.) (Byzantine Institute, Vienna).Google Scholar
Nan King, , 1980–1990. Nan King Textile Institue, China. Reconstruction of ancient weaves. See Jonghe, D. de, Métiers à tisser Chinois. Chine Cielet Terre. (Brussels 1989) 270–315. (Weavers demonstrating at the exhibition on the reconstructed loom were from Nan King).Google Scholar
Needham, , 1979. Needham, J., Science and Civilisation in China I (Cambridge 1954, reprint 1979).Google Scholar
Nicole, , 1894. Nicole, J., Le Livre du Préfet. (Geneva and Basel, Variorum Reprint 1970).Google Scholar
Oikonomidès, , 1972. Oikonomidès, N., ‘Quelques boutiques de Constantinople au Xe siècle: prix, loyers, imposition (Cod. Patmiacus 171)’, DOP 26, 345–56.Google Scholar
Oikonomidès, , 1986. Oikonomidès, N., ‘Silk trade and profits in Byzantium from the sixth to the ninth century’, DOP 40, 33–53.Google Scholar
Palmyra, , 1934, 1937, 1940. Pfister, R., Textiles de Palmyre 1–3 (Paris).Google Scholar
Papas, , 1965. Papas, T., ‘Geschichte der Messgewänder’, Miscellanea Byzantina Monacensia 3 (Munich).Google Scholar
Pariset, , 1862, 1865, 1890. Pariset, E., Histoire de la soie (Paris).Google Scholar
Pasco, , 1905. Pasco, J., Catalogue de la collection de Miguel y Badia (Barcelona).Google Scholar
Patmos, , 1988. Kominis, A. ed., Patmos: Treasures of the Monastery (Athens).Google Scholar
Peirce, Tyler, 1932. Peirce, H., Tyler, R., L’art byzantin (Paris).Google Scholar
Persson, , 1923. Persson, A.W., ‘Staat und Manufaktur im römischen Reiche’, Skriften veten skaps-societeten Lund 3, 68–81.Google Scholar
Pfister, , 1935. Pfister, R., ‘Teinture et alchimie dans l’Orient’, Seminarium Kondakovianum, Vol. 7, 48ff.Google Scholar
Pirenne thesis. Riising, A., ‘The fate of Henri Pirenne’s theses on the consequences of the Islamic expansion’, Classica et mediaevalia (Copenhagen 1952); Havighurst, A. F., The Pirenne thesis (Boston 1958).Google Scholar
Rome Vatican, 1908. Grisar, H., Die römische Kapelle Sancta Sanctorum und Ihr Schatz (Freiburg im Breisgau).Google Scholar
Rome Vatican, 1942. Volbach, W.F., I tessuti del museo Sacro Vaticano (Rome).Google Scholar
Sabbe, , 1935. Sabbe, E., ‘L’importation des tissus orientaux’, Revue Beige de Philologie et d’Histoire 14, 811–848, 1261–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gewänder, Sakrale, 1955. Müller-Christensen, S., Sakrale Gewänder (Munich).Google Scholar
Schmedding, , 1978. Schmedding, B., Mittelalterliche Textilien in Kirchen und Klöstern der Schweiz (Bern).Google Scholar
Schmidt, , 1957. Schmidt, H., Alte Seidenstoffe (Brunswick).Google Scholar
Schulze, , 1917. Schulze, P., Alte Stoffe (Berlin).Google Scholar
Sens, , 1886. Julliot, G., Trésor de la Catheédrale de Sens (Sens).Google Scholar
Silbermann, , 1897. Silbermann, H., Die Seide 1–4 (Dresden).Google Scholar
Simon, , 1975. Simon, D., ‘Die byzantinischen Seidenzünfte’, BZ 68, 23–46.Google Scholar
Speck, Speck. P., ‘Die Endyte’, JöBG 15 (1966) 323–75.Google Scholar
Starensier, , 1982. Barre, A. de la, Starensier, An Art Historical Study of the Byzantine Silk Industry. (Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University).Google Scholar
