Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:48:46.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Business Ethics: Regulation, Code, or Self-Restraint

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Gerald F. Cavanagh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Three strategies for developing just and consistent global business practices are examined: 1) international treaties and agreements, 2) global codes of business conduct, and 3) voluntary self-restraint. International agreements investigated are: NAFTA, Global Warming Treaty, OECD Anti-Bribery Treaty and Infant Formula Agreement. The codes examined are the Caux Round Table’s Principles for Business, The Global Sullivan Principles and The United Nations Global Compact with Business. Each of these three strategies is probed for its relative strengths and weaknesses, and its prospects for developing ethical business practices—especially in the areas of improving the environment, human rights and working conditions.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 625 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annan, Kofi. 1999. Business and the U.N., Vital Speeches, Feb. 15: 260–261.Google Scholar
Brown, Lester, et al. 2001. Vital Signs—2001. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Byrne, John A. 2002. “Restoring Trust in Corporate America.” Business Week (June 24): 31–42.Google Scholar
Caux Round Table Website: http://www.cauxroundtable.org.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Gerald F. 2000. “Executives Code of Business Conduct: Prospects for the Caux Principles,” in Global Codes of Conduct: An Idea Whose Time Has Come, ed. Williams, Oliver F. (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press): 169–82.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Gerald F.. 1998. American Business Values with International Perspectives (Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Congressional Digest. 1993. November, 72(11): 257.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1997. “Treaties Sometimes Languish For Decades” (March 1): 548.Google Scholar
Cowell, Alan. 1999. “Annan Fears Backlash Over Global Crisis.” New York Times (February 1): A10.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 1994. “International Business Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4(1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1994. “The Language of International Corporate Ethics.” Business Ethics Quarterly 2(3): 271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas. 1989. The Ethics of International Business (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dunn, Seth, and Christopher, Flavin. 2002. “Moving the Climate Change Agenda Forward,” in State of the World—2002, ed. Flavin, et al. (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar
Flavin, Christopher, et al., ed. 2002. State of the World—2002 (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar
Frederick, William C. 1991. “The Moral Authority of Transnational Corporate Codes.” Journal of Business Ethics 10(2): 165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Hillary. 2002. “Reshaping Global Governance,” in State of the World—2002, ed. Christopher, Flavin, et al. (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar
Gardner, Gary. 2002. “The Challenge for Johannesburg: Creating a More Just World,” in State of the World—2002, ed. Christopher, Flavin, et al. (New York: W. W. Norton): 3–23.Google Scholar
Getz, Kathleen A. 2000. “International Instruments on Bribery and Corruption,” in Global Codes of Conduct: An Idea Whose Time Has Come, ed. Williams, Oliver F. (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press): 141–66.Google Scholar
Getz, Kathleen A., and Volkema, Rodger J.. 2001. “Culture, Perceived Corruption and Economics: A Model of Predictors and Outcomes.” Business and Society 40(1): 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Compact. 2003. The Global Compact: Corporate Citizenship in the World Economy (United Nations: Global Compact Office).Google Scholar
Goodpaster, Kenneth. 2000. “The Caux Round Table Principles: Corporate Moral Reflection in a Global Business Environment,” in Global Codes of Conduct: An Idea Whose Time Has Come, ed. Williams, Oliver F. (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press): 183–95.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, Kenneth E., Maines, T. Dean, and Rovang, Michelle D.. 2002. “Stakeholder Thinking: Beyond Paradox to Practicality.” Journal of Corporate Citizenship 7: 93.Google Scholar
Hamra, Wayne. 2000. “Bribery in International Business Transactions and OECD Convention: Benefits and Limitations.” Business Economics 35(4): 33–46.Google Scholar
Kell, Georg. 2003. “Do Corporations Threaten Globalization?” Business Ethics in a Global Economy Conference, Santa Clara University, February 20.Google Scholar
Kell, Georg, and David, Levin. 2002. “The Evolution of the Global Compact Network: An Historic Experiment in Learning and Action, Building Effective Networks.” Working Draft: UN 8-2002. Academy of Management Conference, Denver, Colorado, August 11–14, 2002.Google Scholar
Lee, Jennifer. 2003. “Exxon Backs Groups that Question Global Warming.” New York Times (May 28): C4.Google Scholar
MacGregor, Robert W. 2002. Conversation with the author on implementing the Caux Principles. Cited in Cavanagh (2000).Google Scholar
Morgenson, Gretchen. 2002. “Rebound From Ruin, if Not From Distrust.” New York Times (September 8), Sec. 3: 3, 9.Google Scholar
National Jesuit News. 2003. “Michael Czerney Warns that Globalization Needs a Moral, Ethical Dimension” (January): 13.Google Scholar
Noonan, John T. 1984. Bribes (New York: Macmillan). OECD Website: http://www.oecd.org/daf/nocorruption/selfe.htm.Google Scholar
Packard, Kimberly O’Neill, and Forest, Reinhardt. 2000. “What Every Executive Needs to Know about Global Warming.” Harvard Business Review (July–August): 129–35.Google Scholar
Post, James E. 2000. “Global Codes of Conduct: Activists, Lawyers and Managers in Search of a Solution.” In Global Codes of Conduct: An Idea Whose Time Has Come, ed. Williams, Oliver F. (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press): 103–16.Google Scholar
Post, James E. 1978. Corporate Behavior and Social Change. Reston: Reston Publishing.Google Scholar
Preston, Lee E., and Duane, Windsor. 1997. The Rules of the Game in the Global Economy: Policy Regimes for International Business, 2nd ed. (Boston: Kluwer).Google Scholar
Raeburn, Paul. 2001. “The Climate Pact: Is the Forecast Bright?” Business Week (August 6): 28.Google Scholar
Richter, Burton. 2002. “Americans Should Take Leadership on Global Warming.” Toronto Star (August 5): A13.Google Scholar
Roodman, David M. 2001. “Government Corruption Widespread,” in Vital Signs—1999, ed. Lester, Brown et al. (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar
Senge, Peter. 2002. “Collaboration of Firms within the UN Global Compact.” Building Effective Networks. Academy of Management Conference, Denver, Colorado, August 11–14, 2002.Google Scholar
Sethi, S. Prakash. 1994. Multinational Corporations and the Impact of Public Advocacy on Corporate Strategy: Nestle and the Infant Formula Controversy (Boston: Kluwer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethi, S. Prakash, and Williams, Oliver F.. 2001. “Economic Imperatives and Ethical Values,” in Global Business: The South African Experience and Global Codes Today (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Starke, Linda, ed. 2001. Vital Signs: The Trends that are Shaping Our Future (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar
Steiner, George A., and Steiner, John F.. 1997. Business, Government and Society (New York: McGraw-Hill). Transparency International Website: http//www.transparency.de.Google Scholar
Tronnes, Robert D. 2000. “Ensuring Uniformity in the Implementation of the 1997 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions.” The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics 33(1): 97–130.Google Scholar
UN Global Compact Website: http://www.unglobal.compact.org.Google Scholar
United States Department of Commerce, 1998. The North American Free Trade Agreement: What it Means for U.S. Consumers (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
Weber, James, and Kathleen, Getz. 2004. “Buy Bribes or By-Bye Bribes: The Future Status of Bribery in International Commerce.” Business Ethics Quarterly 14(4) (October): 695–711. Paper originally presented in a Global Economy Conference, Santa Clara University, February 22).Google Scholar
Weidenbaum, Murray. 2002. “Globalization: Wonder Land or Waste Land?” Vital Speeches (February 15).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windsor, Duane. 2004. “The Development of International Business Norms.” Business Ethics Quarterly 14(4) (October): 729–54. Paper originally presented in a Global Economy Conference, Santa Clara University, February 22).Google Scholar
World Press Review. 2001. “Negotiating for the Planet: The 21st Century” (February): 8–17.Google Scholar
Yoffie, David B. 1993. Beyond Free Trade: Firms, Governments, and Global Competition (Boston: Harvard Business School).Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1999. Governance in World Affairs (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar