Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:34:59.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Imperfect Nature of Corporate Responsibilities to Stakeholders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

David Lea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In this paper, I specifically consider the issue of corporate governance and normative stakeholder theory. In doing so, I argue that stakeholder theory and responsibilities to non-shareholder constituencies can be made more intelligible by reference to Kant’s conception of perfect and imperfect duties. I draw upon Onora O’Neill’s (1996) work, Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructivist Account of Practical Reasoning. In her text O’Neill underlines a number of relevant issues including: the integration of particularist and universalist accounts of morality; the priority of obligations over rights; the importance of the distinction between imperfect and perfect duties; and the relation between the virtues and imperfect duties. On the basis of the foregoing analysis, the paper argues that business ethicists should avoid recommending the institutionalising of stakeholder responsibilities in terms of legally defined sets of stakeholder rights. Instead, we should regard stakeholder responsibilities as uniformalised imperfect duties. Conceiving responsibilities to all stakeholder groups in this manner, allows the firm the freedom to perfect these duties in ways appropriate to cultural and societal setting, and in accordance with the capacity to do so.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 201 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowie, N. 1998. “A Kantian Theory of Capitalism.” Business Ethics Quarterly, Ruffin Series: Special Issue #1: 37–61.Google Scholar
Bowie, N. 1999. Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective (Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers).Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. 1996. “Perfecting Imperfect Duties.” Business Ethics Quarterly 6(1): 28–41.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Dunfee, T.. 1999. Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1989. The Ethics of International Business (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Evan, W. M., and Freeman, R. E.. 1993. “Stakeholder Theory of Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism,” in Ethical Theory and Business, 4th edition, ed. Beauchamp, T. and Bowie, N. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (London: Penguin Books).Google Scholar
Hadden, T 1972. Capitalism and Company Law (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hartman, E. 1998. “The Role of Character in Business Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 8: 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1996 Creating a Kingdom of Ends (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lea, D. 1998. “Corporate and Public Responsibility, Stakeholder Theory and the Developing World.” Business Ethics: A European Review 8(3): 151–163.Google Scholar
Maitland, I. 2001. “Distributive Justice in Firms: Do the Rules of Corporate Governance Matter?” Business Ethics Quarterly 11(1): 129–145.Google Scholar
McCall, J. J. 2001. “Employee Voice in Corporate Governance: A Defense of Strong Participatory Rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 11(1): 195–215.Google Scholar
Milton, D. 1995. “Communitarianism and Corporate Law: Foundations and Law Reform Strategy,” in Progressive Corporate Law, ed. Mitchell, L. E. (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press).Google Scholar
Mintz, S. M. 1996. “Aristotelian Virtue and Business Ethics Education.” Journal of Business Ethics 15: 827–838.Google Scholar
Nesteruk, J. 1995. “Law and the Virtues: A Review Article.” Business Ethics Quarterly 5(1): 361–369.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1996. Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Roberts, J. 2001. “Corporate Governance and the Ethics of Narcissus.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11(1): 109–129.Google Scholar
Rowan, J. 2001. “How Binding the Ties? Business Ethics as Integrative Social Contracts.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11(2): 379–390.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. 1993. Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar