Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:48:38.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insider Trading and the Social Contract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Steven R. Salbu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The law of insider trading has progressed from an expansive approach, according to which all trading on nonpublic information was considered illegal, to a constricted approach, under which corporate outsiders are permitted to trade on nonpublic information provided such trading does not breach a fiduciary duty. This article analyzes both the former, expansive theory and the currently utilized constricted theory, within a framework of basic tenets of the American capitalist social contract regarding legitimacy of property claims. The existing constricted approach to the regulation of insider trading is found to be deficient in meeting the expectations of two core components of the social contract: it discourages procedural equality of opportunity, and it endorses claims to property that are not characterized by legitimate methods of acquisition or transfer. Because the old, expansive regulatory interpretation was more consistent with the terms of the social contract in regard to property claims, it served our economic and ethical expectations more effectively than the system presently in place. Accordingly, the article culminates in a recommendation that the expansive approach to regulating insider trading be reestablished under Unites States law.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 313 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Calamari, J.D., & Perillo, J.M., Contracts (3d ed. 1987).Google Scholar
Carlton, D. & Fischel, D., “The Regulation of Insider Trading,” 35 Stanford Law Review 857 (1983).Google Scholar
Chiarella v. United States, 445 U.S. 222 (1980).Google Scholar
Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983).Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., The Division of Labor in Society (trans. George, Simpson, Macmillan Co., 1933).Google Scholar
Franklin, B., Poor Richard Improved (1758), in McMichael, ed., Anthology of American Literature, 2d ed., Vol. 1, 263 (1980).Google Scholar
Franklin, B., The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin (1771), in McMichael, ed., Anthology of American Literature, 2d ed., Vol. 1, 269 (1980).Google Scholar
Jefferson, T., The Declaration of Independence, in Ver Steeg, C.L., & Hofstadter, R., Great Issues in American History, Vol. 1, 468 (1969).Google Scholar
Lindley, R., Autonomy (Macmillan Educ. Ltd., 1986).Google Scholar
Locke, J., “An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent and End of Civil Government,” in Ernest, Becker, ed., The Social Contract (Oxford Paperback, 1960).Google Scholar
Manne, H., “In Defense of Insider Trading,” 44 Harvard Business Review 113 (1966).Google Scholar
Nordstrom v. Miller, 605 P.2d 545 (S. Ct. Kan., 1980).Google Scholar
Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974).Google Scholar
Posner, R., The Economics of Justice (1981).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (1971).Google Scholar
Rule 10b-5, Employment of Manipulative and Deceptive Devices, Exchange Release No. 3230, 7 Fed. Reg. 3804 (1942) (codified at 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (1991)).Google Scholar
Salbu, S., “The Misappropriation Theory of Insider Trading,” 15 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 223 (1992).Google Scholar
Salbu, S., “Regulation of Insider Trading in a Global Marketplace: A Uniform Statutory Approach,” 66 Tulane Law Review 837 (1992a).Google Scholar
SEC v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197 (2d Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 (1985).Google Scholar
SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 (1969).Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, ch. 404, 48 Stat. 881 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 15 U.S.C.).Google Scholar
Smith, A., The Wealth of Nations (1776).Google Scholar
Thel, S., “The Genius of Section 16: Regulating the Management of Publicly Held Companies,” 42 Hastings Law Journal 393 (1991).Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A., Democracy in America, Vol. 1 (1835, Vintage Paperback, 1945).Google Scholar