Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T17:38:53.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Profit and Other Values: Thick Evaluation in Decision Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Bastiaan van der Linden  and
R. Edward Freeman
Bastiaan van der Linden
Affiliation:
EDHEC Business School
R. Edward Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Profit maximizers have reasons to agree with stakeholder theorists that managers may need to consider different values simultaneously in decision making. However, it remains unclear how maximizing a single value can be reconciled with simultaneously considering different values. A solution can neither be found in substantive normative philosophical theories, nor in postulating the maximization of profit. Managers make sense of the values in a situation by means of the many thick value concepts of ordinary language. Thick evaluation involves the simultaneous consideration of different values: making sense of a value always involves knowing how to engage with it given the other values in the situation. This also goes for profit: maximization is only one way of engaging with the value of profit, and grasping whether maximization is appropriate involves considering other values. We discuss some consequences of our approach for stakeholder theorists and profit maximizers.

Keywords

stakeholder theoryprofit maximizingvaluesthick concepts
Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 353 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Elisabeth. 1995. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dennis G., Audi, Robert, and Zwolinski, Matt. 2010. “Recent Work in Ethical Theory and its Implications for Business Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (4): 559–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosse, Douglas A., Phillips, Robert A., and Harrison, Jeffrey S.. 2009. “Stakeholders, Reciprocity, and Firm Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 30 (4): 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridoux, Flore, Coeurderoy, Regis, and Durand, Rodolphe. 2011. “Heterogeneous Motives and the Collective Creation of Value.” Academy of Management Review 36 (4): 711–730.Google Scholar
Bridoux, Flore, and Stoelhorst, J. W.. 2014. “Microfoundations for Stakeholder Theory: Managing Stakeholders with Heterogeneous Motives.” Strategic Management Journal 35 (1): 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Ruth. 1997. Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crary, Alice. 2007. Beyond Moral Judgement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 1995. “In Defense of Thick Concepts.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 20 (1): 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 2004. Ethics Without Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 2013a. “Moral Particularism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 edition).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 2013b. “Practical Concepts.” In Thick Concepts, edited by Kirchin, Simon, 44–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dane, Erik, and Pratt, Michael. 2007. “Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making.” Academy of Management Review 32 (1): 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1974. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 2011. “The Inescapability of a Minimal Version of Normative Stakeholder Theory.” In Stakeholder Theory: Impact and Prospects, edited by Phillips, Robert A., 130–139. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Eklund, Matti 2011. “What are Thick Concepts?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1): 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evan, William M., and Edward Freeman, R.. 1988. “A Stakeholder Theory of the Modem Corporation: Kantian Capitalism.” In Ethical Theory and Business, edited by Beaucamp, Tom L. and Bowie, Norman E., 75–84. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Frankena, William K. 1973. Ethics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 1994. “The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 2000. “Business Ethics at the Millenium.” Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1): 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward, Daniel, R. Gilbert, and Hartman, Edwin M.. 1988. “Values and the Foundations of Stategic Management.” Journal of Business Ethics 7 (11): 821–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward, Harrison, Jeffrey S., Wicks, Andrew C., Parmar, Bobby L., and De Colle, Simone. 2010. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward, Wicks, Andrew C., and Parmar, Bobby L.. 2004. “Stakeholder Theory and ‘The Corporate Objective Revisited.’” Organization Science 15 (3): 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. Edward. 2008. “Ending the So-called ‘Friedman-Freeman’ Debate.” Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (2): 162–166.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits.” The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970.Google Scholar
Garrard, Eve, and McNaughton, David. 1993. “Thick Concepts Revisited: A Reply to Burton.” Analysis 53 (1): 57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, Allan. 1992. “Morality and Thick Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66: 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey S., Bosse, Douglas A., and Phillips, Robert A.. 2010. “Managing for Stakeholders, Stakeholder Utility Functions, and Competitive Advantage.” Strategic Management Journal 31 (1): 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey S., and Wicks, Andrew C.. 2013. “Stakeholder Theory, Value and Firm Performance.” Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (1): 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 1988. “The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. 2001a. “Economic Contracts versus Social Relationships as a Foundation for Normative Stakeholder Theory.” Business Ethics: A European Review 10 (3): 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. 2001b. “Missing the Target: Normative Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Governance Debate.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1): 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Charles W. L., and Jones, Thomas M.. 1992. “Stakeholder-Agency Theory.” Journal of Management Studies 29 (2): 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Nien-hê. 2007a. “Is Incomparability a Problem for Anyone?” Economics and Philosophy 23 (1): 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Nien-he. 2007b. “Maximization, Incomparability, and Managerial Choice.” Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3): 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Michael C. 2002. “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2): 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Michael C. 2008. “Non-rational Behaviour, Value Conflicts, Stakeholder Theory, and Firm Behaviour.” Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (2): 167–171.Google Scholar
Jones, Thomas M., and Felps, Will. 2013. “Stakeholder Happiness Enhancement: A Neo-Utilitarian Objective for the Modern Corporation.” Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (3): 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchin, Simon. 2013. “Introduction: Thick and Thin Concepts.” In Thick Concepts, edited by Kirchin, Simon, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, Saku. 2013. “What is Organizational Strategy? A Language-based View.” Journal of Management Studies 50 (8): 1408–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mckeever, Sean, and Ridge, Michael. 2013. “Why Holists Should Love Organic Unities.” In Thinking About Reasons: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy, edited by Bakhurst, David, Little, Margaret Olivia, and Hooker, Brad, 265–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald K., Weaver, Gary R., Agle, Bradley R., Bailey, Adam D., and Carlson, James. 2016. “Stakeholder Agency and Social Welfare: Pluralism and Decision Making in the Multi-Objective Corporation.” Academy of Management Review 41 (2): 252–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mol, Annemarie. 2010. “Care and its Values. Good Food in the Nursing Home.” In Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, edited by Mol, Annemarie, Moser, Ingunn, and Pols, Jeannette, 215–234. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousavi, Shabnam, and Garrison, Jim. 2003. “Toward a Transactional Theory of Decision Making: Creative Rationality as Functional Coordination in Context.” Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (2): 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1999. “The Discernment of Perception: An Aristotelian Conception of Private and Public Rationality.” In Aristotle’s Ethics: Critical Essays, edited by Sherman, N., 145–181. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefied.Google Scholar
Pappas, Gregory F. 2008. John Dewey’s Ethics: Democracy as Experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Andrew. 2005. “A New Account of Thick Concepts.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 39: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Robert. 2003. Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Purnell, Lauren S., and Edward Freeman, R.. 2012. “Stakeholder Theory, Fact/Value Dichotomy & the Normative Core: How Wall Street Stops the Ethics Conversation.” Journal of Business Ethics, 109: 1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1995. Words and Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy: And Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 2003. “For Ethics and Economics Without the Dichotomies.” Review of Political Economy 15 (3): 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 2004. Ethics Without Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1999. Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2001. “Two Views on the Nature of the Theory of Law: A Partial Comparison.” In Hart’s Postscript, edited by Coleman, J. L., 1–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2003. “The Practice of Value.” In The Practice of Value, edited by Jay Wallace, R., 15–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M. 2003. “Thickness and Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 100 (6): 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Senge, Peter. 2000. “The Puzzles and Paradoxes of how Living Companies Create Wealth: Why Single-valued Objective Functions are not Quite Enough.” In Breaking the Code of Change, edited by Beer, Michael and Nohria, Nitin, 59–81. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. London: A. Millar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonenshein, Scott. 2005. “Business Ethics and Internal Social Criticism.” Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3): 475–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, Anant K., and Inkpen, Andrew C.. 2004. “The Corporate Objective Revisited.” Organization Science 15 (3): 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tantalo, Caterina, and Priem, Richard L.. 2016. “Value Creation Through Stakeholder Synergy.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (2): 314–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappolet, Christine. 2014. “The Normativity of Evaluative Concepts.” In Mind, Values, and Metaphysics, edited by Reboul, A., 39–54. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourish, Dennis, and Vatcha, Naheed. 2005. “Charismatic Leadership and Corporate Cultism at Enron: The Elimination of Dissent, the Promotion of Conformity and Organizational Collapse.” Leadership 1 (4): 455–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Linden, Bastiaan. 2013. “Principles as ‘Rules Of Thumb’: A Particularist Approach to Codes of Ethics and an Analysis of the Dutch Banking Code.” Review of Social Economy 71 (2): 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. 2003. “Introduction.” In The Practice of Value, edited by Jay Wallace, R., 1–14. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1982. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1988. “Consequentialism and Integrity.” In Consequentialism and its Critics, edited by Scheffler, Samuel, 225–242. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar