Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:00:32.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

There Is No Rawlsian Theory of Corporate Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2015

Abraham Singer
Abraham Singer*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The major aim of this article is to show that John Rawls’s theory of justice cannot be applied effectively to questions of business ethics and corporate governance. I begin with a reading of Rawls that emphasizes both the critical and pragmatic nature of his theory. In the second section I look more closely at the notion of society’s “basic structure” and its place within Rawls’s theory. In the third section, I argue that “the corporation” cannot be understood as part of this basic structure and is not, therefore, a subject of justice for Rawls or his interpreters. Finally, I show that Rawls’s inability to speak to the corporation is a weakness, regardless of one’s particular view on the corporation. I conclude by considering what Rawls’s theory helps us to understand about the problems involved in integrating corporate governance, business ethics, and political philosophy.

Keywords

RawlsCorporate GovernanceBasic StructurePolitical Philosophy and Business EthicsNormative Stakeholder Theory
Type
Special Section: Social Justice and the Corporation
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 65 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abizadeh, Arash. 2007. “Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope (not Site) of Distributive Justice.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35(4): 318–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, Armen A. 1977. Economic Forces at Work. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen A., and Demsetz, Harold. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62(5): 777–95.Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen A., and Demsetz, Harold. 1973. “The Property Right Paradigm.” The Journal of Economic History 33(1): 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armour, John, Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier. 2009. “What Is Corporate Law?” In The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach, 2nd. ed., edited by Kraakman, Reinier, Armour, John, Davies, Paul, Enriques, Luca, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, and Rock, Edward, 1–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, Samuel. 2012. “The Difference Principle at Work.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 20(1): 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1973. “John Rawls and the Priority of Liberty.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 2(3): 274–90.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian A., and Fried, Jesse M. 2006. Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1986. “The Generalized and Concrete Other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controversy and Moral Theory.” Praxis International 5: 402–24.Google Scholar
Bishop, John Douglas. 2008. “For-Profit Corporations in a Just Society: A Social Contract Argument concerning the Rights and Responsibilities of Corporations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 18(2): 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Margaret M., and Stout, Lynn A. 1999. “A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law.” Virginia Law Review 85(2): 247–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, Sandrine, and Al-Amoudi, Ismael. 2013. “Corporate Institutions in a Weakened Welfare State: A Rawlsian Perspective.” Business Ethics Quarterly 23(4): 497–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, Norman E. 1999. Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Brock, Gillian. 1998. “Are Corporations Morally Defensible?” Business Ethics Quarterly 8(4): 703–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Simone. 2012. “Justice or Legitimacy, Barricades or Public Reason? The Politics of Property-Owning Democracy.” In Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond, edited by O’Neill, Martin and Williamson, Thad, 17–32. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Child, James, and Marcoux, Alexei. 1999. “Freeman and Evan: Stakeholder Theory in the Original Position.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9(2): 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciepley, David. 2013. “Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation.” American Political Science Review 107(1): 139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1997. “Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 26(1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Equality and Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marc A. 2010. “The Narrow Application of Rawls in Business Ethics: A Political Conception of Both Stakeholder Theory and the Morality of Markets.” Journal of Business Ethics 97(4): 563–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Andrew, Matten, Dirk, and Moon, Jeremy. 2008. Corporations and Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas, and Preston, Lee E. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas, and Dunfee, Thomas W. 1999. Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank, and Fischel, Daniel R. 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene, and Jensen, Michael C. 1983. “Separation of Ownership and Control.” The Journal of Law and Economics 26(2): 301–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. 2010. “Politics, the Reorganization of the Economy, and Income Inequality, 1980–2009.” Politics & Society 38(2): 233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 2002. “A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation.” In Perspectives in Business Ethics, edited by Hartman, L.P., 171–81. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward, and Evan, William M. 1990. “Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation.” The Journal of Behavioral Economics 19(4): 337–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward, Harrison, Jeffrey, Vicks, Andrew, Parmar, Bidhan, and Colle, Simon de. 2010. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1974. “Justice and Natural Endowment: Towards a Critique of Rawls’s Ideological Framework.” Social Theory and Practice 3(1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Carol. 2004. Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, Kent. 2006. The Failure of Corporate Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. 1985. “Communitarian Critics of Liberalism,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 14(3): 308–22.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1980. “Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory?” Journal of Philosophy 77(6): 315–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, Henry. 1996. The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier. 2000. “The End of History for Corporate Law.” Georgetown Law Journal 89: 439–68.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. 1975. “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory.” American Political Science Review 69(2): 594–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Edwin M. 2001. “Moral Philosophy, Political Philosophy, and Organizational Ethics: A Response to Phillips and Margolis.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11(4): 673–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph. 2009. Filthy Lucre: Economics for People Who Hate Capitalism. Toronto: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Heath, Joseph. 2011. “Business Ethics and the ‘End of History’ in Corporate Law.” Journal of Business Ethics 102(supp. 1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph. 2014. Morality, Competition, and the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph, Moriarty, Jeff, and Norman, Wayne. 2010. “Business Ethics and (or as) Political Philosophy.” Business Ethics Quarterly 20(3): 427–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Nien-hê. 2005. “Rawlsian Justice and Workplace Republicanism.” Social Theory and Practice 31(1): 115–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Nien-hê. 2008. “Justice in Production.” Journal of Political Philosophy 16(1): 72–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Michael C. 2000. Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims, and Organizational Forms. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael C. 2002. “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2): 235–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Michael C., and Murphy, Kevin J. 1990. “Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy 98(2): 225–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krouse, Richard, and McPherson, Michael. 1988. “Capitalism, ‘Property-Owning Democracy,’ and the Welfare State.” In Democracy and the Welfare State, edited by Gutmann, Amy, 79–106. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laden, Anthony. 2003. “The House That Jack Built: Thirty Years of Reading Rawls.” Ethics 113(2): 367–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, R. G., and Lancaster, Kelvin. 1956. “The General Theory of Second Best.” Review of Economic Studies 24(1): 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malleson, Tom. 2014. After Occupy: Economic Democracy for the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Christopher. 2013. Public Capitalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1848/1987. Principles of Political Economy. Fairfield, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.Google Scholar
Moriarty, Jeffrey. 2005. “On the Relevance of Political Philosophy to Business Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 15(3): 455–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, Jeffrey. 2009. “Rawls, Self-Respect, and the Opportunity for Meaningful Work.” Social Theory and Practice 35(3): 441–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Liam B. 1999. “Institutions and the Demands of Justice.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 27(4): 251–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Néron, Pierre-Yves. 2010. “Business and the Polis: What Does It Mean to See Corporations as Political Actors?” Journal of Business Ethics. 94(3): 333–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Néron, Pierre-Yves. 2013. “Toward a Political Theory of the Business Firm? A Comment on ‘Political CSR.’” Business Ethics Journal Review 1(3): 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Martin, and Williamson, Thad, eds. 2012. Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Orts, Eric W. 2013. Business Persons: A Legal Theory of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Robert A. 1997. “Stakeholder Theory and a Principle of Fairness.” Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Robert A., and Margolis, Joshua D. 1999. “Toward an Ethics of Organizations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9(4): 619–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1977. “The Basic Structure as Subject.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14(2): 159–65.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001a. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001b. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism, Expanded Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ron, Amit. 2008. “Visions of Democracy in ‘Property-Owning Democracy’: Skelton to Rawls and Beyond.” History of Political Thought 29(1): 89–108.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1984. “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self.” Political Theory 12(1): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Andres, and Palazzo, Guido. 2007. “Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Social Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 32(4): 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanczyk, Lucas. 2012. “Productive Justice.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 40 (2): 144–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toenjes, Richard H. 2002. “Why Be Moral in Business? A Rawlsian Approach to Moral Motivation.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12(1): 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, Greg. 2012. “The Political Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Agenda.” Business Ethics Quarterly 22(4): 709–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkelman, Joel. 2013. “A Working Democracy: Jane Addams on the Meaning of Work.” The Review of Politics 75(3): 357–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar