Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:39:42.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Managers’ Double Fiduciary Duty: to Stakeholders and to Freedom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract:

In providing an ethical guide for managers, the Clarkson Principles offer one part of a possible professional code, namely, that managers have a fiduciary duty—a duty of loyalty of the corporation’s stakeholders. However, the Clarkson Principles contain little advise for managers when they act politically to fashion the regulatory framework in which stakeholders negotiate. When managers participate in these arenas, I argue that they ought to assume a second fiduciary duty—a duty of loyalty to fair bargaining. Where the first duty of loyalty pertains to the firm’s “constituents,” the second refers to the firm’s “constitution”—to the rules by which the firm’s stakeholders bargain and to the background conditions that distribute advantages. Together, these two fiduciary duties establish the large good—development as freedom—from which a managerial profession can mature.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce and Alstott, Anne. 1999. The Stakeholder Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory, S. 1997. Commodity and Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought 1776B1970. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko. 1984. The Co-Operative Game Theory of the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1973. “Social Responsibility and Economic Efficiency.” Public Policy 21: 303318.Google Scholar
Barnard, Chester I. 1979. The Functions of the Executive, The Thirtieth Anniversary Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1989. Theories of Justice: A Treatise on Social Justice, Volume 1. Berkeley: The University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1995. Justice as Impartiality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, Jonathan Barron and Miranti, Paul J. Jr. 1997. A History of Corporate Finance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begleiter, Martin D. 1999. “Does the Prudent Investor Need the Uniform Prudent Investor Act – An Empirical Study of Trust Investment Practices.” Maine Law Review 51: 2785.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1956. Work and Authority: Ideologies of Management in the Course of Industrialization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Benton, William B. 1944. “The Economics of a Free Society: A Declaration of American Economic Policy.” Fortune, October: 162165.Google Scholar
Black, Bernard S. 2001. “The Core Fiduciary Duties of Outside Directors.” Stanford Law School, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper No. 219.Google Scholar
Blair, Margaret M. 1995. Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the 21st Century. Washington, D. C: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Blair, Margaret M. and Stout, Lynn A. 1999. “A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law.” Virginia Law Review 85: 247327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, Joseph R. and Kruse, Douglas L. 1991. The New Owners: The Mass Emergence of Employee Ownership in Public Companies and What It Means to American Business. New York: Harper Businessa.Google Scholar
Boatright, John. 1999. “Does Business Ethics Rest on a Mistake.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 9: 583591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandeis, Louis D. 1914. Business – A Profession. Boston: Small, Maynard.Google Scholar
Bratton, William W. 1993. “Self-Regulation, Normative Choice, and the Structure of Corporate Fiduciary Law.” George Washington Law Review 61: 10841126.Google Scholar
Brickley, James, Clifford, W. Smith Jr., and Herold, L. Zimmerman. 2001. Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1981. “The 1980 Earthquake: Realignment, Reaction or What?” In The Hidden Election: Politics and Economics in the 1980 Presidential Campaign. Ferguson, Tomas and Rogers, Joel, eds. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Business Roundtable. 1981. Statement on Corporate Responsibility.Google Scholar
Business Roundtable. 1987. American Excellence in a World Economy.Google Scholar
Business Roundtable. 1997. Statement on Corporate Governance.Google Scholar
Carosso, Vincent P. 1970. Investment Banking in America: A History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Gordon L. 2000. Pension Fund Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1988. The Firm, The Market, and the Law. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. Jr. 1997. “The Folklore of Investor Capitalism.” The Michigan Law Review 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, John C. Jr. 1991. “Liquidity versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor.” Columbia Law Review 91: 12771368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Robert. 1981. The Business Response to Keynes, 1929–1964. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee for Economic Development. 1971. Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations. Washington D.C.: Committee for Economic Development.Google Scholar
Committee for Economic Development. 1976. Fighting Inflation and Promoting Growth: A Statement on National Policy. New York: Committee for Economic Development.Google Scholar
Committee for Economic Development. 1983. Productivity Policy: Key to the Nation’s Economic Future. New York: Committee for Economic Development.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robin and Slagmulder, Regine. 1999. Supply Chain Development for the Lean Enterprise: Interorganizational Cost Management. Portland: Productivity.Google Scholar
Croly, Herbert. 1965. The Promise of American Life. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill (originally published in 1909).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruikshank, Jeffrey L. 1987. A Delicate Experiment: The Harvard Business School, 1908–1945. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael. 1998. Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dodd, E. Merrick Jr. 1932. “For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees.” Harvard Law Review, 47: 11471163.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 2000. “Are Business Managers ‘Professionals’?” Business Ethics Quarterly 10: 8394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas and Dunfee, Thomas W. 1999. Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas and Preston, Lee E. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20: 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, Ronald. 2000. Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism, Japan and German versus the Anglo-Saxons. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. and Fischel, Daniel R. 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elson, Robert T. 1968. Time Inc.: The Intimate History of a Publishing Enterprise, 1921–1941. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Ely, James W. Jr. 1992. The Guardian of Every Other Right: A Constitutional History of Property Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Edward M. (1969). The Corporation in American Politics. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene F. 1980. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88: 280307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene F. and Jensen, Michael C. 1983. “The Separation of Ownership from Control.” The Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortune. 1951. “The U.S.A.: The Permanent Revolution,” February.Google Scholar
Freeland, Robert F. 2001. The Struggle for Control and the Modern Corporation: Organizational Change at General Motors, 1924–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard B. and Gottschalk, Peter, eds. 1998. Generating Jobs: How to Increase the Demand for Less-Skilled Workers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Furubotn, Eric G. and Svetozar, Pejovich. 1972. “Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature.” Journal of Economic Literature 10: 1131162.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John. 1956. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gautheir, David. 1986. Morals by Agreement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald J. and Kraakman, Reinier. 1991. “Reinventing the Outside Director: An Agenda for Institutional Investors.” Stanford Law Review 43: 863905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1982. Collective Action. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1999. Liberalism, Constitutionalism and Democracy. New York: Ox ford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, Ellis. 1966. The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly: A Study in Economic Ambivalence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Samuel P. 1957. The Response to Industrialism, 1885–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Morton. 1985. “Santa Clara Revisited: The Development of Corporate Theory.” West Virginia Law Review, 88: 173224.Google Scholar
Hu, Henry T. C. 1991. “New Financial Products, The Modern Process of Financial Innovation, and the Puzzle of Shareholder Welfare.” Texas Law Review 69: 12731317.Google Scholar
Human Development Report. 2001. Making New Technologies Work for Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Thomas M. 1995. “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Economics and Ethics.” Academy of Management Review 20: 404437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Derek C, Takao, Kato, and Pliskin, J. 1997. “Profit Sharing and Gainsharing: A Review of Theory, Incidence, and Effects.” In The Human Resource Management Handbook: Part I. Lewin, David, Mitchell, Daniel J. B., and Zahiddi, Mahmood, eds. JAI Press, 53173.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Allen, Gregory, Theyel, and Craig, Wood. 2001. “Collaboration and Technology Linkages: A Strategic Supplier Typology.” Strategic Management Journal.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Allen and Englander, Ernest. 1993. “Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. and the Restructuring of American Capitalism.” Business History Review 67: 6681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Allen and Zacharias, Lawrence. 1992. “From Trust to Contract: The Legal Language of Managerial Ideology, 1920–1980.” Business History Review 66: 547559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Allen, Lawrence, Zacharias, and Marvin, Karson. 1995. Managers vs. Owners: The Struggle for Corporate Control in American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank. 1935. The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank. 1933. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kochan, Thomas A. and Osterman, Paul. 1994. The Mutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership Among Labor, Management and Government. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Krause, Elliott A. Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Langevort, Donald C. 2001. “The Human Nature of Corporate Boards: Law, Norms, and the Unintended Consequences of Independence and Accountability.” Georgetown Law Journal 89: 797832.Google Scholar
Lazear, E. and Rosen, S. 1981. “Rank Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts.” Journal of Political Economy 89: 841864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Frank. 1999. “Rhetoric and Reality: Making Sense of the Income Gap Debate.” Harvard Business Review, September/October, reprint 99505.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R. 1999. “Fiduciary Duties as Residual Claims: Obligations to Nonshareholder Constituencies from a Theory of the Firm Perspective.” Cornell Law Review 84: 12661281.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manne, Henry. 1962. “‘The Higher Criticism’ of the Modern Corporation.” Columbia Law Review, 62: 401432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manne, Henry. 1965. “Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Political Economy, 73: 110120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Mike W. 2000. Meaningful Work: Rethinking Professional Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, John W., Thomas, P. Lyon, and Steven, C. Hackett. 2000. “Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism.” Journal of Law and Economics 43: 583617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinty, Park. 1997. “The Twilight of Fiduciary Duties: On the Need for Shareholder Self-Help in an Age of Formalistic Proceduralism.” Emory Law Journal 46: 163305.Google Scholar
McQuaid, Kim. 1989. The Uneasy Partnership: Big Business in American Politics, 1945–1990. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Meckling, William and Jensen, Michael. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305360.Google Scholar
Meckling, William and Jensen, Michael. 1983. “Reflections on the Corporation as a Social Institution.” Mid land Corporate Finance Journal, 614.Google Scholar
Mishel, Lawrence, Jared, Bernstein and John, Schmitt. 1999. The State of Working America, 1998–1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mishel, Lawrence. 1993. “Private Law, Public Interest? The ALI Principles of Corporate Governance.” George Washington Law Review 61: 871897.Google Scholar
Mishel, Lawrence. 1999. “Trust and Team Production in Post-Capitalist Society.” Iowa Law Review 24: 869912.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kevin. 1999. “Executive Compensation.” In Handbook on Labor Economics, vol. 3. Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D., eds. Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Neal, Alfred C. 1981. Business Power and Public Power: Experiences of the Committee for Economic Development. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Nell, Edward J. 1996. Making Sense of a Changing Economy: Technology, Markets and Morals. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nelson, William. 1962. The Roots of American Bureaucracy, 1830–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Marleen A. 1991. “Restructuring the Corporation’s Nexus of Contracts: Recognizing a Fiduciary Duty to Protect Displaced Workers.” North Caroline Law Review 69: 11891260.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 2000. Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Osterman, Paul. 1999. Securing Prosperity: How It Has Changed and What to do about It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostram, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, Mary A. (2000). Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas L. 1988. The Spirit of Modern Capitalism: The Moral Vision of the American Founders and the Philosophy of Locke. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peritz, Rudolph J. R. 1996. Competition Policy in America 1886–1992. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, John. 1995. “The Promise of the Governed Corporation.” Harvard Business Review, March/April reprint 95210.Google Scholar
Preston, Lee E. and Windsor, Duane. 1997. The Rules of the Game in the Global Economy: Policy Regimes for International Business. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice, a Revised Edition. Cambrdige: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribstein, Larry E. 2001. “Symposium Trust Relationships Part 2 of 2: Law v. Trust.” Boston Law Review 81: 553589.Google Scholar
Ross, Stephen. 1973. “The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem.” American Economic Review 63: 134139.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1984. Property and Political Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schattshneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1985. “The Moral Standing of the Market.” Social Philosophy & Policy, 1985(3): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Sethi, S. Prakash. 1999. “Codes of Conduct for Global Business: Prospects and Challenges for Implementation.” In Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics, Principles of Stakeholder Management: The Clarkson Principles. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Sklar, Martin. 1988. The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism, 1890–1916: The Market, the Law and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawson, David W. 1996. Binding Promises: The Late 20th Century Reformation of Contract Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2000. American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections and Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Thomas A. 1999. “The Efficient Norm for Corporate Law: A Neotradtional Interpretation of Fiduciary Duty.” Michigan Law Review 98: 214268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Thomas A. 1997. “Institutions and Entrepreneurs in American Corporate Finance.” California Law Review 85: 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Francis X. 1962. The American Business Creed. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Tiróle, Jean. 2001. “Corporate Governance.” Econometric 69: 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael J. 1993. Limits to Freedom of Contract. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Useem, Michael. 1984. The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and the U.K. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Useem, Michael. 1996. Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers Are Changing the Face of Corporate Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Utset, Manual A. 1995. “Towards a Bargaining Theory of the Firm.” Cornell Law Review 80: 540611.Google Scholar
Vernon, Raymond. 1998. In the Hurricane’s Eye: The Troubled Prospects of Multinational Enterprises. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David. 1978. “Why Businessmen Distrust Their State: The Political Consciousness of American Business Executives.” The British Journal of Political Science, 8: 4578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David. 1988. Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Von Hayek, Friedrich A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, James. 1968. The Corporate Ideal of the Liberal State, 1900–1918. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Young, Owen D. 1927. “Dedication Address.” Harvard Business Review 5: 385394.Google Scholar
Zacharias, L. S. 1988. “Repaving the Brandies Way: The Decline of Developmental Property.” Northwestern Law Review 82: 596645.Google Scholar
Zunz, Olivier. 1992. Making America Corporate 1870–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar