¹ Tripathi, Dwijendra, ed., “Business, Networks, and the State in India,” special issue, Business History Review 88, no. 1 (2014): 6Google Scholar. For an overview of the status quo of research, see also Tripathi, Dwijendra, The Oxford History of Indian Business (New Delhi, 2004)Google Scholar.

² Walvin, James, Fruits of Empire: Exotic Produce and British Taste, 1660–1800 (New York, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Clarence-Smith, W. G. and Topik, Steven, eds., The Global Coffee Economy in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 1500–1989 (Cambridge, U.K., 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Darwin, John, The Empire Project: The Rise and Fall of the British World-System, 1830–1970 (Cambridge, U.K., 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³ Burton, Antoinette M., Empire in Question: Reading, Writing, and Teaching British Imperialism (Durham, N.C., 2011), 279Google Scholar. See also Ghosh, Durba and Kennedy, Dane Keith, eds., Decentring Empire: Britain, India, and the Transcolonial World (Hyderabad, 2006)Google Scholar.

⁴ Markovits, Claude, The Global World of Indian Merchants, 1750–1947: Traders of Sind from Bukhara to Panama (Cambridge, U.K., 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Hamashita, Takeshi, China, East Asia, and the Global Economy: Regional and Historical Perspectives (New York, 2008)Google Scholar. Goswami, Chhaya, The Call of the Sea: Kachchhi Traders in Muscat and Zanzibar, c. 1800–1880 (New Delhi, 2011)Google Scholar. Dejung, Christof, Die Fäden des globalen Marktes: Eine Sozial- und Kulturgeschichte des Welthandels am Beispiel der Handelsfirma Gebrüder Volkart, 1851–1999 (Cologne, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁵ Beckert, Sven, Empire of Cotton: A Global History (New York, 2014)Google Scholar.

⁶ Kaoru, Sugihara, “Japan as an Engine of the Asian International Economy, c. 1880–1936,” Japan Forum 2, no. 1 (1990): 127–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Akita, Shigeru and White, Nicholas, eds., The International Order of Asia in the 1930s and 1950s (Farmham, U.K., 2010)Google Scholar. Akita, Shigeru and Kagotani, Naoto, “The International Order of Asia in the 1930s,” in Gentlemanly Capitalism, Imperialism, and Global History, ed. Shigeru Akita (Houndmills, U.K., 2002), 143–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁷ Manjapra, Kris, Age of Entanglement: German and Indian Intellectuals across Empire (Cambridge, Mass., 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Esleben, Jörg, Kraenzle, Christina, and Kulkarni, Sukanya, eds., Mapping Channels between Ganges and Rhein: German-Indian Cross-Cultural Relations (Middlesex, U.K., 2008)Google Scholar.

⁸ Roy, Tirthankar, “Economic History and Modern India: Redefining the Link,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, no. 3 (2002): 109–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here: 110. Roy, Tirthankar, The Economic History of India, 1857–1947, 3rd ed. (New Delhi, 2011), 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹ van Laak, Dirk, Über alles in der Welt: Deutscher Imperialismus im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Munich, 2005), 109Google Scholar. Conrad, Sebastian, Globalisation and the Nation in Imperial Germany (Cambridge, U.K., 2010)Google Scholar.

¹⁰ Gallagher, John and Robinson, Ronald, “The Imperialism of Free Trade,” Economic History Review 6 (1953): 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹¹ Lubinski, Christina, “Liability of Foreignness in Historical Context: German Business in Preindependence India (1880–1940),” Enterprise & Society 15, no. 4 (2014): 722–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹² As excellently described by Dejung, Fäden des globalen Marktes.

¹³ For World War I, see Ramnath, Maia, Haj to Utopia: How the Ghadar Movement Charted Global Radicalism and Attempted to Overthrow the British Empire (Berkeley, 2011)Google Scholar. Subhas Chandra Bose's cooperation with the German government during World War II has been described in great detail; see Bose, Sugata, His Majesty's Opponent: Subhas Chandra Bose and India's Struggle against Empire (Cambridge, Mass., 2011)Google Scholar; Hayes, Romain, Subhas Chandra Bose in Nazi Germany: Politics, Intelligence and Propaganda, 1941–43 (New York, 2011)Google Scholar; Kuhlmann, Jan and Das, Christel, Netaji in Europe (New Delhi, 2012)Google Scholar; and Hauner, Milan, India in Axis Strategy: Germany, Japan, and Indian Nationalists in the Second World War (Stuttgart, 1981)Google Scholar.

¹⁴ One notable exception is Raman Mahadevan, “Wrangling over the Colonial Indian Market: The Untold Story of German Commercial Presence between the Wars” (paper presented at the “Informal and Everyday Markets: Modern Histories of Indian Business and Entrepreneurship since the Nineteenth Century” workshop, University of Göttingen, 18–20 June 2014).

¹⁵ Arnold, David, Everyday Technology: Machines and the Making of India's Modernity (Chicago, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Domosh, Mona, American Commodities in an Age of Empire (New York, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Lubinski, Christina, “Local Responsiveness in Distant Markets: Western Gramophone Companies in India before World War I,” Management and Organizational History 10, no. 2 (2015): 170–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁶ Aparajith Ramnath, “Engineers in India: Industrialisation, Indianisation and the State, 1900–47” (unpublished PhD thesis, Imperial College London, 2012).

¹⁷ Fear, Jeffrey, “Cartels,” in The Oxford Handbook of Business History, ed. Jones, Geoffrey and Zeitlin, Jonathan (Oxford, 2008), 268–92Google Scholar, here: 275.

¹⁸ Tyrrell, Ian, “Reflections on the Transnational Turn in United States History: Theory and Practice,” Journal of Global History 4, no. 3 (2009): 453–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁹ Abelshauser, Werner, von Hippel, Wolfgang, Johnson, Jeffrey Allen, and Stokes, Raymond G., German Industry and Global Enterprise: BASF: The History of a Company (Cambridge, U.K., 2004), 97, 190Google Scholar. Plumpe, Gottfried, Die I.G. Farbenindustrie AG: Wirtschaft, Technik und Politik, 1904–1945 (Berlin, 1990), 117–18, 571Google Scholar. Lindner, Stephan H., Inside IG Farben: Hoechst during the Third Reich (Cambridge, U.K., 2008)Google Scholar. Bartmann, Wilhelm, Zwischen Tradition und Fortschritt: Aus der Geschichte der Pharmabereiche von Bayer, Hoechst und Schering von 1935–1975 (Stuttgart, 2003)Google Scholar.

²⁰ The universities of Göttingen and Berlin are currently engaged in a joint research project, funded by the German Research Foundation, that will make German archival materials on India available; see http://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/259639080.

²¹ Kipping, Matthias, Bucheli, Marcelo, and Wadhwani, R. Daniel, “Analyzing and Interpreting Historical Sources: A Basic Methodology,” in Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods, ed. Bucheli, Marcelo and Wadhwani, R. Daniel (Oxford, 2014, 305–29Google Scholar. Decker, Stephanie, “The Silence of the Archives: Business History, Post-Colonialism and Archival Ethnography,” Management and Organizational History 8, no. 2 (2013): 155–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²² Roy, Mira, “Dyes in Ancient and Medieval India,” Indian Journal of History of Sciences 13, no. 2 (1978): 83–113Google Scholar, here: 83.

²³ Bäumler, Ernst, Farben, Formeln, Forscher: Hoechst und die Geschichte der industriellen Chemie in Deutschland (Munich, 1989)Google Scholar. Abelshauser et al., German Industry and Global Enterprise. For a detailed description of the changing market structure, see Engel, Alexander, Farben der Globalisierung: Die Entstehung moderner Märkte für Farbstoffe, 1500–1900 (Frankfurt am Main, 2009)Google Scholar and Travis, Anthony S., The Rainbow Makers: The Origins of the Synthetic Dyestuffs Industry in Western Europe (Bethlehem, Pa., 1993)Google Scholar.

²⁴ Engel, Alexander, “Colouring Markets: The Industrial Transformation of the Dyestuff Business Revisited,” Business History 54, no. 1 (2012): 10–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁵ Kumar, Prakash, Indigo Plantations and Science in Colonial India (Cambridge, U.K., 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁶ U.S. Tariff Commission, Census of Dyes and Other Synthetic Organic Chemicals, 1922 (Washington, D.C., 1923), 124Google Scholar.

²⁷ Carayannis, Elias G. and Stokes, Raymond, “A Historical Analysis of Management of Technology at Badische Anilin und Soda Fabrik (BASF), AG: A Case Study,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 14, no. 2 (1997): 175–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁸ U.S. Tariff Commission, Census of Dyes, 1922, 125, table 21.

²⁹ Great Britain, India Office, Tables Relating to the Trade of British India with the British Empire and Foreign Countries, 1909–10 to 1913–14 (London, 1915), 150–68Google Scholar.

³⁰ U.S. Tariff Commission, Census of Dyes and Other Synthetic Organic Chemicals, 1923 (Washington, D.C., 1924), 153Google Scholar.

³¹ Jones, Geoffrey, Merchants to Multinationals: British Trading Companies in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Oxford, 2000), 26Google Scholar.

³² Bayer, Geschichte und Entwicklung der Farbenfabriken vorm. Friedr. Bayer & Co. Elberfeld in den ersten 50 Jahren (Munich, 1918), 400–402Google Scholar.

³³ C. Rumpff, India/Memorandum, 10 Dec. 1888, 82.1, Bayer Archives, Leverkusen (hereafter, BA).

³⁴ Raina, Dhruv and Habib, S. Irfan, “Technical Institutes in Colonial India: Kala Bhavan, Baroda (1890–1990),” Economic and Political Weekly 26, no. 46 (1991): 2619–21Google Scholar, here: 2619–20, appendix 1. Kochhar, Rajesh, “Tribhuvandas Kalyandas Gajjar (1863–1920): The Pioneering Industrial Chemist of Western India,” Current Science 104, no. 8 (2013): 1093–97Google Scholar.

³⁵ Gajjar, T. K., “Welcome Address,” The Industrial Conference Held at Surat, December 1907: Full Text of Papers Read at and Submitted to It, ed. by the Industrial Conference (Madras, 1907), 1–21Google Scholar, here: 9–10.

³⁶ Mehta, Makrand, “Science versus Technology: The Early Years of the Kala Bhavan, Baroda, 1890–1896,” Indian Journal of History of Science 27, no. 2 (1992): 145–70Google Scholar, here: 157. Bayer, Geschichte und Entwicklung, 400.

³⁷ Bayer Group, Bayer Group in India (undated), http://www.ibef.org/download/bayer.pdf.

³⁸ Based on “Report to the Bayer Advisory Board,” Apr. 1902, 5, 5 E.a. 16; “Peace Negotiations World War I,” Mar. 1918, 202/16; both at BA.

³⁹ Abelshauser et al., German Industry and Global Enterprise, 96–97.

⁴⁰ This organization inspired U.S. and British competition during and after World War I; see Great Britain Trade Commissioner for India, Trade of India: Report on the Conditions and Prospects of British Trade in India, at the Close of the War, by His Majesty's Senior Trade Commissioner in India and Ceylon (London, 1919), 54Google Scholar.

⁴¹ “R. W. Carlyle's Report on the Agitation against the Partition (1905),” Pol. (Pol.) F. No.86(J)/1905, West Bengal State Archives, Kolkata (hereafter, WBSA).

⁴² Sarkar, Sumit, The Swadeshi Movement in Bengal, 1903–1908 (New Delhi, 1973), 8–12Google Scholar.

⁴³ Aurobindo, Sri, “The Aims of the Nationalist Party [Speech Delivered in Nagpur 30 Jan. 1908],” in The Complete Works of Sri Aurobindo, vols. 6 and 7, Bande Mataram Political Writings and Speeches, 1890–1908, ed. Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust (Pondicherry, 2002), 846–54, here: 852Google Scholar.

⁴⁴ “R. W. Carlyle's Report on the Agitation against the Partition (1905),” Pol. (Pol.) F. No.86(J)/1905, WBSA.

⁴⁵ Payn, Howard, The Merchandise Marks Act 1887, with Special Reference to the Importation Sections and the Customs Regulations and Orders Made Thereunder (London, 1888)Google Scholar.

⁴⁶ Government of India, Dispatch No. 91, dated 14 Mar. 1901, reprinted in Report of the Bombay Chamber of Commerce for the Year 1901 (Bombay, 1902), 220Google Scholar.

⁴⁷ Government of India Legislative Department, Legislation and Orders Relating to the War, 3rd ed. (Delhi, 1915)Google Scholar.

⁴⁸ “Enemy Trading in India,” Bill, HL Deb, 27 Jan. 1916, vol. 20, cc.1092–99, Hansard 1803–2005, http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lords/1916/jan/27/enemy-trading-in-india.

⁴⁹ “Detention and Internment of German and Austrian Subjects,” Correspondence between American Consulate and Secretary of States, 19 Nov. 1915, Records of the Department of State Relating to World War I and Its Termination, 1914–1929, M367, 59, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, D.C. (hereafter, NARA).

⁵⁰ Dejung, Christof and Zangger, Andreas, “British Wartime Protectionism and Swiss Trading Companies in Asia during the First World War,” Past & Present 207, no. 1 (2010): 181–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here: 197–99.

⁵¹ Friedrich von Bernhardi, Germany and the Next War (New York, 1914); Fraser, Thomas G., “Germany and Indian Revolution, 1914–18,” Journal of Contemporary History 12, no. 2 (1977): 255–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here: 256–57.

⁵² Ramnath, Haj to Utopia.

⁵³ Great Britain Trade Commissioner for India, Trade of India, 53.

⁵⁴ Ibid., 12.

⁵⁵ “Auction Sale of Dyes: High Prices Realised in Madras,” Times of India, 12 July 1916, 5.

⁵⁶ “Shortage of Dyes,” Times of India, 23 Mar. 1916, 8.

⁵⁷ Great Britain Trade Commissioner for India, Trade of India, 54.

⁵⁸ For details on the I.G., see Plumpe, I.G. Farbenindustrie AG, 96–100. Abelshauser et al., German Industry and Global Enterprise, 171–73.

⁵⁹ Johnson, Jeffrey Allan and Macleod, Roy M., “The War the Victors Lost: The Dilemmas of Chemical Disarmament, 1919–1926,” in Frontline and Factory: Comparative Perspectives on the Chemical Industry at War, 1914–1924, ed. Macleod, Roy M. and Johnson, Jeffrey Allan (Dordrecht, 2006), 221–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁶⁰ Ibid., 222–23. Szöllösi-Janze, Margit, “Losing the War but Gaining Ground: The German Chemical Industry during World War I,” in The German Chemical Industry in the Twentieth Century, ed. Lesch, John E. (Dordrecht, 2000), 91–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Steen, Kathryn, The American Synthetic Organic Chemicals Industry: War and Politics, 1910–1930 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁶¹ Manela, Erez, The Wilsonian Moment: Self-Determination and the International Origins of Anticolonial Nationalism (Oxford, 2007), 95–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁶² Curtis, Lionel and Great Britain Parliament, Papers Relating to the Application of the Principle of Dyarchy to the Government of India (Oxford, 1920)Google Scholar.

⁶³ India Fiscal Commission, Report of the Indian Fiscal Commission, 1921–22 (Simla, 1922), 137Google Scholar.

⁶⁴ Banerjea, Pramathanath, Fiscal Policy in India (London, 1922), 176Google Scholar.

⁶⁵ Trivedi, Lisa, Clothing Gandhi's Nation: Homespun and Modern India (Bloomington, 2007), 5–9Google Scholar, quote on 36. See also the analysis of the German consul in Calcutta: Dr. Pausch to German Foreign Office, 20 Dec. 1938, British-India 330–442, BA.

⁶⁶ “Report on the visit of Das Gupta, 1921,” 9 K 1 AG, BA. About Das Gupta see Baruwā, Niroda Kumāra, Chatto: The Life and Times of an Indian Anti-Imperialist in Europe (New Delhi, 2004), 43–44Google Scholar.

⁶⁷ On German cloaking strategies, see also Aalders, Gerard and Wiebes, Cees, The Art of Cloaking Ownership: The Secret Collaboration and Protection of the German War Industry by the Neutrals: The Case of Sweden (Amsterdam, 1996)Google Scholar. Jones, Geoffrey and Lubinski, Christina, “Managing Political Risk in Global Business: Beiersdorf, 1914–1990,” Enterprise & Society 13, no. 1 (2012): 85–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Christopher Kobrak and Per. H. Hansen, eds., European Business, Dictatorship, and Political Risk, 1920–1945 (New York, 2004).

⁶⁸ Bayer to I.G. Farben firms, 27 Oct. 1921, Sales Dyes 420, BA.

⁶⁹ Bayer to Gorio, 16 Mar. 1921, Sales Dyes 420, BA.

⁷⁰ “Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between the United Kingdom and Germany,” 2 Dec. 1924, ratified 8 Sept. 1925; printed in Great Britain, Foreign Office, Handbook of Commercial Treaties, etc., with Foreign Powers, 4th ed. (London, 1931), 299Google Scholar.

⁷¹ Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, Mass., 1990), 475CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Plumpe, I.G. Farbenindustrie AG.

⁷² Sole Importer Contract, I.G. and Havero, 19 A 590-2, BA; “Secret Agreement with Havero, British India,” 9 K 1 2, BA.

⁷³ For details on I.G. Farben's international business and cloaking, see Mira Wilkins, The History of Foreign Investment in the United States, 1914–1945 (Cambridge, Mass., 2004), 462–69. More sophisticated cloaking arrangements were common in the interwar period. For context see Aalders and Wiebes, Art of Cloaking; Jones and Lubinski, “Managing Political Risk.”

⁷⁴ “Our Sales Organization until the War,” Chemicals 330/1088, BA; Tax issues, British India 9 K 1 2, and letter from Havero to IG, 24 June 1929, BA. See also “Income Tax Claim,” Times of India, 22 Mar. 1928, 15.

⁷⁵ U.S. Tariff Commission, Census of Dyes, 1923, 123.

⁷⁶ U.S. Tariff Commission, Census of Dyes and Other Synthetic Organic Chemicals, 1926 (Washington, D.C., 1927), 148Google Scholar. I.G. Farben never manufactured dyes in India before 1947 and first discussed such a step (for their pharmaceutical business) in 1949, when the Indian government lobbied intensely for it. Prior to that, they always shipped from Germany and then diluted the dyes to the required strength and repackaged them, but never manufactured them in India.

⁷⁷ Consul W. Keblinger, Bombay, “Chemical Division Market for Aniline Dyes in India,” 5, U.S. Department of Commerce, Special Circular No. 221, R8128/5484, Federal Archives, Berlin (hereafter, BArch).

⁷⁸ For this detailed market analysis, see ibid., 4–10; “Havero's Dye Business in British India,” 1 Feb. 1938, R 8128/9967, BArch.

⁷⁹ “Critical Notes on the Selling of I.G. Products in East-Asian Countries,” Apr. 1929, “Carl Duisberg's Travel Reports,” vol. 6, BA; “Havero's Dye Business in British India,” XI, R 8128/9967, BArch.

⁸⁰ “Havero's Dye Business in British India,” R 8128/9967, BArch.

⁸¹ Kapp to Foreign Office, 30 June 1927, R3101-21030, BArch; “Confidential Report on the Indian Boycott,” undated [1930], R3101-02664, BArch.

⁸² “Collection of Documents on Trademarks,” I.G./British India, 330/1267, BA; Plumpe, I.G. Farbenindustrie AG, 118; Reader, W. J., Imperial Chemical Industries: A History, 2 vols. (London, 1970), 1:439Google Scholar.

⁸³ Gordon, A. D. D., Businessmen and Politics: Rising Nationalism and a Modernising Economy in Bombay, 1918–1933 (New Delhi, 1978), 210–18Google Scholar. Markovits, Claude, Indian Business and Nationalist Politics, 1931–1939: The Indigenous Capitalist Class and the Rise of the Congress Party (Cambridge, U.K., 1985), 72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁸⁴ Grobba, Foreign Office, to Winter Reisner & Co., 16 May 1930, R3101-02664, BArch.

⁸⁵ “Confidential Report on the Indian Boycott.”

⁸⁶ Coleman, Kim, IG Farben and ICI, 1925–53: Strategies for Growth and Survival (Houndmills, U.K., 2006), 54Google Scholar. Plumpe, I.G. Farbenindustrie AG, 197–99, 455.

⁸⁷ “World Dye Production, Percentage of World Trade by the Cartel,” 1933, 4.B.14.3.6, BA.

⁸⁸ Manikumar, K. A., A Colonial Economy in the Great Depression, Madras (1929–1937) (Chennai, 2003), 100Google Scholar; “New Taxation Not Justified: A Bad Precedent, Ahmedabad Millowners' Protest,” Times of India, 12 Oct. 1931, 11.

⁸⁹ “An Act to Consolidate the Law Relating to Customs Duties,” Act 32, A Collection of the Acts of the Indian Legislature for the Year 1934 (New Delhi, 1934)Google Scholar.

⁹⁰ Tooze, J. Adam, The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy (New York, 2007), 71–86Google Scholar.

⁹¹ “Havero's Dye Business in British India,” R 8128/9967, BArch.

⁹² Ibid.

⁹³ German consulate Bombay [Richter] to Foreign Office, 11 Nov. 1932, R 90656, Politisches Archiv in Berlin (German Foreign Office Archives; hereafter, PA). See also Framke, Maria, Delhi–Rom–Berlin: Die indische Wahrnehmung von Faschismus und Nationalsozialismus, 1922–1939 (Darmstadt, 2013)Google Scholar.

⁹⁴ For a detailed analysis of the election results and the relationship of the INC to the Indian business class, see Markovits, Claude, “Indian Business and the Congress Provincial Governments, 1937–39,” Modern Asian Studies 15, no. 3 (1981): 487–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹⁵ Travel reports, Reithinger, 191/1/3, BA.

⁹⁶ Ibid. On Reithinger, see also Hayes, Peter, Industry and Ideology: IG Farben in the Nazi Era (Cambridge, U.K., 1987), 31Google Scholar. Lubinski, “Liability of Foreignness,” 738–79. On INC governments' purchasing policy, see Markovits, “Indian Business,” 503.

⁹⁷ Harijan, 26 Mar. 1938, reprinted in Chander, Jag Parvesh, ed., Teachings of Mahatma Gandhi (Lahore, 1945), 539Google Scholar.

⁹⁸ “Reorganization of Our [Havero's] Indian Dye Business,” 1938, 7, 9 and 31, 191/1/3, BA.

⁹⁹ “Confidential Note,” Dec. 1938, Legal Department, 330/1114, BA.

¹⁰⁰ “Reorganization of Our [Havero's] Indian Dye Business,” 1938, 33, 330/1124, BA.

¹⁰¹ Series of letters and “Confidential Note,” Dec. 1938, Chemdyes Ltd., Correspondence I, 1938–42, Legal Department, 330/1114, BA.

¹⁰² Roland, Joan G., The Jewish Communities of India: Identity in a Colonial Era (New Brunswick, N.J., 1998)Google Scholar.

¹⁰³ See also Manjapra, Age of Entanglement, 80–85. Framke, Delhi–Rom–Berlin. Egorova, Yulia, Jews and India: Perceptions and Image (London, 2006), 43Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁴ “Mr. Nambiar's Aweful Ordeal: How He Was Treated by Nazi Storm Troopers,” Advance, 11 May 1933. Kreutzmüller, Christoph, “Augen im Sturm? Ausländische Zeitungsberichte über die Judenverfolgung in Berlin, 1918–1938,” Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 62, no. 1 (2014): 25–48Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁵ “Reports on Anti-German Boycotts,” 1934–1935, R 98706, PA.

¹⁰⁶ Consulate in Bombay to Foreign Office, 6 and 10 Feb. 1936, R 77418, PA.

¹⁰⁷ Jewish Tribune, Mar. 1936, 3, quoted in Egorova, Jews and India, 43.

¹⁰⁸ Havero to I.G., 15 Aug. 1938, Reorganization British India, 330/1111, BA.

¹⁰⁹ Urchs to Kuepper, 9 Dec. 1938, Chemdyes Ltd., Bombay, Correspondence I, 1938–42, 330/1114, BA.

¹¹⁰ “Germans in Enemy Countries,” 1939–1945, R 127578, PA; “Civil Internees,” 1939–1945, R 41819–41822, PA.

¹¹¹ D I B's reports on activities of Germans, Italians, and Japanese in India, File 1080(A)/36: July 1939–Feb. 1940, Survey No. 19, IOR/L/PJ/12/506, India Office Records, British Library, London.

¹¹² “Propaganda in India,” 1941, R 55/20822, BArch.

¹¹³ For details on German-Indian relations during World War II, see Hauner, India in Axis Strategy; Kuhlmann and Das, Netaji in Europe.