Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:53:19.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

R. Edward Freeman  and
Robert A. Phillips
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to suggest that at least one strain of what has come to be called “stakeholder theory” has roots that are deeply libertarian. We begin by explicating both “stakeholder theory” and “libertarian arguments.” We show how there are libertarian arguments for both instrumental and normative stakeholder theory, and we construct a version of capitalism, called “stakeholder capitalism,” that builds on these libertarian ideas. We argue throughout that strong notions of “freedom” and “voluntary action” are the best possible underpinnings for stakeholder theory, and in doing so, seek to return “stakeholder theory” to its managerial and libertarian roots found in Freeman (1984).

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 2002 , pp. 331 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkhafaji, A. F. 1989. A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment (New York: Quorum Books).Google Scholar
Barnard, Chester I. 1938. The Functions of the Executive (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Barnett, Anthony. 1997. “Towards a Stakeholder Democracy,” in Stakeholder Capitalism, ed. Gavin, Kelly, Dominic, Kelly, and Andrew, Gamble (London: MacMillan Press): 82–98.Google Scholar
Barton, S. L., Hill, S. C., and Sundaram, S. 1989. “An Empirical Test of Stakeholder Theory Predictions of Capital Structure.” Financial Management 18(1): 36–44.Google Scholar
Boatright, John R. 1994. “What’s So Special About Shareholders.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4): 393–408.Google Scholar
Berman, Shawn L., Wicks, Andrew C., Suresh, Kotha, and Jones, Thomas M. 1999. “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 488–506.Google Scholar
Burton, B. K., and Dunn, C. P. 1996. “Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory.” Business Ethics Quarterly 6(2): 133–148.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B., and Buchholtz, Ann K. 2000. Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 4th ed. (Cincinnati: South-Western).Google Scholar
Clarkson, M. B. E. 1994. “A Risk Based Model of Stakeholder Theory” (Toronto: University of Toronto Working Paper).Google Scholar
Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance.” Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M. 1975. “Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used As the Basis for Distributive Justice?” Journal of Social Issues 31(3): 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea (New York: Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Dunfee, T. W. 1999. Ties That Bind, (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas, and Preston, L. E. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65–91.Google Scholar
Evan, William M., and Edward Freeman, R. 1993. “A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism.” In Ethical Theory and Business, 4th edition, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L. and Bowie, Norman E. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
Follett, Mary Parker. 1994. Mary Parker Follett—Prophet of Management : A Celebration of Writings from the 1920s. Ed. Pauline, Graham. (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 2000. “Business Ethics at the Millenium.” Business Ethics Quarterly 10(1): 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1999. “Divergent Stakeholder Theory.” Academy of Management Review 24(2): 233–236.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1996. “Stakeholder Capitalism,” Financial Times. July 26.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1994. “The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 409–422.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Boston: Pitman Publishing Inc.).Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward, and William, Evan. 1990. “Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation.” The Journal of Behavioral Economics 19 (4): 337–359.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward, and Gilbert, Daniel R. Jr. 1988. Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
Frooman, J. 1999. “Stakeholder Influence Strategies.” Academy of Management Review 24(2): 191–205.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, K. E. 1991. “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis.” Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1): 53–73.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1997. Political Philosophy (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press).Google Scholar
Hill, C. W. L., and Jones, T. M. 1992. “Stakeholder-agency Theory.” Journal of Management Studies 29: 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, Will. 1995. The State We’re In (London: Jonathan Cape).Google Scholar
Jones, Thomas M. 1995. “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics.” Academy of Management Review, 20(2), pp. 404–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Gavin, Dominic, Kelly, and Andrew, Gamble, eds. 1997. Stakeholder Capitalism (London: MacMillan Press).Google Scholar
Lampe, Marc. 2001. “Mediation as an Ethical Adjunct of Stakeholder Theory” Journal of Business Ethics 31: 165–173.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1690/1952. The Second Treatise of Government (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Lomasky, Loren. 1987. Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Marcoux, Alexei M. 2000. “Balancing Act.” In Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics, 4th edition, edited by DesJardins, J. R. and McCall, J. J.Wadsworth: 92–100.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood, D. J. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” Academy of Management Review 22(4): 853–886.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Orts, Eric. 1997. “A North American Legal Perspective on Stakeholder Management Theory.” Perspectives on Company Law 2: 165–179.Google Scholar
Orts, Eric. 1992. “Beyond Shareholders: Interpreting Corporate Constituency Statutes.” George Washington Law Review 61: 14–135.a.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Salancik, Gerald R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (New York: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
Phillips, Robert A. 1997. “Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness.” Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1): 51–66.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. A., and Margolis, J. M. 1999. “Toward an Ethics of Organizations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9(4): 619–638.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. A., and Reichart, J. 2000. “The Environment as a Stakeholder? A Fairness Based Approach.” Journal of Business Ethics (23)2.Google Scholar
Plender, John. 1997. A Stake in the Future: The Stakeholding Solution. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, Timothy. 1997. “Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences” Academy of Management Review 22(4): 887–910.Google Scholar
Rustin, Mike. 1997. “Stakeholding and the Public Sector.” In Stakeholder Capitalism, ed. Gavin, Kelly, Dominic, Kelly, and Andrew, Gamble (London: MacMillan Press): 72–81.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1995. “Liberalism.” In A Companion to Political Philosophy, ed. Robert, Goodin and Philip, Pettit (Oxford: Blackwell’s Publishing): 291–311.Google Scholar
Starik, Mark. 1995. “Should Trees Have Managerial Standing? Toward Stakeholder Status for Non-Human Nature.” Journal of Business Ethics 14: 207–217.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Elaine. 2000. Just Business (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Van Buren III, Harry J. 2001. “If Fairness is the Problem, Is Consent the Solution? Integrating ISCT and Stakeholder Theory.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11(3).Google Scholar
Venkataraman, S. 2002. “Stakeholder Value Equilibration and the Entrepreneurial Process.” Business Ethics Quarterly, Ruffin Series No. 3.Google Scholar
Wang, J., and Dewhirst, H. D. 1992. “Boards of Directors and Stakeholder Orientation.” Journal of Business Ethics 11: 115–123.Google Scholar
Wicks, Andrew C., Gilbert, Daniel R. Jr., and Edward Freeman, R. 1994. “A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4): 475–498.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E., and Bercovitz, J. 1996. “The Modern Corporation as an Efficiency Instrument: The Comparative Contracting Perspective.” In The American Corporation Today, ed. Kaysen, C. (New York: Oxford University Press): 327–359.Google Scholar
Wisdom, John. 1970. Paradox and Discovery (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar