Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:40:36.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The campaign of Shaykh Djunayd Ṣafawī against Trebizond (1456 AD/860 H)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Rustam Shukurov
Rustam Shukurov*
Affiliation:
Department of Medieval History, Moscow State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Trebizond, on the southern coast of the Black Sea is separated by the distance of nearly one thousand kilometres from Ardabīl, the native town of Safawids, situated not far from the Caspian Sea. Despite that, in the midst of the 15th century fate amazingly brought together two royal families: the Grand Komnenoi of Trebizond and the Safawids of Iran. Shāh Ismācīl (1501–1524), the founder of the Safawid state was born in 1487/892 of Halima-begum, the daughter of the Trepezuntine despoina Theodora and the Aq Quyunlu ruler Uzun Hasan (1457–1478). Shaykh Djunayd Ṣafawī (d. 1460), the grandfather of Shāh Ismācīl, had nearly seized the city of Trebizond, about thirty years before the birth of his famous grandson. The Trapezuntine nobles left their sovereigns, the emperor John IV (1429–1459) and, likely, his sister Theodora, the future wife of Uzun Ḥasan and grandmother of Ismācīl. Trebizond remained unprotected and, if shaykh Djunayd were more persistent in his attempts to capture the city, who knows what would be the future of both celebrated dynasties.

Type
Articles
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 17 , 1993 , pp. 127 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © The Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fallmerayer, J., Geschichte des Kaisertums von Trapezunt (München 1827) 252–253 Google Scholar; Finlay, G., The History of Greece from its Conquest by the Crusaders to its Con-guest by the Turks and of the Empire of Trebizond: 1204–1461 (Edinburg & London 1851) 472 Google Scholar; Hammer, J. von, Geschichte des Osmanischen Reiches, I (Pest 1828) 57 Google Scholar; Miller, W., Trebizond. The Last Greek Empire (London 1926) 83–84 Google Scholar (these scholars propose that Djunayd’s campaign against Trebizond occurred sometime in the 1440s). Janssens, E., Trébizondeen Colchide (Bruxelles 1969) 132–134 Google Scholar (this author proposes that the attack occured in the 1430s); Hinz, W., Irans Aufstieg zum Nationalstaat im fünfzehnten Jahrhundert (Berlin und Lepizig 1936) 28–29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, , Uzun Hasan ve şeyh Cüneyd (Ankara 1948) 20 Google Scholar. Hinz, W. dated the attack to 1456, his dating is accepted by Kuršanskis, M., ‘Autour de la dernière princesse de Trébizonde: Theodora, fille de Jean IV et épouse d’Uzun Hasan’, 34 (1977/78) 78f Google Scholar. See also note 10.

2 Wurm, H., ‘Anmerkungen zum PLP in Anschluß an die Lektüre des JöB 37 (1987) 279–280.Google Scholar

3 Bryer, A., ‘Greeks and Türkmens: the Pontic Exception’, DOP 29 (1975) 148 Google Scholar, note 139; Bryer, A. &Winfield, D., The Byzantine Monuments and Topography of the Pontos, 2 vols. (Washington 1985) I, 154–155.Google Scholar

4 Laonici Chalcocondylae historiarum demonstrationes, 2 vols., rec. Darkó, E. (Budepestini 1922-4) II, 220–222 Google Scholar. On the interpolations in the Laonikos text see: Grecu, V., ‘Zu den Interpolationen im Geschichtswerk des Laonikos Chalkokondyles’, Académie Roumaine, Bulletin de la section historique 27 (1946) 92–94.Google Scholar

5 Chalkokondyles, II, 220.25–26 For another interpretation of this name see: H. Wurm, op. cit., 280.

6 Bryer, A. &Winfield, D., Ibidem. A. Bryer notes that the Greek army moved along the same route which the troops of the emperor Alexios III had taken during the campaign against chapnī Turkmens in 1380.Google Scholar

7 Ecthesis Chronica and Chronicon Athenarum, ed. with critical notes and indices by Sp. Lampros (London 1902) 59.

8 cAshīqpāshā-zāde tārīkhī (Istanbul 1332) 226–267.

9 cĀshiqpāshā-zāde, 267: Cānīkda Mehmed Beg qatina vardi, birqaç bin kisi cemcoldi. Andan Ṭrabzōna yüridi, Trabzōn begi daxi leşker cem cidüb, qarsu gönerdi. Ṭrabzōn leşker-ile ugras ėtdiler. Ṭrabzōn leşkerin qirdilar. Ṭrabzōnun vilāyetini xarāb ėtdiler. Rūm beglerbegisi Xiżr Aga daxi cem cėtdügi asker-le Cüneydüñ üzerine vardi. Cüneyd işdüb qaçdi, Uzun Ḥasana gitdi.

10 Hinz, W., Irans Aufstieg, 24–32 Google Scholar. Savory, R.M., ‘Djunayd’, EI2 ; idem, ‘The Struggle for Supremacy in Persia after the Death of Timur’, Der Islam 40 (1964)49 Google Scholar; Tadhkirat al-Mulūk. A Manual of Safawid Administration (circa 1137/1725), Persian text in facs., translated and explained by Minorsky, V. (E.J.W. Gibb Memorial Series. New Ser., XVI London 1943) 190 Google Scholar; Roemer, H.R., ‘The Safawid Period’, in The Cambridge History of Iran VI (London 1986) 201–202 Google Scholar; Baykal, B.S., ‘Die Rivalität zwischen Uzun Hasan und Mehmet II um das Kaiserreich von Trapezunt’, in Trudy 25 mezhdunarodnogo kongresso vostokovedov II (Moskva 1963) 444–445 Google Scholar; Yücel, Yasar, ‘Fatih’in Trabzon’u fethi öncesinde Osmanh-Trabzon-Akkoyunlu iliskileri’, Belleten 49 (194) (1985) 292.Google Scholar

11 Budaq Munshī Qazwīnī, Djawāhir al-Akhbār, the St Petersburg Public Library, Dorn, 288, f. 281r-282v.: Ba-ṣuḥbat-i amīr-i kabīr Abū al-Naṣr Ḥasan-bek āmad/āghāz-i saḷtanat-i u būd amīr-i kabīr u-rā cazīz-u-karīm kard wa kh wāhar-i khūid-rā ba-iltimās bad-u dād Khadīdja-bigi nām bacd az muddatī ba-taraf-i Ṭrābzūn raft dar āndjā shahīd shud dar sal sittīn wa thamānmia.

12 Qazwīnī, Qāḍī Aḥmad Ghaffārī, Tarīkh-i Djahān-Ārā (Tehrān 1965) 261 Google Scholar: karrat-i digar ḥaḍrat-i īshān cazm-i raḥīl namüda ba-Diyārbakr nuzül farmūdand wa az āndjā bā fawdjī as ghāziyān-i żafar shicār ba-ghazā-yi Ṭrābzün rafta …

13 Ḥusayn cAbd, al-Zāhidī, Silsilat al-Naṣab-i Ṣafawiyya (Berlin 1928) 66.Google Scholar

14 Kh wānd-Amīr Ghiyāth al-Din, Ḥabīb al-Siyar IV (Tehrān 1954) 425–426. H.P. Roemer, op. cit., 201.

15 cĀshiqpāshā-zāde) 264; Hinz, W., Irans Aufstieg, 26.Google Scholar

16 cĀshiqpāshā-zāde, 265–266; Hinz, W., Irons Aufstieg, 26–28; Tadhkirat al-Mulük (V. Minorsky), 190.Google Scholar

17 W. Hinz, Irans Aufstieg, 28.

18 Chalkokondyles, II, 220.

19 On the date of the beginning of John IV’s rule, see Bryer, A., ‘The Faithless Kabazitai and Scholarioi’, in Maistor: Classical, Byzantine and Renaissance Studies for R. Browning, ed. Moffatt, A. (Canberra 1984) 322–323.Google Scholar

20 Chalkokondyles, II, 22222–23

21 Chalkokondyles, II, 217; Schreiner, P., Die byzantinischen Kleinchroniken II (Wien 1975) 490.Google Scholar

22 Tihrānī-Ịsfahānī, Abū Bakr, Kitâbi Diyarbakriyya. Ak-Koyunlular tarihi, yayinlayanlar:Luğal, N.,Sümer, F., giriş ve notlar: Sümer, F., I (Ankara 1962) 281 Google Scholar and also 264–265.

23 Chalkokondyles, II, 22026-2211.

24 Finlay, G., The History,472 Google Scholar; Jorga, N., Geschichte des osmanischen Reiches II (Gotha 1908) 103.Google Scholar

25 J. Fallmerayer, Geschichte, 252. Samsun was in Ottoman hands from 1421. See Neşri, Meḥmed, Kitâb-i cihân-nüma, yayinlayanlar F.R. Unat, Köymen, M.A., II (Ankara 1957) 540–542 Google Scholar; Th. Seif, ‘Der Abschnitt über die Osmanen in şükrüllah’s persischer Universalgeschichte’, Mitteilungen zur osmanischen Geschichte 2 (1925) 110; İnalcik, H., ‘Murad II’, Islâm Ansiklopedisi. Sanjian, A.K., Colophons of Armenian Manuscripts, 1301–1480. A Source for Middle Eastern History (Cambridge 1969) 1421: 14.Google Scholar

26 W. Hinz, Irans Aufstieg, 28–29.

27 ed. O. Lampsides ( 1975)4622.

28 1336, ed. Lampros, S., in: 13 (1916) 439 Google Scholar, and commentaries of Lampros 48–49.

29 We are inclined to explain the difference in gender between (neut. or mascul.) and by the fact that the majority of Arabic, Persian or Turkish words borrowed by the Greeks in the late Byzantine time were of the second declension in neuter gender and only a smaller fraction in masculine.

30 Shukurov, R., ‘Trapezundskaya imperiya i tyurkskiye emiraty Ponta v XV veke’, in Prichernomor’ye v srednie veka (Moskva 1991) 231.Google Scholar

31 Chalkokondyles, I, 61, 76, 130, 158, II, 37, 218, 219, 223, 243, 247, 274.

32 Kurşanskis, M., ‘L’Empire de Trébizonde et la Georgie’, REB 35 (1977) 251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A more detailed account of the usage of the place-name Djānīk, in particular, in the Turkish historiography, see Bryer, A., ‘Some Notes on the Laz and Tzan (II)’, Bedi Kartlisa 23-24 (1967) 161–168.Google Scholar

33 Abū; Bakr Tihrānī, I, 178–179.

34 Abū Bakr Tihrānī, I, 203–205.

35 Abū Bakr Tihrānī, I, 205–206. Sanjian, A.K., The Colophons, 225.Google Scholar

36 Abū Bakr Tihrānī, I, 225–238, 241–242, 256, 259, 261. Sanjian, A.K., Ibidem; Woods, J.E., The Aqquyunlu. Clan, Confederation, Empire (Minneapolis & Chicago 1976) 92.Google Scholar

37 Abū Bakr Tihrānī, I, 205.

38 See note 6.

39 R. Shukurov, op. cit., 226–227, 245–246.