Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art, R. Edward Freeman, Jeffrey S. Harrison, Andrew C. Wicks, Bidhan L. Parmar, and Simone de Colle (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).

Norman E. Bowie

doi:10.5840/beq20122219

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

van Aaken, Dominik Splitter, Violetta and Seidl, David 2013. Why do corporate actors engage in pro-social behaviour? A Bourdieusian perspective on corporate social responsibility. Organization, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 349.

Carmona-Márquez, Francisco J. Díez-de Castro, Emilio P. Vázquez-Sánchez, Adolfo E. and Leal-Rodríguez, Antonio L. 2015. Achieving Competitive Advantage through Quality Management. p. 49.

Loi, Teck Hui 2016. Stakeholder management: a case of its related capability and performance. Management Decision, Vol. 54, Issue. 1, p. 148.

Pache-Durán, María and Nevado-Gil, María Teresa 2019. Divulgación de información responsable por los gobiernos locales españoles. Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información, Vol. 33, Issue. 81, p. 111.

William Diener, Keith and Small, Emmanuel 2019. #MeToo and lessons in stakeholder responsibility. Business and Society Review, Vol. 124, Issue. 4, p. 449.

Schank, Christoph 2021. Handbuch Wirtschaftsphilosophie III. p. 417.

Gaski, John F. 2022. Toward social responsibility, not the social responsibility semblance: marketing does not need a conscience. AMS Review, Vol. 12, Issue. 1-2, p. 7.

Alanzi, Sami Ratten, Vanessa D’Souza, Clare and Nanere, Marthin 2022. Context-based Entrepreneurship. p. 107.

Huang, Danny Zhao‐Xiang 2022. Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm value: valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspectives. Accounting & Finance, Vol. 62, Issue. S1, p. 1983.

Gaski, John F. 2023. Replies to comments on “Toward social responsibility,” also incorporating a focus on ESG. AMS Review, Vol. 13, Issue. 1-2, p. 5.

Weaver, David B. McLennan, Char-Lee Moyle, Brenta and Casali, Luca 2023. Early Resident Support for a Mega-Event: Evidence from the 2032 Brisbane Summer Olympic Games. Event Management, Vol. 27, Issue. 6, p. 967.

Yang, Gaosheng Miao, Ganghui Zhang, Xiaoli and Xie, Qiuhao 2023. Research on Value Creation of Engineering Project from the Perspective of Knowledge Creation Fusion—Based on Stakeholder Theory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 2723.

Hecker, Christian 2024. How Profit-Oriented Motivation Can Impair Innovation and Growth: Norman Bowie’s Paradox of Profit from a Micro- and Macroeconomic Perspective. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, p. 1.

Article contents

Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art, R. Edward Freeman, Jeffrey S. Harrison, Andrew C. Wicks, Bidhan L. Parmar, and Simone de Colle (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).

Abstract

Access options

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art, R. Edward Freeman, Jeffrey S. Harrison, Andrew C. Wicks, Bidhan L. Parmar, and Simone de Colle (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).

Abstract

Access options

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests