Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:32:11.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Guest Editors’ Introduction Reviving Tradition: Virtue and the Common Goodin Business and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Alejo José G. Sison ,
Edwin M. Hartman  and
Joan Fontrodona
Alejo José G. Sison
Affiliation:
University of Navarre
Edwin M. Hartman
Affiliation:
New York University
Joan Fontrodona
Affiliation:
University of Navarre
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Virtue ethics, the authors believe, is distinct and superior to other options because it considers, in the first place, which preferences are worth pursuing, rather than just blindly maximizing preferences, and it takes into account intuitions, emotions and experience, instead of acting solely on abstract universal principles. Moreover, virtue ethics is seen as firmly rooted in human biology and psychology, particularly in our freedom, rationality, and sociability. Work, business, and management are presented as vital areas for the development of virtues, not the least with a view to human flourishing. We conclude by introducing the articles included in this special issue.

Keywords

virtuebusiness ethicsmoral judgmentcorporate social responsibilityorganizational ethics
Type
Special Issue: Reviving Traditions: Virtue and the Common Good in Business and Management
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 207 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alzola, M. 2012. The possibility of virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22: 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. 2012. Virtue ethics as a resource in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22: 273–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beabout, G. 2012. Management as a domain-relative practice that requires and develops practical wisdom. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22: 405–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beadle, R., and Knight, K. 2012. Virtue and meaningful work. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22: 433–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierksmeier, C., and Celano, A. 2012. Thomas Aquinas on justice as a global virtue in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22: 247–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, J.M. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. New york: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed. Notre Dame, Ind.:, University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. 2012. The virtue of governance, the governance of virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22: 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler-Smith, E. 2012. Before virtue: Biology, brain, behavior, and the “moral sense.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 22: 351–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sison, A.J.G., and Fontrodona, J. 2012. The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22: 211–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, R.C. 1992. Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2: 317–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, T. and Graafland, J., 2012. Adam Smith’s bourgeois virtues in competition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22: 319–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar