Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:48:14.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Uses and Abuses of Agency Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Joseph Heath
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The use of agency theory remains highly controversial among business ethicists. While some regard it as an essential tool for analyzing and understanding the recent spate of corporate ethics scandals, others argue that these scandals might not even have occurred had it not been for the widespread teaching of agency theory in business schools. This paper presents a qualified defense of agency theory against these charges, first by identifying the theoretical commitments that are essential to the theory (in order to distinguish between agency theory itself and certain incorrect interpretations that have been widely promulgated), and second, by specifying more clearly the different ways that agency theory can be used to analyze relations within the firm. The recommendation that follows from this analysis is that agency theory be used as a critical-diagnostic tool, to identify the points at which both firms and markets will be vulnerable to breakdown in the absence of moral constraint.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 497 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerloff, G. 1982. Labor contracts and partial gift exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84: 488–500.Google Scholar
Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. 1972. Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review. 62: 777–95.Google Scholar
Applbaum, A. I. 1999. Ethics for adversaries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Argyris, C. 1973. Some limits of rational man organizational theory. Public Administration Review, 31: 253–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, D. 2008. Predictably irrational. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. 1973. Social responsibility and economic efficiency. Public Policy, 21: 303–17.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. 1992. Incentive contracts and performance incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 100: 598–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuck, L. A., & Fried, J. M. 2003. Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuck, L. A., & Fried, J. M. 2004. Pay without performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bebchuck, L. A., Fried, J. M., & Walker, D. I. 2002. Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation. University of Chicago Law Review, 69: 751–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. 1999. Game theory and business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9: 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, M. M. 1995. Corporate ‘ownership’: a misleading word muddies the corporate governance debate. The Brookings Review, 13: 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, M. M. 2000. Firm-specific human capital and theories of the firm. In Blair, M. M. & Roe, M. J. (Eds.), Employees and corporate governance. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Blair, M. M., and Stout, L. A. 1999. A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review, 85: 248–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatright, J. 1999. Ethics in finance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boatright, J. 2006. What's wrong—and what's right—about stakeholder management. Journal of Private Enterprise, 21: 106–31.Google Scholar
Braybrooke, D. 1976. The insoluble problem of the social contract. Dialogue, 15: 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. 1996. Toward a theory of the ethics of bureaucratic organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6: 419–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D.E. 1995. Incentives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, R. C. 1985. Agency costs versus fiduciary duties. In Pratt, J. W. and Zeckhauser, R. J. (Eds.), Principals and agents. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Clarkson, M. 1998. Introduction. In Clarkson, M., (Ed.), The corporation and its stakeholders. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. W. 1987. Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. American Journal of Sociology, 93: 406–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. 1982. Strategic information transmission. Econometriea, 50: 1431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, R. M., & Thaler, R. H. 1988. Anomalies: Cooperation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2: 187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dees, J. G. 1992. Principals, agents and ethics. In Bowie, N. E. and Freeman, R. E. (Eds.), Ethics and agency theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De George, R. T. 1992. Agency theory and the ethics of agency. In Bowie, N. E. and Freeman, R. E. (Eds.), Ethics and agency theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. 1990. The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review, 15: 369–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, J. 2002. Lack of character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drucker, P. 2001. The essential Drucker. New York: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
Duska, R. 1992. Why be a loyal agent? A systemic ethical analysis. In Bowie, N. E. and Freeman, R. E. (Eds.), Ethics and agency theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. 1991. The economic structure of corporate law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. H. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14: 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. 2002. Do incentive contracts crowd out voluntary cooperation? http://www.iew.unizh.ch/wp/iewwp034.pdf. University of Zurich Working Paper, 34.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., Gächter, S., & Kirchsteiger, G. 1996. Reciprocal fairness and noncompensating wage differentials. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152: 608–40.Google Scholar
Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. 2005. Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30: 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, H. 1922. My life and work. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., and Regan, D. T. 1993. Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7: 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, T. C. G., & Waschik, R. G. 2002. Managerial economics: A game-theoretic perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 409–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 1998. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In Clarkson,, M. (Ed.) The corporation and its stakeholders. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. 1997. The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. American Economic Review, 87: 746–55.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S., & Osterloh, M. (Eds.). 2002. Successful management by motivation: Balancing intrinsic and extrinsic incentives. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, Sept. 12.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. 1991. Game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. 1982. No need for morality: The case of the perfectly competitive market. Philosophical Exchange, 3: 41–54.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. 1986. Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4: 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. 1996. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21: 13–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, R. 1998. Incentives in organizations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12: 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U. 2003. Do high wages lead to high profits? An experimental study of reciprocity using real effort. Chicago: University of Chicago Graduate School of Business Working Paper.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, K. E. 1991. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1: 53–73.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. 1992. The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. 1996. Economic analysis and moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 1996. Rational choice as critical theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 22: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. 2001. Communicative action and rational choice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. 2001. Cooperation, reciprocity and punishment in fifteen small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91: 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyman, J., and Ariely, D. 2004. Effort for payment. Psychological Science. 15: 787–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holström, B. 1982. Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 324–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, M., McCue, K. F. & Plott, C. R. 1985. Public goods provision in an experimental environment. Journal of Public Economics, 26: 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. J. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, J. 2003. The truth about markets. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. 2001. Why all the fuss about stockholders? In The divine right of capital. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Khurana, R., Nohria, N., & Penrice, D. 2005. Management as a profession. In Lorsch, J. W., Berlowizt, L., and Zelleke, A. (Eds.), Restoring trust in American business. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kim, O., & Walker, M. 1984. The free rider problem: Experimental evidence. Public Choice, 43: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J. 1992. Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulik, B. W. 2005. Agency theory, reasoning and culture at Enron: In search of a solution. Journal of Business Ethics, 59: 347–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labaton, S. 2004. Perle asserts Hollinger's Conrad Black misled him. New York Times, Sept. 6.Google Scholar
Laffont, J. J., & Martimort, D. 2002. The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G., & Simon, H. 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Marcoux, A. 2003. A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwell, G., and Ames, R. E. 1981. Economists free ride, does anyone else? Journal of Public Economics, 15: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, D. 1960. The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McLean, B., & Elkind, P. 2003. The smartest guys in the room. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Michalos, A. C. 1995. A pragmatic approach to business ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. 1992. Economics, organization and management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Miller, D. T. 1999. The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54: 1053–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. 1992. Managerial dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. 1951. Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54: 289–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, L. 1992. Agents for the truly greedy. In Bowie, N. E. and Freeman, R. E. (Eds.), Ethics and agency theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Noreen, E. 1988. The economics of ethics: A new perspective on agency theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13: 359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, F. 2004. Panel says Conrad Black ran a “corporate kleptocracy.” New York Times, Aug. 31.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Quinn, D. P., & Jones, T. M. 1995. An agent morality view of business policy. Academy of Management Review, 20: 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmusen, E. 1989. Games and information, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. A theory of justice, 2nd ed. rev. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revsine, L. 1991. The selective financial misrepresentation hypothesis. Accounting Horizons, 5: 16–27.Google Scholar
Schneider, F., & Pommerehne, W. W. 1981. Free riding and collective action: An experiment in public microeconomics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96: 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, R. 1975. Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. International Journal of Game Theory 4: 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, R. C. 1999. Game theory as a model for business and business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9: 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, G. M., and Matza, D. 1957. Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22: 664–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E., and Messick, D. M. 1999. Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 684–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, S. 2001. Business ethics as corporate governance. European Journal of Law and Economics, 11: 153–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1973. Markets and hierarchies: Some elementary considerations. American Economic Review, 63: 316–25.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar