No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 September 2023
It is common for historians to focus their attention on turning points in the past. The risk with this is that it overstates how dramatic change was and the extent of stasis and stability in between those turning points, at its most extreme form in notions of punctuated equilibriums. We need to remember the importance of continuities across those turning points and transitions in order to understand the roots of change and have a more nuanced picture of the nature of change. This is as valid for the relationship between firms, governments, and global governance frameworks as it is for any other historical subject.
61 Rollings, “The Development of Transnational Business Associations during the Twentieth Century” Business History 65, no. 2 (2023): 235–259.
62 Milward, Alan, The European Rescue of the Nation-State (London, 1992)Google Scholar.
63 Wolfram Kaiser and Jan-Henrik Meyer, eds., Societal Actors in European Integration. Recent examples are Pérez, Sigfrido M. Ramírez, “Crises and Transformations of European Integration: European Business Circles During the Long 1970s,” European Review of History 26, no. 4 (2019): 618–635Google Scholar; Drach, Alexis, “Reluctant Europeans? British and French Commercial Banks and the Common Market in Banking (1977–1992),” Enterprise & Society 21, no. 3 (2020): 768–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ballor, Grace, “Agents of Integration: Multinational Firms and the European Union,” Enterprise & Society 21, no. 4 (2020): 886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also the special issue, “Business History and European Integration: How EEC Competition Policy Affected Companies’ Strategies,” Business History 62, no. 5 (2020): 717-878.
64 Blas, Javier and Farchy, Jack, The World for Sale: Power and the Traders Who Barter the Earth's Resources (Oxford, 2021)Google Scholar. See also Rob Konkel, “Building Blocs: Raw Materials and the Global Economy in the Age of Disequilibrium” (PhD diss., Princeton University, 2022).
65 Slobodian, Quinn, “The Backlash Against Neoliberal Globalization from Above: Elite Origins of the Crisis of the New Constitutionalism,” Theory, Culture and Society 38, no. 6 (Nov. 2021): 51–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
66 For example, see M. Kilroy to Malcolm Day, “Micros for GPs,” 1 Oct. 1982, and Alan Paul to Day, “Micros for GPs,” 6 Oct. 1982, CAB193/342, The National Archives, Kew, United Kingdom.
67 Katzenstein, Peter and Seybert, Lucia, eds., Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics (Cambridge, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
68 Lowe, Rodney, “Plumbing New Depths: Contemporary Historians and the Public Record Office,” Twentieth Century British History 8 (1997): 239–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
69 A small number of files have subsequently been released.
70 For example, see Rollings, Neil, “Babcock and Wilcox Ltd., The ‘Babcock Family’ and Regulation 17/62: A Business Response to New Competition Policy in the Early 1960s,” Business History 62, no. 5 (2020): 743–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
71 See Industry Documents Library, accessed 28 June 2022, https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/.
72 Vanessa Ogle, “Archipelago Capitalism: Tax Havens, Offshore Money, and the State, 1950s–1970s,” American Historical Review 122, no. X (Dec. 2017): 1431–1458; “‘Funk Money’: The End of Empires, The Expansion of Tax Havens, and Decolonization as an Economic and Financial Event,” Past & Present 249, no. 1 (2020): 213–249.
73 Babic, Milan, Fichtner, Jan, and Heemskerk, Eelke M., “States versus Corporations: Rethinking the Power of Business in International Politics,” The International Spectator 52, no. 4 (2017): 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
74 Rosenau, James, Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World (Cambridge, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Rosenau, James and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds., Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.