Stillmann, , 1972. Stillman, Y.K., Female Attire in Medieval Egypt according to the Trousseau Lists and Cognate Material from the Cairo Geniza (Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Stöckle, , 1911. Stöckle, A., ‘Spätrömische und byzantinische Zünfte’, Klio 9, 24ff.Google Scholar
Uden, and Muthesius, , 1982–1990. Uden, A., Muthesius, A., Preparations for reweaving Byzantine twills and lampas weave silks of around 1000 A.D. Unpublished research.Google Scholar
Vogt, , 1952. Vogt, E., ‘Frühmittelalterliche Seidenstoffe aus dem Hochaltar der Kathedrale Chur’, Zeitschrift für Schweizerische Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte 13 part 1.Google Scholar
Vogt, , 1958. Vogt, E., ‘Frühmittelalterliche Stoffe aus der Abtei St. Maurice’, Zeitschrift für Schweizerische Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte 18, 110–40.Google Scholar
Volbach, , Salles, , Duthuit, , 1931, 1933. Volbach, W.F., Salles, E. and Duthuit, G., Art Byzantin, cent planches (Paris).Google Scholar
Vryonis, , 1963, 1971. Vryonis, S., ‘Byzantine Demokratia’, in Byzantium, its Internal History and Relations with the Muslim World (London).Google Scholar
Walter, , 1982. Walter, C., Art and Ritual of the Byzantine Church, (London).Google Scholar
Zacharae von Lingenthal, , 1865. Zachariae von Lingenthal, E., ‘Eine verordnung Justinians über den Seidenhandel aus den Jahren 540–547’, Mémoires de l’Academie Imperiale des sciences de St. Petersbourg 7 ser. 9, 6.Google Scholar

Selected List of Related Literature

Antoniades-Bibicou, H., Recherchessur les Douanes à Byzance (Paris 1963) esp. 157–92.Google Scholar
Bock, F., ‘Byzantinische Purpurstoffe mit eingewebten neugriechischen Inschriften’, Zeitschrift des Bayerischen Kunstgewerbevereins 2 (1894) 65ff.Google Scholar
Boll, H. ed., L. Seligmann Sammlung (Köln 1930).Google Scholar
d’Arzago, A. de Capitani, Antichi tessuti della Basilica Ambrosiana (Milan 1941).Google Scholar
Chartraire, E., Inventaire du Trésor de l’eglise primatiale et métropolitaine de Sens (Paris 1897).Google Scholar
Chartraire, E., ‘Les Tissus Anciens du Trésor de la Cathedral de Sens’, Revue de l’Art Chrétien 61 (1917) 261–80, 370–86.Google Scholar
Linas, C. de, ‘Notice sur cinq Anciennes Etoffes Tirées de la collection de M. Félix Lenard a Verdun’, Mémoires à la Sorbonne (1865).Google Scholar
Diehl, C., ‘L’étoffe byzantine du reliquaire de Charlemagne’, Bulicev Zbornik (1924) 441–47.Google Scholar
m’Weerth, E. Aus, ‘Byzantinisches Purpurgewebe des 10. Jahrhunderts’, Jahrbuch des Vereins für Kunstwissenschaft 1 (1868) 162–65.Google Scholar
Fihmann, I., ‘K charakteristike korporatsii vizantiiskogo Egipta’, Vizantiiskii Vremennik 17 (1960) 17–27.Google Scholar
Fillitz, H., Katalogder Weltlichen und der Geistlichen Schatzkammer (Vienna 1971).Google Scholar
Flanagan, J., ‘The origin of the drawloom in the making of early Byzantine silks’, Burlington Magazine 45 (1919) 167–72.Google Scholar
Flanagan, J., ‘Early figured silks: the effects of the use of the scale harness on early Islamic silks’, Burlington Magazine 68 (1936) 145–47.Google Scholar
Flanagan, J. in: The relics of St. Cuthbert (Battiscombe, J. ed.) (Oxford 1956).Google Scholar
Flemming, E., Les Tissus (Paris 1957).Google Scholar
Frances, E., ‘L’etat et les métiers à byzance’, BS 23 (1962) 231–49.Google Scholar
Frolow, A., ‘Quelques inscriptions sur des oeuvres d’art du moyen âge’, Cahiers Arch. 6 (1952) 163–64.Google Scholar
Geijer, A., Sidenvavnaderne i Heliga Knuts helgonskrin in Aabögen für Nordisk Old kyndighed oy Historie (Kopenhagen 1935).Google Scholar
Geijer, A., ‘Technical Viewpoints on Textile Design’, Studi alto medioevo (Spoleto 1971) 685–712.Google Scholar
Gervers, V., ‘Medieval Garments in the Mediterranean World’, in: Cloth and Clothing in Medieval Europe. Essays in memory of E.M. Carus Wilson (Harte, N.B., Ponting, K.G. ed.) Pasold Studies in Testile History 2. (London 1983) 279–31.Google Scholar
Grimme, E., ‘Der Aachener Domschatz’, Aachener Kunstblätter 42 (1972).Google Scholar
Grisar, H., Die RömischeKapelle Sancta Sanctorum und ihr Schatz (Freiburg 1908).Google Scholar
Guicherd, F., Vial, G., Témi, St., Reims silk., C.I.E.T.A. Bulletin 15 (1961) 38–50.Google Scholar
Guillou, A., ‘La soie Sicilienne’ in: Miscellani G. Rossi-taibi (Palermo 1974).Google Scholar
Guillou, A., ‘Production and Profits in the Byzantine Province of Italy, Tenth to Eleventh Century, an Expanding Society’, DOP 28 (1974) 91–109.Google Scholar
Guillou, A., ‘La soie du Katepanat d’ltalie’, TM 6 (1976) 69–84.Google Scholar
d’Hennezel, Henri, Le museée historique des tissus de la Chambre de commerce de Lyon (Paris 1927).Google Scholar
d’Hennezel, Henri, Pour comprendre les tissus d’art (Paris 1930).Google Scholar
Jerussalimskaja, A.A., ‘Trois soieries Byzantines anciennes decouvertes au Caucase septentrional’, C.I.E.T.A. Bulletin 24 (1966) 11–39.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, A.P., ‘Cechi i gosudarst vennye masterskie v (Constantinople v 9.-10. v’. VV 6 (1953) 132–55.Google Scholar
Kislinger, E., ‘Gewerbe im späten Byzanz’, in: Handwerk und Sachkultur im Spat-mittelalter (Ost. Akad. Wiss., phil.-hist. K1.), (Wien 1988) 103–26.Google Scholar
Koder, J., Probleme des Eparchenbuches. Vortrag (East Berlin 1987).Google Scholar
Koder, J., ‘“Problemwörter” im Eparchikon Biblion’, in: Kolloquium zur byzantinischen Lexikographie (Wien 1990).Google Scholar
Koukoulès, Ph., art. on Byzantine costume in: Vizantinon Vios kai Politismos 2 (1948) 5–99; 6 (1955) 267–94.Google Scholar
Lauer, P., ‘Le trésor du Sancta Sanctorum’, Monuments et Mémoires (1906) 107ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leger, A., Monumenta Annonis Köln und Siegburg. Weltbild und Kunst im hohen Mittelalter (Köln 1975).Google Scholar
Lesne, E., Histoire de la propriété ecclesiastique en France I (Paris 1936).Google Scholar
Malich, B., ‘Wer Handwerker ist, soil nicht Kaufmann sein — ein Grundsatz des byzantinischen Wirtschaftslebens im 8/9. Jahrhundert’, in: Studien zum 8. und 9. Jahrhundert in Byzanz (BBA 51, Berlin, 1983) 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannowsky, B., ‘Ein Byzantinischer Stoff in Seligenstadt’, Beiträge für G. Swartzenski (Berlin — Chicago 1951) 21–25.Google Scholar
Vasselot, A.J.J. Marquandt de, Catalogue raisonné de la Collection Martin le Roy (Paris 1906, 1908).Google Scholar
Matt, L. von, Art, Treasures of the Vatican (New York 1976).Google Scholar
May, F., Silk Textiles of Spain (New York 1957).Google Scholar
Mazotti, M., ‘Antiche stoffe liturgiche Ravennati’, Felix Ravenna 53 (1950) 40–6.Google Scholar
Mendl, B., ‘Les corporations byzantines’, BS 22 (1961) 302–19.Google Scholar
Messerer, H., Der Bamberger Domschatz (Munchen 1952).Google Scholar
Miyakawa, H., Kollautz, A., ‘Ein Dokument zum fernhandel zwischen Byzanz und China zur Zeit Theophylakts’, BZ 11 (1984) 6–19.Google Scholar
Villard, U. Monneret de, ‘La tessitura Palermitana sotti i Normani e i sui rapporti con l’arte Bizantina’, Studi e Testi 123 (Miscellanea Giovanni Mercati 3) (1946).Google Scholar
Munro, J., ‘The Medieval Scarlet and the Economics of Sartorial Splendour’, in: Cloth and Clothing in Medieval Europe. Essays in Memory of E. Cams Wilson (Harte, N., Ponting, K. ed.) (Pasold Studies in Textile History 2) (London 1983) 13–70.Google Scholar
Muthesius, A., ‘De zijden stoffen in de schatzkammer van de sint servaaskerk te Maastricht’, Publications (Maastricht 1974).Google Scholar
Muthesius, A., ‘The Silk over the Spine of the Mondsee Gospel Lectionary’, Journal of the Walters Art Gallery 26 (1978) 50–73.Google Scholar
Muthesius, A., ‘The Silks from the Tomb of Archbishop Hubert Walter (d.1205)’, in Medieval Art and Architecture at Canterbury before 1220 eds. Coldstream, N., Draper, P. (British Archaeological Association) (London 1982) 81–87.Google Scholar
Muthesius, A., in: Anglo-Scandinavian finds from Lloyds Bank, Pavement and other sites. Archaeology of York. (York Archaeological Trust 1980) 132–36.Google Scholar
Muthesius, A., ‘The Rider and the Peacock Silk from the Relics of St. Cuthbert’, in: St. Cuthbert, his Cult and his Community to 1200 A.D. (Woodbridge 1989) 343–64.Google Scholar
Muthesius, A., The Silken Relics of St. Cuthbert: Silks, Saints, the Medieval Latin Church and the Eastern Mediterranean (Durham Dean and Chapter, Public Lecture, May 1988).Google Scholar
Müller-Christensen, S., ‘Beobachtungen zum Bamberger Gunthertuch’, Münchener Jahrbuch 17 (1966).Google Scholar
Müller-Christensen, S., Liturgische Gewänder mit dem Namen des hl. Ulrich. Augusta 955–1955 (Munich 1955).Google Scholar
Müller-Christensen, S., Das Grab des Papstes Clemens II im Dom zu Bamberg (München 1960).Google Scholar
Müller-Christensen, S., Suevia Sacra (Augsburg 1971).Google Scholar
Müller-Christensen, S., Der Dom zu Speyer. I (München 1972).Google Scholar
Nardi, E., ‘La seta nella normativa imperiale romana’, in: atti Accad. Scienza 1st. Bologna 77, Rendiconti 71 (1982/83) 75–105.Google Scholar
Pardessus, M., ‘Le commerce de la soie chez les anciens’, Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 15 (1842) 1–47.Google Scholar
Peirce, H., Tyler, R., L’art byzantin I-II (Paris 1934).Google Scholar
Peirce, H., Tyler, R., ‘The Prague rider silk and the Persian Byzantine problem’, Burlington Magazine 68 (1936) 211ff.Google Scholar
Piltz, E., Studies in Byzantine Imperial Garments and Ecclesiastical Vestments. (Ph.D. thesis. Stockholm Institue of Art, 1970).Google Scholar
Reinle, A., ‘Der Schatz des Münsters zu Säkkingen’, Zeitschrift fur Schweizerisches Arcälogie und Kunstgeschichte 11 (1948/9).Google Scholar
