Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:23:53.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Obligations of Transnational Corporations: Rawlsian Justice and the Duty of Assistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Nien-hê Hsieh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Building on John Rawls’s account of the Law of Peoples, this paper examines the grounds and scope of the obligations of transnational corporations (TNCs) that are owned by members of developed economies and operate in developing economies. The paper advances two broad claims. First, the paper argues that there are conditions under which TNCs have obligations to fulfill a limited duty of assistance toward those living in developing economies, even though the duty is normally understood to fall on the governments of developed economies. Second, by extending Rawls’s account to include a right to protection against arbitrary interference, the paper argues that TNCs can be said to have negative and positive obligations in the areas of human rights, labor standards, and environmental protection, as outlined in the U.N. Global Compact. More generally, the paper aims to further our understanding of the implications of Rawls’s account of justice.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 643 - 661
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beitz, C. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
ChevronTexaco. ChevronTexaco issues statement on U.S. circuit court decision affirming dismissal of Ecuador litigation (August 19, 2002).Google Scholar
Cohan, J. A. 2001. “Environmental Rights of Indigenous Peoples.” UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 20: 133–85.Google Scholar
DeGeorge, R. T. 1993. Competing with Integrity in International Business (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1989. “Moral Minimums for Multinationals.” Ethics and International Affairs 3: 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunfee, T., and Hess, D.. 2000. “Fighting Corruption: A Principled Approach: The C2 Principles (Combating Corruption).” Cornell International Law Journal 33: 593–626.Google Scholar
Dunfee, T., and Hess, D.. 2002. “The Legitimacy of Direct Corporate Humanitarian Investment.” Business Ethics Quarterly 10: 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. 2000. “Human Rights and the Garment Industry in Contemporary Cambodia.” Stanford Journal of International Law 36: 119–74.Google Scholar
Herman, B. 2001. “The Scope of Moral Requirement.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 30(3): 227–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, N. 2002. “Employee Ownership and Workplace Democracy.” Paper presented at The State of Democratic Practice, The Democracy Collaborative Affiliates Conference, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Hsieh, N.. 2003. “sRawlsian Justice and Workplace Republicanism.” Paper presented at the Research Seminar in Political Theory, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Hsieh, N., Laufer, W. S., and Schwartz, M. S.. 2002. “Business Students Debate Ethical Principles and Social Impact.” Development Outreach 4: 24–27.Google Scholar
Logsdon, J. M., and Wood, D. J.. 2002. “Business Citizenship: From Domestic to Global Level of Analysis.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12: 155–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, A. 2003. “The Human Rights Principles in the 2000 UN Global Compact: Six Principles in Search of a Theoretical Framework.” Working paper, Legal Studies Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. 2000. Moral Demands of Nonideal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, P. 2000. “The Myth of Anti-Bribery Laws as Transnational Intrusion.” Cornell International Law Journal 33: 627–55.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Phillips, R., and Margolis, J.. 1999. “Toward an Ethics of Organizations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9: 619–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. 1994. “An Egalitarian Law of Peoples.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 23: 195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T.. 2002. “Moral Universalism and Global Economic Justice.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, J. E. 2002. “Global Corporate Citizenship: Principles to Live and Work By.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12: 143–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, J.. 1999a. A Theory of Justice (revised ed.) (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J.. 1999b. The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, J.. 2000. Justice as Fairness, ed. Kelly, E. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1972. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–43.Google Scholar
Serres, M. 1995. The Natural Contract, trans. MacArthur, E. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar