Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 February 2019
This article examines the nuances and complexities of business-government relations in the British paper-pulp industry between 1950 and 1980 through the prism of interactions between Wiggins, Teape & Co., a paper company, and various U.K. government departments in the postwar period. It highlights the complexity of business-government and interdepartmental relations and tensions, set against the global and domestic paper industry competition and the United Kingdom's international economic position. Long-standing industry underinvestment and interdepartmental tensions in government are identified as principal contributors to the failing competitiveness of the industry and of British businesses more generally in the twentieth century.
1 Jones, Geoffrey and Kirby, Maurice, Competitiveness and the State: Government and Business in Twentieth-Century Britain (Manchester, 1991)Google Scholar.
2 Rollings, Neil, “The Twilight World of British Business Politics: The Spring Sunningdale Conferences since the 1960s,” Business History 56, no. 6 (2014): 915–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Amatori, Franco, Millward, Robert, and Toninelli, Pier Angelo, Reappraising State-Owned Enterprise: A Comparison of the UK and Italy (London, 2011)Google Scholar; Toninelli, Pier Angelo, Galambos, Louis, and Amatori, Franco, eds., The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World (Cambridge, U.K., 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Musacchio, Aldo and Lazzarini, Sergio G., Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond (Cambridge, Mass., 2015)Google Scholar; Hannah, Leslie, “The Economic Consequences of the State Ownership of Industry, 1945–1990,” in The Economic History of Britain since 1700, vol. 3: 1939–1992, ed. Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Donald (Cambridge, Mass., 1994), 168–94Google Scholar; Tolliday, Steven, Business, Banking, and Politics: The Case of British Steel, 1918–1939 (Cambridge, Mass., 1987)Google Scholar; Magnusson, Lars and Ottosson, Jan, The State, Regulation and the Economy (Northampton, Mass., 2001)Google Scholar. See, for example, Coopey, Richard, “Industrial Policy in the White Heat of the Technological Revolution,” in The Wilson Governments, 1964–70, ed. Coopey, Richard, Fielding, S., and Tiratsoo, Nick (London, 1995)Google Scholar; Gerschenkron, Alexander, “An Economic History of Russia,” Journal of Economic History 12, no. 2 (1952): 146–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Holland, Stuart, The State as Entrepreneur: New Dimensions for Public Enterprise (London, 1972)Google Scholar.
4 Kipping, Matthias, “Business-Government Relations: Beyond Performance Issues,” in Business History around the World, ed. Amatori, Franco and Jones, Geoffrey (Cambridge, U.K., 2003), 372–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Michie, Ranald and Williamson, Philip, eds., The British Government and the City of London in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, U.K., 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Phillips, James, “Business and the Limited Reconstruction of Industrial Relations in the UK in the 1970s,” Business History 51, no. 6 (2009): 801–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Morelli, Carlo, Tomlinson, James, and Wright, Valerie, “The Managing of Competition: Government and Industry Relationships in the Jute Industry 1957–63,” Business History 54, no. 5 (2012): 765–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; MacKenzie, Niall, “Be Careful What You Wish For: Comparative Advantage and the Wilson Smelters Project, 1967–82,” in ed. Frolund, Hans-Otto and Ingulstad, Mats, From Warfare to Welfare: Business-Government Relations in the Aluminium Industry (Trondheim, 2012)Google Scholar; Elbaum, Bernard and Lazonick, William, The Decline of the British Economy (Oxford, 1986)Google Scholar.
5 For a detailed analysis of this, see Rollings, Neil, British Business in the Formative Years of European Integration, 1945–1973 (Oxford, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Jones, Geoffrey and Lubinski, Christina, “Managing Political Risk in Global Business: Beiersdorf, 1914–1990,” Enterprise & Society 13, no. 1 (2012): 85–119Google Scholar.
7 Mazzucato, Mariana, The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths (London, 2015)Google Scholar; North, Douglass C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge, U.K., 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Mazzucato, Entrepreneurial State, 91.
9 Mazzucato, Mariana, The Entrepreneurial State, Demos booklet (London, 2011), 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Jones and Kirby, Competitiveness and the State, 16.
11 Barnett, Correlli, The Lost Victory: British Dreams, British Realities, 1945–50 (London, 1995)Google Scholar.
12 Sir Alec Cairncross, “Economic Policy and Performance, 1945–64” and “Economic Policy and Performance, 1964–1990,” both in Floud and McCloskey, Economic History of Britain since 1700, vol. 3, 32–122.
13 Zerbe, Richard O. and McCurdy, Howard E., “The Failure of Market Failure,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18, no. 4 (1999): 558–783.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Jensen-Eriksen, Niklas and Ojala, Jari. “Tackling Market Failure or Building a Cartel? Creation of an Investment Regulation System in Finnish Forest Industries,” Enterprise & Society 16, no. 3 (2015): 521–55Google Scholar.
15 Jensen-Eriksen and Ojala. “Tackling Market Failure or Building a Cartel?” 548.
16 Gamble, Andrew, Britain in Decline (London, 1981)Google Scholar.
17 Owen, Geoffrey, From Empire to Europe: The Decline and Revival of British Industry since the Second World War (London, 1999), 155Google Scholar.
18 Hills, Richard, Papermaking in Great Britain, 1488–1988 (London, 1988), 187–88Google Scholar.
19 Owen, From Empire to Europe, 159–60.
20 Särkkä, Timo, “The British Paper Industry, 1800–2000,” in The Evolution of Global Paper Industry 1800–2050: A Comparative Analysis, ed. Lamberg, Juha-Antti, Ojala, Jari, Peltoniemi, Mirva, and Särkkä, Tim (Dordrecht, 2012), 183Google Scholar.
21 Rollings, British Business, 106; Owen, From Empire to Europe, 157; Jensen-Eriksen, Niklas, “A Stab in the Back? The British Government, the Paper Industry and the Nordic Threat, 1956–72,” Contemporary British History 22, no. 1 (2008): 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 John Taylor, MP, 610 Parl. Deb. H.C. (5th ser.) (1959) cols. 711–31; Jensen-Eriksen, “A Stab in the Back?” 15.
23 Särkkä, “British Paper Industry,” 184.
24 Henri Niklas Jensen-Eriksen, “Market, Competitor or Battlefield? British Foreign Economic Policy, Finland and the Cold War, 1950–1970” (PhD diss., London School of Economics, 2004), 166.
25 Earl Waldegrave, 213 Parl. Deb. H.L. (5th ser.) (1958–59) cols. 460–61.
26 On Bowater, see Owen, From Empire to Europe, 154. Bowater and Reid were part of an international cartel that controlled 75 percent of the U.K. newsprint industry. See Wray, Margaret, The British Paper Industry: A Study in Structural and Technological Change (London, 1979), 154Google Scholar; Särkkä, “British Paper Industry,” 184.
27 “On the Road to The Isles,” Gateway Magazine, Scottish Pulp and Paper Mills Special Number (Autumn 1966): 1.
28 Scottish Development Department (hereafter, SDD), minutes, 24 Apr. 1959, SEP4/1726. National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh (hereafter, NRS); Minutes of meeting between Secretary of State Jack Maclay and Dr. Frankel, Wiggins, Teape, 7 May 1959, SEP4/1726, NRS.
29 “Highlands May Have Wood Pulp Mill,” Glasgow Herald, 9 May 1959, SEP4/2622, NRS.
30 “Pulp Mill May Be Built in North,” Scotsman, 11 Aug. 1959, SEP4/2622, n.p., NRS.
31 “Pulp Mill May Be Built in North,” NRS.
32 J. Watson, SDD, to Mr. Gold, Agriculture and Forestry Group, 25 Sept. 1962, DD12/2945, NRS.
33 Note for Secretary of State's meeting with Dr. Frankel to be held on 25 Nov. 1959, Proposed Pulp Mill at Fort William, SEP4/1726, NRS.
34 Note on meeting on Pulp Mill Project, Edinburgh, 11 Jan. 1960, between Scottish Office officials and Scottish Pulp Mill (Development) Ltd., SEP4/1726, NRS.
35 T. D. Haddow, SDD, to Rennie, SDD, “Memo on Pulp Mill,” 31 Dec. 1962, DD12/2946, NRS.
36 Scottish Home Department minutes for Secretary of State on meeting on Pulp Mill Project, Edinburgh, 11 Jan. 1960, between Scottish Office officials and Scottish Pulp Mill (Development) Ltd., written 3 Feb. 1960, SEP4/1726, NRS.
37 “Blueprint for £8m Wood Pulp Mill Approved,” Scotsman, 20 Jan. 1960, SEP4/1726, n.p., NRS.
38 Minutes by Secretary of State for Scotland, 2 Feb. 1960 and 14 Dec. 1960, SEP4/1533, NRS.
39 Levitt, Ian, “Regenerating the Scottish Highlands: Whitehall and the Fort William Pulp Mill, 1945–63,” Journal of Scottish Historical Studies 25, no. 1 (2005): 21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
40 Minutes by Secretary of State for Scotland, 16 Dec. 1960, SEP4/1544, NRS.
41 Minutes of discussion between Secretary of State and Sir Arthur Gosling, Forestry Commission, 15 Dec. 1962, SEP4/1544, NRS.