Reusch, W., Kempf, T., Frühchristliche Zeugnisse im Einzugsgebiet von Rhein und Mosel (Trier 1965).Google Scholar
Riefstahl, R.M., ‘Early textiles in the Cooper Union Collection’, Art in America 3 (1945).Google Scholar
Font, C. Rodon y, L’Historique du métier pour la fabrication des étoffes faconnées (Paris — Liège 1934).Google Scholar
Ross, M.C., Catalogue of the Byzantine and Early Medieval Antiquities in the Dumbarton Oaks Collection (Washington 1965).Google Scholar
Schmid, W.M., ‘Ein Kasel des späten 11 Jahrhunderts’, Festschrift des Münchener Altertumsvereins (Munchen 1914).Google Scholar
Schnütgen, A., Catalog einer Sammlung von Geweben und Stickerien (Köln 1876).Google Scholar
Schuette, M., Müller-Christensen, S., The Art of Embroidery (Tübingen 1963 Eng. trans. 1969).Google Scholar
Schulze, P., Alte Stoffe (Berlin 1920).Google Scholar
Serjeant, R.B., ‘Material for a History of Islamic Textiles up to the Mogul Conquests’, Ars Islamica 9–16 (1942–46).Google Scholar
Shepherd, D.G., Henning, W.B., ‘Zandaniji identified?’, in: Festschrift für Ernst Kühnel (Berlin 1959) 15–40.Google Scholar
Shepherd, D.G., ‘Technical aspects of Buyid silks’, Fourth Congress of the International Association for Iranian Art and Archaeology (New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, April 24 to May 3, 1960).Google Scholar
Shepherd, D.G., ‘Zandaniji Revisited’, in: Festschrift für S. Müller-Christensen. (Munich 1980) 105–122.Google Scholar
Sjuzjumov, M., ‘Remeslo i torgovlja v Konstantinopole v nacale 10. v.’, VV 4 (1951) 12–41.Google Scholar
Sjuzjumov, M., Vizantijskaja kniga eparcha. Vtsupitelnaja statja, perevod, kommentarii (Moskau 1962).Google Scholar
Hope, W.H. St. John, ‘On the Tomb of an Archbishop recently opened in the Cathedral Church of Canterbury’, in: Vetusta Monumenta VII, i (Westminster 1893).Google Scholar
Stückelberg, E.A., Unveröffentliche Walliser Gewebefunde 1923 (Basel 1924, 1925).Google Scholar
Stückelberg, E.A., ‘Sittener Gewebefunde’, Blätter ausder Wallischer Geschichte N.F. 25 (1923) 317–333; N.F. 26 (1924) 95–115.Google Scholar
Veybras, P., Vos, H. de, Trésor de Sens (Yonne 1965).Google Scholar
Volbach, W.F., Spätantike und frühmittelalterliche Stoffe (Mainz 1932).Google Scholar
Volbach, W., Early Decorative Textiles (Feltham 1969).Google Scholar
Volbach, W.F., Keuhnel, E., Late Antique Coptic and Islamic Textiles of Egypt (Berlin 1926).Google Scholar
Weibel, A., Two Thousand Years of Textiles (New York 1962).Google Scholar
Wilckens, L. von, ‘Mittelalterliche Textilien aus schweizerischen Kirchen und Klöstern’, Kunstchronik 27 (1974) 9–15.Google Scholar
Wild, J.P., Textile Manufacture in the North Roman provinces (Cambridge 1970).Google Scholar
Wild, J.P., ‘The Roman Horizontal Loom’, American Journal of Archaeology 91 (1987) 459–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willemin, N.X., Potter, A., Monuments Francais inédits I-II (Paris 1839).Google Scholar
Wilmowsky, J. von, Diehistorisch denkwürdigen Grabstätten der Erzbischöfe im Dom zu Trier (Trier 1876).Google Scholar
Witte, P., Die liturgischen Gewänder und kirchlichen Stickereien der Sammlung Schnütgen (Berlin 1926).Google Scholar