Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:54:30.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whose Ethos for Public Goods in the Global Economy?

An Exploration in International Business Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Georges Enderle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The discussion of the global economy and worldwide expansion of the capitalist and market economic system barely deals with the topic of public goods, although they are of paramount importance precisely in this international setting. Fortunately, the theory of public economics systematically developed the central concept of the public good with its far-reaching implications so that this knowledge can be applied also to global issues. In order to treat these often vaguely discussed issues, a typology of international relations is proposed. These and other considerations prepare the way to ask the question about the implied ethos. Because a common and sustainable ethos for public goods in the global economy is of great relevance and high urgency, both religious and non-religious ethical traditions are called for making their necessary contributions to this foundation.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 2000 , pp. 131 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, A. B. and Stiglitz, J. E. 1980. Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. J. and Feldstein, M., eds. 1987. Handbook of Public Economics. Vol. II. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Barney, G. O.; Blewett, J.; and Barney, K. R. 1993. Global 2000 Revisited. What shall we do? The critical issues of the 21st century. Arlington, Vir.: Millennium Institute.Google Scholar
Becker, L. C. and Becker, C. B., eds. 1992. Encyclopedia of Ethics. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Braybrooke, D. and Mohanan, A. P. 1992. Common Good. In Becker, , pp. 175–178.Google Scholar
Brieskorn, N. (Hg.). 1997. Globale Solidarität. Die verschiedenen Kulturen und die Eine Welt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. 1968. The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Eatwell, J.; Milgate, M.; and Newman, P., eds. 1987. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: Blasingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enderle, G. 1995. An Outsider’s View of the East Asian Miracle: Lessons and Questions. In: Stewart, et al. 1995, 87–120.Google Scholar
Enderle, G., ed. 1999. International Business Ethics: Challenges and Approaches. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Enderle, G.; Homann, K.; Honecker, M.; Kerber, W.; Steinmann, H. (Hg.) 1993. Lexikon der Wirtschaftsethik. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
Graham, C. 1998. Private Markets for Public Goods. Raising the Stakes in Economic Reform. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kerber, W. 1993. Gemeinwohl. In Enderle, et al. 1993, pp. 339–342.Google Scholar
Küng, H. 1998. A Global Ethic for Global Politics and Economics. London: SCM Press (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Küng, H. 1999. A Global Ethic in an Age of Globalization. In Enderle 1999, pp. 109–128. Also in Business Ethics Quarterly 7: 17–31.Google Scholar
Laffont, J.-J. 1987. Incentives and the Allocation of Public Goods. In Auerbach, und Feldstein, 1987, pp. 537–569.Google Scholar
Mandeville, B. 1924. The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, ed. Kaye, F. B.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McClennen, E. F. 1999. Moral Rules as Public Goods. Business Ethics Quarterly 9: 103–126.Google Scholar
Priddat, B. P. 1993. Öffentliche Güter, meritorische Güter. In Enderle, et al. 1993, pp. 767–774.Google Scholar
Oakland, W. H. 1987. Theory of Public Goods. In Auerbach, and Feldstein, 1987, pp. 485–535.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. Second edition 1996. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1954. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 36: 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1955. Diagrammic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 37: 350–356.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. 1987. Public Goods. In Eatwell, et al. 1987, pp. 1061–1066.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1999. Economics, Business Principles, and Moral Sentiments. In Enderle, 1999, pp. 15–29. Also in Business Ethics Quarterly 7: 5–15.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Ed. Macfie, A. L. and Raphael, D. D.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Ed. Campbell, R. H.Skinner, A. S., and Todd, W. B.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. and Donleavy, G., eds. 1995. Whose Business Values? Some Asian and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar