No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Markets with Limits: How the Commodification of Academia Derails Debate, by James Stacey Taylor. New York: Routledge, 2022. 220 pp.
Review products
Markets with Limits: How the Commodification of Academia Derails Debate, by James Stacey Taylor. New York: Routledge, 2022. 220 pp.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 July 2023
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1052150X23000179/resource/name/firstPage-S1052150X23000179a.jpg)
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Business Ethics
References
REFERENCES
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2000. “Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan.” Health Care Analysis 8 (1): 19–26.10.1023/A:1009477906883CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beit-Hallahmi, Benjamin. 2001. “‘O Truant Muse’: Collaborationist! And Research Integrity.” In Misunderstanding Cults, edited by Zablocki, Benjamin and Robbins, Thomas, 35–70. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442677302-004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jason, and Jaworski, Peter M.. 2015. Markets without Limits: Moral Virtues and Commercial Interests. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315818085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Stein, Joshua. 2023. “Individuating Goods on Markets with a View towards Ethics and Economics.” Journal of Social Ontology 8 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar