Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:37:51.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factory Legislation and Management Modernization during Japan's Industrialization, 1886–1916

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

Koji Taira
Koji Taira
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics, University of Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Faced with a labor shortage at a crucial point in the industrialization of Japan, tradition-oriented businessmen reacted not by raising wages but by longing for the authority-ordered labor relations of the past. Given this situation, the Meiji government moved to improve working conditions through non-economic means. Professor Taira shows that the debate over proposed factory legislation, along with the coming-of-age of a new generation of entrepreneurs, produced a “conversion” to modern management among businessmen of the late-Meiji generation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 44 , Issue 1: Japanese Entrepreneurship , Spring 1970 , pp. 84 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rosovsky, Henry, “Japan's Transition to Economic Growth, 1868–1885,” in Industrialization in Two Systems, edited by Rosovsky, Henry (New York, 1966), 93.Google Scholar

2 Ohkawa, Kazushi, et al., The Growth Rate of the Japanese Economy Since 1878 (Tokyo, 1958), chap. 5.Google Scholar

3 Taira, Koji, “Characteristics of Japanese Labor Markets,” Economic Development and Cultural Change (January 1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 For this period's labor policy, see Sumiya, Mikio, Nihon chinrōdōshi ron (A Tract on the History of Wage Labor in Japan), (Tokyo, 1955), 301–325.Google Scholar See also Marshall, Byron K., Capitalism and Nationalism in Prewar Japan (Stanford, Calif., 1967)Google Scholar, chap. 4.

5 Saito, Kashiro, La protection ouvrière au Japon (Paris, 1900), 33–34.Google Scholar

6 Quoted in Sumiya, Nihon chinrōdōshi ron, 319.

7 For a detailed description of how the council was constituted, see Metji bunka shiryō sōsho (cited hereafter as MBSS), (A Compendium of Meiji Cultural Materials), (Tokyo, 1961), I, 6–16.

8 For the proceedings of the first session of the council, see MBSS, 19–57.

9 Ibid., 46–47.

10 ibid., 48–49.

11 Ibid., 55–56.

12 For an additional commentary on some of these entrepreneurs, see Taira, Koji, “The Dynamics of Industrial Relations in Early Japanese Development,” Labor Law Journal (July, 1962)Google Scholar; and Yamamura, Kozo, “The Founding of Mitsubishi: A Case Study in Japanese Business History,” Business History Review XLI (Summer, 1967)Google Scholar, and “A Re-examination of Entrepreneurship in Meiji Japan (1868–1912),” Economic History Review XXI (April 1968).

13 Based on the recollections of En Kanai, one of the most active members of the third session. See Nihon rōdō undō shiryō (cited hereafter as NRUS), (Historical Materials on the Labor Movement in Japan), (Tokyo, 1968), III, 179.

14 This may be considered as a subset of the “new generation” discussed by Pyle, Kenneth B., The New Generation in Meiji Japan (Stanford, 1969).Google Scholar

15 For the proceedings of the third session, see MBSS, 61–185. For Taguchi's statement, see Ibid., 181–83. Taguchi is given special attention here for his importance in Pyle's “new generation.” See Pyle, New Generation in Meiji Japan, 87–91.

16 MBSS, especially 116–23.

17 Ibid., 118.

18 Ibid., 146–48.

19 Compiled under the supervision of Takao Tsuchiya (Tokyo, 1947).

20 NRUS (Tokyo, 1962), I, 647–48.

21 Tsuchiya, Takao, Zaibatsu o kizuita hitobito (Zaibatsu Builders), (Tokyo, 1955), 104–114.Google Scholar

22 For details of management practices by Shōda and others mentioned in this article, see Nihon rōmu kanri nenshi (Chronicles of Work Force Management in Japan), (Tokyo, 1964), vol. II, pt. I. See also Taira, Koji, Industrial Revolution and Factory Labor in Japan (Memorandum No. 82, mimeographed), (Research Center in Economic Growth, Stanford, 1969).Google Scholar

23 Tsuchiya, Takao, Zoku nihon keiei rinenshi (A History of Management Ideals in Japan, Continued), (Tokyo, 1967), II, chap. 3.Google Scholar

24 MBSS, 92–93.

25 Tsuchiya, Zoku nihon keiei rinenshi, III, chap. 2.

26 Quoted from The New Testament in Modern English, translated by Phillips, J. B. (New York, 1958), 159.Google Scholar

27 Tsuchiya, Zoku nihon keiei rinenshi, III, chap. 3. See also Tanaka, Hiroshi, Kanebō, to keiretsu (Kanebo and Related Firms), (Tokyo, 1958)Google Scholar, chaps. 3 and 4; Kinukawa, Taichi, Honpō menshi bōsekishi (A History of Cotton Textiles in Japan), (Tokyo, 1939)Google Scholar, IV, chap. 13; Irimajri, Yoshinaga, Mutō Sanji (Tokyo, 1964).Google Scholar

28 For kuqaku, see Dore, R. P., “Mobility, Equality, and Individuation in Modern Japan,” in Dore, R. P. (ed.), Aspects of Social Change in Modern Japan (Princeton, 1967), 134–36.Google Scholar

29 Hattori, Shisō (ed.), Kindai nihon jinbutsu keizaishi (A Biographical Economic History of Modern Japan), (Tokyo, 1955), 284–89.Google Scholar

30 For the history of Japan's public assistance, see Taira, Koji, “Public Assistance in Japan,” Journal of Asian Studies (November 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 Tsuchiya, Zoku nihon keiei rinenshi, III, chap. 4.

32 Ibid., 264.

33 Ibid., chap. 5. See also Kinukawa, Honpo menshi bōsekishi (1941), V, chap. 2.

34 Pyle. New Generation in Meiji Japan, 200.

35 Tsuchiya, Zoku nihon keiei rinenshi, 355–56.

36 Ayusawa, Iwao F., A History of Labor in Modern Japan (Honolulu, 1966), chap. IVGoogle Scholar; Taira, Koji, Economic Development and the Labor Market in Japan (New York, forthcoming), chap. VI.Google Scholar

37 Yoshino, Michael Y., Japan's Managerial System (Cambridge, Mass., 1968).Google Scholar