42 Nations, United, European Timber Trends and Prospects 1950–75 (New York, 1964), 174Google Scholar; “Europe's Consumption and Imports of Sawn Softwood in 1949–51 and 1959–61,” 175, table 3, and “Intra-European Trade in Sawn Softwood in 1949–51 and 1959–61,” table 5, both in European Timber Trends and Prospects.
43 Lambridis, Christos, “The Future of the U.K. Paper Industry: A System Dynamics Study,” Dynamica 6, part 2 (1980): 36–46Google Scholar.
44 Hood, Neil and Young, Stephen, Industry Policy and the Scottish Economy (Edinburgh, 1984), 283Google Scholar.
45 Note on Scottish Pulp and Paper Mills (A Division of Wiggins, Teape & Co. Ltd.), Annat Point, Corpach, Fort William, Location Section, SDD, 8 Aug. 1966, SEP4/448, NRS.
46 Bergquist, Ann-Kristin and Söderholm, Kristina, “Transition to Greener Pulp: Regulation, Industry Responses and Path Dependency,” Business History 57, no. 6 (2015): 866CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Nordic Council of Ministers, Study on Nordic Pulp and Paper Industry and the Environment (Copenhagen, 1993)Google Scholar.
47 David Price, MP, 675 Parl. Deb. H.C. (5th ser.) (1963) cols. 1377–1436; Cabinet Economic Policy Committee, “Fort William Pulp Mill Memorandum,” 11 Mar. 1963, CAB 134/1699, The National Archives, U.K. (hereafter, TNA); Article on Dr. Frankel speech, World's Paper Trade Review, 13 Dec. 1966, T224/462, TNA; Haddow to Rennie, “Memo on Pulp Mill,” NRS.
48 Söderholm, Kristina and Bergquist, Ann-Kristin, “Firm Collaboration and Environmental Adaptation: The Case of the Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry 1900–1990,” Scandinavian Economic History Review 60, no. 2 (2012): 183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
49 “Dr. T. H. Frankel talks of the Fort William Project,” World's Paper Trade Review, BT258/856, TNA.
50 Boyd, William, The Slain Wood: Papermaking and Its Environmental Consequences in the American South (Baltimore, 2015)Google Scholar; Bergquist, Ann-Kristin and Söderholm, Kristina, “Green Innovation Systems in Swedish Industry, 1960–1989,” Business History Review 85, no. 4 (2011): 677–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
51 Bergquist and Söderholm, “Green Innovation Systems.”
52 Tom Lister to A. C. Sheldrake, SDD, 27 Sept. 1962, DD12/2945, NRS.
53 “Dr. T. H. Frankel talks of the Fort William Project,” World's Paper Trade Review, BT258/856, TNA.
54 Cabinet Economic Policy Committee, “Fort William Pulp Mill Memorandum,” TNA.
55 “The Paper Jungle,” Economist, 24 Sept. 1966.
56 Note on Scottish Pulp and Paper Mills, 8 Aug. 1966, NRS.
57 “Inverness-shire Delegation Visits Monmouth Pulp Mill, Model for Fort William Project,” Department of Health Scotland note sent to T. H. Frankel, 4 Oct. 1962, DD12/2945, NRS.
58 Prime Minister Harold Macmillan to Sir Norman Brook, June 1962, PREM11/4451, TNA.
59 Haddow to Rennie, “Memo on Pulp Mill,” NRS; D. N. Charlish, Board of Trade, note on Pulp Mill at Fort William, 4 Oct. 1962, BT258/851, TNA.
60 A. E. Welch, U.K. Treasury, to Mr. O'Connell, Board of Trade, 11 Oct. 1962, T224/462, TNA.
61 J. L. Rampton, Board of Trade, letter, 9 Nov. 1962, T224/462, TNA.
62 Lord Polwarth, SC(DI), to Prime Minister, 8 Nov. 1962, DD12/2946, NRS; “Amendment to Paper for the President of the Board of Trade to put to the Population and Employment Committee: The Fort William Pulp Mill Project,” originally written by J. Leckie, Board of Trade, 6 Dec. 1962, amended by A. C. Sheldrake, SDD, DD12/2946, NRS.
63 SDD, “Pulp Mill State of Play – Memorandum for Secretary of State for Scotland,” 8 Nov. 1962, DD12/2946, NRS.
64 Lord Polwarth to Prime Minister, 8 Nov. 1962, NRS.
65 Board of Trade note on Pulp and Paper Project at Fort William, 15 Nov. 1962, BT258/852, TNA.
66 SDD, “Pulp Mill State of Play,” NRS.
67 “The Significance of the Pulp Mill in the Context of Highland Depopulation,” note by SDD officials, 13 Nov. 1962, DD12/2946, NRS.
68 Haddow to Rennie, “Memo on Pulp Mill,” NRS.
69 P. J. Woodfield, Prime Minister's office, to P. W. Carey, Board of Trade, 21 Nov. 1962, PREM11/4452, TNA.
70 Note of meeting between Secretary of State, Prime Minister, and Chancellor of the Exchequer, 7 Jan. 1963, DD12/2946, NRS.
71 Ian Hendry (former manager of the mill), email message to author, 9 July 2006.
72 SDD note on Pulp Mill, 18 Jan. 1963, DD12/2946, NRS.
73 J. L. Rampton, Board of Trade, “Notes for the Record,” 1 Oct. 1962, T224/462, TNA.
74 Prime Minister Harold Macmillan to Michael Noble, 13 Feb. 1963, T224/462, TNA.
75 “Scottish Pulp,” Gateway Magazine, no. 18 (1963): 37.
76 Latham, Bryan, “British Forestry and the Common Market,” Commonwealth Forestry Review 42, no. 1 (111) (1963): 34–40Google Scholar.
77 675 Parl. Deb. H.C. (5th ser.) (1963) cols. 1377–1436
78 Simon Wingfield Digby, MP, 675 Parl. Deb. H.C. (5th ser.) (1963) cols. 1377–1436.
79 The EFTA agreement provided for an annual 10 percent reduction in duties until 1970, when all duties would be removed. It was 1966 when all duties were removed. See Hills, Papermaking in Great Britain, 188; 675 Parl. Deb. H.C. (5th ser.) (1963) cols. 1377–1436.
80 Briefing note on Fort William Pulp and Paper Mills Bill, 4 Apr. 1963, BT279/235, TNA.
81 “Highland Mill Will Create Opportunity,” Times, 5 Apr. 1963, 7.
82 Board of Trade note on Fort William Pulp and Paper Mills Bill, 7 May 1963, BT258/853, TNA.
83 William Reader, Bowater: A History (Cambridge, U.K., 1981), 302.
84 Haddow, Scottish Office London, to Glendinning, Scottish Office Edinburgh, telex, 27 Mar. 1963, DD12/2947, NRS.
85 G. L. J. Lucas, letter regarding meeting with Dr. Frankel, Jan. 1966, BT258/856, TNA.
86 “Austerity Opening – but fullest praise for a great achievement,” Gateway Magazine (Autumn 1966): 5.
87 The Scotsman, 15 Sept. 1966, 10, 12.
88 G. B. C. Johnston, “The Prospect for Papermaking,” Financial Times Annual Review, July 1966.
89 “Ft. William plant may cost Wiggins another £1.6m,” Times, 14 July 1967, 18.
90 D. N. Charlish, Board of Trade, to Mr. Shove, accountant, Board of Trade, 6 Oct. 1967, FV71/14, TNA; Note on Wiggins, Teape Pulp & Paper Mill, Corpach, Miss McLaren, SDD, n.d. [late Sept. 1968?], SEP4/448, NRS; Jensen-Eriksen, “A Stab in the Back?”
91 Johnston, “Prospect for Papermaking,” n.p.
92 Muir, Augustus, The British Paper & Board Makers Association, 1872–1972 (London, 1972), 67Google Scholar.
93 Briefing for Parliamentary Secretary's visit to “Highland Fling” Exhibition, Jan. 1969, SEP4/448, NRS.
94 Jensen-Eriksen, “A Stab in the Back?” 14.
95 Särkkä, “British Paper Industry,” 183.
96 Association, American Bar, Merger Case Digest (Chicago, 1982), 426Google Scholar.
97 Hills, Papermaking in Great Britain, 188.
98 Hetherington, Alastair, ed., Highlands and Islands: A Generation of Progress, 1965–1990 (Aberdeen, 1990), 8Google Scholar.
99 Lovell White Durrant Solicitors (on behalf of Wiggins, Teape) to Department of Trade and Industry, 25 June 1990, FV71/12, TNA.
100 Särkkä, “British Paper Industry,” 184.
101 Owen, From Empire to Europe, 165.
102 Owen, From Empire to Europe, 171.
103 Särkkä, “British Paper Industry,” 184.
104 Wiggins, Teape to Shareholders, 5 July 1963, FV71/12, TNA.
105 “Papering Over the Trade Gap,” Financial Times, 24 Feb. 1965.
106 Board of Trade report to Cabinet Economic Policy Committee, 11 Mar. 1963, CAB 134/1699, TNA; “Start Up In View for Wiggins Teape's Great Enterprise in the Highlands,” Gateway Magazine, no. 23 (1965): 4.
107 Särkkä, “British Paper Industry,” 184; Highlands and Islands Development Board, Annual Report 1983 (Inverness, 1984), appendix 4, table 3.
108 Owen, From Empire to Europe, 170.