Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:06:48.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Byzantine coins from Hadrianoupolis in Paphlagonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

Ergün Laflı ,
Chris Lightfoot  and
Max Ritter
Ergün Laflı
Affiliation:
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir [email protected]
Chris Lightfoot
Affiliation:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York [email protected]
Max Ritter
Affiliation:
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper gives a brief report on the 21 Byzantine coins recovered during archaeological fieldwork at Hadrianoupolis in southwestern Paphlagonia between 2005 and 2008. One coin is silver and the rest are all bronze or copper alloy. Chronologically, the latter are divided between the Early and the Middle Byzantine periods. Although the assemblage is small, it provides useful information about the distribution of Byzantine coins from one of the more remote rural areas of northern Asia Minor.

Keywords

Byzantine coinsHadrianoupolisPaphlagoniaHonoriasnorth-central TurkeyAsia Minor6th–7th centuries A.D.
Type
Articles
Information
Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , October 2016 , pp. 187 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fatouros, G. (ed.), Theodori Studitae epistulae (Berlin and New York 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar II, 63; and Treadgold, W., ‘Three Byzantine provinces and the first Byzantine contacts with the Rus’, Harvard Ukrainian Studies 12/13 (=Proceedings of the International Congress Commemorating the Millennium of Christianity in Rus'-Ukraine) (1988/1989) 140–3Google Scholar.

2 McGeer, E., Nesbitt, J. W. and Oikonomides, N. (eds.), Catalogue of Byzantine Seals at Dumbarton Oaks and in the Fogg Museum of Art, Vol. 4: The East (Washington, DC 2001) 25 Google Scholar; and Oikonomides, N., Les listes de préséance byzantines des IXe et Xe siècles (Paris 1972) 349;Google Scholar Brüggemann, T., ‘Paphlagonia between Goths, Sasanids and Arabs (3rd-8th centuries AD)’, in Tsetskhladze, G. R., Laflı, E., Hargrave, J. and Anderson, W. (eds.), The Black Sea, Paphlagonia, Pontus and Phrygia in Antiquity. Aspects of Archaeology and Ancient History, British Archaeological Reports, International Series 2432 (Oxford 2012) 49;Google Scholar Winkelmann, F., Die byzantinische Rang- und Ämterstruktur im 8. und 9. Jahrhundert (Berlin 1985) 110–1Google Scholar; and Lounghis, T. C., ‘The evolution of thematic encounters in Asia Minor and the reign of Michael II’, in Lampakes, S. (ed.), H Βυζαντινή Mικρά Aσία (6ος-12ος αιώνας), (Athens 1998) 53.Google Scholar

3 Kazhdan, A. P. (ed.), The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium (New York and Oxford 1991) 3 Google Scholar, 1579 s.v. Paphlagonia (hereafter ODB); Constantino Porfirogenito, De Thematibus, ed. A. Pertusi (Rome 1952) 136; and Brooks, E. W.,‘Arabic lists of the Byzantine themes’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 21 (1901) 69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 71, 73 and 76-7.

4 Booth, I., ‘Ghazis, roads and trade in north-west Anatolia’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 31.2 (2007) 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Honorias was examined in historical and philological sources by Belke, K.: Paphlagonien und Honōrias, Tabula Imperii Byzantini IX (Vienna 1996)Google Scholar. The only archaeological evidence for the Byzantine heritage of Honorias was collected by a British team: Matthews, R., Metcalfe, M. and Cottica, D.,‘Landscapes with figures: Paphlagonia through the Hellenistic, Roman and Byzantine periods, AD 330–AD 1453’, in Matthews, R. and Glatz, C. (eds.), At Empires’ Edge: Project Paphlagonia. Survey in North-Central Turkey, British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, Monograph 44 (London 2009)Google Scholar 190–9. For the review of this book, see E. Laflı, Gnomon 84.5 (2012) 439–45. For a recent study on Honorias, See G. Kan Şahin and E. Laflı, ‘Geç Antik Çağda Honorias’, in A. Efiloğlu, N. Hatunoğlu, H. Özer, T. Gürdal and H. Sankιrinsan (eds.), Kimlik, Mêkan Bağlamιnda Zonguldak Sempozyumu Bildirileri 16–18 Ekim 2014, Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi Yayinlari No. 11 (Ankara 2016) 31–41.

6 Anderson, W., Paphlagonia in Late Antiquity: Landscape and Material Culture in North-Central Anatolia (unpublished Ph.D. thesis) (Melbourne 2011) 188–89Google Scholar.

7 Marek, C., Stadt, Ära und Territorium in Pontus-Bithynia und Nord-Galatia, Istanbuler Forschungen 39 (Tübingen 1993)Google Scholar Beilage 3. For Cratea, see E. Laflı, ‘Roma Döneminde Gerede (Krateia) Arkeolojisi ve Tarihi‘, in progress.

8 Belke, Paphlagonien, 235–7.

9 Brown, P., Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire (Madison, WI 1992) 152 Google Scholar.

10 Belke, Paphlagonien, 156.

11 The Metropolitan Kyprianus from Klaudioupolis was there for this purpose. Cf. Ohme, H., ‘Das Konzilium Quinisextum und seine Bischofsliste. Studien zum Konstantinopeler Konzil von 692’, Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte 56 (1990) 292 Google Scholar.

12 Lamberz, E., Die Bischofslisten des VII. ökumenischen Konzils (Nicaenum II), Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Abhandlungen. Neue Folge, Heft 124 (Munich 2004) 65 Google Scholar.

13 Laurent, V., Le corpus des sceaux de l'empire byzantin V (Paris 1965)Google Scholar no. 1593.

14 Belke, Paphlagonien, 156. Cf. Riplinger, T. et al., Kleinasien. Das Byzantinische Reich (7.–9. Jh.), TAVO, Blatt B VI 8 (Wiesbaden 1988)Google Scholar. Naumann, C. et al., Das Byzantinische Reich, die Salğūqen und Kreuzfahrer, TAVO, Blatt B VII 19 (Wiesbaden 1988)Google Scholar; Kazhdan, A. P., ‘Theme’, in ODB 3 (1991) 2034 Google Scholar.

15 Feissel, D. and Kaygusuz, İ.,’Un mandement impérial du VIe siècle dans une inscription d'Hadrianoupolis d'Honoriade’, in Centre de recherche d'histoire et civilisation de Byzance, Travaux et Mémoires 9 (1985) 397–419.Google Scholar For the Byzantine epigraphic documents from Hadrianoupolis: Laflı, E. and Christof, E., Hadrianopolis I: Inschriften aus Paphlagonia, British Archaeological Reports, International Series 2366 (Oxford 2012)Google Scholar 42–52.

16 Filimon, F., Pillar of the Communities: The Lives of Alypius the Stylite (M.A. thesis) (Budapest 2015)Google Scholar, available <http://www.etd.ceu.hu/2015/filimon_florin.pdf> (accessed 15 February 2016); Darrouzès, J., ‘Notes de littérature et de géographie ecclésiastiques’, Revue des études byzantines 50 (1992) 92–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Saradi-Mendelovici, H., ‘Christian attitudes toward pagan monuments in Late Antiquity and their lkegacy in later Byzantine centuries’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 44 (1990) 55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar and note 91; as well as H. Delehaye, Les saints stylites, Subsidia Hagiographica 14 (Brussels and Paris 1923) 193–94.

17 Belke, Paphlagonien, 156. For St. Euphemia cf. Halkin, F., Euphémie de Chalcédoine: Légendes byzantines, Subsidia hagiographica 41 (Brussels 1965)Google Scholar.

18 On the field season of 2006: Laflı, E. and Zäh, A., ‘Archäologische Forschungen im byzantinischen Hadrianupolis in Paphlagonien’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 101 (2008) 681–714 Google Scholar and pls. XIII–XXVI; season of 2007: Lafli and Zah,‘Beiträge zur frühbyzantinischen Profanarchitektur aus Hadrianupolis-Blütezeit unter Kaiser Iustinian I.’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 102 (2009) 639–59 and pls. V-XIII; pottery evidence: E. Lafli and G. Kan Şahin, Hadrianopolis III: Ceramic Finds from southwestern Paphlagonia, British Archaeological Reports, International Series (Oxford, forthcoming); Middle Byzantine pottery: Lafli and Şahin, Kan, ‘Middle Byzantine ceramics from southwestern Paphlagonia’, Anatolia Antiqua 23 (2015) 63–149 Google Scholar; Middle Byzantine glazed pottery: Kan Sahin, ‘Hadrianoupolis ve Çevresinden Geç Ortaçağ Sırlı Seramik Örnekleri’, in K. Pektaş et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth Symposium of Medieval and Turkish Period Excavations and Art Historical Researches, 14–16 October 2009 (Istanbul 2010) 427–32; early Byzantine glass finds: Fünfschilling, S. and Laflı, E., Hadrianopolis II: Glasfunde des 6. und 7. Jhs. aus Hadrianupolis, Paphlagonien (Türkei), Internationale Archäologie 123 (Rahden/Westf. 2012)Google Scholar; early Byzantine red-slipped wares: Laflı, E. and Kan Şahin, G., ‘Terra Sigillata and Red-Slipped Ware from Hadrianopolis in Southwestern Paphlagonia’, Anatolica Antiqua 20 (2012) 45–120;CrossRefGoogle Scholar early Byzantine lamps and unguentaria: Şahin, Kahn, ‘Pottery from southwestern Paphlagonia II: Unguentaria and Lamps’, in Ramminger, B., Stilborg, O. and Helfert, M. (eds.), Naturwissenschaftliche Analysen vor- und frühgeschichtlicher Keramik III. Methoden, Anwendungsbereiche, Auswertungsmöglichkeiten. Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie aus der Abteilung Vor- und Frühgeschichtliche Archäologie der Universität Hamburg 238 (Bonn 2013) 353–78Google Scholar; and early Byzantine coarse ware: Kan Şahin, G. and Laflı, E., ‚Roman and Late Roman-Early Byzantine coarse ware from southwestern Paphlagonia’, in Laflı, E. and Patacı, S. (eds.), Recent Studies on the Archaeology of Anatolia, British Archaeological Reports, International Series 2750 (Oxford 2015) 327–437 Google Scholar.

19 For Early Byzantine frescoes see Laflı, E., ‘Frühbyzantinischen Fresken aus Hadrianoupolis in Paphlagonien’, in Zimmermann, N. (ed.), Antike Malerei zwischen Lokalstil und Zeitstil. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kolloquiums der AIPMA (Association internationale pour la peinture murale antique). 13.–17. September 2010 in Ephesos. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Archäologische Forschungen 23, Denkschriften 468 (Vienna 2014) 735–40Google Scholar.

20 For Kimistene: id. and Christof, E., ‘Der kaiserzeitliche Tempel von Asartepe/Kimistene in der Chora des paphlagonischen Hadrianoupolis – Ergebnisse der Prospektion von 2005’, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 61 (2011) 233–85Google Scholar.

21 The classification follows that of Grierson, P., Catalogue of the Byzantine Coins in the Dumbarton Oaks Collection and in the Whittemore Collection, vol. 3, 2 (Washington DC 1973);Google Scholar for a discussion of Class A2, see: Ivaniševic, V., ‘Interpretation and Dating of the Folles of Basil II and Constantine VIII – The Class A2/Tumačenje i datiranje fola Vasilija II i Konstantina VIII – vrste A2 ’, Zbornik radova Vizantološkog instituta 27–28 (1989) 19–41 Google Scholar.

22 There has been quite a debate about how to understand the numismatic evidence from this period. See Lightfoot, C. S., ‘Byzantine Anatolia: reassessing the numismatic evidence’, Revue numismatique 6.158 (2002) 238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Morrisson, C., ‘Survivance de l’économie monétaire à Byzance (VIIe-IXe s.)’, in Kountoura-Galake, E. (ed.), Οι σκοτεινοί αιώνες του Βυζαντίου (7ος–9ος αι.), Διεθνή συμπόσια 9 (Athens 2001) 377–97Google Scholar.

23 Ahrweiler, H., ‘L'Asie Mineure et les invasions arabes (VIIe-IXe siècles)’, Revue historique 227.1 (1962) 9 Google Scholar and 28.

24 A different perspective is provided by the Byzantine coin finds from Amorium in Phrygia: Katsari, C., Lightfoot, C. and Özme, A., The Amorium Mint and the Coin Finds: Amorium Reports 4 (Berlin 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Recent studies which highlight the phenomenon of Late Antique ruralisation in Paphlagonia and Asia Minor in general: Ritter, M., ‘The end of Late Antiquity in Paphlagonia: disurbanisation from a comparative perspective’, in Winther-Jacobsen, K. and Summerer, L. (eds.), Landscape Dynamics and Settlement Patterns in Northern Anatolia during the Roman and Byzantine Period, Geographica Historica 32 (Stuttgart 2015) 119–33Google Scholar; Baird, D., ‚Settlement expansion on the Konya Plain, Anatolia 5th-7th centuries AD’, in Bowden, W., Lavan, L. and Machado, C. (eds.), Recent Research on the Late Antique Countryside, Late Antique Archaeology 2 (Leiden 2004) 219–46Google Scholar; Foss, C., Ephesus after Antiquity: A Late Antique, Byzantine and Turkish City (Cambridge, MA 1979)Google Scholar; Ivison, E. A., ‘Amorium in the Byzantine Dark Ages (seventh to ninth centuries)’, in Henning, J. (ed.), Post-Roman Towns, Trade and Settlement in Europe and Byzantium 2, Millennium-Studien 5.2 (Berlin and New York 2007) 25–60;Google Scholar C. Kirilov, ‘The reduction of the fortified city area in Late Antiquity: some reflections on the end of the “Antique City” in the lands of the Eastern Roman Empire’, in Henning, Europe and Byzantium, 3–24; Müller-Wiener, W., ‘Von der Polis zum Kastron. Wandlungen der Stadt im ägäischen Raum von der Antike zum Mittelalter’, Gymnasium 93 (1986) 435–75;Google Scholar Niewöhner, P., ‘Welkende Städte in blühendem Land? Aizanoi und die Verländlichung Anatoliens. Untersuchung im Umland Aizanois’, Archäologischer Anzeiger 2003, 221–8;Google Scholar Niewöhner, ‘Archäologie und die “Dunklen Jahrhunderte” im byzantinischen Anatolien’, in Henning, Europe and Byzantium, 119–58; Ratté, C., ‘New research on the urban development of Aphrodisias in Late Antiquity’, in Parrish, D. (ed.), Urbanism in Western Asia Minor. New Studies on Aphrodisias, Ephesos, Hierapolis, Pergamon, Perge and Xanthos, Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series 45 (Portsmouth, RI 2001) 116–47;Google Scholar and Vanhaverbeke, H., Martens, F. and Waelkens, M., ‘Another view on Late Antiquity: Sagalassos (SW Anatolia), its suburbium and its countryside in Late Antiquity’, Proceedings of the British Academy 141 (2007) 611–48Google Scholar.

26 Cf. to a similar picture in Galatian Pessinus: Devreker, J., Thoen, H. and Vermeulen, F., Excavations in Pessinus: the so-called Acropolis. From Hellenistic and Roman Cemetery to Byzantine Fortress (Ghent 2003) 382–97.Google Scholar

27 Matthews’ assumption of a ‘steady rural collapse’ beginning in A.D. 700 and lasting until the Seljuk conquest is unsustainable. See Matthews et al., ‘Landscapes with Figures’, 192.

28 W. Anderson and A. Robinson,’Marginal or Mainstream? The Character of Settlement in Late Roman Paphlagonia’, in G. R. Tsetskhladze et al., Paphlagonia, Pontus and Phrygia, 24.

29 J. Dalaison and F. Delrieux,’Les monnaies trouvées à Pompeiopolis durant les campagnes de fouilles 2006–2009’, in L. Summerer (ed.), Pompeiopolis I. Eine Zwischenbilanz nach fünf Kampagnen (2006–2010), Schriften des Zentrums für Archäologie und Kulturgeschichte des Schwarzmeerraumes 21 (Langeweißbach 2011) 141–48.

30 Casey, J., Sinope: A Catalogue of the Greek, Roman and Byzantine Coins in Sinop Museum (Turkey) and Related Historical and Numismatic Studies, Royal Numismatic Society Special Publications 44 (London 2010)Google Scholar 3f.

31 D. S. Lenger and S. Atasoy, ‘Tios kazιlarιnda bulunan sikkeler’, in: Ş. Yιldιrιm and S. Atasoy (eds.), Zonguldak’ta bir antik kent: Tios (Ankara 2015) 391–95.

32 Ireland, S., ‘The ancient coins in Amasra Museum’, in Ashton, R. (ed.), Studies in Ancient Coinage from Turkey, British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph 17 (London 1996) 115–37Google Scholar.

33 Ireland, S., Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Coins in the Museum at Amasya (Ancient Amaseia), Turkey, British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara 27 (London 2000).Google Scholar

34 Casey, Sinope.

35 Both of these homogeneous local collections, established first in 1950s (Amasra inaugurated in 1955 and opened to the public in 1982; Amasya inaugurated in 1958 and opened to the public in 1980), consist of acquisitions made mostly by local antique sellers or inhabitants who happened to find Byzantine coins in their farms. Almost no excavated coins or hoards exist among them, as systematically excavated Byzantine sites are not many in these landscapes. These two publications are not clear enough with regard to the provenance of the Byzantine coins presented. In addition to the published collections at Amasra and Amasya there are further Byzantine coin collections in the local museums at Ereğli, Bolu, Kastamonu and Çankırı. Collections in Sinop and Ereğli especially are of great importance since they contain unpublished coin finds from the ongoing excavations at Tium, and Balat Church in Sinop. A private museum with some Byzantine coins is located at Çanakçı near Gökçebey (Tefen), on the way to Tium. None of these Turkish collections, however, has been published so far.

36 After the conquest of Theodosioupolis/Erzurum in A.D. 607/608, Asia Minor became a theatre of war, and until 613 the fight was taking place in Cilicia, Cappadocia and Pontus. In 615/616 the Persians reached Chalcedon, but most strongholds like Ancyra were still in Byzantine hands. The winter of 621/622 was the first one the Persians stayed in Asia Minor – in the Pontus region. Only in March 624 did Heraclius go to the offensive, first to Cappadocian Caesarea, campaigning in the Caucasus thereafter. Meanwhile, the Persians amassed forces and besieged Constantinople in 626. Heraclius was able to intercept one of their armies in Armenia, after Sharvaraz’ failed siege. The Persians left Asia Minor at the end of 626. See Howard-Johnston, J. D., ‘Heraclius’ Persian campaigns and the revival of the East Roman empire, 622–630’, War in History 6 (1999) 1–44;Google Scholar and Belke, Paphlagonien, 68–9.

37 Ireland, Amasya, 108–10.

38 Callot, O., Les monnaies. Fouilles de la ville 1964–1974, Salamine de Chypre 16 (Paris 2004) 54–75 Google Scholar.

39 Cf. to a thorough analysis of this situation in other parts of Asia Minor, which is in line with our own interpretation: Drauschke, J., ‘Bemerkungen zu den Auswirkungen der Perser- und Arabereinfälle des 7. Jahrhunderts in Kleinasien’, in Heinrich-Tamaska, O. (ed.), Rauben – Plündern – Morden. Nachweis von Zerstörung und kriegerischer Gewalt im archäologischen Befund (Hamburg 2013) 126–37Google Scholar.

40 Casey, Sinope, 112–113; strangely, all the decisive coins of this hoard were misidentified or confused: the Heraclian coins have to be corrected as no. 7 is MIB 5 fifth officina, no. 8 is MIB 1a tenth officina, no. 9 is MIB 48/49 third officina and the latest coin of the hoard minted in 638/39, no. 10 is MIB 39, second officina.

41 E.g. Sanders, G. D. R., ‘Recent developments in the chronology of Byzantine Corinth’, in Williams, C. K. and Bookidis, N. (eds.), Corinth, the Centenary: 1896–1996 (Princeton, NJ 2003) 387–88Google Scholar.