Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:57:31.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Guest Editor’s Introduction: Normative Business Ethics in a Global Economy: New Directions on Donaldsonian Themes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Alan Strudler*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
From the Editors
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blair, Margaret. 2015. “Of Corporations, Courts, Personhood, and Morality.” Business Ethics Quarterly 25(4): 421–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1982. Corporations and Morality. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 2012. “The Epistemic Fault Line in Corporate Governance.” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (April): 256–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 2001. “The Ethical Wealth of Nations.” Journal of Business Ethics 31(1) (May): 2536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010776922597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1989. The Ethics of International Business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 2008. “Hedge Fund Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 18(3): 405–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200818329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 2011. “The Inescapability of a Minimal Version of Normative Stakeholder Theory.” In Stakeholder Theory: Impact and Prospects, edited by Phillips, Robert, 3039. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1999. “Making Stakeholder Theory Whole,” Academy of Management Review 24(2): 237–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259079.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1994. “The Perils of Multinationals’ Largess,” Business Ethics Quarterly 4(3) (July): 367–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 2010. “The Values Realignment of Modern Industrial Society.” Business Ethics Quarterly 20(4) (October): 728–29.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas, and Dunfee, Thomas W. 1999. Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Business School Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, Peter, and Velasquez, Manuel. 2015. “How are Ethical Values Related to Economic Prosperity?” Business Ethics Quarterly 25(4): 513–40.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994, Leviathan. In Leviathan, with selected variants from the Latin edition of 1668, edited by Curley, E. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Nien-hê. 2015. “The Social Contract Model of Corporate Purpose and Responsibility” Business Ethics Quarterly 25(4): 439–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1999. Metaphysical Elements of Justice, second ed. Translated by Ladd, John. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Plato. 1961. The Collected Dialogues. Edited by Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntingdon. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. 1987. On the Social Contract in The Basic Political Writings. Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy. 2015. “Denying Corporate Rights and Punishing Corporate Wrongs.” Business Ethics Quarterly 25(4): 495512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Andreas. 2015. “Can Hypernorms be Justified? Insights from a Discourse-Ethical Perspective.” Business Ethics Quarterly 25(4): 467–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Andrew. 2015. “Inverting Donaldson’s Framework: A Managerial Approach To International Conflicts Of Cultural And Economic Norms.” Business Ethics Quarterly 25(4): 565–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Danielle, Peytcheva, Marietta, and Gaspar, Jospeh P. 2015. “When Ethical Tones at the Top Conflict: Adapting Priority Rules to Reconcile Conflicting Tones.” Business Ethics Quarterly 25(4): 541–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar